JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:the lens is not too bad, sharp enough, not heavy as well as compact
Cons:in my opinion often it tends to underexpose when dark areas appear in the frame, so then underexpose a bit all over the restornchi Lee uses filters must have a non-wide given the wide ring that does not snap at all well at this paraluca ... I consider it a defect grosso.rnho fact had also ordered the ring non-wide (70 eurozzi including ss)
Opinion:was looking for a very wide angle of more 24/105 sigma art that already possedevornla choice was not very wide, nikon f4 16/34, 08/02 and 16/28 tokina suddettornil tokina is too heavy and bulky although 2.8 but making mainly landscapes 2.8 was not essential so I opted for the F4rnnon there often use, the surprise was when after buying the holder of LEE the ring would not snap frontalmente.rnho I had to then buy back a second non-wide ring LEE losing definitely the shots at 17 mm because surely the photo vignetterà the focal more short (I have yet to test it sincerely)
Pros:build quality, minimal distortion even at 17mm, sharpness, brightness, distance close focus
Cons:Step AF / MF sinecure
Opinion:A great angle to an honest price. I use it on a Nikon d750. I bought it mostly for URBEX photographs, but actually I'm taking also mounted for other types of services. Angle really broad, remarkable sharpness, almost no distortion. It will not be 2.8 but it's still a bright lens. Missing stabilization but on such short focal length (17mm to 35mm) it is impossible to notice. I find it complicated the transition from manual to automatic fire because it is constructed in a way that I had never seen on other goals, but it's probably only a matter of habit. Note: a month after purchase came via a gold string 1mm thick that surrounded the goal. Not a prelude any funzionamente but it seemed strange because the lens to be the impression of being built really well. In any case, it recommended.
Opinion:Purchased in alternative to Samyang 14 f2.8 and used on a Canon 6d for a week. It has not been removed. I find it beautiful. Some of the most "painterly" the objectives that I have used so far. Fantastic on FF angle apertura.rnUna remarkable sharpness. The build quality makes it a precious object. I highly recommend it especially to those accustomed to 50 mm ff and want to discover another world.
Pros:Construction, sharpness, low distortion, dial precise distances, speed in going from AF / MF....rn
Cons:The lens hood (rarely) is insufficient.
Opinion:For 10 days in Sardinia I have only used this lens and I was sorpreso.rnNitidissimo the center, using it with D7100 use only that part of the objective being to FX; the distortion is almost non-existent; also great for photo with flowers on the minimum distance of focus! rnIl hood I was a little disappointed ...
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
