RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on February 26, 2015

Pros: Well done, good hike from 12 to 24 strength and construction.

Cons: pesantuccio slightly.

Opinion: I use it for almost two years and I am fantastically well. its ideal environment is the landscape, but also the Street and architecture, comes off very well in its internal 12mm and aperture f4 make it quite powerful, masters in strength (goal made all metal) so its reliability is high.

avatarjunior
sent on August 26, 2013

Pros: Strong, interesting range, low distortion at 24mm

Cons: Flare

Opinion: It's in my kit from a couple of years, and I have never regretted the purchase. RnrnBuona yield, robust (it is a brick). RnrnQuello I appreciate the most, and that was a determining factor in the final choice, it is the range of focal lengths that copre.rnE 'true that there are targets of the same type that offer more wide-angle side, but then often are more limited on the side lungo.rnIl tokina vice versa, with its 35mm equivalent on the "long", is a lens extremely flexible and rarely feel the need to change lens when I'm in urbano.rnrnConsigliato environment.

avatarjunior
sent on April 29, 2013

Pros: Solid, smooth, pleasant colors and realistic, very good focal length range from landscape to street, the hood does his duty.

Cons: Weight a little 'higher end, 77mm filters, mechanism AF / MF is not practical, a little hood' dancer but absolutely irrelevant, flare, dark.

Opinion: The objective is convenient in terms of focal length range, the stabilizer is absent but useless these focal lengths. The colors are excellent. The focus is smooth and precisa.rnDipende always what you want to do, if you use it for internal (even in the dark) it takes the 11-16 F2.8.rnSoffre the flare but with some changes (and maybe a filter) can be limited, but there are aberrations delete PP is simplicity disarmante.rnCerto landscapes for those who, like me, take 650g rump in the long run you feel but you do get used to ...

avatarsenior
sent on May 07, 2012

Pros: Solid construction, overall quality, sharpness, f / 4 constant

Cons: Flare, focal little extreme ("only" up to 12mm), only APS-C or FF 17mm up.

Opinion: Constructively oozes quality and strength from every pore, even in the hood lined in velvet. The focal range is not extreme but covers up to 24mm and can be very useful (eg combining it with a 24-105). The switching between AF / MF is to "pump" and may or may not (like me). Although it is not USM, close enough: fast and silent AF. The point of focus to infinity place at one end of the ferrule can be very useful. The version II with respect to I, for CANON (different speech for Nikon mount instead of the autofocus motor inside), only has an anti-flare add-on, it seems, is not so decisive. Therefore, the version I, in my opinion, is just as attractive as the version II. Moreover, the price of used, it is definitely very affordable.

avatarsenior
sent on March 31, 2012

Pros: Strength, sharpness, excursion Focal, MAF infinity

Cons: Flare

Opinion: On APS-C may be the classic lens walking thanks to the excursion from 12 to 24 fully usable. It 'so robust that it can be used as a weapon to launch, of course, a little heavy given the quality of the materials. Focus fast enough and (hear hear) to infinity at full scale is the actual infinite. So in dark situations you can put it in manual mode and turn the dial completely: I use only manual now. The sharpness is not at the level of 11-16 but still good. The flare is a problem but I'm not actually present it is presented so frequently. Since the Series II does not seem to have solved this problem completely, the buy back of the series I could be a bargain considering the price lower.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me