|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on December 14, 2020 Pros: Sharpness, detail, bokeh Cons: original lampshh a little faint Opinion: I used this lens a lot and found it really good on so many occasions. A handyman of the highest quality. Fast autofocus, at least for my expectations. The only flaw is in the original lampshon that lasted little, replaced with an aluminum one, screwed that I found very practical. Solid but not very heavy, excellent grip of the rings and convenient 24 mm locking for transport and trekking. As for a must in the kit. |
 | sent on June 17, 2020 Pros: Brightness, sharpness, stabilization, price Cons: Weight, diameter filters, rubber dial, stabilizer a little slow Opinion: A very high value for money target, which is now possible to buy for less than 300 euros with a little patience. It is the classic all-rounder as a focal range, with a plus not just given by the stabilizer, very effective, but that I find slow in the intervention. The yield is pretty good at all the focal points and openings, and, honestly, I don't regret the Canon equivalent (first version), at least my specimen. Balanced perfectly with the 5DIII, it has on the barrel in addition to the classic selection switches AF/MF and VC ON/OFF, also a switch that blocks the zoom to 24mm, great when you bring the lens with you in the trekking exits. The lampshade is a bit cheap in the making, but it still does its job. The minimum focus distance is quite low, allowing for great close-ups. The diameter filters of 82mm, in line with the Canon second version, makes the cost of the filters themselves a little increase, but nothing dramatic. The only flaw, but easily solvable, are the dial tires, which tend a little to widen, as I had happened on other Tamrons, but they are found as spare parts to a few". Overall I find this lens very very good and a great alternative to Canon peers. Details and blurred by pro lens, solid construction, effective and fast enough AF, great stabilizer, but to use carefully, and certainly not in situations of quick tip and snap, where it is better to disable it to rest easy. |
 | sent on March 30, 2019 Pros: Blurred sharpness to onion Cons: MAF not really a lightning, rubber ring Opinion: I have used this optics in different services, the sharpness that pulls out is impressive as the Nikon, if not higher.. The stabilizer works well even if with quick shots it is better to put it on off, the tires of the ring nuts come off easily., take it into account the MAF is not lightning but it is quite fast then it depends on which machine you mount it. Recommended |
  | sent on February 23, 2019 Pros: Sharpness, AF, solidity, price, quality/price ratio, resistance to all weather conditions, stabilization Cons: Hood, Nuts tires Opinion: Now I use it for 5 years Best Buy in absolute is the only lens that I have not dared to change and sell, I was never disappointed in any condition he used (in the rain, under the snow, extreme temperatures both cold and hot) has never Missed a shot, only note that this summer in Sicily (after 5 years and temperatures of almost 35 ° C) after a day practically constantly under the sun the ring of MAF has slightly low but honestly can also stay. Af for me very fast never suffered from Front/back focus ever had to calibrate it and I used it pretty much as the only lens on D90 and on d610. Suffers a little bit of distortion at 24mm on FF but nothing so serious that you can not correct with a click in PP. In short, a really exceptional lens in relation to the price, so much so that now, I was so satisfied that I do not believe (after using it) is less in any way "to the original" Nikon 24/70 2.8. Also as a weight in relation to the latter I think is a feather considered the focal aperture. Yes the lens hood makes you laugh but despite all I found it solid I still have the original and it took a beating and falls but without ever making a fold. In short, how you could understand me the Straconsiglio. |
 | sent on February 23, 2019 Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, fluency ring, solidity, zoom lock Cons: Lens hood, 82mm filters, locknuts tires, Canon USM slower USD Opinion: I purchased it after using for a year the Tamron of a friend of mine three years ago. Heavier than the Canon 24-105 that I used until recently, but it is a burden to which I am accustomed; Sharper already at 2.8 and with a better stabilizer. The AF ring is small but smooth, that zoom is harder, but in this way it makes the presence of the zoom block almost superfluous because the barrel does not go down with the lens downwards. As soon as you take it in your hand it gives you just the idea of solidity and good overall construction. The construction is however in two particular places: the AF and zoom rings that are consumed, discolour and quickly detach and the lens hood that is very light, fragile and small, is just a piece of plastic. Among the cons are the 82mm filters not so much for the magnitude itself but because it does not share the same diameter as the Tamron 70-200 2.8 of the same series. The autofocus is pretty fast, but not like the Canon USM, and it does fatigue when it lacks light. |
 | sent on January 23, 2019 Pros: Sharpness, construction, Autofocus Cons: Maybe the weight, AF ring a little bit small Opinion: I start the review by talking about the specs of this lens. 24-70 f 2.8. At first I had several doubts: there will have been a few 70mm ones on the long side? Would the 2.8 be enough to freeze the action? How useful would the stabilizer be? What portraits could have come out? After a little ' experience but I realized that a 24-70 f 2.8 allows you to really do everything, addiritutra with a thread of planning you can also do shots that could be done with fixed F2.. In short, a 24-70 is a lens that aspires to always be glued to the machine body. Could the Tamron Mark 1? The answer to all these questions is yes. First, the AF, to be a third party lens, at least in my specimen is very good and reliable. Then the sharpness is there and it is very good always. Maybe it's not a 50art, but still has a lot of it. Then if one is sick can try to pull out that fraction of roughness with a dash of sharpening. I haven't extensively tested the stabilizer, photographing people shooting often at less than 1/50. But to have it and know that it can give you 2.3, or 4 stops in the landscapes, however contributes to the judgement of lens in the round. Finally the construction is very solid. The only faults I have found are a little weight a high cicinino (which discourages to keep the reflex on the neck all day) and the ring nut for the full time manual focus a small thread and placed in the middle of the barrel, a position that requires a bit ' of habit. But the rest is a lot of stuff. A must for full frame |
 | sent on December 27, 2018 Pros: Construction, stabilization, overall performance Cons: None, the tele side is slightly poor, filters 82 mm. Opinion: Honest lens from the price contained in the used, offers so much yield at a price that is half the original Nikon 24-70 G. also offers stabilization. I can't complain about anything. With regard to surrender, compared to the Nkon d800 I realize that the tele side is qualitatively less performanant than the wide side. In essence it does well what you expect, without smeing. At 24 mm The distortion is visible but not excessive (the Nikon AFS 20 1.8 Despite being wider has less distortion-but it is a fixed, I know...). It offers saturated colors, maybe it is slightly warm in yield, I find the Greens a yellow thread and I find myself often change on LR the green slide when I click with this lens. My lens has no front/back focus problems, the AF is always very accurate fast enough for generic use. From 24 to 35 mm, comparing the yield with the Sigma 24-35 f\\2 Art which I also own, the Sigma is better in all, except for the distortion, visible on both at 24 mm. On the Nikon D800 F/11 is already excessive, at 100% there is a loss of sharpness in the finer details due to diffraction. I have not so far detected any particular problems of flare or ghosts with strong lights in the frame. Like all 24-70 f/2.8 It has on its side the versatility in the generic use, embellished in its case by the presence of the stabilization. It works well with Nikon flashes (used with sb700 and sb900) and therefore communicates smoothly with the Nikon CLS. It is a safe purchase with the only unknown common to all independent manufacturers: Future compatibility with Nikon\\canon camera bodies to come. In conclusion: I am very satisfied with the purchase and use that I make. I've never had the original Nikon 24-70 in any of its variants so I can't make comparisons but I don't feel the need to change the Tamron. When I need something more I know that I have to use a fixed. Recommended. |
 | sent on October 22, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, F 2.8 constant, build quality Cons: Never disassemble, filters, blurry not exciting Opinion: I have this optics for 2 years now, I can only say that does everything you expect when you buy it. It's the best companion you can choose on the road, practically never dismounts it. The chromatic rendition is as good as the sharpness, which reaches the maximum from F. 4 onwards. The only flaw for me is definitely the blur that is quite trivial, but for everything else I'm more than satisfied with my purchase |
 | sent on July 10, 2018 Pros: I don't know, for the time being Cons: Weight, cost, stabilizer and AF Opinion: I took the piece used by a well-known store in Padua. Equal to the new one with two years warranty. I have not yet been able to make a shot in focus.... I tried in all conditions, with tripod and not, with stabilizer and not day and night, at all focal lengths. I haven't been able to take a picture in focus yet. I have read, even in this forum, that so many have encountered the same problem. |
 | sent on February 06, 2018 Pros: Optical quality: useful to T.A., it is excellent from f.4 to the extreme corners of the frame, very good colors, absence of flares and parasitic reflections even backlight "shot", effective stabilizer, solid and reliable construction, multivalent for reportage and panoramas, modest price, 5 years of warranty Cons: weight, blurry not ugly but a little banal, lacks the field prondity scale (but lacks in almost all current zooms), try your specimen at the purchase, there is a lot of dispersion of quality according to the specimen (front/back focus). Then it is very sensitive to diction, the quality expires quite after F.11 Opinion: It's really a handyman's optics that is always in my bag, at first I found it a bit heavy and cumbersome, but I got used to it and now I'm very fond of this goal, : the optical quality is really good, only the blurred (boken), sometimes, makes me regret the fixed focals; not that it is ugly, it is very harmonious but a bit banal without "personality"... but for reportage and travel is not a problem. In short, I am very happy with the purchase, if I had to buy a zoom I would buy the same, but I did not abandon the fixed focals that for me remain indispensable. PS : when I bought it again it had such a back-focus that you could not recover it with the micro-adjustment AF camera. I sent it to the race from Tamron and a week later they returned it perfect to me, now the micro-regulation AF is zero and the AF is extremely precise and fast, all free including shipping costs, under warranty... don't forget to take an AF test when you buy it. |
 | sent on December 31, 2017 Pros: Focal excursion, vc, opening 2.8 Cons: Zoom ring slightly fluid, hoody and absolutely not at 'height. Opinion: Optics promoted, not with full marks but is appreciated. The stabilizer is not bad at a first test iso 100, 70mm, and 1/10 at about 3mt from the subject with a correct posture, did not hesitate even once. As a handyman, all in all, it is an octane glass, it would not have problems for street and reportage set in twilight as it responds to 70mm.rnAt the same way, at the same focal but opening to the maximum, the blur is pleasant and not excessively nervous, so all occurrence usable for portraits.rnOn my D700 the AF is not lightning but we are not talking about a hunting lens, nor is it the body of the car, the colors at first glance are a bit cold compared to the old style lenses that I usually use but nothing extreme.rnI had the opportunity to try the G2, for half an hour and sincerely for now its predecessor does not disfigure much.rnPeso ?? Mah on D700 is a perfect combination or at least I do not mind at all.rnAbsolutely the hood, hard and insufficient.rnThe ghiezoom lens little fluent.rnAcquistata used at 550 € with 2 years warranty residual, I am satisfied and I recommend surely.rn |
 | sent on November 23, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, loose colors, 2.8 opening and usable opening, solid construction though made of synthetic materials, all compact. I forgot that it was stabilized. Cons: A bit demanding for weight, but less heavy than canon counterparts. Filter diameter of 82. Opinion: I found it used as new and at a great price, a bit by accident, and it has become the central part of my cameramen kit. I was somewhat uncertain of the too many reviews that, on this site, exacerbated the defects (but from all the tests and reviews on the net emerged a very different reality) despite that I wanted to test with hand if they corresponded to reality and so did not is. We start from the hardened hood, of which they are called of all colors (small, graceful, does not serve anything, etc., etc.) but is of the same shape and approximately the same size as the hood of Canon 24- 70 L 2.8 II or 24-105 series I and II and other optics currently on the market, but none of them said anything, the construction seems good and has never given any sign of failure. The yield I found was superior to all the focal points at the Canon 24-70 L 2.8 first series (which I had to test well since I wanted to buy it but did not exalt me), also does not suffer from the curvature problemto field at shorter focal lengths. I can not make a comparison with the II series as it has ever been tried, but being simply a cameraman I'm not interested in spending three times bigger numbers for a paper quality a little bit better without having a cheap return and not having the stabilizer that in the state of low light is an extra gear to make photography in the ambient light without the risk of moving or having to carry behind a tripod (too much is not allowed to place an easel wherever you are). I find it a great goal for ff to fit in the car (a serious machine with which it is well balanced) and take very seldom for the use of super wide angles or thrusters, then return to mount it for 90% of the remaining photos especially without flash (naturally for static subjects with slow times). Of course, it is not the perfect optics, but the zoom is generally not for construction, but it is a good compromise and compromise. With the release of the new G2 model updated aesthetically and ifWith great breakthroughs in performance, the prices of the used go away, making it a great deal for those who want a good optic without spending one eye on the head. |
 | sent on October 16, 2017 Pros: cost, is frequently found in the used market, 2.8 constant, vr, lock for zoomatarn Cons: the zoom that makes the lens extend is a kind of vacuum cleaner, at 24mm there is a lot of distortion (it's not too much against), I expected a better performance at backlight, bad latch, exaggerated filter diameter Opinion: I've been using this fantastic zoom for several months, optical quality is amazing, and I feel it is very suitable for street and landscapes photos, in fact more photos from "everyday" and it's its advantage, because it lets you dare with the fantasy. The 70mm I do not like much as they do for portraits, in fact, I always prefer to replace it with my 85mm 1.8 if I can, not so much for the brightness as for the more mms that better off the subject than to distort less. I did several backlight tests with the sun at sunset and made me flare, unfortunately ... I was hoping to resist more or better ... I would have liked to delight a bit with the nd filters but I did not have so big diameters (82mm ), the cost for NDs of those sizes and that they are qualitatively good is about 100 euros ... The weight is not exaggerated, we say that when you see it, you expect a certain weight! The vr is an invasive coat, as soon as it engages the fire the image moves rischianI'm going to determine a move image ... The sharpness on my d610 is at a good level, especially when I close already at f4 and 5.6 gives very thin details ... It's worth spending on 650-700 euros in the market of the used compared to 1500 (at least) of the nikon fee, now, certainly nikon will be better in many respects, but for my use and my experience tamron is more than enough. Conclusion: Excellent handyman for FF, very useful for excursions and trips where you have to limit the gear to the bone. |
 | sent on October 16, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, construction, stabilization and tropicalization Cons: Distortion to 24mm Opinion: Great goal, I found myself very good right now. It has become one with my d750. A bit heavy, but stable. The sharpness is exceptional in particular by closing it with two stops but in general it works well in all the openings. Detect enough in 24mm but personally it is not a problem ... with a couple of pp clicks it resolves everything. Asurd that Tamron makes such holes in .. in some situations it does not serve nothing at all. Definitely recommend it, great quality-price lens |
 | sent on October 04, 2017 Pros: Construction, sharpness, excellent stabilizer, tropicalized. Lock button on barrel. Cons: Lens not at eye level. Opinion: The lens has exceptional sharpness. It has an excessive weight and the stabilizer works flawlessly. You want to never remove it from the car body. I only do it to mount a 70 200. It has an important frontal diameter (82 mm), therefore it requires a generously sized protective filter (I have mounted a Hoya HD protector for a cost of around 60 € and therefore not forbidden). Closing a couple of stops, from the top of the self, even if at all opening it does not disappoint. What to say, happy to own it. Vote 10 and praise. |
 | sent on August 22, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, full colors, aperture, stabilization, mechanical lock of the zoom at rest Cons: The zoom ring in the video field does not allow small fluid movements, but in photography it is perfect Opinion: Purchased nearly 3 years ago after excluding the Nikon 24-70 G ED then unsaved and paid half: since then it is always mounted on the D610 with which I shoot 90% of the photos. The large diameter and weight give a feeling of stability in the sx hand and weighs 245 gr. Less than the Nikkor 24-70mm f / 2.8 and ED VR. It has a huge frontal diameter (82mm) diameter that required the attachment of a small hood, otherwise they would have to study a hood with a much larger diameter. Autofocus is not a lightning strike but is correct and some light weight problems I attribute to the D610 that does not excel in these cases. Mild short-range distortion corrects with a click in Camera Raw. Recommended, for me one of the best shopping in the photographic field. |
 | sent on July 05, 2017 Pros: Stabilization, sharpness, saturated colors, fair price Cons: Absolutely inadequate hood, some flare too Opinion: The lens is great and does its job well. In extreme situations, the hood is little more than useless. For such a look would be a hail like Nikon's. Longer and more serious .. Anyway I'm looking for one and I will find it .. I ask for advice here, maybe to find a brand or something more serious. It's a shame that the Tamron has just caught on a particular so ... I think I can fix my problem, but if I think of the Nikon 24-70 hood that I tried and Tamron's hood, the difference is embarrassing! |
 | sent on June 26, 2017 Pros: Construction, cost, stabilizer Cons: Variability of specimens Opinion: I had to try it 3 before finding that right, but now it has become the main optic of my kit. Having no chance to spend more than double for the Canon II series (I'm not a professional so I would not be able to cushion the expense) I tried both the I series and the little brother F4. The first did not convince me for clarity, the second is clear, but unfortunately it's just F4. I wanted to try the Tamron, and after looking for a copy in the used that it was okay I bought it and I'm quite satisfied. Of course, the Canon II series is superior, but it is (unfortunately) also the price. I think that for an amateur is a great solution without getting faint |
 | sent on June 25, 2017 Pros: Weight, sharpness, blur and vibration compensation Cons: Slight distortion at 24mm, for the rest nothing Opinion: After several fixed lenses, I decided to buy this high-brightness medium-zoom lens as an all-in-one mount for the nikon d810, I was astonished by the sharpness, has nothing to envy at a 24-70 of the Nikon home, it's very compact and You notice a little this gives you more security against theft. Weighs a little despite the diameter of the lenses (82mm). Also recommended for those who make videos as well as photos. |
 | sent on May 21, 2017 Pros: High f / 4 sharpness, general solid feel, tropicalized, effective stabilizer Cons: Nervous, cold dominant, 24mm distortion Opinion: I have been holding this lens for 2 and a half years, but I can only praise it and highlight the few flaws, especially for a really good quality / price ratio. R Very clear in the center by f / 4, it loses its edge on the edges . The stabilizer really appreciated when low light turns it into a good shooting companion. The AF is the characteristic on which I move into criticism with fast-moving subjects: it's not always accurate as in other cases of use, where it does its job well.rn I blurred it I found it nervous, hard ( A user in a little previous review has called me onion and agrees) but this is a matter of merely personal taste. The shades of color that I return are, to my mind, tending to the cold (also here with personal taste), while the shorter focal distortion is quite evident (both corrected in post-production). General quality, resistant to humansDense and dusty, it offers a good feeling of solidity. By virtue of the price it is sold I feel full of advice. |
 | sent on May 02, 2017 Pros: Price and size Cons: Focus not always impeccable and vignetting (controllable by machine body or in post) Opinion: Excellent professional optics, comparable to the Nikon or Canon homologue for both sharpness and quality. The low price makes it very appealing for those who want to have a professional quality at a fair price; Also the smaller size than the Nikon officer (I think it also applies to Canon) makes the lens quite easy to use in all conditions. The snooze is the focus that is sometimes a bit slow (not a lens Sport obviously) and vignetting at f2.8 but I personally fix it directly in the car (Nikon D800) or that can be adjusted in post production. I'm totally happy with this optic and heartbord |
 | sent on April 28, 2017 Pros: Versatility, construction Cons: Micromouse problems at 1/125 or faster times with inserted vr. Opinion: I bought this lens for its versatility in replacing sigma 24/70, reading various positive comments. Honestly, it does not make me crazy as sharpness and rendering optical but the most annoying thing is the light micromouse that you have with fast times and inserted, so many shot throws. For the rest of my humble opinion nothing exceptional, except its versatility. Good blur for a lens of the genre. |
 | sent on April 20, 2017 Pros: sharpness at all focal lengths, color rendering, and repeat color rendition, blurred although it is obviously not his strong point, construction, stabilization and openness, and cost rningombri Cons: diameter of the filter (82mm), weight but that 'is unfortunately due to the opening, and from there can not escape. Blurry good but does not have a corresponding level of nikon and canon, it is not weather sealed Opinion: I purchased this lens at the end of 2014 and it was my main lens to date. The sharpness, color rendering, opening and range of blankets focal does not regret both canikon fees, and the use of fissi.rnLa color rendering of nikon is just spectacular and perfect, not pumped colors and very natural, it is as if the nikon goals that effect had been taken a little pastel, and had been increased color drama, making the colors a bit 'more' main smorti.rnL'utilizzo I made this point was for landscapes and portraits , always getting good results, speaking purely of file quality. For landscaping I have often used the CPL and ND filters, and the use of 24mm filters to create a vignette meccqnica important, in fact I discourage the use cascading to 24mm, 28mm already has the situation improves drasticamente.rnL'obbiettivo A resolution and truly embarrassing clarity aperture interaverage, even more 'I clear my Nikon 50mm 1.4 at the center. The zoom of the problem is always that edge. However, the edges are not bad and very small apertures, by F / 9 up improve so much, even if the sharpness decreases in the middle, but the yield becomes more 'uniforme.rnLo stabilizer is not necessary on a lens of this kind, but in some situation has proved useful, although it is a very subjective thing, however, adds an added value to the lens and is really a plus when you turn the videoclip.rnl'ottica is very balanced, compared to nikon has a more 'large diameter and is less long, so it has a better center of gravity, the construction is very good but does not guarantee protection against moisture and dust, and then do not recommend the purchase to those who are traveling or is often found in unpleasant situations. Although with proper precautions you can 'live the same felicemente.rnrnSe you are not a professional photographer and you can not afford the 24-70 nikon and canon, or simpleMind you want to save money in the purchase I can not help but recommend this ottica.rnrnMatteo |
 | sent on April 20, 2017 Pros: Price, clarity, precision. Cons: For now, no. Opinion: I purchased this lens only a month, but I'm already very satisfied. Taken as a handyman for travel and has made it perfect for landscapes and for portraits. The clarity and focus are also beautiful to 2.8, the stabilizer is perfect and precise so that I have not missed a shot. Lens Highly recommended if you want and you do not have the option to buy the workhorse Canon or Nikon. |
| sent on March 31, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, opening, construction, stabilizer Cons: weight, diameter filters, Opinion: A beautiful lens that does not regret the Canon except perhaps for the AF .... but to have the stabilizer and stabilizer ... even rnrnNitido to TA, also nice bokeh (maybe it's personal to me ... like) excellent the focal range of FFrnrnCerto, a little heavy but it is to be put in quote on a optical to so solid opening 2.8 of construction. rnrnIl diameter of the filters is important, the filters can be found with some difficulty and they are expensive, slow for the rest to try in life |
 | sent on January 17, 2017 Pros: Colors and sharpness, stabilizer, 2.8, Price Cons: Bokeh "onion" of the lights in the background Opinion: Use this goal for over a year on D750 and are satisfied with the risultati.rnLa sharpness is good at all focal also to 2.8, in paticolare the wide side; by f4 onwards it becomes ottma. I've never had problems with the autofocus as read in earlier reviews. Although it is not the fastest in the world always engages the bersagio.rnStabilizzatore 3 stop abundant effettivi.rnrnUn flaw is the "bokeh onion", ie bright circles that form at the highlights in the blurred but they are not uniform inside them concentric circles more or less marked depending on the situation. Cherchi are a reminder of an onion; that a portrait is not just the massimo.rnComunque for the price which is a great acquisto.rnrn |
 | sent on January 16, 2017 Pros: Accurate, fast, good camera movement control. Cons: I would have preferred some parts less plasticky. The sun creates annoying reflections. Opinion: Since I mounted on my Nikon D7200 I have not taken off or else to mount the 50 1.8 in a few portraits. I use on a DX and therefore behaves as 36-105, but for my use in fashion shots and portraits, mostly for the web, is just perfect. The 10-year warranty then, are not to be underestimated. |
 | sent on January 08, 2017 Pros: Cost and sharpness Cons: noisy stabilization Opinion: very good optical as the replacement of the Canon, good build quality. Now I use it for some months and I missed some shots due to AF a bit 'iffy but nothing to worry about. For photos cutlery nightclub or other premises it is excellent. very good VC, declared 4-stop, fully usable up to 3, then it depends on what you are stationary |
| sent on December 17, 2016 Pros: Those of previous reviews Cons: Those of previous reviews Opinion: Of plastic rings (both zoom that mf) poor, with time, particularly if you use it for so frequent video, become loose enough to "fall" from the target, forcing you to send him to guarantee each about 2 years if not prima.rnPersonalmente i make a photographic use, socially, as a passionate and my plastics are still in place after 1 year and mezzo.rnSconsigliato for professionisti.rnAltro flaw: a little zoom ring too little fluida.rnPer else excellent lens |
  | sent on December 12, 2016 Pros: medium wide angle perfect for my new nikon d810 - no problem of back-front very sharp focus - lower price than its competitors - heavy but professional, without any problems with the hand-free use Cons: nobody Opinion: definitely an average wide angle perfect for ff which contends the first place to its competitors like the Nikon 24-70. Purchased on-line with substantial savings as compared to its other competitors. It holds well and the fact that the focus occurs by turning the barrel on the contrary is not a problem. No problem for the exif data that nikon law fine |
 | sent on December 04, 2016 Pros: value for money; ductility; sharpness, stabilization (I have a "shaky hand" ... and are perfect photos); F4 to scream Cons: Difficult to find ... maybe autofocus (occasionally crashed) Opinion: boh ... what to say that has not already been said. This objective is to have, stop. I do not say to keep it in a backpack ... this is precisely the lens that I always fixed mounted. We do everything: landscapes, portraits, street, reportage ... what about ... then try it you will buy right away ... even more so when compared with "the more famous" trademarks. Never fiermarsi brand ... that is in part a symptom of reliability ... but here tamron (as he did with the Tamron SP 70-200mm f / 2.8 Di VC USD) gave a jolt with the top products at affordable prices " reasonable " |
 | sent on November 30, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, Aperture, Quality / Price, Stabilization Cons: difficult to find Opinion: A great lens for those seeking certain focal lengths and a great versatility in different situations without the need to shell out astronomical figures. I was lucky enough to buy one used in mint condition and I must say I have never regretted essermene. One can not define a target "magic", the kind that enchant at first use, but certainly a "faithful" companion and trusted. It boasts a fast AF speeds and better driveability fire, despite having a fairly important role. Surely an excellent purchase on the quality / price ratio. For those not enormi.rnPs claims: In my opinion routs emblazoned 24-105 Canon, these 30mm more NOT make a difference if you do not, in the negative, for the Canon. |
 | sent on November 24, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, weight stabilization, solid feel Cons: Hood-looking fragile and diameter of 82mm Opinion: I bought this lens without actually having the need to cover the focal my disposal because of the already very good nikon 24 / 120f4 and three fixed lenses (28/50/85 all 1.8g) that I have not sold and which still use with satisfaction. I took it on a whim and because I wanted to minimize the backpack for medium / long runs where I can not load myself with slow but carry with me only the "triad" without making me too many thoughts. What about ... I almost did not deadlift more from my camera (d750) and use it in many occasions from street to landscape to portrait. I already knew the goodness of Tamron lenses as happy owner of a fantastic 15-30 and this is not far behind. In both cases I have preferred to corresponding nikon them and are not at all repentant. I read that some have found front / back focus, perhaps the first samples ... Or maybe it's just luck, mine is fantastic in every way, and the only fault is not having it ... Perfectly balanced with my SLR and weight & eacute; then so much ... At least I have only "heavy" slow and I'm not complaining ... It will be a question of habit |
 | sent on November 24, 2016 Pros: Value for 'extraordinary price, sharpness, construction. Cons: hood improvable Opinion: Using this' optical two years, mounted on the first D 70 and subsequently on 7 D Mark II. I have always enjoyed it and gives clear images already at 2.8, before improving to F 4 and up. Tropical conditions stabilized, truly exceptional; I also have the Canon 24-105 F4 L and you notice no difference in the sharpness. In 2.8 you can 'take pictures with ambient light or the evening street with light publica no hand problems free and They come out of brilliant images. Someone complains about back-front focus issues, but I have never encountered anything like this, so I highly recommend it. |
| sent on September 30, 2016 Pros: good already at 2.8 Excellent from f4 up af good speed at all focal Cons: perhaps in diameter 82mm I am somewhat exaggerated Opinion: I found myself very well with this lens especially from f / 4 to 2.8, but already it is quite clear af fast but not as much as his brother 70/200 usd vc .da f / 8 is already very good to excellent views perhaps the 24mm lens a bit long on aps for street and views definitely recommended as it is stabilized and the price is less than half the nikon which will also be a very good lens, but the price maybe a little exaggerated |
 | sent on September 18, 2016 Pros: quality 'unbeatable relationship Cons: A bit soft at the maximum apertures edges ... Opinion: My doubt was if you take the Canon 24-70 f2.8 used or take the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 again and in the end I chose the Tamron for stabilizzazzione that allows me to take pictures quietly 1/40 smoothly and for me that I do not have a steady hand and .... rnLo important to know that the canon and 'more' sharp but lacks the stabilizzazzione and after trying it I could not go below 1/100 wits' wax a good shake-average .. rnComunque valid objective for all the I coupled to tokina 16-28 f.2.8 Tamaron and 70-200 f2.8 vc and I must say that I cover the entire focal range ... rnPer me and 'a great lens and could be use for all portraits and landscapes has a nice broken in then f2.8 and lightweight versatile short-stabilized very sharp ... rnChe say you can make a single output by car and 24-70 and shortly ecc..rnottimo weight you have fun shopping with the 6d and perfect ... |
user69293  | sent on August 19, 2016 Pros: Price quality stabilization. Cons: None, if you happen a piece without AF problems. Opinion: After a year with the 24-105 and after so many second thoughts because of its known problems, I finally decided to buy this Tamron, again with a 5 year warranty. The 24-105 (now sold) was really good zoom handyman, but on many occasions I considered most need the 2.8 more than those 105mm. So I decided to groped the purchase. I can only tell you that if you are lucky, as it was me, of hitting a good example, this is the best all-rounder for the price zoom qualities. Crisp even at TA, excellent stabilizer, weather sealed. In short, no way I miss 24-105, indeed, and I count it as handyman, given the fact that it saves me even those in low light that before I was forced to shoot at f4, with poor sharpness and high ISO. If I have to find him some defect may zoom on the contrary, even if we get used, and the lens hood, the fact that the lateral petals a bit short so there very well protects the lens. I also got to try the Canon 24-70 2.8 and sincerely that slight sharpness more youedges and the absence of the stabilizer are not worth € 1000 more. Try you too, buy it, you do not regret veins. |
 | sent on August 10, 2016 Pros: Stabilization, sharpness (including TA), 2.8, resistance to flare Cons: Weight (but it is a 2.8 so ...), diameter filters. Opinion: For the price at which it is proposed is really good, also very crisp at TA improves (like everyone else) by closing some stop.rnIl weight is felt but for the kind of difficult goal to find more leggeri.rnBuona stabilization and resistance to flare even if it does not produce a "star" very beautiful even by closing the very diaframma.rnAF not excellent but more than excellent in 90% of my casi.rnIl has no problem of front / back focus.rnCosto other to screw view filters the size of 82mm diametro.rnAh, last thing to say but not essential: with the hood you dig the trenches with you soon: D |
| sent on June 18, 2016 Pros: sharpness, stabilizer Cons: back focus Opinion: I would say that the difference to 28-75 tamron I had before is obvious. The photos are very sharp in B without the need to intervene with much postroduzione. For now the only discomfort is the backfoscus I still solved with the possible adjustment on the D7000. Even the hood of which many complain it seems good. Good also the possibility of using the VR that from a value in a more objective. |
 | sent on June 12, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, color reproduction, image quality, stabilizer Cons: At the moment nothing Opinion: Got I used this morning, tried now to various shots. I read in some comments of a sharpness not satisfactory at full aperture but maybe I got lucky with my copy, checking the PC shots were all in focus and sharp on the verge of maf (even with the side of the 5D II) .rnLa gem is the stabilizer, useful in order to keep the iSO and shoot below the safety times with subjects statici.rnLa color rendering for my taste is very good. The weight is not excessive, the lens hood is screwed very well and is very easy (apparently a bit fragile) .rnQueste first impressions, we'll see over time how it will behave! |
 | sent on June 01, 2016 Pros: all Cons: all Opinion: From what I read are more and more 'convinced that the views of us "photographers" are only a paradox in the real world of optics and photography in general. Speaking of Tammy 24-70 2.8 vc writes that some are very happy, others scontentatissimi. And I wonder: WHY 'this dilemma, it may be because the optics are made in series and maybe someone happens glass mediocre and worse than the other? no I do not think, so why and so ?. I'm not my habit to hear opinions that may be misleading, but I try to try before the designated optical me if you can, and after the buy. The only problem that remains is who we can trust ??. Excuse my reflection will only ever be mine. |
| sent on June 01, 2016 Pros: Price Cons: It does not live up to professional lenses Opinion: I write in order to prevent others to do my mistake. I took this view after reading various reviews and because the 70-200 is fully PLEASED that the Tamron 15-30, but this view is not at those levels. To get an interesting sharpness you must close at f4. A 2.8 is as if there was a veil over the lens; nothing unrecoverable and dramatic, but certainly unsatisfactory professional levels. Be taken only if you can not spend more, in fact it is also to 760 € with Italian guarantee and to get something more you would have to spend another 600 € (Nikon). Think about it ... |
 | sent on May 20, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, color rendering, weight Cons: Hood a little bit fragile (in appearance but nn I believe in substance at least until now). Opinion: I took this Tamron after several readings here on the site, trial and error with various home rivals Sigma and Nikon..ma the end my choice fell on him, a bargain and really performance on all occasions. It involves the wonder with my D610 never giving me problems of any kind, the MAF is rapid and color rendering is outstanding at least for my taste, and then the weight will not feel that much even if nn is so lightweight, a it does turn up their nose is maybe the size of the front lens and the relative cost of the various filters that one could mount, but if we really need you do a little effort and on;). However after a couple of years or so of shots I can say it was my best purchase with regard to the optics will never change it with anyone, Tamron is traveling to the great! |
 | sent on March 01, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, lightness. Made silent fire. Cons: NO WITH CANON 6D. Hood brittle material. ring position MAF problematic. Opinion: Unfortunately, my experience with this (first) lens TAMRON was negative. I found out after the first CLEAN CONTACTS problems which was a very common problem when mounted with Canon 6D. Really disappointed, because it is an excellent lens. The sharpness is great and is relatively light. Stabilized and weather sealed, I thought I had bought a lens that I would last years. Instead it lasted two days: returned. The problem, for those who want clarification, appears suddenly and so logical NOT: Newly fitted, the first click is presented on the screen warning CLEAN CONTACTS. Off everything and turned on again, the first click is presented on the screen warning CLEAN CONTACTS. Off all, disassembled, reassembled, shaken and on, the first shot is presented on the screen warning CLEAN CONTACTS. Off all, disassembled, reassembled, and then switched back ... shaken BETTER goes. He makes some shots then when you change aperture ... CLEAN THE CONTACTS! NotThere is no solution, clean the contacts it is useless (what tried for hours). |
 | sent on February 22, 2016 Pros: Sharpness constant at all focal, Price than 24-70 f / 2.8 other brands, Boken, contrast, true color, fine detail. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Excellent superb professional optical who wins the comparison with Nikon / Canon / Sigma. very well established Contrast, Sharpness across the board and at all focal, very true colors and well defined. Highly recommended purchase. Among other things purchased new in the physical store with 10 years of Italian guarantee. Since I bought did not take off most of my Nikon, good for aps-c, excellent for FX. |
 | sent on February 13, 2016 Pros: True quality images, weather sealing, price, robustness, F 2.8 Cons: Weight, front focus (in my case), distortion at 24mm Opinion: Great lens for the price at which it is sold, unfortunately I had a front focus issues with my example where or solved with AF fine adjustment. Very heavy but very robust, distortion at 24mm that can be removed in a PP, to 24mm excellent depth of field. Excellent tropicalization, photographed at -23 degrees with no problem. purchase advice! |
| sent on February 04, 2016 Pros: Price, sharpness, brightness', vibration control, size and weight Cons: really no Opinion: I sold the Nikon 24-70 2.8 to buy the new long awaited with VR. Given the price so 'high I paused to read a bit' of reviews and in various forums Americans also spoke very well of tamron, so I rented for 3 days to do all the tests with my nikon d750. outstanding, compared to my old Nikon so loved by the fundamentalists, and 'around another planet, day from night, photos much more' defined and sharp, vibrant color. I still can not believe it bought on amazon uses for $ 812, a third of the price of nikon. I recommend it to everyone, if you do not believe try it first. |
| sent on December 23, 2015 Pros: Value for money. High sharpness. Cons: For my use none Opinion: I made this point to replace the Canon 24-105. Used on canon 6d and I must say that is truly exceptional. Then I switched to 5d MarkIII them and began pains. On the points side suffered Back Focus. Posted in Polyphoto and after 20 days I will return perfect on the side, but this time the central focus of Back suffered. Another round in Polyphoto and after 20 days it came back perfect on all points of maf. Now, what about 5d MarkIII I appreciate even more its quality and sharpness. |
 | sent on December 16, 2015 Pros: The use of Canon 6D for landscapes, portraits, street and sports photography with good results. Excellent sharpness and stabilization ok. Value high Cons: Distortion at 24mm, lens hood and attention to vignetting when using full frame and filters .... Opinion: The optic is also of excellent quality, is very versatile and can be maintained in a fixed manner on the machine. The hood is not 'the best. Cartoon a while at room temperature, but it is also normal in this kind of lens on full frame. I highly recommend it for those who can not 'afford the costs of the respective optical Canon; who still personally I have never used and with whom I can make comparisons. |
 | sent on December 15, 2015 Pros: Optics really fantastic. I use it for landscapes, portraits, street and sports photography with excellent risultati.rnNitidezza really fantastic, sharp right. Stabilization ok. Well blocking Zoom lens. rnTropicalizzata. Robustezza.rnRapporto money. Cons: Hood, distortion to 24 mm but not relevant. Opinion: I have this goal for two months, and are super happy with our purchase. It has an excellent sharpness, since F4 Super excellent. rnStabilizzazione perfetta.rnColori faithful. Great alternative to expensive like Canon and Nikon. Furthermore it has stabilization and 2.8 .rnOttica versatile, suitable for all, practically it can keep mounted. rn |
 | sent on November 20, 2015 Pros: attractive design, the use of a Nikon D7100 and offers excellent results. Sharpness and color purity in all situations. Used for landscapes, portraits and street. Tropicalization and the fact that it is also stabilized are other points in its favor. It also has a zoom lens of the block, which stops at 24mm, so in the case of transport or when you keep the weight moves the zoom unnecessarily neck. The robustness and build quality are excellent, maybe could be better the type of plastic used, but these are details. Cons: The filters for the attack is very large, which makes it expensive purchase. Slower dell''autofocus using focus points continuously variable (type 9 points or 51 focus points). It does not happen in the case of the focusing point single focus. Opinion: The lens is of excellent quality, is very versatile and can be kept permanently on the machine. Compared to the Nikon series it is softer which makes it convenient in situations of portraits. Considering the price becomes very interesting. The zoom ring is not hard but safe, the movement is precise. In some cases the weight is felt, but all optics of a certain quality must weigh especially because they have more lenses inside the barrel. The lens hood leaves something to be desired, it could definitely be of better quality, but as far as I count the optical quality for the results it offers. |
 | sent on October 21, 2015 Pros: Price, quality optics, image stabilization, great, high quality real handyman Cons: Onion-shaped bokeh, lens hood is kinda slim, battery drain Opinion: I have this lens for October 2015, picked to replace a 24-70 L first series for stabilization. Build quality and good image even if compared with the product of the parent company. The sharpness at room temperature is noticeably larger than the Canon MkI although these kinda regret the bokeh and focus, which gave it to my pictures a mood closer to what I'm looking for (but I have the 35 f/1.4). The most negative feature of this lens is in my opinion the unattractive formation of concentric circles at point lights in the blurred, the so-called "bokeh onion", however a very short account. On the 5 d MkII I have encountered no problems with front or back focus and autofocus is much better than I thought, even with low light side steps, conditions under which accuses only a certain slowness. Excellent, never had problems shake stabilizer complained by many, 1/8 shooting handheld. Colors to my taste a tad cold. Battery drain striking if left mounted on the body, I must remember to remove or disconnect battery. Lens that I would recommend strongly: If you require stabilization is a solution that I personally feel much better than the Canon 24-105, in spite of mm less. Due to the lower brightness I did not take into account the Canon f/4 so I can't make any comparisons. |
| sent on September 22, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, no vignetting at 24mm, f Good, Vc useful Cons: Zoom ring lasts Opinion: I bought this lens a week ago and I must say I am very happy purchase. rnMontato Nikon 610 no trace of vignetting (boh) although there is a slight distortion to 24 mm. The yield and sharpness are immediately very high (up to f4 is outstanding) .rnL'af I must say that it is quiet and fairly quick, but when compared to Nikon is less speedy; the VC instead works fine and my copy is reasonably straightforward to camera shake when shooting with safety times. rnUn few negative notes: the zoom ring is quite tough and has a race a bit 'long by 24 to 70 and then carefully removed as the goal, always remember to unplug the machine to 24 mm focal superior because you discover the internal circuitry of the lens. rn |
 | sent on September 15, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, blur, color, build quality, tropicalization, not the stabilization provided fits in times of safety. Cons: Maf not fast, weight, images micromosse with vc added Opinion: I own this goal for more than a year, with which we've done twenty marriages. Just over two or three weddings this year, he appeared on the monitor of the reflex an error message, saying "problem focusing lens to incompatibility". Then, once he cycled the car spun round and smooth away .. fortunately !! Another problem I found, as mentioned among the other hand, is a slight camera shake in some photos (sometimes not so slight) with times of absolute security, as 1/160 and 1/250, with the stabilization inserted. After much research, just on this forum I saw that others have encountered the same problem. Diffetto that still does not show up in all the shots, but often enough. I did several tests without Vc and the photos are all perfette.rnPer the rest, I find it a fantastic goal as sharpen, blur (to "onion" over highlights, which I do not mind at all), and color rendering. Cartoon a while at room temperature, but it is also normal to theNo such ottica.rn |
 | sent on August 31, 2015 Pros: build quality, weather sealing, sharpness, excellent stabilizer. Value for money. Cons: Maybe the weight, but I think it's essential the quality ... Graft paraluce.rn Opinion: Using this perspective on Nikon D750 and D7100, with excellent results on both bodies. If used for portraits, has a sharpness that can be "awkward" at high magnifications, detecting imperfections of the skin invisible to the naked eye ... I have no experience with the Canon optical similar, but I think more than Nikkor 24-70 ( that costs more than twice without stabilizer). A purchase that would do it and I recommend. |
 | sent on August 31, 2015 Pros: Crisp and clear TA, stabilizer excellent value for money. Cons: Weight Opinion: Excellent lens, the mountains (in my case on 6d) and strives to remove seen working excellently on landscape, portrait and street. Sharpest already af / 2.8, imagine it from f / 4 onwards ... even if is not "given" the quality / price ratio is a winner .... perhaps the only flaw is the weight, however, it is still an F / 2.8 stabilized . Good in combination with the f .... 6d recommended for versatility and results. |
 | sent on July 14, 2015 Pros: Excellent sharpness and construction Tropicalized-af stabilization, Cons: Hood lousy, besides being misdemeanor if it engages well in rotation produces a pronounced vignetting at focal around 24-30 mm- rotating zoom ring in the opposite direction than the original Opinion: I took this view it based only on the various tests and reviews that are on the internet, mainly for not spending hallucinatory figures for buying today after about 4000 shots I can talk very, very well. After a few shots we say the running, with dials and with various focal lengths, I would make a very positive opinion of the vast majority of situations. landscapes, ceremonies, reportage and portraits. Used with a 6D accompanied by battery pack to avoid causing imbalance everything turned ergonomically valuable, even if it is not af lightning hardly mistaken. Mainly I saw that many users preferred the original Canon 24-70 this goal, and if compared to the first series, the Tamron is clearly superior both technology and how to slow, after it's Canon 24-70 II then everything changes, but for a payment in euro tripled. The sharpness is good at F2.8 for portraits, to f4 is valuable. the straconsiglio |
user5755 | sent on July 13, 2015 Pros: Construction, price, quality and yield. Cons: Hood ridiculous. Opinion: I took a few weeks instead of the Tamron 28-75 or'sono of which I was very soddisfatto.rnOttima the quality with which it is built and built, appearing pleasant to the touch although the ring of focus seems a little hard to azionare.rnUtilizzato in different situations has not lived up to expectations, extremely quiet in the focuse provides very sharp images and contrasted. The colors rnsono appeared pleasantly saturated and blurry at full aperture pleasant. I am fully satisfied with the purchase and I can only consigliarlorndopo doubting much whether to take the original Nikon. In fact, I have to highlight are pesantucci entrambirnDi against the hood of dimensions ridiculous and of dubious quality as if it were his own, this aspect seems to be his Achilles rntallone a little bit for everyone; grafting requires attention asthe happen beyond his bayonet allocandosi on barilotto.rn |
 | sent on June 25, 2015 Pros: Price, stabilization, construction Cons: Hood Opinion: From today I joined the Tamron 70-200 f 2.8 vc and as the older brother has the same quality construction and exceptional nitidezza.rnPrezzo, stabilizer and truly effective weight that goes perfectly with the lens hood for nikon d750.rnIl I put it in the rest position creates many difficoltà.rnA aside the collars are wonderful and beautiful then I find the idea of ??putting the button to lock the extension to 24 mm.rnColori reproduced faithfully, made several shots at different openings I noticed that from f 4 on the sharpness at the corners in a growing esponenziale.rnPer what little I tried it I can not say anything but I remained extremely satisfied with their purchase and the next will certainly be the brother 15-30 vc ... as soon as finances allow me |
| sent on June 22, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, price Cons: Auto focus, weight Opinion: And an excellent optics, well built though more plastic, but sturdy and solido.rnLascia a bit to be desired 's autofocus that wrapped ciucca and must intervene manualmente.rnLa zoom ring rotates to the opposite of the optical canon, a little hard but one gets the abitudine.rnMolto reduced AF but the ring has a good grip. Convenient them switc of blocco.rnrn |
 | sent on June 18, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, weather sealing, construction, acceptable price Cons: maybe the hood, but now there are many that are embarrassing ... Opinion: Objective rounder, not too pushed, of undoubted quality optics. Quite compact than the competition and with more efficient stabilizer. The more I tried to portraits and 24mm (FF Nikon d750) for landscapes, in both cases gave me back good clean, sharp images. The diameter of the filters is important (82mm) and unfortunately the filters screw quality with this diameter are quite expensive. Excellent zoom lock to 24mm for those who make the landscape and good weight, despite the lens is also sealed. Cartoon a little wide open on full frame and slightly distorts the image on 24mm, but nothing that you can not easily recover in post production. The only real sour note is the hood ridiculous and plasticky, but trust me ... it gets worse! So at a price after all abordabile, you take home a professional goal, tropical conditions stabilized, clear and also returns the beautiful colors, what you ask for from life? |
 | sent on May 22, 2015 Pros: good construction, good stabilizer, good quality image Cons: autofocus embarrassing, hood ciofeche Opinion: I comply with this objective by about 3 days (for which relatively little) taken to replace the SIGMA 24 70 f2.8 EX DG MACRO. When I was deciding whether or not to give into the sigma I preferred to hold it, given the limited economic value that was attributed to possibly exchange them fixed focus that I will have to buy in the near future. As holder of the second optical focal hand why not dabble in a confrontation? and so I did. Well it turned out that the good old sigma is less than the new Tamron only for a slight less accurate detail on the edge of the image and a bit of chromatic aberration in più.rnCome I expressed in against the Tamron AF Ultrasonic against AF noisy and mechanical SIGMA was significantly slower (test canon 6d midpoint) tamron effort to "catch" spending himself in an awkward back and forth while sigma: Bzzzz ... caught! Hood: we put aside the speech plastic poor light ... etc etc ... I tried a aggancI quickly with extended barrel 70 mm and I was literally stuck ring on the barrel ... as they say in my part: DO NOT GO !! PAROE (Trans .: are so upset by it that I have no words to describe the situation) rnStabilizzatore, construction and image quality are definitely three points in favor of TAMRON but the store made me kindly try also the CANON 24 70 f2.8 USM II ...... and there's history .... 1000 euros more but so much more quality. Too bad not having :-( |
user62707 | sent on April 08, 2015 Pros: Excellent value for money, stabilized, weather sealed, f2.8, excellent color rendering Cons: No One Opinion: I bought this lens to replace canon 24/70 l is usm f4.rnNel month dicemdre I took the 6d and I was undecided on optics to go with it, if the canon above or tamron.rnEbbene after three months I decided to replace the original canon with this lente.rnAlla beginning I was skeptical on the lenses of third parties, but I was wrong! RNE 'a fabulous optical well built nice color rendering stabilized and is f2.8.rnA comparison of canon f 2.8 costs 1000 euro less and is stabilized .rnUnica negative note the zoom ring that rotates in the opposite direction to the canon, but it takes little to abituarsi.rnrnIn conclusion, it is my second lens Tamron after 28/300 and I must say I am very satisfied with the Tamron, I find this brand is producing lenses exceptional arn prices ragionevoli.rnConsigliatissimo.rnBuone photo tuttirn |
 | sent on March 21, 2015 Pros: sharpness general, stabilizer, button lock zoom range, blurred pleasant, good color rendering, good construction, price. Cons: focus not fast, not always accurate af, af ring impractical (thin), zoom ring turns in reverse, diaphragm 2.8 soft. Opinion: I used this good lens for a few months to use events to use work and private and he confirmed the good results, I was impressed by the excellent stabilizer and sturdy construction, with regard to the professional did not give me full guarantee in particular 'AF is not always accurate is this is a problem as it can disturb the use of the zoom ring that is running backwards (compared to Canon), working in such occasions Confirmations, Baptisms etc. with two camera bodies can have a moment of "confusion" ... rnL'autofocus is slightly slower Canon.rnPer use of work I highly recommend a lens type Canon EF 24-70 f / 2.8 L II USM for other uses is the optimal objective. rn |
 | sent on March 19, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, block excursion zoom control, small size, robustness and compactness. Quality construction. Excellent risolvenza both FF and on APSC. Tropicalised. Stabilized. Cons: Autofocus not always 'Prey', the focus ring without limit switches when focheggia hand, hood hardback. fairly ubiquitous aberrations. Vignetting up to f4. Opinion: Compared to the Nikon 24-70 it is certainly more compact, but equally heavy, as the substance is in equal measure. Who complains about the lack of clarity is because it uses it improperly (perhaps with VR position, if it would not) or because gl'è happened exemplary ciucco.rnLa risolvenza is very good, as well as the sharpness, just less of saturated Nikon consideration, and more opens the shadows. The engine USD is handsome and quiet. The seal around the bayonet labbrino is appreciable, at least since the excursion blocking command Zoom. The hood is not a ciofeche as I expected. It has an anti-reflective coating of excellence, and this results in sometimes toned colors (also in terms of temperature). A 24mm loses a bit ', including distortion and vignetting, but the 35 is 70 is very good (70mm There are pulled out of the finest portraits). great only drawback, the AF unresponsive in low-light conditions. Octoberimo value for money. |
 | sent on February 27, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, stabilizer, cost, tropicalization Cons: AF is not always lightning Opinion: At the end of several months of indecision I opted for the Tamron at the expense of Canon 24-105 f4 IS and Canon 24-70 f4 L IS L.rnA front of several readings on the internet and magazines, compared to tests performed on the field, the My reasoning was as follows: rn1. I need a lens to do everything, to APSC, to momento.rn2. If and when I pass to FF (or buy a FF body if I take this occasion there's a 5D old say) I wish I could use, wide angle and portraits, handyman secundis.rn3. I like the opening of f4 canon, soft and creamy bokeh, but the f2.8 aperture gives me more detachment in photos taken in the family (home mostly), then lower PDC with the background in distance is not always so high be excluded with a f4.rn4. I like a lot of the f2.8 Canon 2.8 mkII, I do not like that the canon f2.8 mkI continues to cost as a goal, and then again with warranty 4-5 anni.rn5. the stabilizer would save me on many occasions taking home with the not always long enough even to f2.8rn6. I like less bokeh Tamron, more nervous and less creamyCanon's 2.8 mkiirn7. I like that costs 1000 euro less and have the stabilizer best I provatornrnAlla end I acqusitato the Tamron. All my expectations were abundantly ripagate.rnLa my review is as follows: rn- The sharpness is very very high, I made the shots at home, my granddaughter with shower heads and behind the other nephew ... you see it detachment at large, so do not ask for more from a apsc.rn- As for the hood I have not tried in a state of having to use the lens hood, but with bounce flash on the ceiling I had no problem to flare or altro.rn - The vignetting I do not appear at all or in any case is not very evident, I immediately put a filter and lens hood slim hoya .. I want to emphasize because of interneto I found the review of a person who has tried and found vignetting inhomogeneous, is left up to the right and then not be changed automatically .. to me it is a lens flawed and / or tarare.rn- The stabilizer is outstanding, I took in 1,6s 2.8 sat with folded arms andthe photo does not seem moved. I did not open the file at 100% because I do not enlargements of this photo, but the data I need to understand that I can feel comfortable up to 1 second. I saw the test of outdoor photographers that follow and in fact they too were able to 1 second to shoot. No Canon or Nikon permit it unless it was with a tripod ovviamente.rn- The tropicalization did not try it yet, but I've seen people in Groellandia have this lens ... we go on trust by, so do not ever under Scatterò the flood without tricks because I have a sore body pro.rnrnNota: sometimes the af takes longer than it should (not lightning) when the contrast is not high. NB: I had the same problem with the Canon 24-70 f4 IS L is that 24-105 ... I do not think I have had this problem with the canon 24-70 2.8 mkiirnrnSono still really pleased, they did a really good job ! rnrn |
 | sent on February 27, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, Color, stabilizer, weather sealed Cons: Hood skimpy, AF works fine with adequate light but struggling a bit 'low light to focal low. Opinion: I purchased it recently because I needed a substitute 24-105L f.4 that although the last production I did not like the definition (too soft) for use with body 5DMark III. From the first pictures I found that AF has a fast but only in the presence of very good light and if you use it as I used it I quickly and often changing focal lengths, sometimes (with focal below the 40mm) struggling in MF especially with stabilizer entered and you can do no more than 2 photos of 5. In the rest of the situations is an excellent optics for me with excellent focal 70mm diaphragms on all the good blurry f.2.8 from f.4 onwards is very incisive with faithful colors , has a little 'vignetting at 24mm but not as the 24-105 that was terrible, AC light but only with front light and not as the 24-105 that was unrecoverable to 80%. Conclusions after 3 days of testing is that it has acquired an excellent lens not completely substitute the (24-105 that me'come zoom range is exceptionally good) but with F.2.8 best there is only the Canon 24-70L f. 2.8 II USM, while compared with the CanonSeries one (I've tried) is significantly better and recommended for those who can not afford the Canon 24-70L f.2.8 USM II. |
 | sent on February 18, 2015 Pros: Remarkable sharpness, stabilization and autofocus. Cons: A bit pesante.Paraluce and lens cover ridiculous. Opinion: La lens responds beautifully on my Nikon D610 to all focali.Lo stabilizer is simply outstanding as fast autofocus optics like original Nikon 24-70.Tropicalizzato and well balanced if the machine is mounted battery grip.Infine considering my resources I purchased a perspective to compare the original with half its prezzo.Tamron was exceeded. |
 | sent on February 12, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, aperture, weather sealing, stabilization Cons: Autofocus. I can not make the adjustment with 5dlll. Opinion: Maybe I was unlucky ... but with autofocus we did not own; you can not make the fine adjustment of the room, so I have to manually correct (and often is a problem ...). If he had not I would be happy with this problem, although I must say that after trying the canon, the Tamron is far behind for sharpness (and autofocus). I think I will make an effort and I will change it to the canon. |
 | sent on February 06, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, stabilization (phenomenal) engine af fast and accurate Cons: Hood, weight Opinion: Really amazing rendition to any opening I was really impressed by the color fidelity, the relationship between light / shadow and for the remarkable stabilization. I tried several Canon series I must tell you that the result is more than similar. They are not as "professional" that you can judge the full, at least not yet, but I can not recommend this lens so excited since changed my 5D and has raised the quality of the sensor. Of course, the weight, between 5D, battery grip, lens nearly 2kg .... but who cares ..... lots of glass, a lot of quality and great satisfaction in files that churns out the combination. What about others? The lens hood is literally sucks (but have stressed all) especially in the thread. |
 | sent on January 30, 2015 Pros: many: crisp, af fast and accurate, stabilized, blurred pleasant Cons: few: Hood, slight vignetting (but 'a real flaw?) Opinion: took this week to replace the 24-105 kit canon of which I was not satisfied .... I only regret not having made the change before seen the ridiculous price difference compared to the canon: this lens (from my point of view) worth every euro of its price (and even more 'seen that the much famed 24-70 canon coast more' than twice)! |
 | sent on January 29, 2015 Pros: excellent sharpness, good stabilizer, good autofocus Cons: high weight, bokeh onion Opinion: I have used this lens on my canon 6d for about a year with great satisfaction, initially I used it to 17-40 then joined mainly for portraits (ambientati and not) and some landscape where I needed a longer focal length or in situations low light. Then it was with me for a month in the states where I got to use it a lot in the urban landscape at night and also as a handyman walking into town. I found myself really covered very good in almost all situations. The stabilizer is phenomenal and has allowed me to shoot even at 1/4 or 1/8 freehand. I would absolutely recommend. The only negative notes are the weight and the bokeh is not particularly pleasant in some situations, especially at night. |
 | sent on January 26, 2015 Pros: sharpness, af accurately and quickly, stabillizzato Cons: weight, lens hood, construction Opinion: I own this light for almost two years in version canon, that is, price / performance is unbeatable, Tamron's engineers have really done an excellent job, clear already in TA, AF excellent, precise and fast and the price really low taking into account that it is also the only 24-70 f2.8 with image stabilization, only sore point is the construction, it is ok to levels well above the usual plasticotti Tamron, but in front of the canon fades in a jiffy all in all there always be borne in mind that it also costs less than half the canon 24-70 mkII and his work does so admirably. |
 | sent on January 21, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, af Central precise color rendering Cons: Weight, materials a bit plasticky Opinion: D7100 goes on 'and that' a marvel, clear already at 2.8, to the best of itself between f4 and f 11. On dx does not distort and does not guarantee Italian vignetta.Con worth everything costa.Una lens respectable, for amateurs do not give beginners' excellent results even in demanding sensors such as the Nikon D7100. the weight and 'the only known if you want a little sore, and the material a bit plasticky but still solid. Not sealed. |
 | sent on January 08, 2015 Pros: See Opinion Cons: In my opinion a slight distortion but absolutely is normal. Opinion: Provides results already sharp openings medium, the distortion can be seen slightly to 24 mm but is well controlled, the blur is his strong point is soft and pleasant, the contrast it provides is well balanced colors slightly soft but faithful to reality, is a solid lens, the stabilizer is also great with a long time, is a worthy rival giants Canon and Nikon. |
| sent on December 08, 2014 Pros: see opinion Cons: not have taken it before ... Opinion: quality of materials, the hood is not comparable to the Nikon but I do not bear any disorder indeed I can keep it in the trolley mounted direttamente..molto the soft fuzzy, pleasant ... af not lightning but still very good ... now feeling robustness and security ... is good although on balance d800 with BG ... considering the price does not exceed € 1,000 can be a valid alternative to cover these focal f2.8 ... highly recommended |
 | sent on November 23, 2014 Pros: See Opinion Cons: See Opinion Opinion: I bought a couple of months and I decided to write my impressions on lente.rnLa build quality of Tamron (albeit not to the height of the optical equivalent nikon and canon top level) is reported to be excellent, it is a robust lens, equipped of a good system of weather sealing, weighing less than the 24-70 home nikon 2.8 (825g VS900) .rnL'unica sore point is the hood, not at the level of the lens and the diameter of the filters from 82 mm (in house nikon most of the optical F4 / 2.8 filters have a diameter from 77 mm) .rnIl stabilization system is very efficient, allowing to recover 3/4 stop, the system focus is very fast and accurate .rnIl Tamron is a lens extremely crisp, with excellent color rendering with chromatic aberrations extremely small, good resistance to flare .Riguardo yield major defects are distortion and vignetting at 24mm f2.8 at 24mm, the bokeh is good (not at the level of the nikon 24- / 70 or 28/70), although some users, in particular conditions,have reported the presence of "Bokeh onion" .rnIl quality / price ratio is very high! The Tamron 24/70 has a cost of about € 600 less than the nikon 24/70 f2.8 and offers a guarantee of 5 years .rnIn conclusion are extremely pleased with the lens and I highly recommend it as a standard zoom! |
 | sent on November 06, 2014 Pros: Price with 5 years warranty Polyphoto, extreme sharpness at all focal lengths, construction and weather sealing, stabilizer. Cons: Hood not appropriate zoom ring rather hard, missing a soft bag to protect the lens. Opinion: I do not have a lot of experience with this lens, I have only done a wedding and was amazed at the performance of this lente.Al time I used Nikon D4, later I will update the review also Nikon D800! RnCon 800 euro you will come home a very sharp lens (even at room temperature), bright, and stabilized with a construction professional ... all with a guarantee of 5 years (but applies only to the original purchaser)! I never would have said ... I have always had prejudices against the slow "third", this Tamron has opened my eyes! The equivalent Nikon is just as good, but costs more and is not stabilized ... and it's in a bit less clear. The Canon's second version costs twice the Tamron.rnNon I considered vignetting and distortion as defects, the two are remediable in PS with a few clicks. Not even the weight of a defect, is a professional zoom with constant aperture f / 2.8 and weighs as direct concorrenti.rnL'unica downsides lies in the hood ... is really ridiculous and not at all indeguato the type of lens: I decided to leave it to always be mounted to avoid breakage during assembly / disassembly! rnNon I found the bag to protect the lens, should be included in a lens 800 euro ... but I remedied with a bag Neoprene purchased on Amazon (15 Euros for 4 bags of various sizes) rn |
 | sent on August 13, 2014 Pros: NN Cons: NN Opinion: I bought this lens used here on Juza.rnPurtroppo my specimen suffers from a strong front-focus and, with my EOS 1Ds Mark II, can not be calibrated by the AF menu.rnHo did test shots with a test chart detecting, at a distance of about 75 cm, a front focus of 3 cm (24mm focal af 2.8) up to a front focus of 6 mm at a focal length of 70mm af 2,8.rnSulla long distance (not to infinity) the front focus is 2/3 metri.rnAnche the manual focus "assisted" not c'azzecca.rnFare a portrait is virtually impossible: focusing his eyes were sharp eyebrows !!! rnVorrei then warn those who, by purchasing a used still under warranty, you know exactly the warranty is valid ONLY for the first purchaser registrato.rnNel Should you need to call for service you should have "assist" by those who made the first purchase: the second buyer will not be recognized !!! rnDico this because I am in these conditions and to calibrate or replace my copy before I send it to my seller (who has recorded) .rnAverlo known before ........ rnrnAGGIORNAMENTO: the Polyphoto recognized the guarantee of two years and he repaired the free lens .rnLavori played: firmware update, replacing wiring and taratura.rnrnAGGIORNAMENTO: I sold the original (even though it was "repaired") and I got a new one with serial recente.rnOra I can say I have a REAL goal: a little 'soft f / 2.8 but stopping down becomes perfect. |
 | sent on August 09, 2014 Pros: Stabilizer, construction, sharpness, brightness, value for money Cons: Slight vignetting at F / 2.8 on FF, slight distortion at 24mm Opinion: I bought this lens a few months ago and I use it on Canon 6D. I was very hesitant about purchasing for having read some reviews that talked about the problem of Battery Drain. Before taking the Tamron I had the Canon 24-70 F / 2.8L USM (first series) and before that the Canon 24-105 F / 4 L IS USM and I must say that there is no story. This lens is best at everything, especially compared with the Canon 24-70L F / 2.8 USM (first series) considering that the price of the new Tamron is almost equal to the price of the used Canon 24-70L F / 2.8 USM. Probably, reading some reviews, it is slightly less than the Canon 24-70L F / 2.8 USM II but the price difference is more than double. The construction is good and quality is excellent and the zoom lock. The images are sharp and colors I like in particular. The AF is fast and reliable and stabilizer VC 4 stop is quiet and works perfectly. I feel very satisfied and happy with our purchase, also the warranty is 5 annthe |
 | sent on August 05, 2014 Pros: Sharpness, good bokeh, light, stabilization, good construction, warranty. Cons: Vignetting at f2.8, distortion at 24mm, AF microscopic ring, in case of problems and do not care 'to the level of Canon Opinion: Mounted on 6D, return quality images: sharpness and 'remarkable, the fuzzy and nice contrast and colors buoni.rnLa construction, while making use of plastic for the body, and' quality, with the highlight of the seal around the bayonet and zoom.rnLa AF lock nut and 'really understaffed, excellent rather than Zoom, which rotates as the objectives Nikon.rnLo stabilizer and' very good, very little invasive intervention, it seems there is until you try disabling with time lunghi.rnConsiglio to disable it with a very fast way because it brings a little 'nitidezza.rnL' AF 'fast and generally reliable, occasionally enchants in critical condition more than other lenses in my possession, it is necessary to assess the 'coupled body-goal and the situation of light and contrast before talking about difetto.rnLa vignetting and' mind at f2.8 and the distortion and 'evident at 24mm but are present in marginal defects and objectives equivalenti.rnBen is the guarantee five years, I hope I do not need help because thePolyphoto service and not 'on the level of CS Canon.rnIn conclusion, I can say very happy with purchase. rn |
 | sent on August 01, 2014 Pros: Brightness, sharpness stabilization, weather sealing, zoom lock switch Cons: Light vignetting on full frame and slight distortion to the focal child Opinion: Objective great, I had it before on Canon 1D Mk4 and now Nikon D800 D800.rnSulla slightly cartoon (which was not on the 1D due to the 1.3x multiplication factor of the machine), but nothing to worry about and nothing that is not you can correct it in PP with a simple click.rnLa extreme sharpness and brightness are the real strength of this objective |
 | sent on July 14, 2014 Pros: Sharpness, value, image quality Cons: Weight, hood ridiculous Opinion: After a little 'of shots can I leave my opinion on this lens. Excellent! A remarkable sharpness of the images in any opening range. The files that come out (paired with D7100) are already very good and require little PP. The weight is substantial but due to the type of lens you could not think otherwise, but at the end of the day not too tired. The lens hood is really ridiculous! perhaps the only flaw. Board neutral density filter to protect the lens because diam. 82mm is really so much glass. Great lens Highly recommended. |
 | sent on July 04, 2014 Pros: Construction excellent, robust, without games, well finished, f/2.8 with stabilizer, razor sharp at all focal lengths is at the center than at the edges, and even at full aperture. I'm loving it. I got to compare it directly with the Canon 24-70f/2.8 LI series, there is no story! Cons: Distorts at 24, but nothing that can not correct in PP. a bit 'heavy, but in this class of targets who is not? Lens hood a bit 'too light. Opinion: After purchasing the new Canon 24-70 f/2.8LI series and not be left satisfied, I found peace by purchasing this Tamron at the suggestion of friends in this forum. I fell in love, both for the high quality construction, both for the clarity that reaches wide open and at all focal lengths. Fast autofocus, VC 4 stop which is a rarity on this class of targets. Lately Tamron is doing a great job with its optics. I have not found defects alleged by the other kind of sharpness fall on low contrast situations. No problem with regard to the discharge of the battery. All new Tamron have the latest firmware and do not suffer more from this problem. Probably the 24-70f/2.8 Canon L series II will be sharper (what?), But it certainly does not have the stabilizer is costs more than double. Evaluate you. About: warranty 5 anni.rnP.S. Who wrote this review has owned and has only Canon lenses and was very reluctant to buy a non-Canon optics. |
| sent on June 08, 2014 Pros: Speed, clarity. Great to 2.8. The stabilizer makes the difference. some say that is not needed, but honestly I find it very useful Cons: Weight. on a machine like the d700 battery grip for more feel, the neck is prohibitive ... in his hand all day is a good test of forza.rnaltro defect filters are 82mm and oversize by price and excessive clutter! Opinion: on nikon d700 behaves really well, sometimes I do not the autofocus locks in dark situations, the d700 is perhaps the flag raising, the sharpness is 10, as the speed of the motor. it is heavy but after proving his f/2.8 on a portrait spends all! : Drnsulla d600 I am just as well, hooking them is even more veloce.rnTrovo a lot of distortion at 24mm, but just a program of post-production, and activate the profile picture will magically lens ... "" open "" and it turns out a world! rnper me it passed with flying colors ... |
 | sent on May 29, 2014 Pros: Excellent image sharpness in situations with high contrast light photo Cons: loses its sharpness so conspicuous in situations of soft light, backlight, or little contrast Opinion: great lens very versatile, I would not recommend such use in a professional environment, I personally tested in the field during a wedding ... all the pictures taken in low-light situation, backlight, or low contrast were much lower quality than the same lens nikon. the price difference you will notice greatly if used in a professional environment. this is certainly not the most ideal for amateurs to professionals. |
| sent on February 05, 2014 Pros: no, Cons: no, Opinion: Mine is not a judgment, but an important message about it to anyone who is interested to buy it. Maybe someone will have already seen this link but for others who do not know it check it out. I entered here because it is the point where people observe the problems and the best parts of optics commissioning esamernrnrn http://saint-andres.blogspot.it/2013/01/tamron-24-70-2.8-problemi -download-rn batteria.htmlrn In frattenpo course I contacted the poliphoto from which graciously told me that the problem currently exists with the nn canon d6 and previously was just a failure ... We try to believe given this perspective is very inviting as a result of the benefits that it has. |
| sent on January 28, 2014 Pros: Excellent construction, nothing to do with the old 17-55 is canon I owned .. here we are on another planet! Very sharp at all focal lengths. The stabilizer does its duty: Allows you to shoot with times that would be impossible for non-stabilized optical type 1/15 second or meno.Lo use with great satisfaction in the nightclub business coupled to a Canon 600EX flash 6d and the rt. From Amazing Results! The bokeh is good but lower than an objective canon and nikon. Let's say that it is less creamy .. The quality of the plastics is good. It 'sa bit heavy in the hand but by a' good solid feel. Cons: Distortion at 24mm showy enough not fully correctable. Cartoon with photoshop but at certain focal resolves. The lens hood is too small. I would have preferred a facsimile of the canon. Another downside with little or no highlighted by other users on the network is the dust that can 'entering the lens if you do not block the optical position with the button before removing it from the slide. The autofocus is a bit 'slower than the canon when shooting in low light. Filters 82mm expensive. Opinion: I bought this lens after I was well documented in various foreign sites. They talked a lot of good. I've seen a myriad of video not to mention the reviews that I've read .. I was very undecided whether to buy the old canon 24-70 I (used) without stabilizer or somethin 'else. After careful analysis I have come to the conclusion that presently there is nothing better for this price. I also thought the new 24-70 f4 is but the price and the loss of a stop made me desist from the purchase. The use prevalentamente disco with canon 6d and unimaginable results for other optical sibling: I just want to see you with the canon 24-70 II in the dark. Camera shake is still there! The sharpness is great! rnPurtroppo requires filters with a 82mm thread which costicchiano something more than the usual 77mm canon, etc.. I mounted a filter of B + W neutral to protect it from dirt. It should be great, do not notice any loss of quality in the image with this filter. Council to be very careful when it is removed from the slide: if it is notstuck with the "lock" by rotating the rear part of the lens ring leaving exposed internal components and allowing dust to enter the lens. Another thing that happened to me with the entry of a grain of dust in the optical phase change in speed. The autofocus in the dark, when used with center point (in 6d is the most sensitive), rnfatica a bit 'to focus on: you turn on the red square (the focus in this case may' not be precise) after which waiting yet again you have confirmation of focus and it is at this point that must be squeezed otturattore the way down. With this system of approximately 600 pictures not miss a beat! I do not regret the choice I made, in fact I buy another one. Please note some users come into possession of optical flawed: the diaphragms were not working well. To check this just shut one stop at a time is to verify that there is a marked decline in overall brightness. IF it were not so the lens is to be repaired. Even the STABILIZERhours is not existent defects. However, if you buy it in Italy by poliphoto give you 5 years warranty! Rnrn |
 | sent on January 26, 2014 Pros: Consistent, manageable and lets achieve very satisfactory results. Beautiful lens under all profili.resistente and robust when it is cradled. The sharpness is amazing in all aperturern? the only lens that has stabilization (very efficient), weather sealing and ultrasonic motor fast and accurate Cons: Nothing Opinion: Mounted on my Nikon D700 after a long battle to decide whether to orient myself on this or Nikon optics. I chose this and I am very happy. Tested at very intense in all sragioni and not ever shown signs of slowing down. The pictures should only be watched in 2.8 because it is difficult to describe. Sharpness across the board, cartoon ture very modest. rnBello really a mid-price competitor Nikon (which it is not stabilized) rn |
 | sent on December 30, 2013 Pros: Sharpness at all focal lengths and TA, stabilizer very effective, excellent color rendering, USD silent, soundness, sealing, buying it in the store you get the Polyphoto warranty of 5 years. Cons: Quite heavy but definitely understandable why, expensive 82mm filters, focusing not just fast in low light conditions but overall acceptable, considerable price, but considering the Canon 24-70 f2.8 II would say that saving is a lot. Opinion: I purchased this light for my Canon 6D after reading several reviews and watched many videos comparison with the more expensive Canon 24-70 f2.8 II, it was said that on many comparisons lost sharpness at 24mm compared to canon, I could make a comparison between these 2 personal goals thanks to a friend who owns it, and I have not seen any noticeable loss of sharpness, nor the rest of it to 24mm focal lengths and apertures (at least for my copy) the only things that I can say may be slightly better in canon is that in low light conditions Canon engages faster (although in each case tamron always snaps and never misses the focus), but in contrast canon does not have the stabilizer and I would say that there is little second thing, the hood of the Tamron is just infimo.rnNon know if it was luck or if they are all so these tamron, but as for me I consider myself quite satisfied, my friend said the fact that some rode, he could save € 1000. , D |
 | sent on December 14, 2013 Pros: Excellent sharpness, good in the center at any focal length and also towards the edges do not lose almost nothing (valuation date on APS-C, who knows what will be on FF :)), good and pleasant it sfocato.rnAF accurate, fast and efficient silenziosissimornStabilizzatore, you can use a very long time and really makes the lens "weapon" infallible in the most extreme shooting conditions. In the static shots, I prefer to exclude even with its super fast because time is not in my opinion the VR causes a small vibration that for those who want absolute clarity becomes fastidiosa.rnCostruzione: very solid and well built, well-sized rings and right in friction, and excellent useful extension block zoom.rnHo used the optical far outside only and a few portraits in natural light so I can not speak for use with studio lights and backgrounds, for now I have not noticed defects such as flare or another, the colors are nice though with the D7000 I do not think you understand the right settings. Cons: practically nothing, the only relief in my opinion is on the sun visor, a piece of plastic substantially inadequate to slow and practically useless. Opinion: I bought this zoom to prepare for the FF, so I'm not able to fully assess the characteristics. What I can say is that in APS-C I missed so much the ability to use the full 24mm. I think if I had a FF in my last trip to Patagonia, I would have used only this view, already with APS-C I did 80% of the shots and also for the views I preferred to shoot in vertical sequences, where the affinity the lens shooting freehand was extraordinary. |
 | sent on May 31, 2013 Pros: Construction, Tropicalisation, sharpness and colors, price! Cons: Hood and zoom ring that is running backwards. Opinion: Massive, expect to find the classic plasticone, instead I found myself with a lens very solid, not vignette on APS-H and has a beautiful color rendering, what I liked the most are the stabilizer really very effective, and the silence of the USD.rnTutto this engine at half the price of the 24-70 F/2.8 MK II, which will also be higher quality but does not have a stabilizer (which is important to me on occasion), weather sealed! rnUnici two of them in the hood that I find really cumbersome and put it off, the zoom ring rotates in the opposite direction to the Canon (matter of habit). |
| sent on May 29, 2013 Pros: beautiful colors, VC (stabilizer) performance, allows you to take in the shake-time basis without fear; excellent construction (solid), USD rapid and accurate; price: half of the Canon 24-70 mark II Cons: Hood that makes you laugh, a little heavy; vignetting at 24mm (is removed in 10 seconds and, in any case, I do not mind the vignetting, indeed) Opinion: - Optical I use on my 6D; Stacatto not ever since she purchased; rn-USD Tamron engine is very powerful, the stabilizer is really excellent: allows you to take a shake-1/4sec ??without problems; rn-construction is quality and feel solid piece; rn-I do not doubt that the Canon 24-70 mark II is sharper, but has no stabilizer and especially costs twice as much. rn-optics with an excellent quality / price ratio really good, recommended to all those looking for a bright 24-70mm. |
 | sent on May 04, 2013 Pros: Sharpness, Construction, stabilizer, Motor USD, Price. Cons: Hood, Vignette. Opinion: 29, has a slight vignetting at 24mm at TA FF, but corrects itself with two clicks of the mouse. rnIl general opinion is great, will not have the exceptional performance of the Canon 24-70 f/2.8 II but costs less than half and has an incredible stabilizer, in my opinion very useful in this range of focal lengths, recommend it to all those who looking for a 24-70mm bright, sharp and important to assess the presence of the stabilizer. |
| sent on April 12, 2013 Pros: overall an excellent performance - sticker at room temperature, good / excellent color rendering as well as sharpness, responds very well working with flash. Cons: PS is that Ligtroom are not yet able to correct vignetting in the car (at least at the time I write) Opinion: I just bought this lens, and I state that I only L-series lenses canon. It was not an easy purchase for the reason mentioned, but spend over € 2000 for canon 24/70 I did not see that mine is just a passion. But all in all I had to change my mind since responding that well in a variety of situations. Plus it has something others do not: the stabilizer that allows you to work in ambient light so dear. Money well spent and no regrets, this ultimately my account. |
 | sent on April 08, 2013 Pros: Sharpness even at the edges according to my humble opinion, contrast, af speed and lack of chromatic aberration Cons: vignetting and distortion at room temperature (corrected) Opinion: I own this lens for about a month, taken in tandem with the 6d, and strongly supported than the kit with 24-105, because of its good features decanted into several parts after several tests and usi.rnPurtroppo I have not used yet very because here is a month now that it rains every day, and go out to check its sealing, it should be my health because I am not weather sealed against the elements:-D. rnLe tests done at home I was fully satisfied, and although I'm not an expert in tests and reviews, my impression is very good as far as my eye can see compared to other lenses I had. |
 | sent on February 13, 2013 Pros: sharpness construction ... (I took it to -16 ° and I had it made changes in temperature of 30 degrees without problems) ... speed af, stabilization .... ... Cons: a little vignette to 24 mm but nothing to worry about ... and 82mm filters are expensive ... Opinion: bought after reading countless reviews praising it ... and I agree with them .. used on nikon d700 is perfect ... really nice crisp .. and having tried the 24-70 nikon I must say that well ... . Tamron has made a huge leap in qualità.l 'autofocus is fast .. the stabilizer does its job very well .. maybe only drawback is that the front lens is 82mm and the diameter filters cost a little problem ... solved using filter plate |
 | sent on December 29, 2012 Pros: Perfect clarity, even at RT. Price contenuto.rnStabilizzatore really great (shooting up to 1/3 of a second to 70mm blur-free). RnBuona and fast focusing. Silenzioso.rn Cons: A little heavy, maybe a little small hood; distortion at 24 mm. Slight vignetting at 24 mm f2.8 Opinion: Having a nikon d600, I was inclined to buy the nikon 24-70. Only seeing the price (well minimum € 1,800) and considering the fact that it was very cumbersome and even without the stabilizer, I went to look at the sigma and tamron. For some € 100 plus the Tamron was equipped with stabilizer unlike the sigma, so it was worth spending a little more, and the choice proved successful. I tried to take photos of 2 time 1/2 of a second focal length 50mm. The first without stabilizer, the second with it on. The result has left me speechless. Although I had a very steady hand, the first move is coming, but with the stabilizer I got a photo perfectly stable and clear: DrnSi feels much weight, and unfortunately there is distortion at the minimum focal length. But compared to other brands and prices, I think it is the most convenient target. |
 | sent on December 28, 2012 Pros: Sharpness quite good already wide open, good yield of fuzzy (but see Cons) AF fast and silent, effective stabilizer and quiet, excellent construction, competitive price Cons: Bokeh onion in some situations Opinion: BACKGROUND: I bought the lens for a next step to Full Frame, at the moment I have a APS-C body, so all the tests and the results of which I speak are evaluated on cropped sensor body. rnrn-Sharpness and IQ: The sharpness is GOOD at the center of the frame at all focal lengths, even at full aperture. What really leaves satisfied is that moving towards the edges, until arriving at the corners loses very little and has a sharpness EXCELLENT when compared for example to 50 mm 1.8 (that the center is, however, slightly sharper). This suggests that the lens is much more enjoyable on full frame, where I assume a GOOD sharpness from corner to corner. rnLo focus is very pleasant. Very creamy and without the "jitters". The shape of the bokeh light points is perfectly smooth, round, elliptical without variations. However, in certain circumstances (actually not too frequent in normal situations), such as underexposed background with bokeh, bokeh presents onion. rnQuesto is aico defect with regard to the optical quality, aberrations not detected absolutely and sealing of the flare medium-high. rnrn-AF: autofocus is on the whole, VERY GOOD. Precise. Quite fast (a little slower than the 85mm 1.8) and inaudible. rnrn-VC: the stabilizer is GOOD, 70mm can shoot at 1/8 without shake; 24mm to arrive in fifth. Silent too, feels just approaching the ear lens. rnrn-Building and nuts: The build quality is EXCELLENT. Is not a featherweight but it is still slightly lighter than lenses with which contributes. From an extreme sense of solidity. Very convenient lock button zoom to 24mm to avoid accidental extension. The zoom ring is the one towards the front lens, the focus is toward the body. The collars also run counter to the objectives canon, I is not appearing at all difficult to adapt. The zoom ring is large, well rubbed, hereis hard, as I find it convenient. rnQuella focus is smaller and softer, is convenient and very precise. rnrn-Vignetting and distortion: scattanto on aps-c clearly this does not say anything. Additionally, there are features that I consider important. rnrn-comparisons and conclusions: The only competitor that I tried was the Canon 24-70 2.8. Mark I. I am not convinced at all neither for its sharpness, nor for the AF. Honestly with tammy I had suffered very much feeling. As I have already pointed out, the sharpness is good already at room temperature, with good sealing the edges. The stabilizer can be a godsend as to do nothing, that is very sogettivo, I have also tried the video and I must say that you turn by hand as if he were on a tripod. Recover in the photo is 3.5 stop the endpoint canvases and 3 stop on the extreme wide-angle (and I do not have very steady hand). The only problem, as mentioned, is in some rare cases, the bokeh onion. What can I say? the straconsiglio. Non doubt that the mark II canon is sharper, but has no stabilizer and above all cost at least twice as much! |
 | sent on September 25, 2012 Pros: Sharpness from TA - good contrast - Excellent construction (firmest) - Presence of key lock (despite the zoom does not have games and seems tight) - Stabilizer great, allows you to take time to very low without hesitation and not noisy at all (in Unlike that of the Tamron 70-300 vc) - USD rapid and very precise - Price below the Canon 24-70 series 1 and incredibly below the series 2 Cons: Maybe a little 'heavy (for me is not a problem and are not exactly Hercules: P) - Vignetting and distortion at 24mm (can be removed with 2 clicks in 10 seconds and in any case I do not mind the vignetting) - For those who use filters, mounting 82mm from those, we have to consider the expense. Opinion: EXCELLENT! There was just a good feeling. compared to 28-135 canon another planet (and God forbid!). solid construction, I enjoyed the key lock so you do not run into unexpected elongation of the lens (which happened to me on the canon). fast autofocus, stabilizer that triggers a 1/20s without thinking much the problem. a little 'pesantino but if I want to travel ultra light use other (Fujica film or mirrorless Panasonic). thought to suffer from the lack of millimeters in length (from 70 to 135 there is a difference) and yet nothing, but the 4mm less (24 against 28) I do not even think we have done. on balance (a blow to my wallet) are STRA SATISFIED purchase! |
 | sent on September 24, 2012 Pros: Sharpness at room temperature, stabilizer, motor USD very high performance, cost Cons: Filters 82mm, 24mm made corners, vignetting TA Opinion: High-performance optics, a 24mm surrender the corners improves only after F11, 35mm on the performance improves significantly. A 70mm is really good with a good focus. The engine is very powerful Tamron USD rivaling that of the Canon, the stabilizer is really great! Easily allows you to take a 1/4sec ??to 70mm. A really good lens with a quality / price ratio really great! |
 | sent on September 23, 2012 Pros: Excellent sharpness, good construction (nothing to do with the previous Tamron), large stabilization (noiseless), beautiful colors. Cons: Vignetting TA hood a little 'light. Opinion: Optical use on FF (posssiedo a 550D and a 5D mkII). On aps-c in my opinion are not interesting focal lens and the yield is less powerful. I can only compare this to the Canon Tamron 24-105 (which I own and I use to report). I think the quality is the same. The distortion at 24mm but there is less than that of Canon. Clearly the separation image of the Tamron is higher (a 2.8) but the focus is similar, so not great but good. Overall a great lens for portraits and street that boasts such remarkable plus a stabilization of both performance and low-noise operation. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
