RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on August 16, 2016

Pros: Lightweight, zoom range, stabilizer, cost

Cons: Vignetting from 100 mm up, dark (but what can you expect from an 15x zoom?), Smooth, flare

Opinion: I own this lens for about a year and I can say that I fully exploited. I think it's one of the lightest and most compact superzoom on the market and its also has very low cost, if you search for a handyman lens without fainting, and you have no need for a large aperture is ideal. The stabilizer works well, especially at 18mm, where you can also shoot at 1/8 without blur. He has made a very soft wide open, but it disappears from f5.6 to f11 and focal lowest climbing focal. It has a strong vignetting after 100/150 mm, but closing at f16 disappears almost completely. Backlit suffers a lot of flare and the risk that artifacts appear with night shots is very strong. Despite this, I do not think you can expect more at this price and with these dimendioni and weights (is roughly a little over 18-55 kit ..)

avatarjunior
sent on February 19, 2016

Pros: Price, Weight, excursion Focal, Silent, fast and accurate AF, Stabilized

Cons: Dark, Calo sharpness at the edges to extreme focal

Opinion: I bought this lens a year ago aims to do everything. The really good construction and well-balanced weight, give a sense of solidity and value of both entry-level and on the most massive bodies (Nikon D3200 and D7200). Despite plasticosità body, the rings move fluid and precise, giving a sense of precision. Good sharpness in the center of the lenses if properly calibrated with the diaphragm, slightly tends to lose and vignettare over 200m if we want to be picky. The AF is really fast and precise, and quiet, as well as the stabilizer, essential with a superzoom. Colors and Contrasts not lively, but easily correctable by car. Fully satisfied.

avatarjunior
sent on January 27, 2016

Pros: Aim to do everything with undisputed quality including handling, focal length optical stabilizer very effective, price ... everything with the necessary compromises

Cons: For wide-angle shot flaw slightly at the edges, chromatic aberazzione this but nothing obscene as many say all fixable flaws in PP ... as I said with these optics are compromises but if you do not want to change is often the lens only solution

Opinion: Rehearsed as optical handyman ... good compromise for those who are beginners and want to travel light ... Bought on ebay at a crazy price € 225 with shipping again ... I did not believe it myself all arrived on time and all new with warranty ... maybe it has remained one if I remember correctly ... but I highly recommend it, vastly improved compared to the previous, vc really good, some flaws them senz other but are acceptable given the price and the opportunities It offers ...

avatarsenior
sent on October 28, 2015

Pros: Convenient to carry, light weight, low cost, excellent companion because of his mm, do not ever miss in your bag.

Cons: How to zoom to 250 loses a bit 'on the edge, very bright, a18 of APSC does not give up, disappointed that do not give a case. Like any Tamron has the manual system ro, add inevitable, big hassle.

Opinion: I 've purchased as my first lens for my APSC, after the 18/55 supplied I dropped and broke the screw coupling (plastic). Its large extent and the advice of a friend, very satisfied, convinced me (although its cost). I must say that I took a lot with him, also published on Juza, but not all pictures have come so well, since taking over the 250 mm consumes a little 'edge. Anyway, I'm satisfied with the shopping, if I were to lose the riacquisterei, small footprint, if you happen to go to a place where the weight of the equipment is a problem with this and you'll have a APSC volume of a powershot, with the possibility of keen entertain. NB Screw metal lens hood, bag buy on amazon for a few Euros. I hope I was chiaro.ciao to tutti.rnForse system ro is migliorare.rn

avatarsenior
sent on November 24, 2014

Pros: Versatility, hike, autofocus, stabilizer, quality / price

Cons: Not too bright, derived Zoom when tilted.

Opinion: I purchased it along with the first reflex is aware of the merits of that difetti.rnE 'a handyman at the beginning allowed me to go out without constantly change objectives allowing me to practice and experimentation. rnL'ho found excellent and superior to the various 18-55 or 18-105 supplied that do not have the versatility and sometimes even the quality (distortion and vignetting) .rnIn conclusion a good buy in the awareness of the limitations that such a hike and a this quality range comportano.rnQuesta the first picture taken (unfortunately in automatic iris fairly closed) with the D7100 rnhttp: //www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php? t = 1126652 & l = itrn

avatarsenior
sent on November 24, 2014

Pros: Huge zoom range, optical stabilizer, and fast autofocus.

Cons: The sharp falls in the maximum focal

Opinion: State now that I was lent a week from my brother .... but this lens was not particularly happy with the found faint and dark .... Accustomed to my 18_55 equal to the focal found inferiore..poi a particular that bothered me in and zoom are that if you put the safety falcimente comes out and you find yourself with the camera around his neck with the zoom all out.

avatarjunior
sent on June 03, 2014

Pros: Price / quality good, focal length, weight and image stabilizer

Cons: A little bright, but at this price and with this focal length what you want?

Opinion: I bought it because of pressure from my wife, who wanted to lens a handyman, I have never forgiven the purchase of the D7100 without optics kit (18-105). Rnih a day we did about 300 photos to prove it in different situations, landscapes, portrait, children playing, etc. .., I have to say that he behaved very well, clear images and blur-free micro (the VC system works really well), the brightness is its biggest flaw in some situations we had to raise significantly the ISO.rnrnSe you are looking for a lens to do everything at a reasonable price, I highly recommend it.

avatarsenior
sent on October 16, 2013

Pros: Ability to use only one objective, without having to make changes and lose the ability to do a particular photo. Stabilizer fairly effective.

Cons: For practicality of use you lose a little bit in terms of brightness, the maximum focal length and with a 270mm MAF infinity is but just reduces the MAF you get to about 240mm, which could make him prefer the canon 55-250

Opinion: It may be a good buy for those who need practicality of using a single objective, or to learn, the only coupled 18-55 55-250 is superior. So buying this lens should be evaluated very carefully, if only for the fact that it is not (except with the MAF infinity) a true 270. Recommended as mentioned in newbies to learn without having to constantly change target, or for those who have space problems in having to manage 2 or more goals.

avatarjunior
sent on October 09, 2013

Pros: Versatility - A variation always come out with one goal

Cons: Pitch dark in many situations, the great stabilizer does not work miracles - up from 200 the image quality becomes a mirage

Opinion: When I took it seemed like a good choice, in hindsight ... is convenient because it allowed me many times to go out without purse, and switch to a landscape, to shoot a bird on a tree in 1 second, but the compromises are many: it is bright, with little light in my hand is almost always been impossible to take pictures freehand, l is is great, in my hand (very firm) compensates for 3 stops, but does not do miracles. The focus is lentina, but acceptable condition No normal, low-light and moving subjects (in particular the focal length of 200-270) is ... I would say eccentric ... because you never know who will combine. Until around 150 mm overall image quality (sharpness, vignettaura, distortion, the difference between corner and center, c) is more acceptable and less homogeneous, more and better standard of classical canon 18-55 etc. .... but above this focal the edges are impastatissimi, and dark, and also in the center, there is not much detail. IN CONCLUSION my first picture I made with him, but I do notadvice, take 2 lenses if you want a hike so great, canon 15-85 and 70-200 f4 if you want long distances, canon 10-22 and 24-105 if you love landscapes and reportage, or cm ², avoid long trips.

avatarjunior
sent on February 23, 2013

Pros: great product as factotum with this lens you can safely take pictures very beautiful in many moments to capture enough light and excellent engine excellent stabilizer for focus, zoom responds quickly to the movements of the ring would highly recommend it to every machine I use with a Nikon D60

Cons: I do not have to make negative comments but just an observation you might have a focal length a bit lower than 3.5 the ideal would be a focal length of 3.0 or 3.3 for the rest everything ok

Opinion: very happy with our purchase also are available on service and professional I have resolved quickly and with diligence really is lacking in many other companies if you have to buy a lens you can go on the quiet with this product will make great pictures at any distance using the right timing and the right aperture in manual a lot of satisfaction

avatarsupporter
sent on February 14, 2013

Pros: Practical and convenient to save time and do not miss the moment for close-ups and wide-angle lenses with good brightness, effective stabilizer.

Cons: Gaining Convenience, of course, is lost in depth than the classic canvas 28-300.

Opinion: For those like me who have to learn to use good camera and lens is on good investment, good brightness. price and quality right, I can not compare it with other paintings. The photos are sharp with good colors for both landscapes and close-ups are not too bad. Discreetly silent, but the focus seems to me quite quickly.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me