JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:AUTOFOCUS - SHARPNESS - WEIGHT - GENERAL QUALITY
Cons:COST...
Opinion:Objective that I would call simply SPECTACULAR .. With my Sony a7rIII + L Smallrig bracket everything is balanced and you can shoot safely with one hand (obviously it is not the position to prefer ..). Already at full aperture the sharpness is impressive and the autofocus does not miss a beat with Eyes track on the model (I tried the lens mainly for portrait), you can control from my shots on the site. Chromatic aberration absent as is normal for a lens of this category, pasty and circular Bokeh that detaches the subject from the background and enhances it. The only drawback for non-professionals is its cost...
Pros:Image quality, autofocus, low weight, performance with multipliers
Cons:price, if desired, clutter if compared to the Canon.
Opinion:The new FE 70-200 GM II is 30% lighter than the previous one (which I still have). But the feeling is that it is much lighter. I don't know if it's due to the fact that it's more balanced, but certainly today I shot there all day and I didn't hear it. The zoom ring is very short and close. Therefore the zooming is fast and going from 70 to 200 is a moment. A bit the same concept of the 200-600 where it is internal zoom and not even a rotation is enough to have all the zooming. Very convenient. Not making videos I can not help, but I see that there are countless switches that serve for videomakers, such as IRIS, declick and some settings of the OSS. The hood is not petal but similar to that of the 100-400 GM (but it is not compatible). Comfortable because it has a rubber edge and compared to the previous one it is easier to support it with the hood upside down. The tripod bracket is removed like the other Sony canvases, so only the foot, not the whole flange. I do not notice any particular differences in IS other than a greater general silence. The previous 70-200 GM was a bit noisy, even in AF. In the cons I wrote clutter, as it is not smaller or shorter than the previous one, and compared to the Canon it is disadvantaged in this respect. But the Canon has the big limitation of not being able to use the extenders, and has the zoom ring away from the hand and quite hard. So I much prefer this which is also internal zoom and does not extend.
Pros:Lightweight, fast, great with 1.4x and 2x, internal zoom.
Cons:f 2.8?
Opinion:After so much waiting it finally arrived but it was worth it. Light and very fast as I hoped, the unknown was the combination with the multipliers and I must say that even with the 2x maintains an excellent speed and above all a good sharpness even at 400mm !! This makes it very versatile for mountain hikes in combination with a wide angle. In deninitiva the perfect all-rounder, light, bright, fast, versatile, compact, excellent with multipliers (in apsc it becomes a 600mm f 5.6) and with the internal zoom. Rating 10
Opinion:Just unpacked, just 4 shots to understand what it is. It is incredible how light it is, it is exactly the same weight as the more than good 70-200/4 (10 g difference) and in terms of volume there is no abyss. It is also good on the A6600 as well as the aforementioned f/4, while the 100-400 is complex to handle. On the A1 with VG and 'almost too light, if you pass me the term ... Autofocus that at first glance seems definitely the fastest ever tried so far on a Sony, but it must be tried with subjects a little more complex, which I hope to be able to meet already tomorrow. I think I'm already in love...
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
