JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user47513
sent on April 19, 2020
Pros:All.. Weight, price, performance...
Cons:... maybe the brightness? Missing the distance selector of the af
Opinion:It's a gem!!! It seems to have a normal 18-135 for reflex, it is large and weighs half of a 100-400, ie 680g!!. It starts to come at a very interesting price. Closed and without a lampshade is almost in your pocket (a pocket of a vest) and weighs nothing, the zoom does not extend even holding it around the neck facing down. The autofocus for sports and photo hunting is valid, also helped by the effectiveness of the sony system and ok also the stabilizer. However, we lack the distance limiter of the autofocus, which could have been there, because the transition from infinity to the minimum distance is not very fast, we are at the level of sigma C, it takes a second, but if the working distance remains similar there are no problems,it goes very well, or in tracking with a6600 does not lose a shot even on small birds. In single AF, however, at sunset he struggles to hook colored clouds or little contrasting mountains, the same thing as the sony 200-600, a feature unfortunately of the mirrorles sony, unlike the d500 that focuses almost in the dark. I tested it right together with the sigma 100-400 (among the sharpest in the category) on d500 and the sony came out winning at all focal points and distances.there is not a huge difference, but it is more engraved and contrasted. At 350mm in the distance it makes better than sigma at 400mm.
Cons:Price and footprint (although there are much more expensive goals, but I speak as a non-professional)
Opinion:I'm not a professional in the industry. They gave me this lens that took the place of the 50-210 that I used on my a6000. A little scared by the weight (over 600 gr) but you get used to it, of course, the previous one was definitely more practical, but as a quality it is totally of another level. Remarkable sharpness, which allowed me to make high quality shots on the a6000, even at 350 mm of focal (for animals etc). I can't wait to test it on the a6400. Overall, I didn't see any weaknesses.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
