|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on December 22, 2021 Pros: Value for money, sensor and file quality, good af Cons: Build quality, battery life, high iso yield Opinion: Despite its years it is a machine that can give satisfaction. Combined with good optics it gives sharp and reasonably malleable files. The AF sector does its job. Machine in hand, the ergonomics are not particularly pleasant as well as the feeling of solidity that is not great. Another flaw is the batteries that provide a decidedly limited autonomy. The yield at high ISO is in line with the year of design and today is average. However, I must say that the car behaves well in many situations. Weight and bulk make it a friend for travelers or for those who want to be "light". Considering then the prices of the second-hand market you can take home very little. Net of everything I find it is still an attractive machine that I recommend to those who are beginners and have a limited budget. |
 | sent on November 15, 2021 Pros: FAST AF, handy, beautiful colors Cons: video , not internally stabilized , a bit complicated the menu keys but just get used to it Opinion: I'm an amateur amateur I was looking for a saving machine to take beautiful photos at 400 euros is not better, really beautiful light and fast throw away the optics with the basic kit, I took a sigma 1.4 30mm is a beautiful lens with this camera recommended to those who already know a little photography, with the menus you will find yourself really good sin for the videos, perhaps in that case use the lens kit that has the integrated stabilization |
 | sent on December 25, 2019 Pros: files quality; focus; good evf; iso estate; compactness; lightness; interfaceable commands; installable apps Cons: an extra dial would have been perfect; eye af not available in af-c; The mode ring could be better interfaced Opinion: the first mirrorless interchangeable optics I put my hand on. focus to envy many reflexes, many complain about ergonomics but if you buy this kind of machines it's because you want compactness, you feel like a panasonic and your hands are comfortable. always about ergonomics I found myself better with the a6000 than many other cameras because I have thin fingers. Many complain about chaotic menus but I found them more comfortable than canon ones (I have never been a big fan of user-friendly interfaces) but I understand that for less geeky users it is not pleasant, while with the viewfinder I found myself excellent. speaking of technical data the 24 megapixels are enough to crop pushed. the focus is very responsive and even tracking is still decent, the only thing is that you can not use the eye af in af-c forcing you to use the af-s (commercialized to sell more a6300) raw file produced by the camera (extension . ARW) should theoretically have a lossy compression, despite the fact that the produced file holds unthinkable recoveries in the past on apsc. the high yield in my opinion you should represent by comparison, but in a review it is not possible so I will just say what everyone says. works well up to 1600 iso, with the right lights it goes to 3200. with a good noise reduction and black and white I went even further. also to remember the mega burst of 11fps, but I use little during my shots. and remember the ability to adapt any vintage lens thanks to the 18mm draw. in my opinion the a6000 is good for everyone, from the professional looking for a second light and economic body to the neophyte that only starts in automatic mode and that you want to insert in the sector, to the geek who wants to experiment with fixed goals and apps |
 | sent on November 02, 2019 Pros: Image quality, portability, unparalleled value for money, build quality Cons: Inability to silence the shutter, incomprehensible instruction booklet (both in Italian and English), not tropicalized. Opinion: My hobbies are riding motorcycles and the mountains. I have been using compact superzooms (currently Lumix TZ40) for years who are loyal companions of travel and ascents. Since life is also made of normal trips, photos taken in absolute "comfort", simple walks in the mountains I felt the need to join my current superzoom, of which I have no difficulty in recognizing the countless limits optical and sensor, something more efficient and satisfying. Excluding THE FF because it is too bulky and heavy (I can also rely on my Nikon FE with ample optical kit when I want to return to film), with the complicity of Amazon for about a year I am the happy owner of an A6000 bought in kit with the 16-50 and with 55-210 to an absolutely ridiculous figure to which I then joined as first lens the Sony E35 f1.8 OSS and E50 f1.8 OSS and, for Christmas the 18-135 OSS as an all-rounder. What about... maybe in 2019 it does not make much sense to express your opinion about this machine now at the end of the race, yet I think that its purchase now is the most successful you can make since its price is constantly falling but the quality remains constant. The various improvements (apart from the tropicalization and touch screen) of some of the new models are also marginal and do not affect the original design. With this machine you go around easily with the confidence to always take home quality shots. Of course, it is better, the lenses in kit are not impressive but if you want to take photos and not count pixels to the computer, this object will give you great satisfaction. To learn all the secrets I recommend not to rely on the instruction manual but to rely on one of the third-party books written by professional photographers in which all the countless functions of the machine are accurately described and I recommend shooting and shooting again to get to know it in depth and make the most of it. It gives you great satisfaction |
  | sent on October 24, 2019 Pros: Compactness, lightness, image quality, value for money Cons: Noisy high iso files Opinion: I took it for the lightness and compactness, priceless to always go out with the car, to the limit in the pocket with the optics in kit 16-50, which will not be a champion of sharpness and quality, but that works in an acceptable and comfortable way even with movies. The price then, for a remarkable 24 mpx sensor and excellent quality, if you do not push it too much with iso, is in my opinion unsurpassed in its class. Currently I also use it as a second body paired with the Sony 7r ii, multiplies the focus of the goals for full frame and uses the same batteries, which I took in abundance. Even if the best performing models have come out, this in my opinion is still the most convenient, if you do not want to focus exclusively on the aps-c format and you want a light and versatile machine. |
 | sent on August 11, 2019 Pros: Price, viewfinder, sensor, lightness. Cons: Touch controls. Opinion: Having several e-mount lenses and the younger sister alpha 5100,I purchased in the body version the a6000 (also because personally disappointed by the 16/50 3.5-5.6 zoom they give supplied). Very nice as lightness and wearing I compared with the sister 5100 some shots with the same goals obtaining for the 6000a better quality even if the 5100 also reproduces excellent results. As a sixth mirrorless is practically at the top of my favorites along with the Panasonic Gx80 (micro 4 thirds). It suffers a bit on high iso but I prefer to set a maximum of 800isin in the evening and 100iso by day in posixion P. The autofocus is great and fast. With fixed goals (7artisans, sony, samyang) with excellent results and for its lightness is for me an alternative to my D5300 making the comparison of aps-c. Purchased from Amazon for 396 euros (body) is a fundamental brick for those who want to make great photos using specific lenses. |
 | sent on June 09, 2019 Pros: Compactness of the body, white balance, MAF, dynamic range, operating speed, tiltable display. Cons: Noise at medium/high ISO, few Sony lenses really good at human prices, not stabilized, JPEG native, display quality, battery life Opinion: I have it recently but I use it really intensely to replace, cause weight and clutter, the Canon kit I'm using I do not say much less but only when I know I need absolute of its optics L. This Sony is a very interesting camera with which if you mount quality optics The results are always very satisfactory. It is not stabilised on the sensor and unfortunately the Sony offer for stabilised quality optics is not very wide unless you are willing to spend really much. Its lens Kit 16-50mm is just decent but if you close the aperture it can give satisfactions and the focal range is enough for most situations. I personally use the machine with a Sammy 12mm F2 and a Zeiss Touit 32mm F 1.8 and I'm really satisfied so much that I think short of taking a good 50/55 mm as a tele medium. Excellent the MAF; In manual focus assistance is very good, in automatic it is fast and the recognition of the eye of the subject is perfect. Extraordinary the automatic balancing of white, practically never misses. I was amazed at the dynamic range, certainly higher than that of my Canon 6D. Defects? Those shown in the cons but nothing dramatic if you do not shoot at exaggerated ISO, the display is virtually unusable in full sunlight and batteries... Better to always have one, or as I do, two escorts. Considering that the moment I write you buy new on Italian sites very reliable to less than 380 Euro optics kit including the Straconsiglio, but I would recommend even if it cost, as I paid, a hundred euros more. Ideal to be joined to a FF kit, not necessarily Sony too. |
 | sent on June 09, 2019 Pros: Superb image quality for the price, compactness, discrete ISO hold (if Cons: JPEG Quality Opinion: Now I use it for a year and a half and never disappointed me (or when I thought, it was because I was inexperienced and I could not use it well). For the price, it's must-buy for someone like me who just takes pictures and not videos. Coupled with good lenses, the only real limit becomes only when you are forced to pick up the ISO because, past the 800, the image degrades with speed (and it is not a problem if you have a tripod or steady hand but if you have moving targets, then it becomes a problem) But at this price and for an APSC sensor, you can't ask for more. |
 | sent on March 03, 2019 Pros: Image and video quality, good ISO hold, excellent face tracking in AF-C Cons: Handle, little shutter key ' decided ', too small, uncomfortable grip, screen just enough upper ring a bit hard (this point is very personal). Opinion: I come from the Sony A58, of which I am essentially regretdoing ergonomics. The a6000 is too small and square for those who have big hands, the grip is not very strong. And it's a pity because the photographic side has nothing to fear: excellent quality of RAW, with good goals produces an incredible detail. Excellent dynamic range. The tilting screen I prefer it to the articulated one: in this way it is always in axis with the user, however the resolution is just enough and the aspect ratio is 16/9, then the lateral black bands always present. The upper ring I find it personally a bit ' hard, I prefer to use the front wheel. The shutter button does not transmit safety and solidity. I do a few videos but for what little I saw: AF in very fast video and excellent video quality. The 16-50 kit is honest, very 16 vignette but it is small and you still manage to get great photos with it. However I find it a great machine, despite the many faults compensates with the auto focus and the great image quality. |
 | sent on January 26, 2019 Pros: General quality, compactness, functions. Cons: JPEG quality in the room, lens kit, noise already at low ISO. Opinion: After a fortnight in the world APS-C SLR mainly canon, I decided to buy a Sony A6000, only body, mainly to use it with my large park of vintage lenses, some of which do not go to infinity focus on the Canon bodies. For this application I must say that I was absolutely satisfied, recovering Pentacon, the Pentax and Sekor-Mamiya to which I am very attached. I have however immediately noticed that for the use hit and run of quality, is a camera not suitable... The JPEG products in the car are to my taste indecent with all the settings tested. In sporting events where I often distribute thousands of photos "on the fly" to many friends, I hold the Canon that with the due precautions produces excellent jpg. However nothing dramatic, shooting in RAW and away, on the other hand also with Canon, in more studied events, click in this format. Other disappointment I was given by the noise, already present at low ISO... For goodness sake, under manageable development, but I expected it less invasive... here too... compared with a Canon APS-C DSLR older than several years, the DSLR wins big time. With the menu I familiarized immediately... a little chaotic, it is true, but you get used to it and in the end is not bad at all. Even the ability to install apps and connectivity are not a little pluses. Taking us taste, however, even given the convenience, I took a fixed 35 1.8 Sony and the kit lens 16-50 to be used in the light outputs. I have to say that defining the 16-50 a bottle bottom means offending the bottles heavily... Really obscene... at low focal features a vignetting that would suggest a project for another type of sensor... even distortions are unacceptable. All easily correctable... on rawtherapee They settle with a click, but it seems absurd to put on the market such obscenity, at a price from new also quite high. The 35 has a good yield, but the detail rendered sometimes leaves me perplesso...in certain light conditions also details at diaphragm a little closed, type F4, you lose... let's say it comes out with broken bones from any comparison with different vintage lenses , with the same conditions, despite the lack, in the latter, of automatisms, antireflective treatment, and stabilization. By pulling the sums, I'm definitely satisfied for the main application for which I bought it, the camera body is really well done, solid, and think that in that little space is locked so much technology and many functions really makes a certain impression. Avoid the kit lens, absolutely, at that point better a compact tip and shoot... produces better photos.... also evaluate the optics before buying them... The 35 I took it at a great price, but blindly, at full price would have been suicide. I tried to use the lenses Canon and Tamron APS-C and FF with various adapters, but I have not satisfied, AF slow and undecided, sometimes even inaccurate... so I think I will continue to use it mainly for the purpose for which I searched and bought, and for Which is really a pleasure to use. |
 | sent on January 24, 2019 Pros: Excellent value for money. Excellent photo quality with a good lens. Excellent videos in XAVC format S. Very fast focusing in the photos, even in manual with the excellent use of focus peaking. Adjustable screen. Excellent use of the integrated flash. Super Compact. Cons: Few points of phase and contrast detection. Slow focus in video (but depends on what lens you use). Lack of third party lenses with stabilizer. Mancaza Jack for microphone. Opinion: I love this car! I have it for over a year and still I get satisfactions from chills! Taken at a price: 450 euro approx. with 16-50 kits and 55-210. Spent other 300 for 50mm f 1.8 Sony and 8mm fish-eye f2.8 Samyang. Next objective: Sigma 16mm f1.4. Exceptional sensor quality; For example I tried a Samyang 35 mm f1.4 canon with Speedbooster which makes it practically become a 25mm F 1.1, a monstrous thing! Going down to F4 the sharpness is stellar for an APS-C. The same lens on his canon makes photos that you can watch. Not to mention the Dynamic Range that is comparing sacred FF monsters Canon and Nikon will dream of. Sony has worked really well on its sensors! Excellent ISO seal for an APS-C, up to 1600 almost nothing, up to 6400 definitely usable and still adjustable in PP. Very fast Autofocus in the photos, it has good phase detection points but contrast detection was. However, the autofocus speed is significantly higher than many commercially available DSLRs. Photographic part promoted with flying colors! Where it creps a little is in the video part. The quality is outstanding in XAVC s, even better than a6300 in 1080p, but you need a SD of at least 80 MB/s write. The problems are 2: autofocus and stabilization. About the first one resolves with a good goal, but still it remains quite slow in the videos. Regarding the second the stabilization is bad even in Sony lenses, I do not ask for stabilization on the sensor but at least a good stabilized lens of third parties. No matter what stabilization lens you have, there's always a need for gimbal or Steadicam. button to record randomly, scomodissimo, but apparently at Sony like since it has always put them also on the brand new a6400:( Another small problem is the lack of jack to capture the sound, but the problem is risove with a cheap recorder to put in place of the flash that records audio separately and then overlaps it in PP (those few times that you will need audio live to POS of music). Part photo rated 10. Video part rated 7.5 (Quality 10 ma Autofocus and Stabilization 5). Considering the price and the portability absolutely to have! |
 | sent on October 14, 2018 Pros: Value for money, burst speed, features from semi pro machine, portability, built-in flash, good quality raw file Cons: Considering the price it is difficult to make some critiche...se just want the quality of the viewfinder is low and the ISO is better to keep them under the 600 Opinion: If you are looking for a machine that is cheap enough to take you on excursions, travel and street trips is perfect, because it is not cumbersome, reliable and of excellent quality, at a very low price. Arm yourself with several spare batteries because you will need it, especially if you are going to shoot a few videos, also take into account the fact that after about ten minutes of video the camera will turn off for the overheating of the Sensor. |
| sent on September 21, 2018 Pros: Light and Unspacious, W-Fi, peaking focus, price, personalization functions Cons: Electronic viewfinder, keys to make us a little hand, but for what it costs is more than good Opinion: Bought by a week and the fear of not being coming from a Canon 60d was immediately exceeded, the car goes that is a marvel, to make us a habit for those who come from a different system, the focous peaking is something fantastic, even if you use goals Manuals you can very well to put in kelp, the only flaw in my opinion is the EVF, I have not yet managed to get used to and it seems that tired the eye, but I think it's just a matter of habit |
  | sent on September 21, 2018 Pros: Light and compact, very high performance AF, advanced features of MF and more, Q/P ratio, articulated screen, customization keys/nuts almost from semi pro, eye-AF (although not in AFC), Wi-Fi, electronic viewfinder, Gust... At this price what do you want more? Cons: Limits of an APS-C sensor, not excellent screen but sufficiently adequate to the expense, non-infinite optical park and at a high price, battery life (but it is known) Opinion: Bought a short time ago and I still have to dissect its potential. I state that I come from a D3300 then passed to FF with a D600 (which I do not close in the drawer). Why buy then a A6000? But of course, to reduce weight and clutter, with this little girl your back thanks! Clear, the limits of an APS-C sensor We know them especially when you have tasted the full format but are limits that in some contexts are not so obvious or however to an amateur photographer affect relatively. Stacco of the tops, crop, high ISO etc. with the right optics and especially the correct technique even the reduced size can tell its. I did not choose the elder sister (A6300) because the jump did not feel so drastic and I preferred to save a few grams/euros to invest in optics. Idem for the A6500 even if the internal stabilizer always makes a throat. We will see in the future what we will get Sony. Af very performant and seasoned by interesting and convenient features also for manual focus as focus peaking, Magnifier, eye-AF (this not in AFC, sin). Excellent burst but I still have not exploited. The electronic viewfinder (coming from a pentaprism) is one of those things that most worried me in the passage to ML but the trauma there was indeed, being able to have a slide of what will be the final shot in addition to keep everything under eye is a comfort not just! This will be the future, there is little to do nostalgic. The keys are widely customizable and the dials easy and fast access (timing, ISO, diaphragms etc.). The screen does not excels but is sufficient, but compensated by the fact that it is articulated (even if limited in movements). Great for making macro and landscapes. The Wi-Fi I had always snubled but it comes back very comfortable in file transfer contexts and remote control. The image quality seems to me very good as well as the machinability of the raw. The native optics there are even if embarrassing the comparison of quantity when compared with the two big. They also cost a lot but the quality is there. In any way there are very valid alternatives at lower prices (see Sigma C Series, Samyang...). For the battery life I was aware, nothing to add (reserve Patona and Via). It does not seem so chaotic the menu as described by many. Different from what I was used to but it takes a little to take our hand. I have not taken it for video so I do not express myself on this aspect. I hope you give me great satisfaction. |
 | sent on January 01, 2018 Pros: Compact and light; ergonomics; image quality; autofocus; integrated flash, swivel screen, viewfinder, value for money. Cons: No silent shooting; absence of stabilization on the sensor; impossible to set the minimum shutter speed in aperture priority, she decides it on the basis of the objective. Opinion: It's still an excellent buying option. I came from the world of compact, compared to which I was willing to sacrifice small in terms of weight-dimensions, but I wanted more image quality and responsiveness: I was not disappointed. After more than three years that I own it, my limits are still much higher than those of the machine ... rnThe image quality is very high, both as details and colors and dynamic range. The ergonomics, compatibly with the dimensions, is among the best: the protrusion on the handle makes the grip in my opinion more comfortable and safe than that of direct competitors (Olympus type em-10 or Fuji xt-20). The integrated flash, moreover adjustable upwards, is a great convenience and, appropriately adjusted, allows you to get shots otherwise impossible; also the adjustable LCD screen is very convenient, both to use it as the old "cockpit" cameras (photos to children, stolen shots, etc.) that, on the contraryrio, to take pictures from above. Autofocus is fast, even if the a6300-6500 seems even better. The kit kit 16-50 is more than decent, very clear at the center and, closing at f8, decent even at the edges; in practice, you make landscape photos printable at 100x70 with excellent quality. It is stabilized, which helps, but for photos in the evening or indoors it is a buietto (like all the kit objectives, except the fuji 18-55), you need to help yourself with the flash. But it has small size (with the kit mounted you can put the a6000 in the pocket of the jacket, and, thanks to the fact that the a6000 is comfortably held in one hand, make photos otherwise impossible with other more cumbersome equipment) and weighs just over 100 grams : this means that it always finds its space, even in a very compact bag, so you can go out with a more specific lens mounted, and still have the kit as a spare wheel for any unscheduled shots. Other value, the field angle of 24mm is equivalenton FF, wider than the Olympus kit (28 eq.) and Fuji 18-55, it is very useful for landscapes; moreover, shooting in RAW and removing the objective correction, has an opening of about 14.5mm (21-22 eq.) and a moderate fish-eye effect, due to the distortion, which can be exploited for particular shots. As for the other objectives, the a6000 undeniably gives the best of itself with quality standards; my favorite is the Zeiss Touit 32mm, with which the beauty of the photos is really special; but, even if the optical park is not provided as the Fuji and micro 4/3, there are still many quality options (for those who want to get oriented, there is a very well done post by Roberto P in the forum dedicated to the mirrorless Sony lenses ). Finally, a gem for those who want to focus on Sony is the ability to buy for 50 euros the Capture One pro photo-development software, in my opinion much higher than Lightroom; in this regard, it must be said that, always if you want the maximum from the a6000 (such asmoreover applies to all the others), shoot in raw and develop with Capture One allows you to have, even without invasive interventions, a final photo definitely superior to the "ready" jpg. |
 | sent on November 10, 2017 Pros: Construction; Ergonomics; 1080P 50Mb stunning; Autofocus Fast. Cons: Lack of input jack for external microphone; Non-tilting screen for selfie mode; Belt hinges invented by a serial drunkard. Virtually non-existent optical stabilization. Opinion: I have now purchased this Sony a6000, choosing it between 5100, 6300 and 6500, for a quality / price ratio. In fact on Amazon it's 540 € with the 16-50 Kit which is all about a perfect opt ??for starting out and still getting nice things out. rnrnI do not understand sincerely what to write that the optics is stabilized when it trembles with Parkinson's. The autofocus is fantastic, really, it's exactly what everyone says. Never tried an AF so fast and efficient. Great ergonomics, very small and light, but to put it in your pocket it takes an even more flat look of 16-50. Remember that to record with the XAVCS codec (which you should prefer as AVCHD's best), you will need to purchase a minimum 64GB SDXC with high read and write speeds. I got a Kingston from the top 90 / 80Mb price. rnrnWith the Gray coloring it has a rough matt finish (like the 6300/6500) compared to the black instead of smooth glossy like the black a6000. rnRegge the iso up to 1600 fairly well, but I would not push it further. Integrated external flash that could save you, as much as useless as all integrated flashes. rnTrack for video recording in the most uncomfortable position of video recorder history.rnrnThank you very happy about purchasing, but you need a steadycam or a Gimbal to shoot decent video. |
 | sent on October 14, 2017 Pros: light, compact, short draw, viewfinder (in the sense that it is there), rendered ISO in relation to the format. Cons: file quality, color, white balance, shortage of original wide-angle optics, operating speed, lag viewfinder, and just enough resolution. Opinion: I review this camera after two years of use, taken to leave the reflex home of fact this never happened, the first kit is FF Reflex. In the Apsc field I come from a Nikon D7100 held for the same time period, I can draw a comparison between the two based on the experience of use, I have a decent raw archive obtained with the two Apsc and I realize that the ML does not it holds the comparison, at least for those that are my tastes. I find the Sony file in a little detailed and with colors out of focus. In daylight, Sony is appreciated by returning pretty good files so much to make a difference, but when it falls in the evening, especially at 100 ISO, long, nothing to do, it should be put back on the bag. The ISO seal is pretty amazing for the size of this ML, from this point of view the D7100 can only look (I was never out of 2000 and I did not like it), Sony allows me to leverage the 3200 fairly easily, provided that it does not wrong exposure because in recoveries it returns to lose in comparison with the reflex. The white balance istotally unreliable, the post is always necessary if anything else to recover this problem (relative to me that I always jump in raw). Overall slowness and frequent sight lags are the price to pay for the product class (although I did not pay for it at a little while), as well as the viewfinder resolution just enough to remember to have a camera in your hands . rn In some areas it is unbeatable, put on a micrometric slide because of its compactness / lightness, it makes it easy to make stackable even with slides not too precise. However, I had problems using it with extension tubes, in fact the viewfinder was dark to the point of not allowing to locate the focus point. The indisputable strength lies in the short draw, everything can be mounted, and experiments, even with non-photographic lenses, are easy to use thanks to focusing systems (peacking, though not too precise). rnEasy to use with some adapters equipped with elicoide for macro focus, useful not only in the real macro but also to minimize the minimum distance of MAF, stuff that on a reflex it is also impossible to even think. One of the reasons that does not allow me to use it properly is the shortage of original high quality widescreen lenses, and appropriate to the car (12/24 seems to me to be disagreeable). rnSee in short the lack of a 10mm fixed or something alternative to 10/18 F4, to be understood, an equal choice of the reflex world. rnChi says that Sony should do washing machines is actually wrong, should make Apsc lenses because it is a useful format to stay compact and the Samyang alternatives just fit into a stingray machine like this where a quick MAF could be needed on short distance. With a 16/50 series of lenses, no infamy nor praise, as long as you do not pretend too much. By lending the enthusiasts coming from the Nikon reflex world I can only admit I do not understand them at all, so I definitely think the personal taste factor brings me toto allow buyers to make more than one turn with this ML before deciding to buy it. |
user72446  | sent on September 27, 2017 Pros: Dimensions, Lightness, File Quality, Speed Cons: Noise beyond the 3200 iso, Noise Shot. Opinion: Since I come from Canon 6d + 24-105L / 50stm / 16-35L and many more optics bought and sold over time, sold all for the need to have a very portable camera, I come across this Sony. I could have opted for a top model as the 6300 and 6500 were already available, but I have to say that I've never had the best choice. Working in pairs with fixed optics such as the 16mm 2.8 Sony, the 35mm OSS 1.8 Sony and a Zuiko 50mm 1.8 of the 1980's with its adapter adapter all I need in very little space. (very little to say too much, they really come in a bag) the quality of the files is great, clicking on Raw + Jpeg I choose which files I can postproduce with Capture One (thanks to the Sony option I paid only 50 euros perpetual license ) Very fast and with many more focus points than my old Canon, Discovering the Focus Peaking and its many options I found the true pleasure of taking a picture. and in fact within 5 months I have made more shots than manynot done with 6D in 2 years. The real thing about this car is the transportability of the quality of the files that it forces, and for those who, like me, often travel with friends in motion or with couples or in places where cmq there is also the need to to optimize space, this ML was a salvation! The real thing I regret with respect to the 6d are the photos taken from 3200 iso to climb where the cmq noise is seen and is remarkable compared to the old Canon files where at 12,800 iso I could get nice photos. But I'm really a few times where I need Iso so Alti.rnrnper about 16-50 as a kit I understand it's not an exceptional lens, but I invite you to look at my gallery and evaluate the actual yield of optics, considering that the postproduction I apply is really basic, without invading the file too much. This is to say that when I use the term '' sucker '' I always perplexed.rnrnCONSIGLITISSIMA !!!!! |
 | sent on August 29, 2017 Pros: Lightness, size, ergonomics, burst, operational speed, raw quality up to iso medi Cons: High yield iso, jpeg, colors, battery, viewfinder Opinion: Very compact and lightweight car, I always carry with me and for the price you can find I can recommend the purchase. Unfortunately, the kit lens is not at all alike (distortion to the absurdity limits and sharp drop in the edges) and the alternatives are few and expensive. I find ergonomics also great for large hands and the accessibility of the main functions is from reflexes. The operating speed, when not jammed, is great. The raw are good but not amazing: the sake of the incarnate has never satisfied me and the colors, even though working on white balance. Personal opinion apparently. Also there is a bit of noise already in iso medi (400, 800) but it does not bother too much. Already from the 1600s if you snap with little light it is annoying and the details are affected. I find it almost useless at 6400 iso. It has a good recovery of lights and shadows and a good dynamic range. He kicks herIt is difficult to spare, it is indispensable to have a spare. The autofocus in turn is very fast and offers many settings, but it does work a bit when the light is shorter. Other negative is the electronic viewfinder, under the sunlight is almost useless. I do not know what competitors or newcomers do, so I can not go down heavy. I've listed the limits even though my comparison meter is a d700 (over 1000 shots with a battery and top sensor in everything) buying it I thought the age difference allowed her to approach my "old" FF. Ultimately with good light it is a pleasure to use it and the comfort and quality that comes with very little effort are still a luxury. I still have not tried it with optics worthy of luck. A negative note about jpeg: tried for necessity I was a bit disappointed (I thought that at least iso bass and under the sunlight did not look artifacts). rnConcludendo, I would go back to buy again but above all for good value for money and for its lightness. I do not know what the other Aps-c's offer now. The advice for those who want a light, economical and versatile machine with a satisfactory quality anyway. rnAgrication: thanks to some discussion on forums I solved the problem of mysterious (working on Acr profiles) and I can tell you a lot more satisfied with the raw file. The a6000 is a real miniature bomb, only the small choice of optics. |
| sent on July 25, 2017 Pros: Ergonomics made to high ISO applications sony great value for money Cons: Battery charger Opinion: I was amazed by this car, coming from nikon I was fascinated by the world of fuji, but trying to work the fuji files there was always something that was not or therefore decided to go to sony a6000 and I do not regret it nikon or anything else, I invite you to watch the photo on my milky street profile made with a6000 + lens kit 16 50 |
 | sent on March 21, 2017 Pros: Size, design, ergonomics, build quality, display, burst, AF, low ISO quality, recoveries, videos. Cons: Yield at high ISO (already at 3200 is in crisis), 1/4000, messed up menu, no input for microphone, timelapse app available for purchase separately. Optical park with few alternatives. Distressed sensor with subjects in the distance, screen not readable in sunlight and rough white balance under certain conditions. Opinion: With the A6000 there was a continuous relationship of love and hate to the point of having sold and bought it twice. The camera is very fast in general, as AF and burst and operation. AF in addition to being fast is also very precise, as well as my old Reflex and maybe even better. The menu I find really complex and in my opinion poorly organized. On the ergonomics nothing to say, it is very comfortable and holds very well in your hand as long as you do not mount disproportionate optics that unbalance the camera. The battery life is not the best, if you shoot a lot does not arrive in the evening. Update after months (years) of more or less intense use: exceptional camera still today (2019), never disappoints, once accustomed to the menu and all its settings, you manage to bring home very satisfactory results; excellent sensor even if it kneads the subjects a little in the distance. Inseparable companion of travel and adventures. Updated rating: 8 |
 | sent on March 11, 2017 Pros: compactness and robustness, elegance and completeness of functions. Price End of career lined up for competition at the difference that the presentation three years ago. Cons: slowness' of the 'menu, lacking the usual charger to avoid having to stop filming when you download an item, small built-in flash, firmware defects of small entities', is missing an accessory battery grip up to the demands. Opinion: Mirrorless now entry level but much more 'dignified system in the Sony E-mount, where sometimes targets cost much more' than those for FF reflex.rnSi could to release a firmware update to improve the performance of the buffer in RAW. But in the complex and 'a machine for every need that has nothing to envy to the sisters (EXCEPT MAYBE IN SPORT AND JOURNALISTS IN ACTION) or to competitors such as Canon and Fujifilm. |
 | sent on February 17, 2017 Pros: compact, portable, good the video portion, affordable price Cons: menu absurd, ridiculous battery life, annoying lag in the viewer, missing the shoe cover Opinion: Taken to have a quality machine to take the place of the SLR kit with the standard zoom (comfortable but as quality is not feasible for a press). It has all the advantages and disadvantages of ML beginning with the embarrassing battery life, resolved by taking a compatible complete with a charger (which is not provided in the kit). The vision in the viewfinder is still affected by a delay sometimes annoying as well as the times when it stops between shots, and the 'other. Great the orientation features, compactness and of the whole machine finish. The menu is quite complex and the core functions are mixed with other patently useless, perhaps a little too prosumer. Some bugs type the 'zeroing Zoom and settings upon shutdown could be resolved with a simple firmware upgrade. The files are beautiful full-bodied, jpg churning machine tend cold. rnIl price, especially now that I'm out the new models is very attractive. With good optics is lost compactness but the quality is ottima.rnNella packaging is not including the flash shoe cover cap (3 euro on a popular online store), a fall of style for a home like Sony. |
| sent on February 01, 2017 Pros: very compact body, monitor and viewfinder of a good standard. Now it is just. Ability to mount optics vintage. Cons: optical cost. Overall menu. devaluation Opinion: Great product that, combined with optics of a certain level, offers benefits in line with the best SLR Nikon and Canon. Mounting his bundle lens becomes almost pocket. Resistance to really good high iso, lightning-fast autofocus. I did not like the complexity of the menu, to change the parameters it takes time. The optics are expensive and few. For the rest is a good system, perfect for those who want to start limiting the upfront costs. To make a jump you have to take one or the Zeiss 16/70 18-105 |
 | sent on December 19, 2016 Pros: Size, reactivity, AF, image quality iso minimum, resolution, viewfinder, good customization buttons, possibility to use any optical adapter. Cons: noisy as soon as you raise the ISO, EVF just enough, battery life, unwieldy physical buttons, missing level Opinion: to replace the grip of a NEX5, whose main defect the absence of the viewfinder and a poor display. A6000 in the image quality, with such a high resolution, it is very good only the minimum ISO. Raising them will immediately notice the noise and requires intervention of reduction being raw development. This is very workable in development and allow excellent recoveries of the shadows, just below the Nikon peers but a little better in the estate on the highlights. The viewfinder has just enough: on a sunny day on the snow did not see almost nothing, if it becomes a little dark shells quite a lot and the vision is very contrasted. In particular conditions, like dark clouds in the sky, the sun and then dark again, you notice an annoying glare (only in the viewfinder). Possibility finder adjustment even for presbyopic. Menu not well optimized, improved by Nex bad management but still much to do. The buttons are all configurable and is excellent news, unfortunately, they are difficult to find being flushthe camera body, you often have to take your eye from the viewfinder to see the position. A bit of camber and everything would be solved. With the gloves are unusable. Very comfortable the possibilities provided by using manual focus lenses, the magnifier settable image to a button (I recommend the one next to the shutter button) to peaking in 3 intensity and with different colors. Lacks the bubble, so many possibilities of bkt both in continuous and not. Af with a lot options and very responsive and precise with 16-70 sony, a little more cumbersome with the kit lens. rear display unusable with such external light, missing one st by efficient and if you forget to put the switch to off when you have the machine shoulder this stays on and drain the battery in a jiffy. The battery still lasts approximately 3-400 shots. The barrage is remarkable for a 24mpx, also the buffer is not bad especially if you put in jpeg (here I did a few tests but the first impression was not the best). Possibility of remote control infraredEven with a smartphone and an app is more control shooting. Possibility to install only an SD card.Come all machines require optical quality for quality shots, but given the high resolution here the issue is more delicate. Flash pretty ridiculous, on video..passo (there is a dedicated button). The battery charges only via micro USB plug, it lacks an external battery charger. Finally value - very good price. |
 | sent on December 01, 2016 Pros: Ease of use, small size, auto focus, photo quality, burst! Cons: ISO noise even at low, too bright viewfinder elttronico Opinion: After years of Nikon SLR, I bought almost by accident a sony alpa-3n for work and found it fantastic qualities, I convinced him to take the top range of mirrorless and not wrong, after one year of use I am absolutely delighted, on I have not used the Reflex. Counting that most of my photographs are dedicated to landscapes and atrofotografia, cost and choice of targets was rather easy: there are excellent guides at reasonable prices (Samyang)! As for the photographic hunting I found a good compromise with the expensive but well done sel24-240 for APSC (which divente become an excellent 36 * 360mm) - (Today admirably sostituzito with super teel Sigma 150600 Sigma MC11 with adapter ring) the real advantage of this mirroless is the compactness and ease of use and speed in choosing delel settings, with live view. Battery not too durable, but just as with other machines giarare with at least two charged batteries. Perhaps the biggest flaws that are reflected due to the iso noise for astrophotography I trovato too high, nonostate the absence of light and clarity of the sky, and finally the electronic viewfinder pollution: too bright for my eyes, it is hard to recognize the fire at best and tired in the long time the eye. Truly a great jewel, counting also the possibility of wi-fi and some free and other applications very well made payment. |
 | sent on November 02, 2016 Pros: Compactness, weight, picture quality, value for money, autofocus. Cons: Controls, high ISO performance, noise, requires high-level objectives, and only enough screen viewfinder, battery life. Opinion: I state that I am using from 2 months after using for years a Nikon D7000rnSono two different worlds, sometimes overlapping but not comparable not so much in performance as in the type of utilizzo.rnProvo to explain my impressions detailing the pros and contro.rnMolto compact, compared to a DSLR with kit lens you can comfortably put in a baby carrier and forget about her. This is the real advantage, combined with low weight, you can take comfort in every situation and it carries with incredible ease. My laps in the mountains or by bike are no longer an ordeal and traveling (by air) it can hold in a large pocket or a handbag microscopica.rnL'ergonomia perhaps is not the best if you have big hands, but not is my problem. The price is now adjusted to that which provides a system of this type. I find it impossible to pay a APSC over 1000 €. But it is my point of vista.rnL'autofocus was my real concern but until now I have never putcrisis. In low light, however, the performance declines, especially in precision. You can compensate by installing good optical light (and expensive) or at least going to manual focus, not for everyone and not for all situazioni.rnIl sensor is great, it allowed me to recover files from lights and shadows would otherwise be thrown away, RAW have a wide margin of processing and this is a big vantaggio.rnLa natural color rendering not my thing, but being very workable RAW you can squeeze bene.rnL'utilizzo is different from that to which it is of course with a reflex, not the 'I have never felt for action shots, concerts, photographic hunting and maybe I would not dream of farlo.rnParlando subjectively loses much of sense to use with heavy and bulky optics, altering both usability and functionality. Useless to have a body to 300g with a view mounted that weighs twice as much and cluttered almost as much a practical reflex.rnNell'uso the controls I found them a bit 'cumbersome, but customizingferrules and practicing with the functions that we need more, with two steps you get to do what you want. Of course do not expect the rate of use of a camera with LCD screen or a mirrorless with scales of nuts and obiettivo.rnUn big advantage is to be able to adapt optical vintage (manually) with the focus facilitated by the large focus peaking.rnDue flaws are the following. Being quite dense sensor, it requires high-level optics to make the most, negating the low initial cost. Another problem is that the sensor generates a lot of noise (when compared to the D7000) although on paper will say no. I do not understand if my copy, but already from 800 ISO under certain conditions pulls out a horrible digital noise. You can get around by mounting optical light, so you can maintain the ISO bassi.rnLa definition and screen brightness are really at the limit, the electronic viewfinder is rather bright but poorly defined. On balance issues they are unimportant. Alreadybeing able to see the result of the parameters (speed, aperture, ISO) set in real time are notevole.rnLa really poor battery life advantage, especially in the videos (I do not do), if you smanetta very course menu with drinks . If you have the habit of looking through the viewfinder and use the screen with care you will still arrive at a fair number of shots. Better to buy a spare battery anyway. |
user92328 | sent on October 20, 2016 Pros: The detail that Sony produces does not change it with anyone and the truth is in HR to 24 MP, you see them the goodness of a sensor.... Natural and three-dimensional files... Unbeatable value for money, stupendous sensor that returns excellent colors and details, high-level JPG, stratospheric shadow recovery (even from black pitch come out unimaginable details) but also on the high lights the recovery is excellent, high yield ISO If you know how to use, buttons all manageable with one hand, a nice feeling of robustness... With the battery I make about 400 photos at 24 Mp in Raw + JPG... The monitor I use it with satisfaction even under the burning sun, but in case there is the viewfinder for those very few really difficult cases with very strong light......... Cons: It lacks the level and I find it inconceivable, but using the grid lines for the rule of thirds helps a lot... There is no silent shot or maybe I did not find it..? For me this little girl is just beautiful... it certainly has some defect as all machines of course, even the flagship from 7000 euros have flaws and becomes incomprehensible with all the money spent, instead, here with €500 the quality is so high That you forget some flaw, that then at the end of what defect you can talk with €500 spent when producing files on par with machines that cost a bang....??? Opinion: Choosing the a6000 my expectations were really high, but not only were they respected but they were outdated, so to say that I am satisfied it is reductive... The recovery of Shadows, in my opinion, is at very high levels, and as an example is better than a thousand words, take a look at this photo where below between the comments I put the original file www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&bk=&t=1938566&show=5...... the shot is Clearly wrong because I had just bought the car, so it was set badly, but out of curiosity I wanted to try to see that recovery was possible... On 19 June 2017 I add that, the stain is really gorgeous, high overall yield, of entry level has Only the price but then releases files of great quality, does not end up amaze me... "About the 16-50 in the kit, someone complained but I like a lot..." After about 8 months that I have the a6000 and with almost 12000 shots, I can only talk not well but very good and the advice to everyone, for my needs satisfies me fully and being small is always with me, luckily that ML there,:D:D... I add that: if everyone put the files in HR I think that so many people would realize that a small Sony like this gives you photos as more expensive machines, and with this I said everything... |
 | sent on October 16, 2016 Pros: af lightning and gusts, compact, ergonomic, performance sensor. Cons: monitor and viewfinder in low light are ridiculous, the most obsolete and least expensive Nikon J1 and v1 the tear. poor battery life. Opinion: I was intrigued by this little "gem" we are talking about a lot of good. so I jumped at an opportunity and I can only confirm what was widely read. unfortunately monitor and viewfinder, low light, are shameful and resemble those belonging to the first digital compact ... However neo tolerable and rewarded by the gorgeous files that churns out. recommended. |
 | sent on June 23, 2016 Pros: Size, AF system, quality photographs, countless functions Cons: battery life, electronic viewfinder Opinion: I wanted a small car and high performance affiancrae to my Canon 5d and seen the high costs of the A7 my choice fell on this beautiful Sony camera. Found at a great price I presasenza the fly. Beautiful and light, produces jpg beautiful and ready to use, Raw lavorabi and holds up acceptably chart at ISO 3200. However I still prefer my SLR as ergonomics and ease of uso..e then will be the future, but the electronic viewfinder can not digest it ... beautiful, full of information etc etc but the delay and the feeling of "mal sea ??"that generates soparttutto when the scene becomes dark not soporto.Ripeto: if I have to choose which machine to shoot for now reflex life. Let's say you did not fire the love for this ML. Definitely try with higher performance than the zoom lenses as good 16-50 lightly but to limit dell'utilizzabile as photographic performance, but for now it remains relegated to its more easy as point: with family outings, little weight, so surrender.I forgot: a second battery to be taken absolutely seen the short duration of the same especially if you are used to high-level autonomy Refelx and biblical. Anyway I recommend it to all who want a lightweight body all or most of the potential of a reflex.rnrn |
 | sent on January 19, 2016 Pros: especially compact, compact viewfinder side, 16-50 compact, high ISO Cons: devaluation when it comes out the next model, optical difficult to sell Opinion: I went from sony A7 + RX100 to this ML for one body to carry in your pocket with the 16 50. I scared the fact of passing from Zeiss optics to sony 16 50 but I have no regrets. I chose the camera especially for the compact lens 16 50 which makes the machine pocket and the ability to mount optical vintage. Its direct competitor the fuji xt1 I was not impressed with 18 because 55 is as big as the A7 and would much prefer the latter. Needless to couple it with long lenses and heavy so best to take otherwise directly A7r with a 2.8 or 35 14 70 (a7 of the fact I was not satisfied ghosting flare). Outstanding at high iso: in principle I would say that 2500 iso a6000 meet the 640 canon 50d or 1600circa the 5d or 5/6400 of the A7 in practice for my purposes I could not ask for more, mold size 45x30 and 2000 ISO images are acceptable. Viewfinder and then pivoting eccezzionali.AF are amazing, better than the A7 a bit 'less powerful SLR midlevel although for myuses (views-portraits) is completely unnecessary since use of the manual. |
 | sent on January 17, 2016 Pros: Density sensor, viewfinder, ability to customize menus, structural strength, small size, ergonomic handle Cons: Battery life, connection difficulties (with Samsung) Opinion: I'm using it only for a few months and have yet to discover the right settings for different shooting situations. It seems to me a very versatile camera and challenge it gives a good impression of solidity. Very convenient menu fast and comfortable, in bright light (but not only), the electronic viewfinder is not present on the younger sister a5100. The 16-50 in kit does not allow to exploit the sensor density, better cost targets or very sharp (such as the sigma 60), you can then cut out without problems of loss of qualità.rnFantastica the compactness and the (relative) lightweight which allow you to bring it along (even with some goal) in a normal bag effortlessly. rnOccorre study it well and strive to obtain the highest quality of immagine.rnQualche perplexity by the battery that has a life reduced to avoid eliciting quick charger and spare battery on long runs. rnPer some reason (as yet unanswered) I am not so far managed to find a way to connect it permanently to SamS3.rnConsigliata sung, especially those who want to get good photos without investing high digits and a "feeling" towards semi-professional. |
 | sent on December 09, 2015 Pros: yield sensor, AF speed, compactness, versatility, coupled viewfinder - tilt monitor, aesthetic quality, quality, reliability. Well suited to the use of manual lenses, vintage, etc. Cons: Menus and functions excessive and wasteful, kit lenses lacking on telephoto (from 200 up above), on which we must seek in the manual lenses. Opinion: I have the A6000 October 2014, then to now more than a year and a month and over 5000 scatti.rnMi feel very comfortable, his real strength is the high quality of the sensor but to give the best dev 'it is combined with optical sibling. Among those I have certainly the Sony Zeiss 24 / 1.8 ZA, the Sony 10-18 / 4 oss, Sony 50 / 1.8 OSS. Zoom Sony 55-210 / 4.5-6.3 (taken in kit) makes up the sensor only in good light and preferably not at TA, while the 16-50PZ is usable on A6000 preferably not with very short focal. Generally on this sensor they tend to prefer fixed focal or zoom in top quality: the Sony stabilized 10-18 / 4, 18-105 / 4, the Zeiss 16-70 / 4. Cost, but on second is not difficult reperirli.rnUn great strength I find in the monitor tilt, useful and convenient, much more than other monitors booklet macchine.rnCompattezza: I have a kit with the A6000 "fixed" 4 AF optics that putin a handbag HAMA about 22x20x12, and advancing even a bit 'of space for 16-50PZ, wanting ... rnBatteria: it is true that it is small and has a capacity of about half compared to the SLR, but charges in approximately a 'Now virtually any USB hole with amperage decent, even during the lunch break or while downloading photos to PC (connecting the machine directly), and if you disable many unnecessary features (from "compact") that on a machine like this are also embarrassing, the battery life becomes more than sufficient to cover a long photographic output. I do not have a second battery, and do not feel the need, once I loaded the A6000 from 25% to 80% charge in the drive of about 40 minutes from the cigarette lighter and accessory telephone carica.rnAF: Fast, a sword, never had any type of problem in many different lighting conditions. In any case, the manual focus is fruibilissimo and easy soprattuttto activating the focus peaking with which a check is very well alsoshallow depth of field. I use it sometimes on optical AF.rnSono very pleased and I think I'll use it for years to come, then we will see what will bring out the mercato.rn |
 | sent on November 08, 2015 Pros: SLR performance with compact dimensions from, fast and accurate AF, manual focus peaking in fantastic good up to ISO 3200 Cons: Battery life, few targets emount Opinion: I come from a variety of SLR Sony (A200 A350 A58) past the Mirrorless not a whim or excessive weight due to the photographic material to take but just 'cause I stole all the equipment, therefore I preferred to go to the Sony a6000 especially to have a equipment to take with me.Dopo few days lost due to understand all the many features I realized I had available a device that allowed me to do (better) what 'I did before with the camera, but with a footprint minimum and qualitivamente for amateur use definitely fantastic. |
| sent on April 24, 2015 Pros: Size, weight, build quality, menu simple and effective, manual adjustments very fast and well accessible by the thumb, images of high quality !!! Cons: Well the desktop charger in package could put it as the battery for those accustomed to the reflex lasts less than half so you have to always have 2 charges if you want to get a full day with the a6000. Opinion: 2C hours on the neck and forget it !!! Who has a nice outfit reflex can capirmi.rnL'unica flaw that for now I can tell about the park optics, the one that comes in the kit has mini size and really not bad, but for those used to the optical nikkor 2.8 1.8 and 1.4 really poor in sharpness, while for the colors to be more than it is bene.rnL'aternativa zeiss 16 70 I want to buy but no one and I mean no one has done a full review in Italian, maybe comparing it with optics of this caliber, we speak a zeiss 1000 euro, then saw the rest of the market should offer the same performance of 24 70 nikkor.rnLa competition does not offer anything except sigma who put on the market with three fixed lenses and mount attack but that is said by those who possesses not a granchè.rnSpero that sony is decided as soon as possible to introduce a 17 50 or similar good quality mount and mount so as to prevent the owners of these "compact" to buy the various rings to fit other ottiche.rnAggiungo that if you have any doubt sull'acquisto Ilce a6000 can have sweet dreams, did not disappoint, it at high iso it throughout the resto.rnrn |
 | sent on December 25, 2014 Pros: Small, compact, lightweight Cons: Body seems "delicate", menu too broad, too many features to be compact. Opinion: Personally I am disappointed by purchase, I take pictures in the manual and are in favor of camera bodies where maximum ten seconds can set any parameter. By a6000 there are too many settings. The focus and fast but slow indoor outdoor. I used to use the viewfinder and live view to focus such as macro. The screen for the focus and worse than a 600d. Overall, a nice car, but I go back to the old mirror. |
| sent on September 08, 2014 Pros: Dimensions / weight, yield sensor. Cons: Battery life, poor optics park. Opinion: I took the A6000 after having a Micro Kit 4: 3, Fuji XE-1 and 2, Nex-6 ... I 've taken more than anything else to use for all those outputs read, where the Canon 6D stays at home. . I was a little skeptical on the sensor still denser than the Nex-6 .. I have changed my mind! From what I've noticed the noise of the old Nex to 1600 ISO here it is in 3200 ... Really good job by Sony! White balance improved, with good operating speed AF at the top of the class .. There are still cons: battery life, AF in low light still a little slow, park poor optics for now if you do not use adapters .. |
| sent on July 03, 2014 Pros: Autofocus and burst, covering AF points, dimensions, controls and customization sensor (dynamic recovery), video department. Cons: Af in low light, lack of accessories, photo review, development Raw absent, and level. absent, selection points maf no immediate safety time in the car iso absent, raw 12 bit Opinion: 26egrave; higher (slightly) to 24 Mpxl the D7100. Recovery is less noisy in the shadows, and the banding is less obvious; but it comes to recoveries extremes. Instead, in situations where there is a sudden transition from darkness to light (eg a face that has a part exposed to the sun and the other in the shade) I have not seen the obvious noise that instead the D7100 was afloat even at low iso . * But after several thousand shots the difference between 12 bit and 14 bit raw at times sente.rnLa supplied as other sony series is lacking, there is not even the flash shoe cover over body cap and lens cap (if kit). The USB charging is only useful in some cases, much better than an external charger; tralaltro times by charging usb are greater, but not the collegherei never that of the car if not protected. Basic multilingual manual, pretty useless. To me, the A6000 does not come cheap, it costs the right. * As there are several limitations; from the viewfinder to the operating speed dictated by the electronics think. If you take una gust, for example, you can not simply change the drive mode, you have to wait for it to finish writing the file on the development scheda.rnManca raw and you can not even download applications, tralaltro apart from some app I find them quite useless. * The machine becomes very slow when the app is running. Bad review of the photo; Slow zoom in (tested with card from 95MB / s) and low in the definition of raw. For the wi fi, I found much better system of samsung nx. To put in mod. aircraft that do not exhaust the battery in a hurry please. I took 700 photos and 15 minutes of video with 2 batteries and the second still had 23% charge. Not bad direi.rnPer the rest is a great machine, light, compact and excellent performance that does not make me regret a reflex aps-c, except for the choice of targets, however, is almost good, * even the operating speed is even lower. The electronic processor (which you will) is not up to exploit the potential and the speed of* Add operazioni.rn after use with 5 goals sony (sel1650, sel16f2.8, sel35f1.8, sel501.8, sel55210) to fund the 24 Mpxl are too many. The optics mentioned make it better 16 Mpxl precedente.rn * details added on 30 08 14 |
user37370 | sent on June 11, 2014 Pros: Size and portability with excellent ergonomics, very good sensor, autofocus and burst, electronic viewfinder of excellent quality, customization and quick menu commands, good choice 20mm range goals? 60mm Cons: Poor choice targets ultra wide and telephoto, battery capacity less than the SLR, tripod QR attack that prevents the rotation of the monitor Opinion: After less than a year with a FF DSLR, I decided to go to the mirrorless world to gain portability. FF and related optical pultroppo always remained in casa.rnInizialmente, to stay on FF, I was directed to the A7. By a factor of choice and cost lenses instead I decided to go back to a smaller sensor. Excluding the m4 / 3 system, the choice was between Fuji and Fuji Nex.rnAlla I finally excluded mainly for the known problems with the software development raw (use lightroom 5). The lenses of medium quality sony then, generally, they cost a little bit less whereas the situation is balancing on the high quality ones (the Sony Zeiss). The body Sony also generally costs less. Among other things, this was not a lens in fuji pankake ultraportable such as the 16/50 which among other things is given in the kit (I admit, however, that does not have the same quality as fuji 18-55) rnIl system Sony has a very good choice targets between 20 and 60 mm (also including the sigma) while it is lacking on the canvas (there is only the 55-210, great but little brightnessknow) and pushed on wide (for now only one and one sony zeiss - while in the future it will be interesting Samyang 12mm). My needs were, however, to have two generic goals (16-50 and 55-210) and a fixed street quality (Zeiss 24 1.8). The system sony for me was so perfect. In the future then, you probably will extend the 50 1.8 for portraits (24 1.8 already allow me good things) and will be released if maybe the samyang.rnIn conclusion I then took the kit with 16-50 and 55-210 as an additional lens and the 24 1.8 Zeiss.rnDopo a couple of weeks of use and a short trip I can say I find very bene.rnLa portability is fantastic and is maintained very good ergonomics. In the bag into a backpack and can not seem to bring along anything (on a tripod dimensioned these weights is too much light) rnI controls are very customizable and you can find their ideal configuration. The quick menu is in fact completely editabile.rnIl optical viewfinder does not regret the optical ago, innzi offers many advantages (magnification focus, depth of field vision direct vision direct exposure, histogram, etc ...). It is known only in low-light situations (photo by 1600iso up) a slight grain in mirino.rnL 'autofocus is really very handsome. With lenses that take advantage of the hybrid system is the same, if not more effective, than many SLR systems. The cover of points then it's amazing. The advantage of not having problems then front / back focus is a very inportant systems mirrorless.rnLe images out of the oven at the end are of excellent quality. The sensor is great. Cm ² is given with the best quality fixed lenses (Zeiss 24 is outstanding). I then had to think again about 16-50. Using the correction lightroom goals and doing well on the excellent sharpness out immagini.rnIn comparison with my previous FF images up to 800iso are virtually indistinguishable. Besides cleaning the FF vede.rnI downsides that I have found so far are of a limited durationbattery and a problem with the use of the tripod. Bearing mounted the quick release plate is not in fact possible to tilt the monitor. There are solutions cmq online to solve the problem (see ps-n7) rnih conclusion I can only conisgliare the a6000. With this system, I'm going back to have fun shooting. Before transporting the equipment ruined everything. If you are not kept at high ISO amazing and you are not interested in optical light canvas is a choice you will not regret makes the system reflex.rn |
 | sent on May 28, 2014 Pros: Dimensions, weight, ergonomics, speed autofocus sensor, tilting LCD, burst, viewfinder, Cons: Low number of objectives aps-c, it lacks the electronic level Opinion: Having an A7 I wanted to combine this complementary body as a6000. Fortunately, the old-style menu Nex has been replaced by the one already present on the mirrorless FF, gaining intuitive, operating speed and completezza.rnrnIl camera body looks small, light and robust, features that transmits vibrations of pleasure when handling it. rnPer my hands, medium in size, ergonomics is excellent and the controls placed in affordable points after a minimum of 16-50 propedeutica.rnrnCon attacked the camera do the rest in the space of a compact, even if the ' lens kit not represent certain quality standards of value, allows you to cover the most common focal unnoticed. rnrnIl vaunted autofocus is actually handsome. Although it may be inevitably influenced by the characteristics of the lens attached, it is easy to notice the ease of coupling even in situations where light is not too favorable and 179 points maf I seem to be sufficient for more than un'o26ugrave; suited to meet the needs of the new sensors, except for the excellent and cheap 50mm OSS. We remain confident in attesa.rnrnLa gust, who served ... it's a real reflex.rnrnIl finder does not miss the optical viewfinder so the picture looks real. During fast motion lag is perceptible but not annoying, but not a negative influence on the time of scatto.rnrnLo tilting screen, which I learned to use with satisfaction on the A7, it is a godsend on many occasions and I could not help it more less. Unfortunately it is not including the electronic level and those who, like me, routinely uses it, it could be an absence annoying. You have to make do with the different lines given by the grid selectable menu.rnrnPer who may have difficulty traveling or charging recommend one or two batteries (charged) to riserva.rnrnComodo the wi-fi and NFC for those who love fast sharing. rnrnInutile recall the possibility to mount the entire world of photography through rings you adattatori.rnrnInI heard At the a6000 camera body suitable for all palates, even the most demanding. The relatively low cost can make it palatable advanced amateurs looking for lightness, discretion and ease of use without sacrificing the quality of a sensor that, when combined with the right lens, can bring more of a reflex forced to stay in the cabinet kit. It 'an all-rounder camera that if you do not need to tropicalizzazioni various specialty or niche, you will want to always have with you. Consigliata.rn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
