RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sony A5000 : Specifications and Opinions


  1. Reviews
  2. »
  3. Cameras
  4. »
  5. Cameras Sony
  6. »
  7. Sony A5000
  8. » All Opinions


Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this camera.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Sony A5000)


What do you think about this camera?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on July 31, 2017

Pros: They are pretty good, with very low weight and ergonomics because, while being a small body, in my opinion, it holds the hand, sensor quality in relation to the really extraordinary price, held at the high iso

Cons: More than I would call them compromise, but in the opposite it has but for me all can be overcome, the absence of the viewfinder that in my opinion can be exceeded, the absence of the slot to add external flash or microphones and the fact that they do not have two ring One for setting the timing and the diaphragm, these in my opinion are the compromises for the small body of the car but the real big defect and the screen, and really bad.

Opinion: I am a passionate boy of photography but amateurishly. It's been a while since I asked my parents a camera worthy of being called that and I was tired of photographing with the phone or with compact cameras, the usual ones that every family has and pull out on holiday or birthdays. After knowing For a good vacation in spain I found by mediaworld the a5000 on offer at 289 euros and so i got it for the great price.rn Now and almost a year I possess and are fully satisfied because for the price that costs you from Really so much satisfaction, the files that come up are really defined and detailed and of great quality even in jpg and I found it very useful to save two copies of the same file a jpg and a raw so you can have the photos ready to show and then Those to post produce when you have time. The screen I mentioned in the counter and its only big defect as other owners say can not be entrusted to it to make photos because it looks like Not really ugly, beyond a certain level of brightness reproduces white and so does crBut it's not just the screen that translates it to the dynamic gameplay that plays and really is reduced and for that I have spat at least three four photos of the same subject by relying on the histogram with various time and aperture settings because if Do one almost surely and wrong and you may lose some beautiful photos just for the screen that makes them look bad. Part of this big defect to which I am now used to the satisfaction that comes from you and so much and without fading and I am fully satisfied with the Machine itself because I can carry it everywhere because it is small and lightweight. A small note on the lens that comes with the 16-50s, and a good lens but nothing special in my opinion its greatest value is the weight and the size, No excel in any field, and bright enough that it is a good value but in the macro having a minimum focusing distance of 30 cm so small and almost impossible p Making insects macros in itself is very good especially for the excellent bokeh effect that makes up to f / 8 focal apertures in wide angle and panoramic photos noN has a satisfactory opening in my opinion to come in anyway.rnAs a good lens would enhance much more the sensor in the short term i take another.rnIs it definitive I would recommend it? I highly recommend it because for the price it costs it allows anyone to make great photos and really a lot of satisfaction.rn

user47725
avatarsenior
sent on December 21, 2016

Pros: Very compact and particularly light body, High resolution and sensor APS-C, fully tipper screen, Compact and interesting hike (starts at 24mm), Wi-Fi, Price, paid 249 euros complete of optics on offer these days at Mediaworld

Cons: The high ISO yield, REcharge via USB, focus a little slow, but uninfluential for landscapes.

Opinion: The images it produces in RAW are poor do not do justice to the excellent sensor, the lack of the viewfinder and flash door sled that could be used to insert an optical viewfinder is a significant lack even if it can be evaluated before the purchase. I intend to use it for landscape photos and on easel so the use of the orientable screen is advantageous. The dynamic declared by DXO is 13 versus 13.1 of the A6000 is remarkable. Soon I will buy an adapter to use the vintage nikon optics that I own. Don't let it get away with it. 01/01/2017 - To get the most out of sharpness without introducing noise open the RAW file with sony image data converter, process according to your needs and save in TIFF, reprocess with PS, in my case CS5 vers. 12 - filter - other - accentuates passage - vivid light. 14/01/2017 after taking several photos I have to state with great regret that I still can not pull out the quality that I hoped to get with 20 mp sensor fault of the poor optics provided in the kit, I'm still waiting for the adapter ring to arrive for nikon optics. 31/01/2017 - Negative note, does not have the internal device for eliminating dust on the sensor, avoid continuous change of optics 26/06/2017 - https://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&bk=&t=2392075&show=last#12182379, example of shot processed with Capture One 10.0 16/02/2017 - The ring has arrived, tests with samyang 14 f2.8 MAF in manual using the hyperfocal to f16 in focus from 3m to infinity, excellent results. 02/07/2019 - Trials with Sigma 50 2.8 macro MF manual optics using focus piking, a valuable help for perfectly focused images.

avatarjunior
sent on September 06, 2016

Pros: Certainly the price, I have paid € 319, the photo quality is really very good.

Cons: The lack of optical viewfinder.

Opinion: This camera has really good grip seems a compact, but obviously it is a mirrorless APSC with a great sensor, I have used it several focal also vintage with more interesting results, but unfortunately the note for me absolutely negative is the lack of viewfinder (I did not think), the use of the camera through the only display is really stressful (thanks to my view) especially with voluminous and "heavy optics".

avatarjunior
sent on February 07, 2016

Pros: Prezzaccio. Quality of images and videos in low iso. Small and lightweight. With inexpensive adapter using all optical canon

Cons: bad display. awkward grip. At high ISO kneads jpg to reduce noise

Opinion: Taken at a bargain price in mw, and produces images of exceptional quality video at up to ISO 800, then it becomes a bit noisy, the noise in RAW + or equivalent to that of a 70d but in jpg knead very image. With a commlite adapter from 79 € you can use all optical canon with only a bit of worsening af speed. With its 16-50 he is really in your pocket. The display is very bad, but for such a low price is a truly straconsigliata machine.

avatarjunior
sent on September 29, 2015

Pros: Amazing price !!!!! Image quality even at high ISO.

Cons: Display, but if no one is related to the price.

Opinion: I leave this review because personally I did not find much information on the network and so my purchase was a question mark. I bought it for the holidays so as not to take so much weight behind. Paid € 299 with optical kit 16-50 by Mediaword online and I made about 1000 by scatti.rnPartiamo negative points: the display is bad. The machine lacks viewfinder and has a display resolution and color quality poor. In essence what you shot and shooting does not correspond to reality, and fortunately what the camera captures. Let me explain: made the first pictures I saw from the dispaly and I semravano all overexposed (but much) and with the use of flash things got worse. Having taken in hand and, having entrusted all'esposimentro (mode matrix) I thought of some malfunction and tried to shoot in automatic mode, but the result did not change. Very disappointed by the purchase I still download the first photo on the PC and ... SHOW !!!!!!! Beautiful pictureswith rich colors, white almost perfect, delicious flesh and made at high ISO extraordinary. rnOvviamente perovenendo from an SLR with FF optics respectable are also visible drawbacks: speed autofocus especially in low light, but it is an issue of minor importance; speed burst shooting, but for me it was the car of the holidays and so no rush; distrsione optics to 16 mm, but this is a surmountable problem. The only real problem is the display, but now I've got used to it and then after you take do not pay attention to what the display makes me see again. In addition to the manual I also tried the mode A and car and are perfect. Another small drawback is the battery life, but after 4/5 hour charging cycles seems to have improved greatly. rnih conclusion is a purchase that would do it 1,000 times !!!! Even my d700 and d90 gave me so much joy. The very low price (almost compact camera) is appreciated a lot more positives than negatives,which they are however negligible because no one with such an object would dream of making a photographic work. Given the uses to which they will do is so amazing, you can put it in a bag, the neck weighs nothing and in addition makes fantastic photos. What can I say .... great sony !!!! If this toy with the Sony managed to achieve this I would have to hand in a reflex FF to see how it behaves ... those nikon and canon should worry.

avatarjunior
sent on September 26, 2015

Pros: Its price is ridiculous for the image quality that produces sublime filters supplied can not imagine what you can do with the sisters Full Frame t'innammori instantly ....

Cons: Nothing on price

Opinion: A car that immediately feeling, conveys feeling of quality coming from the Full Frame Nikon I was stunned, I never imagined it could be so simple and inexpensive open new orizzonti.Le photos are highly creative baked colors are so special that I take pleasure to photograph in particular the filter and the filter toy bw



Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Sony » Sony A5000 » All Opinions




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me