RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Sony E 10-18mm f/4 OSS)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsupporter
sent on October 01, 2018

Pros: Light, compact, stabilized, af fast.

Cons: Not cheap.

Opinion: Slow with good performance, moreover stabilized. I find it - in my limited experience with wide angles pushed - extremely compact and light and it seems to me that (my specimen) has good sharpness: in general I am satisfied. It's not a cheap lens (but I don't think there are many other alternatives with comparable characteristics for aps-c e-mounts).

avatarjunior
sent on January 08, 2018

Pros: -

Cons: -

Opinion: it's the first time I use such big angles, I've only used a 20mm on 24x36 sometimes. The distortion (barrel) seems to me very well correct even the smallest focal length, the distortion reptile complained by some, the shorter focal length, is due to the non-perfect orrizzontalità axis of the lens, focal length so reduced you have to be very careful leveling up.

avatarjunior
sent on October 17, 2017

Pros: Useful for photos and videos, sharpness

Cons: Distortion

Opinion: I took it in July for the holidays. I hardly got it off with a 35mm 1.8 and a 18 105 f4. Very useful for photos and video too. Ideal on an a6500 so it does not "sform" it too much like balancing and taking. Obviously 10 distortions but nothing that can not be repaired in post. Optics that gives very sharp photos, which does not do the 18 105. Lens recommended though the costs of sony are certainly not the most accessible.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 23, 2017

Pros: compact, crisp, great af, ease mounting filters, 15mm equivalent

Cons: Price a bit 'high but average, flare with front light, lights not beautiful.

Opinion: I have long been undecided before purchase because of little rave reviews, then I am convinced thanks to the review of Juza. I agree with him in saying that instead this lens is perfectly usable. I coupled to the A6500 and the results are very positive. The distortion is corrected well in the room and the sharpness is excellent throughout the frame diaframmando from f / 5.6 onwards. The refractive index is felt to f / 16. The lens from its best between f / 8 and f / 11. rnNon I noticed chromatic aberration problems but suffers a little 'flare with strong front light. You get discrete "stars" on the light points closing but did not reach the level of the 16-35 type lenses Nikon (I refer to the one that I know well). RNLA stabilization with a6500 is great but I do not know if the merit is of the body or the lens (or both). Af always precise and discreet, in combination with interesting focal even allow shots street very immersive. rnTutto all it was a good buy and coupled lens body does not make me regret the d750 and 16-35 nikon. Me too I would recommend their purchase!

avataradmin
sent on July 04, 2016

Pros: very compact, lightweight, fast and quiet AF, stabilizer, relatively bright

Cons: a little less sharp and 'large' compared to the Sigma 8-16 that I used previously.

Opinion: After photographing for many years with the Sigma 8-16 (I consider the best wide angle for APS-C), I chose to go to the Sony 10-18 for various reasons: to avoid the use of adapters, reduce the overall dimensions and weight ( Sony 10-18 Sigma weighs a third of 8-16 + adapter and is along the middle). At 225 grams, the Sony is really a featherweight; despite this it is a brighter stop of the sigma and is also equipped with image stabilization. In the past I had avoided this lens because the tests I had seen showed a very poor quality; perhaps Sony has improved over the years because the copy I bought is more than good - is a less clear coat 8-16 in the corners, but overall it is fully usable at all focal lengths and all the diaphragms. If you have a Sony APS-C camera, I definitely recommend buying this wide angle.

avatarjunior
sent on December 10, 2015

Pros: Excellent build quality and optical performance, more than excellent particularly to 18mm and fairly even in the range of diaphragms

Cons: Price, important perspective distortion towards the edges at 10mm but remains "planar" and the lines remain quite straight.

Opinion: The possess almost a year of using it A6000 and also on NEX3n. Lens very funny in the street, both on "architectural" that kind of live handled. Lens ideal for shooting from center stage. Great for landscapes, pleasant "star" effect photographing backlit diaphragm inquadrato.rnAttenzione closed with the sun because it is a "handyman", is a specialized lens, push, that must be taken in combination with other less thrust of focus for use in round. In the street it should combine it with a 24 and a 50 not to miss niente.rn

avatarsenior
sent on April 22, 2014

Pros: Excellent build quality, focus, well-wheeling without jamming as well as the zoom operation ring. My best results I have achieved at f / 8, although excellent from f / 5.6 to f/16. I have no way to express myself even more technically, but I must say that I fully satisfies. The drop in brightness and resolution at the edges is also contained at full aperture. The weight is consistent for use with the Sony Nex-7 and the other optical in my possession all Sony does not exceed 300g with lens hood and front and rear caps.

Cons: The one in my possession optical filters with diameter of 62mm, the other 49mm diameter filter mount. The price of Euro 791.99 is the highest of all the series of Sony SEL lenses for the Nex, but justified by the complexity of construction of wide-angle zoom.

Opinion: Purchased recently, I have to say that the lens has been given me great satisfaction. Used especially in the wide-angle position I was able to take some photos decidedly sharp and full of detail. At the optics are interested in purchasing an invitation to look at the photos taken by me and other photographers on this website.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me