RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG Macro : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG Macro)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on December 10, 2014

Pros: Range of focal lengths, price, price, weight

Cons: Brightness

Opinion: It is a good optic to start and continue for those who do not expect the top and I do not know what he buys known large aberrations but after 200mm loses a bit of sharpness is dark, af average does not weigh much lens hood I are not satisfied stabilized has a function "macro" in short, do not hit me for sharpness but for what it costs, then used is great for outdoor fun

avatarjunior
sent on May 13, 2014

Pros: Price, focal.

Cons: rnNitidezza, chromatic aberrations.

Opinion: Paid 130 Euros, you can expect? It covers a good focal length, the autofocus is fast in order not to be a hsm. Good workmanship, but the focus ring is so soft ... the brightness is in the standart price and competitors. From 70 to 300 the minimum distance of 1.5 m is fire, but by activating the macro mode, which is activated from 200 to 300 we can approach up to 95 cm! On the barrel we have the distance scale and the magnification ratio of up to 1:2. The lever of the macro if you are not at the right focus and focal length are not active and if you have not noticed you are likely to break it. Lens hood included in the price!

avatarjunior
sent on September 25, 2012

Pros: Price, Focal

Cons: Sharpness, Brightness, AF, mechanical, construction, non-stabilized

Opinion: I must say that the focus is nothing short scandente as Sharpness horrible! only two of 10 shots are on fire! It is not clear, and shows a lot of AC close to the center, vignetting is not as bad as the rest, but you notice it. The only comfort is up to 300 mm (although the quality is poor!) And if you want to be comfortable even the macro option 200 to 300 mm, which allows you to stay away from subjects such as butterflies and insects! I tried it for an afternoon of sunshine thanks to a friend who lent me this objective to see if the 300mm enough for me to photograph wildlife (and I must say that I'm happy to 300mm on APS-C), NEVER would purchase this objective by poor quality to say the least! Of course if you have little money and want to take a tele this is convenient, but if you can afford the Sigma 70-300 is better to forget instantly! In conclusion, this objective is poor and very disappointing! Much better than those who aim to sharpness and AF!

avatarsenior
sent on June 23, 2012

Pros: Low Price

Cons: Quality ultrascadente: plastic gears after a while 'you use it break.

Opinion: A telephoto cheap and decent quality at least up to 200mm and when shooting in very closed aperture (I use it in this way to be able to take full advantage of). Although taken all my stuff with kid gloves, in 2 years of use it broke the gear autofocus 2 times, in the most important moments in which I used, among other things (including a hockey championship final Ice)>: (The second time it broke I was also sent by Sigma unrepaired (for their incredible error) and I had to send it back for repair accollandomi for the umpteenth time shipping! Given this experience and another bad experience with another Sigma lens, I think I'll never slower than this brand. Prices are low but the quality even more. autofocus plastic gears do very little last, a break is always in view.

avatarsenior
sent on November 29, 2011

Pros: price

Cons: sharpness, brightness, focus is not always accurate

Opinion: is a suitable lens for taking pictures at distances that range beyond the classic basic kit. of course, after a while you want to improve and it is certainly not a view that allows great strides .... all in all would recommend it to those who approach for the first time to photography and do not want to spend too much!





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me