JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Opening record of the entire zoom range, quality in terms of yield and constructive, price.
Cons:Weight.
Opinion:I purchased this objective in combination with the 18-35mm f1.8 always home Sigma, to fix the classical zoom kit with two objects in total instead of a single all-rounder. Previously, I had the 16-85mm Nikon. In this way, I accept the small but significant chasm between 36mm and 48mm, but gain an incredible brightness not typical of the zoom, and especially did not expect was translated into actual goals especially for the APS-C format. Sigma did, and at low cost because of the quality achieved. The 50-100mm is a discreet boulder while not stabilized, has a weight similar to that of 300mm f4 IF-ED Nikon that I've used for over three years and almost always by hand. So not very comfortable, but I used it for about 150 minutes of concert in December, despite a 'half-hour central interruption, and arrived at the bottom alive and well. Autofocus fast, quiet and free of the front-back focus problems, in any case I purchased the Sigma USB dock to remedy any problems, upgradeof necessity the firmware, and perform calibration over time if it were needed. Also excellent hood, well built and engages with a loud "clack", without any particular games. The behavior is also excellent at open aperture. I wonder simply because to have two optical quality zoom to APS-C, after the release and the subsequent boom in D500, you either had to wait for a home as Sigma (which had already produced earlier 18-35mm) while Nikon is limited to updating the building the 16-85mm 16-80mm with little more brightness, more plasticona construction and a crazy price, when the 17-55mm DX requires a serious upgrade for a lifetime.
Cons:Limited Excursion. (severe) stabilization Deficiency. Not tropicalized. Very delicate Coating. Weight (weighs as much as a 70 200). 82 mm Filter Diameter (Costosetti).
Opinion:Excellent Optics. That has a certain weight (which is not a little) I think is logical, given the construction and the number of lenses. The ring nuts have an exceptional fluidity. To Be used especially for portraiture, it returns excellent images. Unfortunately the lack of stabilization is felt, especially because of its weight: shake lurking. You Have to be very careful in handling it because it is very delicate.
Pros:ruggedness, clarity, range of focal lengths to f1.8
Cons:weight
Opinion:I did not test it science fiction, but my opinion is great! At this price you have the most commonly used focal portrait at a fair price. If you do not have a full frame, a ASPC this brightness to zoom there does not regret a FF with various f2.8. And if you have a FF and I want to use creatively I have tried on a 6D and it works well for me from 75/80 to 100MM, and it's not bad! Rn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
