|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on May 08, 2018 Pros: Build quality, focal range, sharpness, very fast focus, good brightness Cons: A little too soft to TA especially on the edges Opinion: I have acquired this lens in order to enlarge (in the true sense of the word) my horizons from the photographic point of view. In this it is a lens with a very good focal range, for nothing limiting in landscape photography. The quality in my opinion is great, the construction more than solid, the focus is fast and quiet, the sharpness very good (except to TA and on the extreme edges). I have chosen this lens compared to its competitors because I think the right compromise between focal range, brightness and value for money, I am very satisfied! |
 | sent on April 16, 2018 Pros: Angle of view, focus speed, build quality Cons: Backlight, Chromatic Aberration, Distortion Opinion: I got to try the Sigma 10-20 for a couple of days in order to carry out interior photographs on Canon APS-C quite dated. I opted for this lens because it wasn't cheap (it's a rental) and allowed to have an angle of view equivalent to 16 mm on APS-C Canon House. Personally, at sight, seemed to convince me in that the build quality seemed decent and indeed the body immediately took on connotations, so to speak, more "professional". After processing the shots, though, I realized that despite having snapped at ISO 100 and apertures over F11 in order to get everything in focus, I found almost always distortions very domineering at 10 mm, but, above all, of virtually incorrigible chromatic aberrations and loss of sharpness. Personally I would buy it if I had a APS-C and I need a lens ultra-wide angle, probably I'm leaning for the priciest Home 10-22 Canon. Rating: 6.5, just above the sufficiency because it allowed me to fulfill the purpose and to take decent shots. |
user58495  | sent on October 19, 2017 Pros: Virtually everything Cons: It feels fragile, a little vignetting at 10 mm Opinion: Taken this morning in exchange for the old variable diaphragm version. The look is more edgy, the construction is solid, a little less the haze than the feeling of fragility. For the rest we are the usual: most positive reviews, then the usually four or five according to which this goal would be cesso or quasi.rnParlimo always of a mid-low goal so not perfect or high pretese.ma I suspect that many reconsider their frustration or technical inability to get certain results. Everything, read these funeral shows, if you look at the galleries, you will find beautiful pictures, some extraordinary and many done just under the conditions that are described as limiting or disastrous, in these so-called reviews. I know this goal well, the old version I have owned for four years and the new one I have used on many occasions over the past two years, until the decision to buy it this morning and I can tell you that it is an amazing and surprising look. For the price range and poured itThere is not much better on the market than this.I mean I'm referring to the Nikon coupled ... maybe it hurts only on other brands, I do not know .... rnI will be owls .... Look ALWAYS the galleries ... there are people who really know how to photograph and many photos that deny the improvised reviewers of the last hour! |
  | sent on August 17, 2017 Pros: Construction, precise AF, reduced distortion, very small chromatic aberrations, focal length, color rendering. Cons: TA 10 mm vignette, 82 mm filters. Opinion: Great goal for my tastes, my needs and my finances. Thank you who advised me. Used on the Nikon d300 and D7100 I do not seem to suffer as the megapixels increase, though with d300 to 12 mpx it was a blade. My copy does not suffer from front / back focus or special distortions / aberrations. Although not tropicalized I used it in non-ideal conditions with strong water vaporization and had no problem. To get a good balance from center to edge just diaphragm af / 8, but already at full opening the yield is good. A 10 mm wide vignette opening somewhat but nothing that can not be corrected in PP. I have so far had no problems with flare and the like, which suggests that the anti-reflection treatment of the optic is good. I was astonished by the distortion, which is exceptionally well corrected even at 10 mm and, despite being present, corrects very simply in PP, at the pact to shoot snap. For my desires 10mm on apsc are very useful, actually in this optic I was looking for oneSurrogate Canon 20-35 I had on FF at film time and I think I found it, gaining some degree of field angle on shorter focal lengths. Finally on d7100 with the possibility of additional 1.3 x crop in practice it's like having a 20-40 equivalent. To sum up, I would say that this is an honest and consistent lens sold at a reasonable price and lower than the original nikon 10-24 or 12-24. |
 | sent on April 05, 2017 Pros: Resistance to flare, construction, accessories, constant aperture at all focal lengths Cons: Distortion at 10mm diameter filter (82mm) Opinion: 9. For APS-C in my opinion is the best wide angle in circulation, the one with the highest value for the price is 10-18 Canon but is behind the door of the low-end limits (plasticky construction, variable aperture, this flare , lens hood separately), so I feel I recommend their purchase without thinking much. |
 | sent on March 31, 2017 Pros: Focal Range ideal for landscapes and architecture. Solid and well built. Distortion contained. Cons: Diameter filters, sharpness at the edges to 10mm TA Opinion: And 'the main objective of my kit and use it with satisfaction for some time for photos of landscapes, interiors, street and architecture. Excellent color rendering. The build quality is definitely high level as demonstrated by the fact that, cadutomi accidentally in water (sweet), continues to function perfectly without any problems for many years. very favorable price / performance ratio. Definitely recommend it. |
 | sent on March 31, 2017 Pros: Focal Range convenient for some street, compact and small solid, f3.5 Cons: Diameter 82mm filters, not very sharp, ta either 10mm or 20mm, hard to use at night, marked distortion at 20mm not to mention the distortion at 10mm Opinion: It was my first wide angle, has a long way disappointed his lack of sharpness, especially in dark scenes ... The nice that (like all wide-angle), the scene must be drafted and the angle and the light go well dosed for the appreciable compositions ! The problem that this objective is the size of the filters, too big and expensive, so even for a filter you have to shell out na beautiful figures (also 70 euro for 1 only of average quality filter) |
 | sent on January 13, 2017 Pros: Cheap, easily applicable filters Cons: Too flare and dim diaphragm Opinion: I started with this goal for landscapes but I brought home a few interesting results. It is not cheap but an excellent lens and of course the differences are seen ... Pe ril price it offers are then passed to Samyang 14mm 2.8 and I have been able to achieve very large bright night shots and crisp picture postcard! It is a lens that would estimate whether to take for those who must choose between this and Samyang Samyang would say all my life! |
 | sent on November 06, 2016 Pros: clear objective, bright and well-built, good color rendering, can insert filters. Cons: Difficult to insert cap with lens hood, weight. Opinion: A great product, produces good photos also defined at room temperature (the slight edge sharpness loss) rnma just switch to aperture values ??more to get an excellent definition even at the edges of foto.rnResiste well to flare and has a controllable distortion even to 10mm.rnMessa fast precise and silent fire, no problem of f / b focus.rnCon the Nikon D7200 has a color rendering fantastica.rnHo greatly appreciated the opportunity to insert a protective filter or other, unfortunate that the diameter rndell 'lens (82mm) significantly increases the purchase price of the sturdy but heavy enough filtri.rnFattura (520g) .rnUn great lens to have in your backpack for scenic, street view and indoor photos. rnrn |
 | sent on October 18, 2016 Pros: Brightness, robust construction, little distortion and little flare Cons: Diameter filters, sharpness at the edges ta, a bit 'cumbersome Opinion: 26quot; basic ", the digit to spend can become impegnativa.rnIn combination with the Pentax K-3 is well balanced, while on the K-S2 is rather cumbersome, especially with the indispensable lens hood mounted, however, in both cases gives me great shots . I recommend it without problems. |
 | sent on September 05, 2016 Pros: overall quality, crisp, light taste, excellent resistance to flare, Cons: nobody Opinion: I purchased for about one month for me this is a jewel, perhaps the purchased copy of fotocolombo is excellent and I have not encountered any problems detected by other rnnon .... I can only be satisfied and recommend it to all of APSC owners. At night it returns a spangle fantastic no chromatic aberration and it is always sharp at all focal lengths from 10 to 22 .... I can not criticize it for a price so I can only straconsigliarlo. for me 10. |
 | sent on June 30, 2016 Pros: crisp, compact and well made Cons: diameter filters Opinion: I bought this lens a month ago after reading a comparative than a year ago on a magazine and to be honest I am very happy: they are lucky not to have had the focus fb problems, the images are very sharp the average usage value (f8-11) and the autofocus is quick and quiet if you do not use in live view. I have not encountered problems of flare. |
| sent on May 29, 2016 Pros: Robustness, excellent construction, zoom range, sharpness, brightness Cons: At the moment no one perhaps the diameter of the filters if you want to be picky Opinion: Great for my D7200 was stunned from the first release of an incredible sharpness even at f 3.5, however, if you close from f8 on is strbilianternLe distortion even at 10 mm virtually non-existent, the price also means that it is a 10 optical cum laude with a value for money, I can not be beat, rnOttima robust and fluid built in rings, rn sometimes when you have a bit of a hurry mounting the lens hood is a little cumbersome but then gets stuck to the large, rn? f 3.5 aperture over the entire focal length makes it ideal even in interiors with its wide angle of view it captures details with a view to have absolutely unica.rnDa |
 | sent on May 09, 2016 Pros: Construction, sharpness, resistance to flare, focal range, supplied accessories, fast, quiet autofocus, the focus rings and very smooth zoom, full time manual focus, saturated colors and balanced, constant brightness Cons: I think no one Opinion: I have owned and used for about a year and a half's younger brother, who now Sigma has taken away from produzione.rnPur being already excellent wide-angle lens, this lens has many more cards than the more sharper economica.rnSembra version (but I have not done a detailed comparison). I use it mainly for indoor photography with aperture 5.6 to 8, and in this range of openings has no problem whatsoever. At full aperture it is slightly softer but, to realize you have to enlarge the image a lot. The corners lose a sharpness hair ... what other lens does not? RnAvendo a constant maximum aperture throughout the zoom range, does not even require continuous adjustments of timing or sensitivity when using it at full aperture. For some types of photography is manna from cielo.rnLa resistance to flare is proverbial .... not even known by the sun at the corners of fotogramma.rnUtilizzato in any type of photo makes saturated colors and well balanced, it seems almost a polarizzat lensa.rnLa focus with HSM is silent, precise and quite fast, although not fulminea.rnLe the zoom and focus rings are fluid at the right point, giving you the right resistance and always scorrevoli.rnViene stocked with everything serving: petal-type hood, padded carrying bag and, of course, the two coperchi.rnCostruito impeccably for what it currently costs (paid 430 February attack with Pentax), with solid materials that make it pleasant even when handling it. Remains compact and very accettabile.rnAl current price weight, I think it is a lens not to be missed for those who love landscape photographs, interior, street and all use that it can fare.rnCerto being a wide angle rather pushed, unforgiving framing errors ..... worth distortion of converging lines especially at longer focal corte.rnPer the type of lens that you would not say it has flaws ... when you buy you should be aware of its characteristics intrinseche.rn |
 | sent on April 03, 2016 Pros: Image quality (sharpness, color, contrast) Excellent construction, fluid rings, made fast and quiet autofocusing Cons: Perhaps the diameter of the filters because expensive Opinion: I bought 30 March I made a few test shots and I'm excited. The only flaw in 10 focal loses sharpness on the edges and sometimes there is a slight chromatic aberration on the right edge. (All this at a magnification of 100% printable enlargements you notice only a slight loss of sharpness at the edges) A ??focal 11 the sharpness becomes good even at the edges. I believe that the diameter of the filters is justified by the brightness of 3.5 at all focal so large diameter lens. I use it on a Sony a77II and Sony A390. |
user68915 | sent on May 04, 2015 Pros: Excellent sharpness, good construction, color rendering, good luinosità, ability to mount filters, price, nonexistent flare, lens hood, handbag brings supplied lens, 3-year warranty Cons: AF slightly noisy but nothing so drastic Opinion: I have read many articles on this lens before buying it, I only ever bought Canon lenses and I was very hesitant to switch brands .... but in the end I decided and I can only be happy! Excellent yield for photo landscapes, unrivaled sharpness, contrary to what was written by some I have not found any excessive loss to the corners of the picture, but ... compared to wide angles much more noble is even better when used in long exposures in Night returns stellature to 14 bits on the lights, something that others do not 10mm. As it regards the distortion in my opinion nothing to report, as each wide-angle distorts if not properly consists shooting. Great advantage for those who triggered mainly landscapes is the ability to mount filters, the diameter "exaggerated" by 82 mm ensures no vignetting. Before choosing this I had a chance to try other 4 similar goals and can compare the same photo taken with different objectives, the only way I was able to see some real differences between a lens and the other and the choiceIt went on the best course. I highly recommend it |
 | sent on January 08, 2014 Pros: Good construction, excellent sharpness and aperture 3:5 on all the focal lengths. Cons: Loss of sharpness in the corners showy, perhaps excessive distortion at 10mm diameter filter (82mm). Opinion: On this 'optical everything has been said in other reviews, but I want to post my impressions anyway positive.rnE' a fantastic object and for those approaching the landscape makes a real difference and you start to do " seriously. "rnI ten mm focal length and the ability to use filters allows extreme viewing angles and creative possibilities that even on full frame you can get a budget ridotti.rnL 'I got used to 370 € but it was practically new since the low utilization of the previous proprietario.rnOttima resistance to flare and sharpness to the corners centro.rnSolo the 'image' shades', although I think it is a defect of all accettabile.rnIl price has fallen and is now at about 470 new euro.rnL 'autofocus is not lightning but I think on a lens of this kind is entirely normale.rnInsomma the advantages far outweigh the shortcomings of this' optical and considering that now the price is much more affordable than in the past I recommend strongly l 'purchase. |
 | sent on July 17, 2013 Pros: construction, hood included Cons: sharp edges, ring focus hard Opinion: Price a little excessive for the new product. He does its duty and performs well even in backlight. The focus ring is a bit hard, but with the use becomes more manageable. The distortion is felt especially in 10mm, it is resolved in two minutes with automatic corrections in post production, everything is back in place. Weight and size extremely, the goal is very solid and is not made of cheap plastic. Tried with a slight drizzle but there were problems. |
 | sent on May 15, 2013 Pros: Good construction, good sharpness from f8, light, shooting angle, good resistance to flare brightness Cons: Filters 82, a bit of distortion at 10mm but correctable in PP Opinion: Optics bought used and then found a good price, again it costs a bit too much in my opinion. I use it for a month and I am really enjoying it, it's perfect optics for landscaping / street / reportage, has a good sharpness already at f4, but the best in the range f8/f13, it is not as extreme as a 8/16 , and found it just as good compared to canon 10-22 that I had previously tried. I suggest buying, especially if found used. |
 | sent on March 06, 2013 Pros: Pros: good construction, good quality feel to the eye and confirmed to the touch, the sharpness I find it excellent, it's an f / 3.5 at all focal lengths, so if you need is quite bright, great contrast and saturation, the camera angle is eccezionale. Cons: Cons: distortion at 10mm is great, but disappears from 11.5 to 12. Filters 82 mm are expensive. on the first use, the ring of focus, creaked a little, defect disappeared in a short time. Opinion: In my opinion (I'm not an expert) possess it for a year, I am very well, I like the angle, for those who like the wide angle, I highly recommend it, the rewards are certainly miss ... rnnon I've never tried a wide angle nikkor, so I'm not fit for a comparison of the different lenses, but for what I could see it seems to me a large bell 'obbiettivo.rn |
 | sent on February 13, 2013 Pros: Strength, sharpness, little distortion at 10mm, flare nonexistent. Cons: 82 mm for the filter Opinion: I purchased it here on Juza used 380 euro a month fa.rnOttima construction, barrel very solid, very clear already at F3, 5 and F8 really stupendo.rnA my opinion the distortion to 10 mm does not affect anything, I have found to perform this panoramic focal union of the shots I had to discard it was really poco.rnl 'AF despite not using it seems very fast and preciso.rnA Unlike many who say not worth the price difference I I would recommend more than the twin scuro.rnL 'flare I was almost never presented even in situations of controsole.rnQuello do not understand is why they have decided to prepare it for 82 mm filters when they could definitely work it for a diameter more piccolo.rnrnLa conclusion is that in the months elapsed purchase today I had some unexpected results even compared to my inexperience, I highly recommend to everyone! rnrnMattiarn |
 | sent on September 17, 2012 Pros: Materials, price, sharpness, excellent color rendition, brightness, ability to mount filters and low noise. Cons: Weight, 82mm filters, distortion at the corners, the manual focus ring. Opinion: The sigma 10-20 was the first lens on which I have spent a little more (about 600 euro). For me, I love nature photography, this perspective has been a quantum leap categoria.E 'an objective that satisfaction and I would say that what I do is a very versatile lens, and although it is a little pesantuccia worth take it dietro.I defects in this goal? well, to begin with .. 1) there is a little too much distortion at 10mm! instead vignetting is not so marked, and sometimes it is also nice. 2) the ring nut of the MF is a bit jerky is does not allow a precise focus. 3) Filters! it is true that can be mounted, but, unless you buy them on the internet, those from 82mm are a bit more difficult to find than 77mm mounted on sigma 10-20 f / 4. Three "In" .. but trust me the rest is clean "as a baby's bottom." |
  | sent on January 31, 2012 Pros: Construction, sharpness, brightness, contrast and saturation in excellent yield, angle of exceptional flare practically non-existent and the ability to mount 82mm filters even if it is one more quality. Cons: distort excessively 10mm MAF ring for manual hard. Opinion: the own recently and I am not an expert photographer so much detail to judge this perspective. But for what I could see on the field seems to me a great goal. I've never owned a wide angle at this level and 'he' has crept regret not having bought it before. I think my travel report qual'cosa would have more if my kit there was this great Sigma is a true stimulator of creativity and soothsayers when the shots made is extraordinary. A short'll prove it with my new D7000 and I can not wait. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
