JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC : Specifications and Opinions

Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC

The Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC is a tele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2015. The focus is done by Manual Focus, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 462 €;

33 users have given it an average vote of 9.8 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.

Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.

Sony A-mount: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Sony A-mount.

Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.

Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.

Pentax: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Pentax.

Specifications
Focal lenght	135 mm
Angle of view	18.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.0
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	11 elements in 7 groups
Min. focus distance	0.80 meters
Reproduction ratio
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Manual Focus
Internal Focus	No
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	No
Filters	77 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	830 g
Dimensions	82 x 122 mm
Buy
Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Philomene Reis

sent on February 19, 2018

Pros: Sharpness from F2 with a great restitution of colors. It's quite very solid and has a weight well balanced. Remarquable transmittance (T2.2).

Cons: The manual focus but that's the game ;) The focusing ring is a bit hard on the video edition of this lens…

Opinion: For 338 € on a black Friday, I let myself be tempted by this lens for video reports. (You still can find it at that price I presume). I have got the Samyang 135mm T2.2 VDSLR II ED UMC version, which is fitted with a narrow focusing ring, hard and indented in order to receive the follow focus. Apart from that the photo and video versions have exactly the same optic composition. So, then, I tried it to take pictures. And to me since the very first trigger, the optical result is magnificent! For now, among my five lenses this one is my favorite. Within two months of event work, I have been using it on a second camera with an average of two hundred pictures per day (which actually is a lot for a manual lens). Furthermore that frenzy cost me real pains in my hands :'( To conclude, here is my advice: if you buy it for creative pictures which give you time to create your composition and shut whenever you feel like, at that price it's the best choice. You might get better with a Zeiss… ? But I don't have any gold teeth to sell! ; ) But if you want to shoot events like dance, sports or get clear wildlife pictures, I wouldn't say it's useless, but not suitable at all... Without autofocus, you waste lots of pictures. Apart from all what I said, this lens can be a real good investment because without autofocus or stabilizer (and if you do not let it drop or bang it ;), then you should keep it for years without any breakdown ;)

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Giuseppe Dipalma

sent on January 08, 2024

Pros: Image quality, sharpness, bokeh, bright aperture, price

Cons: Loss of contrast in backlight, weight, absence of contact, green cast

Opinion: Spectacular optics to say the least for the selling price. The image quality is impressive, the sharpness is very high already at f/2 and improves when the aperture is closed. Incredibly creamy bokeh with well-defined bubbles of highlights in the background. Optically corrected chromatic aberration, almost non-existent. Well-frictioned and precise focus ring, aperture ring with half-stop increments (f/2 to f/22). Excellent build quality, which raises the weight to almost 1kg. Fortunately, the lens is compatible with a ring for Sony FE 24-240 mm, an accessory I would say almost indispensable. Good reproduction ratio (1:4, which becomes 1:2 on m4/3 cameras, I use it on OM-1) which, together with the minimum fairly close focusing distance, make it a perfect lens for artistic nature photography of flowers, fungi, insects etc... Since it has no contacts, the machine does not save the exif data. It suffers from a large loss of contrast in strong backlight situations. My specimen has a green cast that can be easily corrected in post-production by acting on the color temperature. It is not a tropicalized lens. It seems that it takes up the optical scheme of a Zeiss lens, and the results can be seen. Great goal.

user9483

sent on December 03, 2023

Pros: Build Quality, Sharpness, Brightness

Cons: Lens hood, front cap

Opinion: I've been using this lens for exactly 1 year. On the Z6 + FTZII, the weight is felt, but I think it's synonymous with quality. The lack of AF is not a problem for me, in 25 years of photography I think I have figured out how to focus by hand. Smooth and smooth manoeuvres of any kind. At maximum aperture it is able to bring out a very pleasant blur. The sharpness of the lenses has nothing to envy to the most famous optics of the same category. I've never tried my hand at astrophotography, so I can't pronounce myself. On the set portrait (even full-length) the detachment between background and subject is well marked! Photographing flowers with shots on the grass is what I love to do the most, so much so that I don't regret the 105 macro. Maybe the quality of the lens hood and the front cap is not excellent, but I think that at that price (paid just over € 500.00) you can accept it without too much discontent.

Stenikon

sent on December 02, 2023

Pros: Excellent sharpness, astrophotographic performance, excellent construction, smooth and precise manual focus

Cons: The caps, especially the back one, are quite poor.

Opinion: I bought this lens almost exclusively for astrophotography, as it is recommended by many people for its quality under the starry skies. I can only confirm the various positive opinions about it. It enjoys excellent sharpness, as well as a very good quality construction. Its generous maximum aperture makes it a high-performance lens in the field of astrophotography of large portions of the sky. It is also easily transportable even in less accessible places, unlike a telescope which by nature is obviously more bulky. Its short focal length compared to a telescope makes it superfluous to the use of autoguiding. I would also recommend it for naturalistic or portrait use, as long as you accept manual focusing (moreover operated by a very fluid precise ring) The only drawback to point out: the caps, especially the rear one, are of a quality not up to the optics.

Maxsaab64

sent on September 18, 2023

Pros: Excellent image definition and precise MAF adjustment

Cons: maybe the weight but I think it is consistent with the characteristics of the lens, the hood rather ugly

Opinion: I took the samyang 135 f2 to use it on mirrorless aps-c Fujifilm then with the well-known crop factor that makes it a bright 200mm. I use it mainly for remote portraits, landscapes and photographs in events: what can I say, as an owner of both the Fuji 56 APD and the viltrox 85, I am very favorably impressed. The color rendering is balanced (in my opinion better than that of the Viltrox that tends to magenta in some situations) and hardly mistakes a photo for incorrect focusing. I use it mostly on X-H1 so I benefit from the stabilizer being able to shoot even with 1/60 time without motion problems. I highly recommend it.

There are 8 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC

Pentax K-1 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
21 comments, 6353 views

Nebulae in the Sorpione

by Bares
31 comments, 3995 views [editors pick]

Goldenhour

by Inserius
53 comments, 6586 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Nicole mask of the Venice Carnival

by Stefano Grilli
13 comments, 9512 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

The colors of Dawn

by Mautrekking
25 comments, 3129 views

by Ayps
40 comments, 10370 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Having fun

by Philomene Reis
71 comments, 4939 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Veronica...

by Stefano Grilli
10 comments, 6653 views

HI RES 36.2 MP

Cyclamen hederifolium

by Giuseppe Dipalma
16 comments, 1121 views

HI RES 25.1 MP

Lower Falls, Yellowstone

by Tragniact
15 comments, 1275 views

Orion wide field.

by Elio Magnabosco
15 comments, 7244 views

Carefree

by Inserius
6 comments, 2954 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Pentax K-1 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
13 comments, 3486 views

Eleanor

by Fausto Pesce
32 comments, 1666 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Pentax K-1 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
7 comments, 9152 views

Eliška

by Vnosek
3 comments, 3531 views

S.t.

by Fausto Pesce
13 comments, 1494 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

My horto

by Cosiminodegenerali
42 comments, 2994 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Clouds in Scorpio

by Bares
18 comments, 1661 views

Pentax K-3 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
6 comments, 4420 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Neowise

by Giancarlo Melis
15 comments, 850 views

HI RES 18.8 MP

Saturday morning ...

by Simolucca
32 comments, 3713 views

S.t.

by Fausto Pesce
7 comments, 1384 views

Pentax K-3 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
4 comments, 3370 views

HI RES 24.1 MP

In the waves

by Inserius
16 comments, 2518 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Pentax K-1 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
11 comments, 1598 views

HI RES 75.4 MP

From Venice Carnival 2016

by Stefano Grilli
2 comments, 3888 views

HI RES 36.2 MP

S.t.

by Fausto Pesce
15 comments, 630 views

HI RES 20.2 MP

Sabi

by Vnosek
5 comments, 2687 views

HI RES 10.9 MP

Ophrys sicula

by Giuseppe Dipalma
14 comments, 619 views

HI RES 25.1 MP

Stop moving please, I'm in "manual" :)

by Run66
54 comments, 2600 views

HI RES 16.1 MP

Blue hour in San Gimignano

by Francesco I.
16 comments, 1456 views

HI RES 22.2 MP

Andrea

by Pasticciere82
6 comments, 3965 views

HI RES 5.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

by Ayps
2 comments, 5186 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Pentax K-3 + Samyang 135/2

by Vnosek
9 comments, 2830 views

Heart and Soul

by Giancarlo Melis
5 comments, 975 views

HI RES 19.7 MP

P46P/Wirtanen Shakes the Seven Sisters (M45)

by Marzio Bambini
12 comments, 2754 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Samyang » Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC

Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC