user38888 | sent on May 27, 2014
Pros: Made up at high ISO, Autofocus very precise and quick, stabilized sensor (also stabilizes "old" hand lens) color range very wide, files to DNG (Digital Negative), cover 100% viewfinder, pentaprism instead Pentamirror, Tropicalisation serious megapixel right, a quick shot up to 6 FPS and 1/6000 s, Electronic Level included, double ring, exceptional ergonomics (subjective). Pixel Mapping efficient in case of need. Sensor used in the "higher" K-5II
Cons: Battery short-lived for those who make a lot of shots (530 shots made personally before the shutdown, which are not few), video recording maximum 25 minutes (defect subjective). Aufocus slightly slow on optics without engine (better optics with internal motors are equal to the other makes)
Opinion: An excellent machine for me, photos with saturated colors (so mild and pleasant) and with a remarkable range of colors (23,7bits) .rnUtilizzo the machine for sports photos, still life, street shoot and nature photos, although with the basic objectives of "limits" the quality of the machine, but just take a good aim higher and ... no remorse for anything and everything about guadagnato.rnMacchina superb for athletes, 6 FPS second or 3fps choosing mode, if the board do sports or take photos in very high frequency, a memory of at least 400x of velocità.rnrnI DNG files that churns out are excellent. I took to the High ISO for lack of Objectives bright and you can tell that the effect may be slightly granulated pleasant although photos of little use (10-16 thousand ISO) over 20 000 ISO photo unusable, the only use and only for photos that are then in b / w in a newspaper of this sensitivity, ISO 4000-8000 usable photos moderately below 4000 perfectly utilizzabili.rnObiettivo 18-55 base is very good for egbe basic, much greater than that of Canon (model II do not know III) and to Nikon.rnrnVolete know more? Find her and provatela.rnrnP.S .: it is not true that it has many optical Pentax, Pentax has only 109 optical and cover everyone and everyone needs (how many goals you have for SLR? Do you own canon all 169 Goals? I do not think Thus important reason with the question: what do I need?) rnI brands compatible objectives are: Tokina, Tamron, Vivitar, Sigma, Schneider-Kreuznach, Cosina, Carl Zeiss Lenses, Ricoh, Voigtlander, Quantaray etc ... rnrnSenza forget that is compatible with all the goals from the 60s onwards with stabilization and confirmation of focus! About 800 targets "classic" no longer in business and about 1/5 have the AutofocusrnrnAggiornamento March 9, 2015: RIDING A CMOS SENSOR TYPE (+ BSI). this type of sensor, much more expensive to produce compared to traditional CMOS, is mounted only on Semi Professional of other brands such as Sony and Canon NIkon while Pentax in all din mid-year 2013. have the benefit of better capture the incoming light, this means less chromatic aberrations, greater dynamic range and huge range of color (in fact even exceeds this many of the FF of the same year!), then a three-dimensional unique, high details and a great naturalness of the picture, that is a loyalty shooting very close to the reality closer to the sensors Foveon (which still remain the best in this) and a good seal at high ISO high despite a size "small" sensor. (OF COURSE AND 'IMPORTANT OPTICS ATTACKED MAKING THE BEST THAT MAKES THESE PROPERTIES' IMPORTANT) rnrnInoltre boosts the mpx available without losing quality in the ISO (up to a certain limit, miracles do not make them any more) .rnrnEcco explained the duration of shots total with a battery with a full charge that is lower (but not low) in comparison to other brands. Officially 420 shots (while I make about 580 with active options: [+ activated stabilizer], [+ Maximum noise reduction] [+ reduction aberration] [+ reduction deformation photo] [+ reduction shadows maximum] [+ AF motor car]) against 750 of about 800 Canon and Nikon in the same band or in the upper one at least talking about price, non-performance (theoretical, I think there is a car for every type of photographer, there is NOT the worst or the best) rnrnVi like this beautiful discovery? That's why love snapped just proven the machine |