JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Compactness, sharpness (but in bright environments). Lightweight and well executed.
Cons:high price. A 14mm distortion at the sides. Not stabilized. Non-tropical conditions. dim
Opinion:Those who read this review maybe you are wondering whether to buy this Panasonic 7-14 or maybe spending a little more, the Olympus 7-14. Unfortunately I have not tried this, but the ability to shoot (or turn) to F 2.8 is really important. The fact remains that the Panasonic is a great goal, very well done. The shots are spectacular freeform day, just as in the evening, but with the aid of a tripod. It is a lens that takes practice, you have to try and study the best pdr.
Pros:Overall yield (sharpness and color rendering) already at room temperature. Size and weight very much in line with the philosophy M4 / 3. build quality. Quality price.
Cons:You can not install filters.
Opinion:I got it used and, after six months of use, I can say that struck me very positively. In the words of Fausto Pesce, excellent optical system for lovers of the m4 / 3: crisp edge-to-edge already in TA, it has a nice color rendering and a great micro-contrast. No need diaphragm. Being F4, limited overall dimensions and weight: and, unless you have special needs, F4 on a wide angle is already more than enough. rnInoltre, considering how much has lowered the price from the initial list (we are now about 700 euro for the new abundant), I would say that the quality / price is very good. rnDifetti: they are not easily available in the market filter holder (the front lens is protruding and, as I know, only American company produces one) and, just as with all ultrawide, you have to do some 'attention to the flare.
Pros:Excellent performance at all focal lengths, F / 4 and 5.6 it is at its best, no need for further diaphragm. The camera software (GH2) immediately corrects aberrations and distortion perform admirably in RAW. Lightweight, compact and very well built.
Cons:Can not be mounted filters rear. Cost per gram very high!
Opinion:An 'objective that requires a lot of satisfaction but which, like all super-wide-angle, a bit' of time to learn how to exploit it to the fullest. As focal available, from 14 to 28 equivalent, and 'able to meet all photographic situations requiring the' use of a wide angle. Definitely worth all the money it costs and does not regret the expense.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
