JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:It is a valid "gregarious" with medium-high performance
Cons:Nothing, if you accept the "physiological" limits of the handyman not very bright.
Opinion:Optical rendering, definition, colors, and so on. They are more than good, and they do not expire in an appreciable way - very important - even at 140 mm: it is a 10x REALE zoom, a handy all-rounder with no breaks. It does not shine, it is true, it does not have that extra thing: just compared it, for example, with a Panasonic Leica 12-60 you see a certain difference, but the price is quite different. Rn As a little "plasticous" is well built And appreciably robust. He followed me in several Italian vacations and two trips to India without ever complaining about problems. Congratulations to this "gregarious" who, for certain uses, is definitely advisable.
Cons:chromatic aberration (on Olympus bodies), sensitivity to flare
Opinion:I am very happy with this goal, which has a sharpness unexpected given the focal covered: wide side I find it even comparable to the Olympus 12-40 at the center, the sides are softer. The images returned are well contrasted. It stays sharp up to longer focal lengths, loses something obviously above 100 but remains widely usable. Among the defects there is a building a little ' "plasticky", high susceptibility to AC (the Panasonic correct bodies in the car, not the Olympus). rnNon can be described as a defect but a characteristic the low light, but considering the price and size of an excellent compromise.
Cons:you can't have 'great' results due to a just discreetly acceptable brightness' a focal amplitude that begins to limit performance.
Opinion:for almost a year I have had this lens strongly,... desired to associate it with a Panasonic m4/3 body (DMC-G5). but also weighed down and bulky if I have to defend it a little, everything is what you are looking for. I shot using all its potentials and certainly even if it has limits, the brightness is acceptable, the discreet construction, compactness and lightness make him a good travel companion if you want to be light. I admit that Technically I can not give data to satisfy the 'gurus' of photography the very fact that I chose it makes me an anomalous photographer who is 'satisfied'... but I repeat everything is about what we want to do. In my opinion I add a 'gem'.... with the G5 I can digitally make a 2x that associated with the ratio of the sensor brings in case of zumata the value ... 140 x 4 = 560.. (a nice cannon!).. the fact is that I tried and the result (others tell me, those who understand it..) was good.. I would say that this too should not be underestimated, even if it is at the limit 'performance'. good light at all G.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
