JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:In 1977 it was my first OM lens with an OM1, mine that was of the first version (silver ring) had a marked flare and a low sharpness at full opening. For the inexperienced it represented the entrance into the wonderful world of photography and everything was taken with enthusiasm, but as time went on and as the experience grew, the flaws became obvious. Of mine I noticed when I took a few test photos comparing it to the Pentax 50 f1.7, when already in the crosshairs you could see the difference of the flare and the tests showed a clear optical inferiority. It is possible that with the second version -black dial and MC treatment - the quality had improved. On my own... I switched to 50 f1.4 and changed the world.
Cons:It does not matter since it is a vintage lens
Opinion:I took it for curiosity given the price of € 40.00. Tried with Olympus O-MD-EM 10 MARK II and the result is more than satisfactory. I think it's a lens to always have with if the street in B & W is amazingly very satisfied with the expense. For all photographers who like this kind of photo I would highly recommend it
Opinion:I think the best. 50 1.8 in its category, I used it with om 10, very sharp does not foul in anything from the center to the edges already open, I use it now on nikon d200, d7000, d610 after changing the bayonet, pixco per l , Accuracy purchased on ebay at 15 euros without lenses with infinite mf, great on all the perfect machines on the d610 where it resumes all its features, such as the movie of a vote, even better on sensor, compared with nikon 50 1.8 afd Wins in sharp contrast and uniform image, manual but soft, quick note due to the fluidity of the ring, which say if you like the vintage and perfect optics .. I highly recommend it.
Opinion:It is the lens where it all began about 20 years ago. I do not see, however, with the eyes of affection because with that objectivity: in its price range there is nothing better, neither in terms of overall image quality, or to costruttiva.rnCi quality can be slow with a blurred even more special, the most effective anti-reflection coatings, crispest, greater plasticity and improved design quality. But you will not find one that has all the features listed without lacking in any area. RNLA color rendering is optimized for film: Before you turn up your nose past files for acr and eye to the white balance: it is still the optics that do not communicate with machines moderne.rnSu aps works fine but loses a bit 'of its three-dimensionality.
user94858
sent on May 27, 2016
Pros:A goal exceptional, very bright, lenses and good manufacture rings, stunning bokeh effect
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:It 's definitely the best goal I've ever used, I realized the larger part of my photos with the OM-1 including portraits, concerts and reportage; for up under extreme lighting conditions I managed to take pictures with just 200 Digital ASA.rnrnSu I used it just because I have a M4 / 3 system where this becomes a 100mm lens, but still maintains its quality, giving a maximum aperture eccezionale.rnChe bokeh effect really say you must try it if you have one, if you have not you should buy it.
user46920
sent on December 10, 2015
Pros:Excellent value for money - good sharpness of detail and general risolvenza - dimensions and weights given - build quality - outer ring diaphragms
Cons:Reflex draw - some more obvious aberrations in digital
Opinion:Excellent optical design, the Zuiko 50mm f / 1.8 also works well in macro and perhaps better positioned poured or reverse. As the whole series of Olympus OM Zuiko for the film camera, it is well constructed and convenient to use, especially on the iris ring positioned externally with respect to that of maf-miniaturization and lightness. I use it with a mirrorless APSC and find it perfect as a focal length (75mm), a focal normally difficult to find without going into Leica or looking for some special pattern and rare.
Pros:Very good yield, quality and fluidity of mechanisms, good yield on the macro
Cons:It seems to return a slight dominant magenta, tonal passages not perfect
Opinion:I confirm what has already been said, lens 80 of high quality and that "holds" in risolvenza on digital current. Very pleasant especially on the black and white, while the color, to be picky, suffers a bit 'in the shade and seems to have a slight dominant. Anyway fruibilissimo photo worthy of the best fixed optical digital. Very good for street and ritratti.rn
Pros:Construction, fluidity ring focus, excellent yield and size
Cons:For me nobody
Opinion:It is built in a fifty jeep, very small, I used with Olympus OMD M10 and Canon 6D.Generalmente yield is great and the resistance to flare much buona.rnUtilizzato for macro images with tubes returns very defined almost similar to an optical macro.Lo advice to those who want a good fifty manual unobtrusive given the size.
Pros:Minimum size and weight, from 49 filters, excellent overall yield
Cons:Little delicate in tonal passages
Opinion:The manufacturer says. "Extremely compact and its optical design provides a superb definition for sharp images across the entire frame, with an appreciable reduction of internal reflections." . In fact it is 5 mm shorter and 60 grams lighter than the already small 50 f1, 4. When these parameters were crucial, I preferred it to f1, 4, but did not get the same answer delicate gradation in total. Great in macro, thanks to its optical design symmetrical.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
