|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on June 13, 2021 Pros: A professional entry-level Cons: Addictive Opinion: Having this, the EM-D5 and two EM-D1s and the EM-D10 was the only one I missed. After i gave her away, I felt like those men who leave a woman, seemingly more beautiful and charming, and understand that they love her after they no longer have her. Given away for the EM-D5, which did not satisfy me, and I resold for the EM-D1, which despite being a flagship, did not have the photographic rendering of the EM-10. Then, after the first one died, I took another EM-1, to which the upper ring had broken, after it had already been repaired and electrocuted the screen, turning pink striped white suddenly. Which is why I'm done with olympus, but another EM-D-10, plus in the fork I'll buy it back. We are still talking about machines designed, but that are assembled in China, that only have the pedigree of the brand and it is not clear why, the best successful ones are the entry-levels, which have nothing entry-level, because they are professional machines. |
  | sent on April 08, 2021 Pros: Tiny, robust, reliable, extremely versatile, a thousand thousand useful functions! Cons: I find it a problem to find them for the category to which it belongs. Opinion: I have owned it since 2014, in the meantime I have changed numerous kits but she has never left; I was so satisfied with the goodness of the product that, having lost one after less than a year, I bought back another equal! (you usually "take advantage" of these opportunities to change with something new). A small tank, transmits a solidity outside the ordinary! She also fell from the saddle of the Vespa but the little girl must not have noticed because it continues to work as if nothing had happened! Purchased with the 14-42 EZ pancake I immediately completed it with 40-150 of the poor and the 9mm f8 cap, a minimal kit that entered a pouch but that was able to give me emotions. Combined with a 17mm f1.8 it turned out to be a phenomenal combination of pocket and quality. Good ISO seal, at times miraculous considering the year of construction and the format of the sensor. The Live Composite feature is brilliant, making star trails disarming! I would recommend it to anyone who wants to try to tiptoe into the ML world. |
 | sent on April 02, 2020 Pros: Compactness, quality, aesthetics, functionality, finishes, robustness, customization, built-in flash, customization Cons: No battery grip to extend battery life, focus peaking to 2 colors, slow wifi if you want to transfer files, Opinion: After almost 4 years of use, and this is the second em10 marki in these 4 years, I can say that it is a wonderful machine. It was my first machine and although I now have a more professional body I still use it. It is small and manageable, this means that on the road, in the mountains or for outings in general it is perfect to take with you. Combined with the zuiko 14-42ex and 14 f2.5 lights it has excellent yield and ridiculous volumes. The quality is great and I say this following A2 prints and a little more. The stabilizer as well being on 3 axes does an excellent job. I've used it in all areas and it hasn't given me many problems, it's really flexible. The only area where it really is better to leave alone is to photo subjects in very fast motion. Mainly photo hunting. with the right technique I was able to make good shots even in motor racing. The responsiveness to the recovery from the stand is a little low, so much so that I prefer to turn it off in manual to turn it back on. the tilting screen for me is a pro compared to the tiltable, machine indicated to those who want to start but also to the advanced amateur to have fun. It is recommended to mount the grip if using heavy optics. |
| sent on April 02, 2020 Pros: Compactness, quality, aesthetics, functionality, finishes, robustness, customization, built-in flash, customization Cons: No battery grip to extend battery life, focus peaking to 2 colors, slow wifi if you want to transfer files, Opinion: After almost 4 years of use, and this is the second em10 marki in these 4 years, I can say that it is a wonderful machine. It was my first machine and although I now have a more professional body I still use it. It is small and manageable, this means that on the road, in the mountains or for outings in general it is perfect to take with you. Combined with the zuiko 14-42ex and 14 f2.5 lights it has excellent yield and ridiculous volumes. The quality is great and I say this following A2 prints and a little more. The stabilizer as well being on 3 axes does an excellent job. I've used it in all areas and it hasn't given me many problems, it's really flexible. The only area where it really is better to leave alone is to photo subjects in very fast motion. Mainly photo hunting. with the right technique I was able to make good shots even in motor racing. The responsiveness to the recovery from the stand is a little low, so much so that I prefer to turn it off in manual to turn it back on. the tilting screen for me is a pro compared to the tiltable, machine indicated to those who want to start but also to the advanced amateur to have fun. It is recommended to mount the grip if using heavy optics. |
user159336  | sent on January 31, 2019 Pros: File quality, build quality, right and programmable ring nuts, quite intuitive menu, good quality display and excellent viewfinder. Cons: Lenses that do not do justice to the quality of the machine, but for the price it costs, you can not expect otherwise. Opinion: A professional camera for the price of a beginner's camera. They leave to be desired lenses, which for the band to which they belong are more than dignified, but with good quality lenses becomes a camera from USA quietly use in any situation, both professional and amateur. I always carry it with me in my pocket, and it is always ready to shoot at any time. It's a made in China, but well built. It is not a video-maker machine, but designed exclusively for photographers, but the Full HD 30 fps is of good quality, both video and audio. |
 | sent on July 30, 2016 Pros: light, technology, tiltable LCD, beautiful !! a technology focused to a now Piotrowska Cons: difficult to grip with pancakes, ISO held over 3200, in aperture priority tends to overexpose Opinion: a small jewel to always have with you. At a price that now is really a great value for money, a concentration of the excellent stabilizer, it has the flash pop-up technology, tiltable touch screen that allows you to focus on the point which touches and shoot (convenient !!) in my opinion should use the grip especially with lenses cracked pancake type 20 panasonic, menus are extensive and a bit messed up you have to lose a bit of time but otherwise a good ML, of course, there are now more advanced micro43 products but the quality It does not differ much and especially the price goes up !! ... The black is more beautiful !!! IMHO |
user94858 | sent on June 15, 2016 Pros: Small, light, easy to always carry around, aesthetically a crash; Digital rnMirino: allows you to see how will the while shooting photos, allows to realize even video footage (with a significant increase in battery lasts), allows you to see the photos taken without using the display (increased battery life) .rnFunzioni: live composition, video, possibility of enlargement with the detachment of planes during riprese.rnStabilizzatore on 3 assirnSchermo LCD basculanternPer now I have never had the need to use a second battery also working all day. Cons: If you mount very large targets (70-210mm) and you have to take a few hours to be comfortable it can be useful additional grip even if not strictly necessary. Opinion: Bought out of necessity, the E-M10 is the only machine that I felt up to replace my OM-1 '79 .rnNel course of this year I was able to test it in a professional environment both for the photos to videos and I can say that certainly keeps all its promesse.rnIn field photos with the first works I have caused a stir among both linking customers; It is definitely an unusual and coveted pro machine is still little known, although in different, during the work, wanted to make a change given the qualitative results and praticità.rnrnOvviamente is not a full-frame and not I compare it even to this but in expert hands can give professional results matenendo quality even in stampe.rnrnIn field video I made short films, concerts, commercials and dance performances; and even then I could test the quality and comfort of this small gioiello.rnrnDiversamente by reflex it gives the opportunity to use the viewfinder instead of the LCD during shootingthus leading to a lower battery consumption and a better view; the button for the ingrandimemento focus in the field of video, becomes a really handy accessory to perform the plan changes during shooting (which is not present in any SLR) and the stabilizer on 3 axes provides smooth shots without the need for steadycam or spallacci.rnrnA market level offers a very wide range of objectives as it does not include only the dedicated optics M4 / 3 Olympus and Panasonic, but also all analog optical and non-adaptable through a special ring (optical analogue and FF obtained a factor multiplicative 2x) .rnrnPer Finally, I used a lot of cars (Nikon, Canon, Pentax) both APS-C and FF, and I can certainly say that the Olympus OM-D E-M10 offers, for a relatively low price, convenience , impressive performance and features that no other brand owns. rnrnrnrnrn |
 | sent on March 29, 2016 Pros: Cute, compact, stabilized Cons: the optical not up kit (14 / 42mm EZ + 40 / 150mm) Opinion: Purchased on the internet and returned after three hours, because the 14/42 EZ optic offered too much resistance when it was attached to the camera body, (but the quality controls they make them in Olympus?). In addition, the 40-150 has a really poor appearance, with the bayonet in plastic and a lightness of toy. I replaced it with a Panasonic Lumix LX100 with fixed zoom lens Leica Vario Summilux 24-75 f1,7-2,8. Another story! |
 | sent on November 17, 2015 Pros: lightweight, compact and aesthetically very pretty. stabilizer. Zuiko lenses, especially the fixed, are always of the highest standard Cons: noise already noticeable at ISO 1000, but do not consider him a true bug (later explain), battery scandalous. menu packed with art filters inutilissimi Opinion: 26egrave; a problem that is solved, taking with him one or two batteries of scorta.rnper conclude I think it is a good mirror, both peri beginners and for the most demanding. |
 | sent on September 19, 2015 Pros: Small and packed with features, Cons: evident already ISO low noise, battery life, overall, small keys menu, WB mistake tends to cool colors, green and bad. Opinion: I bought this camera to avoid to take me behind my corrredo Canon full frame, ergonomics and functions complettezza struck me right away, but just as quickly disappointed me on some points: the battery life does not exceed 100/150 shots and it goes well I bought some batteries scorta..ed I solved by analyzing other details I found painful to the included Olympus software. Really leeeeentooooo with Lighroom they can not develop good raw, I could not seem to me little workable and noisy. Finally, by the white balance is not the best, tends to blue, and finally the icing on the cake: Olympus suffers from Nikon syndrome, model born in 2014 obsolete and replaced in 2015 ... However, all in all is done well "and me I keep it "for the fact that the other ML are not miracles, the new model also seems to me worse with the mode dial in the middle of the control dials and file quality is not better than what I could see on the web. I stand corrected, I sold the camera why not sono ever I succeeded in some conditions to eliminate the anti noise filter that builds planer faces out of focus areas and produces dots in shadow areas. |
 | sent on July 21, 2015 Pros: Reliability, compactness, quality Cons: Poor battery life it serves a second, slightly complicated menu Opinion: I bought this machine from a month or so, as I took the optical pancake, was in kit, really excited. I took it because I had to go on a trip and I did not want to carry too much weight, I brought back this little gem, with a second spare battery, a 7.5 and a Samyang tele 40/150, what about in a small space so much versatility, ports and neck do not feel nearly so. From the technical point of view I found it excellent, good quality materials, from the point of view of the image, now I'm looking at the raw and I must say that I find them very good, a machine that I recommend to all also saw the value for money . |
  | sent on July 19, 2015 Pros: Compact, lightweight, interchangeable lens excellent. Cons: The battery does not last tantissimo..siamo on 170-210 scatti..vi recommend the spare battery .. Opinion: I purchased the EM10 three months ago, since I own I have learned to appreciate the excellent quality photographic and color rendering even at high ISO..le functions are many, but the menu is not intuitivo..comodi buttons setting aperture and time at your fingertips, and also the customizable function button is a beautiful thing, even at ISO 3200 you can appreciate the quality of the photos, which appear slightly grainy only zooming parecchio.rnPossedendo 3 goals ranging from wide-angle to telephoto and I can be fully soddisfatto..la advice to those who want a great car with excellent quality and very light at a price concorrenziale..PROMOSSA! |
 | sent on June 14, 2015 Pros: Compact, lightweight, good image quality, stabilizer Cons: So far no one, especially for the price at which it is sold Opinion: I bought this with the aim of mirrorless kit 14 42 IIR. rnDevo say that I am fully satisfied, I did not think a little girl like this could achieve all this quality. RNE comfortable, has a thousand functions of all kinds; The menu initially seems a little 'complicated, but just half an hour to understand how it works. I also own a D90, I made numerous comparisons (with Olympus 14 42 nikkor vs 18,105) and I must say that the quality of this Olympus is higher; I really like the white balance of this Olympus, quite warm, natural colors. rnResa at high ISO, it performs well at least up to 2000 ISO (in this definitely above d90). rnAppena I can, I would buy a fixed zuiko 25 f1.8 to make a further leap in quality (known some limits of 14 42) .rnConsigliatissima |
 | sent on June 01, 2015 Pros: light and versatile- value high. stabilization. Cons: It is tropicalized. noise during the focus (if not negligible photographing insects) Opinion: fantastic car. light well built quality. I think before long this system will undermine the throne of reflex. for the moment, however, lack of competitors at optical reflex lineage .I use two optical zoom all-rounder with good results. stabilization is spectacular. Photographer freehand without problems to 1/15. some optical appearance of high-level macro |
 | sent on May 27, 2015 Pros: excellent alternative to the SLR, especially for me as I use it for work. Cons: It is planted after less than a year, is not the aim, image flickering, and finally assistance bad. Fotocolombo never, never Olympus. Opinion: I am very disappointed in the treatment, first of all the dealer, and then the Olympus. I handed over the car to be repaired to 02 April, today I call it directly in Olympus, as the dealer does not show up, and they tell me that the machine has come to them to 12 May, and of course then rimpallano responsibilities. Seriousness nonexistent. |
 | sent on May 13, 2015 Pros: Lightness, strength, internal stabilizer, materials, color rendering, 8fps burst, shooting with the touch screen, tilting screen, perfect for the street, elegant Cons: Small buttons, menu slightly complicated, noise (for me) annoying at low ISO, poor sharpness with the kit lens indoors or in low light, battery life Opinion: I bought and I had with me for a month the OMD EM10 but I was not fully convinced, or rather, I would feel rather suggest it as a second camera body, of course depending on the needs of those who buys it. I 'a good ML for the segment in which it appears, the files and the overall quality of the picture, however, I was not totally impressed, I immediately felt the need to return to the SLR and, in this case, a ff. It is perhaps a simple goodbye, because, at that time, I was not going to invest in optics that would definitely improved the performance (I mean the beautiful fixed offering the Olympus). Postponed |
user62049 | sent on May 13, 2015 Pros: Light-Handy-Stabilized-Yield good at high ISO Cons: Maybe buy yourself a spare battery Opinion: I purchased this ML from about two months and I am fully satisfied, practically replaced the reflex I had and I do not have the pentito.rnLeggera wear it and it does not seem to have neanche.Ci Includes many creative filters from very interessanti.rnStupito which produces images at high ISO, the camera body is important stabilizzato.rnSopra I mounted the classic 14-42 who gets along bene.rn |
 | sent on April 19, 2015 Pros: Compact, light, well-built, aesthetically affascinante.rnSforna high image quality, effective stabilizer. Cons: menu complicated and not immediate Opinion: I took it as an additional body for outputs read and proved portentous! I stressed over and defends very well, does not make you regret the SLR, the picture quality is remarkable. It took me a while 'to set it according to my tastes and the menu does not facilitate complicated, but once you do it you can manage and make them do what you want. Excellent exposure system that surprised me in strong contrast exhibition. Useful electronic viewfinder where you can immediately see how it will be found useful foto.rnHo the additional handle that makes it much more actionable. It 'a machine suitable for advanced amateur photographers who can claim and ottenere.rnrn |
 | sent on February 22, 2015 Pros: Jpeg files already 'ready, great WB, made at high ISO, shutter with touch screen, many function keys to customize settings, body stabilized, opportunity' to manage the machine smartphones Cons: Duration not excellent battery, 1/4000 as the minimum time of scatto.rn Opinion: I took this car to replace the Nikon d7000 and I'm satisfied, great portability ', you can' keep your neck for a whole day without problems and with a view pancake there is in a pocket of a giaccone.rnCome I wrote in 'against', and 'a must have at least one spare battery because especially with the screen always active has a great battery life (200 shots anyway you do quietly) rnSecondo me more' boring having the minimum time of 1 / 4000 because with fixed lenses on days with good light you go often overexposure with apertures (except adopt ND filters) |
 | sent on January 29, 2015 Pros: Yield at high ISO - Compact but powerful - Excellent features and settings outside of the manual - Stabilizer on cam well executed - remote control via wifi with the mobile app - Very solid and ergonomic Cons: Physical noise (constant background hiss, but not annoying) - Not Tropicalised (but holds up well even in critical condition) Opinion: I am a happy owner of this great little camera, and I can say after a few months of use who are totally satisfied. I never thought that a little girl like me could turn away from the reflex. And 'practice, in the bundle of purchase was the practical lens 14-82 that makes his duty very well, and with little clutter to me I can bring everywhere. Ok not be tropical conditions, but personally I used the snow to cold temperatures (we also talk about -10) and was not affected at all, neither the battery nor the camera. The viewfinder is electronic and makes eye already see the result before the shot, but it is practical indispensabile.rnPersonalmente believe as already mentioned by other reviewers that this technology Micro Four, will not migrate within a few users aps-c, and without the slightest regret. Maybe there will be many goals still on the market, and those that there are cost and not a little, but with time I will go much better. Speaking of the lack of physical noise, is somethingimperceptible if you are around, but I happened to use it in indoor places, and feels a bit, but it's nothing serious, just a little annoying, but no way detracts from the quality of the camera. Finally, I close by expressing my astonishment at the behavior of the camera at high ISO (3200 and sometimes beyond), the noise is minimal and maintains a good quality. I personally recommend the purchase, both the professionals and the neophyte to the first shots. You will have fun. |
 | sent on November 18, 2014 Pros: versatile 3-axis image stabilizer to the sensor, with the additional grip and more comfortable, jpeg files with various filter options "art" incorporated into the machinery already seem so beautiful, fast AF, Wi-Fi comfortable with the smartphone x click to "steal" in the street, always handy to have around, the LCD monitor (tilt), money ... Cons: It is tropical conditions and the battery does not last very much, but for me they are superficial problems ... Opinion: I purchased this camera a few months ago on the recommendation of a friend, and I must say that I was good advice! For example, I take the camera when I say "today I go out to take pictures," but the Olympus is've always behind !!! with its 14-42mm (28-84mm) is doing very well and is lightweight. I'm curious to try a lens "PRO" on that beautiful "sensorino" 4/3, I will give a hard time to aps-c. |
 | sent on November 10, 2014 Pros: Stabilizer - White Balance - Handiness - Yield at high ISO - Ergonomics, mainly due to additional handle - rnAutofocus accurate and fast - Build Quality Cons: The lack of tropicalizzazione.rnSinceramente find none other. Opinion: I am writing this review after using the Olympus during a wedding so that you can try in all conditions luce.rnL'ho alongside a Nikon D610 with a shoulder strap that I kept to the right and a Nikon D3 to the left while the Oly was hanging the neck; at the end of marriage I performed a total of 1,300 of which 700 shots with the Oly and anyone with D3.rnCon the WCO and M10 shots and you want to keep doing it, forgetting to have the professional options available, because the Olympus behaves such as these, if not even meglio.rnHo taken photos to the spouses (in situations with the absence of sudden movements of the subjects) even during the exchange of the rings with exposure time up to 1/10, because thanks to the stabilizer is not likely to blur Due to the internal vibrations, and this is wonderful for people like me who works in low light conditions without wanting to get up too .. I have pushed the ISO up to 4000 ISO setting while maintaining the car, and I must say the quality is impressive when you knows a minimum the light. E 'can take buoI also photos to 6400 but do not recommend it if you have to make prints important. Considering that we are talking about a micro 4/3 is amazing how much quality they have photographs taken compared to the Full frame.rnrnIl white balance left me open-mouthed, never any camera I had met so much, the pictures come out exactly as what can be seen with the naked eye, even in poor lighting conditions, including by increasing ISO is even better than what the human eye vede.rnrnSplendido as you can choose all the settings even looking through the viewfinder with only two buttons and dials for Additional selezione.rnrnL'impugnatura gives the machine a perfect grip as well as a touch of professionalità.rnrnEssendo a reportage photographer and then lover of travel, I would have preferred a mirrorless tropical conditions, but in the future you never know, now I wanted to start with this and I am totally satisfied. I recommend everyone this mirrorless, professional or not, and do not care about if you think that he does not do her figure onlybecause it is not a reflex.rnrnrnrn |
 | sent on November 01, 2014 Pros: A camera light and handy, compact but - try to hand - extremely comfortable and ergonomic. A multitude of features, perfect for the beginner and for the professional. Cons: Maybe a little 'limited in quick bursts. And certainly there will be some other defect that by the time I was not particularly bothered! Opinion: I came to the conclusion that the mirrorless system was the one for me after a long "labor." I followed the article by Juza about the transition Mirrorless SLR-but it seems that the center of the debate is - excuse the language - a competition to see who has it harder instead of a quiet reflection among enthusiasts where we exchange views and points of view. In fact, I have not discouraged and I poked around online and in magazines, I sought advice from my dealer and I've made my decision: I sold my beloved Nikon SLR body with his two goals to advance to this small Olympus. rnIl reason for the choice was dictated by several factors, not least the fact that sometimes I just give yourself a little whim and fun as - precisely - enjoy a new toy. It is still the main fact that with two small children and with less and less free time, be able to take pictures with my SLR system was becoming increasingly difficult. Heavy backpack, heavy lenses, heavy body (especially con a child in your arms or shoulders) meant that most of the time the camera ended up staying at home and the photographs were taken, alas, I am happy with the cellulare.rnAdesso. I chose the OM-D-M10 and evaluating different aspects: manageability, ease of use, number and menu functions, the possibility of extending the park's objectives, electronic viewfinder, large display and mobile touch, looks a little 'retro, price and other things that when I return to mente.rnIl result is that I always carry with me. In the bag when I'm traveling for work - I work with antiques and have some good photos can make a difference - and so it can be used at any time, even the night coming home to capture a sunset, a landscape or a city that I had not ever visited. In shoulder when I move alone or with family in his free time. So, after almost two years on the run, I returned with infinite pleasure in this wonderful passion which is the fotografia.rnCoNo pace of my old (and mind you, beloved) SLR Nikon.rn |
 | sent on August 25, 2014 Pros: Small and light, good quality and workability of the file, no AA filter, LCD touch screen and tilt-defined, responsive and accurate AF, excellent ability to configure the buttons at will, and a large park with glass lenses of the highest quality, value / good price. Cons: It is not tropical conditions, but for what is the big sister E-M1 Opinion: The E-M10 camera is a small, discreet and very responsive. In these two months of use I was really amazed by the quality of the file and trasporabilità. I chose it as one system (with 17,45,12-40 and 40-150) to replace Canon 5D2 + several lenses and at the moment given my "need" cameras are very satisfied. |
 | sent on August 11, 2014 Pros: lightness, compactness, ability to use optical leica, lumix and zuiko. great price compared to other mirrorless interchangeable category. Good result is that jpg ras (orf), three-axis stabilizer inside the sensor. Cons: Excessive consumption of batteries (which do not last long and you have to have at least a couple of spare), the machine's menus too rich and not easy to manage, software included useless and too cumbersome. Missing in the box the instruction booklet that is available only on the Internet. Opinion: I took it in exchange for the 7d which is now outdated?., Before I tried to buy the flagship EM1 for 7 days and it hit me like when you fall in love (strong heart sank). and 'amazing what he could do OLYMPUS ??., have reduced everything? weight sensor, costs and volumes? but have doubled the optical quality with amazing (I mounted the 45mmf1,8) and if you use leica lumix or The results are ensured even in high iso. I always carry around waiting for the new lenses that Olympus put on the market. In a small backpack you find everything you need x enables the photographer, but without feeling the weight. I'm sorely tempted to sell you the whole kit canon (including my 400mmf2,8) x buy a complete kit olympus that I would make available a 500mm f2.8 lenses (I speak of 90-250 in 43 which is a 180-500 f2 , 8 in fullframe) or the future 40-150f2,8 that becomes a 80-300 f2.8 in ff (no house has a zoom lens that reaches 300mm f2.8 to prejudice). If the om10 gives them satisfaction, let alone the flagship EM1 that withprofessional optics shoot even in the rain. You want evidence ??? I am a fan of photographs in digiscoping and if you go on the website and type in the username DIGISCOPINGITALIA.IT SAVINIMAGES, you will discover the extraordinary results I get by combining the m10 or a spotting scope? .. |
 | sent on August 11, 2014 Pros: 3-axis stabilization and high ISO phenomenal performance, quality / price ratio, small, practical and intuitive, good materials, double ring, makes you want to carry it with you. Cons: for what it's worth you can not expect more Opinion: I was lucky enough to take advantage of this E-M10 for 6 days due to the free trial made available from my store. As soon as I saw it I was struck by the small size .. and even more so when I took it in hand for excellent grip. I found it comfortable even without hand grip. As mentioned by others the more you use the more you judge "Beautiful and fun." I think it is objectively say that within this body hides a great potential. Can you look small, almost a compact, but those guys have really done a miracle Olympus with the micro 4/3 sensor. The yield at high ISO is amazing. There were times that I even snapped at 2-3-4000 iso and slightly corrected in pp without any problems! Good management of the ISO if you leave it to the car (which I never do with D7000, I prefer to keep in the manual). The most beautiful of all of this machine is the system integrated. Try it for yourself !! Take a quarter of a second without blur now you can. With it I rediscovered the pleasure of fotografare to capture the moment and tell something. The auto-focus on what I have to do it fast enough (I do not do sports photography) and accurately, even in dim light I have never had problems! Obviously you can not expect the impossible. I've never been disappointed. The double ring is perfect to manage aperture and exposure .. plus the changes are visible in Live View or in the viewfinder before shooting again! I also like the fact that they put the option that if you remove your eye from the viewfinder activates Live View, and vice versa. As for the lens I've tried just fine 14-42 mm f / 3.5-5.6 EZ Digital and say that is not evil as well as small. The image quality is not that of an SLR but it comes close! I should add that I only did some short tests but if you want to improve the board's fixed targets 17, 25, 45, 75 all 1.8. It opens up a world in which case, great! Experience and very positive feedback! Recommended |
 | sent on June 21, 2014 Pros: Price / quality, small, easy to handle, fun to use, has a nice file, free wi-fi with your smartphone, good yield at high iso, adjustable monitor, you can see the display in live view even before you take the picture , AF function touch screen (if you use the monitor to frame just touch the screen with your finger at the point where you want the focus and the camera takes the picture by focusing on where you touched the screen) Cons: maybe gave them but I do not I still found. Opinion: Beautiful and fun, and the more you use the more you want to use. It 's the proof that size does not matter, for use in their free time is perfetta.rnHa a lot of interesting ART filter with the supplied lens (the 14-42 / 3.5-5.6) to have very good results, but if you mount a lens on a bit 'more quality becomes a bomb, for example, I've mounted the 17/1.8 (equiv. 35mm film format) and does not take away him ever again. even with the 45/1.8 is amazing. |
 | sent on April 11, 2014 Pros: Robust, full (optical viewfinder, flash, 3-axis stabilizer, large monitors and so on ...), very nice design a bit back that hides a wealth of technology, compact but high-quality photos. Cons: Optical viewfinder a bit uncomfortable after a few photos Opinion: The first opinion is the excellent noise handling at high ISO.rnHo off some photos at different ISO Demonstration: http://tinyurl.com/lupfar2rnMi was very impressed its size, not much bigger than a compact, and its objective 14-42 once retracted takes up very little space. rnQuando you have it in your hand you realize you have a car really sturdy and very solid. rnIl optical viewfinder is really convenient as it is comfortable large display adjustable for 3 ". rnLo 3-axis stabilizer is perceptible to the ear because it makes a noise type cooling fan but it is barely noticeable. rnEffettivamente allows you to take pictures did not move even with openings where there would be to force the shake-if you do not use a cavalletto.rnL '81 AF points is incredibly nice veloce.rnMolto the built-in WiFi that allows through its APP to be able to control the camera on the phone display seeing what the sensor sees, also you can zoom and act on other parameters as well as download photos directly on the phone for themmay share it on the social or give you the ability to add GPS positioning to the photos just scattate.rnAl moment I only did a few test shots, but soon I will try at night or during any trip out of town. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
