JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Practical, good quality up to 100mm, tropicalization, extremely low weight
Cons:Poor brightness, lack of zoom block, slow autofocus, poor sharpness after 100mm and bad at 150mm.
Opinion:I claim that I bought an Olympus E-M10 MarkII with the 14-150 to get rid of the heavy weight of the Canon 6D on my hiking trails from the neck, aware of the advantages and disadvantages of this machine and of this goal. Goal achieved?? I would say yes, the lens is light and in a long hike (7/8 hours) not particularly annoying, the quality found up to 100mm is more than acceptable and in good light conditions, as always happens in the outside, comes to have a very good quality and personally I was very pleased with it ... Then there are the limits that are not few, but I find them more than acceptable for the use I do. In low light conditions, even taking low ISOs, it knocks the image a bit, it suffers tremendously from the counter light, even if it behaves beniny with the warm lights of dawn and sunset, it suffers tremendously the flare so much that it has to avoid it accurately, walking so often, it often happens that the zoom gets annoying (buta mechanical lock) and when it comes to catching animals on the fly, moving, the autofocus is so slow that most of the time the animal has run away and you still have to shoot. Despite all its limitations, I like it, I'm more than happy and I could only change it with the 14-100 PRO but it costs exactly twice ...
Pros:Dimensions, sharpness up to 100-120mm, Weight, versatility, Autofocus.
Cons:Nothing that is not already known: not very bright (it is already known at purchase), sharpness at very high focal lengths.
Opinion:I bought it as a handyman for my M5 mark II and I must say that it did not disappoint my expectations. For about the same price at the time I bought in my kit Canon, the equivalent Sigma 18-200 contemporary, paid more or less the same price as this, but I must say that there is really no comparison.rnAutofocus is always fast and precise, even in low light conditions. I use it for a while and rarely could not focus. The Sigma made me damn.rnThe sharpness is really good up to 100-120, after there is a bit 'of degradation. Nothing alarming, I took good pictures even at 150mm.rnOf course is a bit 'scuretto, but this is something known from the technical data, not a defect.rnThe construction seemed good, it is very solid.rnrnHere my full review: https://www.mondomirrorless.it/2018/04/07/recensione-olympus-14-150mm-f-4-5-6-tuttofare/rnrnVoto: 9.rn
Cons:- Max. F / 4-5.6 diaphragm is an extremely compact lens. Using the camera flash (Olympus o-md e-m10 mark ii), the lens shadow appears in the photo for the most wide-angle focal lengths .
Opinion:I bought this lens together with the car (olympus o-md e-m10 mark ii) in November 2015 and can not disassemble it ... it's a handyman I always have behind and that thanks to the stabilization of the car body does not make me feel Too flawed for diaphragms f / 4-5.6.rnI have not had any problems with the ergonomics that I find excellent, walking disappears in my hand, I do not even have to wear the camera on the shoulder strap.rn its weigh is perfect for walking, going up and down By public transport, with my car body disappearing and reappears in the bag or backpack at the moment.rnI used it in the rain without the slightest problem.rn the hood (supplied) mounted to the reverse not from problems with the zoom while for the mass Manual focus must be disassembled. Rn I've never had excessive problems in focusing on the night. Rn What is missing? Nothing.rn my vote? 9
Pros:Compactness and lightness considered the 28-300mm equivalent focal, weather sealing, ergonomics.
Cons:Not excellent sharpness over 100mm, sufficient brightness, lack zoom lock.
Opinion:I chose this point to have an all-around in the mountain walks, where you have the need to do a scene with wide angle, how can you have the need to photograph a 100 meters away deer. In the field of versatility so excels beyond comparison. At longer focal it lose some sharpness, but it is always much more than acccettabili levels. The only drawback that drives me crazy is the lack of zoom lock (present instead in the Tamron 14-150 which is not weather sealed): in the mountains harbor the camera hanging by a special support to the walls and on time after a while 'I find myself way with the zoom all extended downward. I noticed, however, that going walking in the most inaccessible places, while walking on trails or roads fairly even jokes this phenomenon greatly decreases. Excellent value for money, will never take away from my "arsenal".
Cons:For me not very bright especially in the early morning and at dusk, however, it is used. Autofocus unresponsive with moving subjects.
Opinion:A good lens used with Oly omd em 5 first series. Its compactness helps to want to always carry your camera when you go quietly walking aimlessly (unfortunately less and less!). It covers from 28 to 300 mm equivalent to FF and has a good definition even at extreme excursions. Not very bright but still usable even in low light (not little) .The yield with good light is excellent. It used even under pouring water without subsequent problems (thankfully !!!). If you purchased used excellent value for money for me.
Opinion:I am a new owner of an Olympus om-d E-10 Mark II and I sold all my equipment in my D7000 with Nikon 50mm 1.8 Tamron 70-200mm Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 2.8rned other lenses with various Flash to buy a light machine can be transported without clutter and with a goal of good handyman qualità.rnNon are a professional but for three years I did sports photos for Kart and Moto where I learned many things, especially photograph well things moving without stabilizer;) rnp.s . I'm no expert. rnL'obiettivo in question allows me to drive around the city by bike with a purse piccolo.rnPuoi all of us with an excellent sharpness, not really suitable for indoors in low light and moving subjects, it is almost impossible to have a photo without blur. rnPer portraits with good light and long exposure evening is very good !!!
Pros:lightweight versatile, aperture f / 4-5.6 puts it in the middle of all these objectives do, tropical conditions and is resistant to splashes and dust, good image quality, the package also included the hood.
Cons:improved in construction, in af paintings not always fast, but still acceptable.
Opinion:Olympus to put on the market another update of this 14-150, more modern design and seals with splash and dust, but the construction of the lens remains the same, in my kit lens can not miss a whole do so, for the quality and light weight (about 300g) which gives me mounted on the E-M5dII in my long hikes in the mountains is good for me, combined with the backpack Photo Sport 200 AW in the 8mm fisheye lens Lumix, my vote is 9.
Opinion:I'm not a great expert photographer for which they are not able to make many comparisons especially with other Micro4 / 3 while I know a little 'more goals Nikon SLR which I really appreciated when I accepted much iron below (= beautiful but very heavy). the versatility of this lens is remarkable. but also it weighs less.
Pros:Weight and focus, sharp and incisive enough, moderately priced (for a 28-300 as the focal 4/3 is multiplied by 2), constructively honest, tropical conditions.
Cons:Construction definitely improved, missing the hood sold separately, US engine failure.
Opinion:Everything I tried to do honest with the formula "touch and try" Olympus for three days. More than satisfactory results and no fact to do given the price. Compared with 28-300 Nikon VR (FF) it is certainly much stronger. It suffers a bit 'at maximum focal sull'AF but nothing serious. In summary a good lens honest and useful to leave the backpack fixed focal. The trial compared the type of use is definitely positive.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
