RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon TC-20E III : Specifications and Opinions


  1. Reviews
  2. »
  3. Lenses
  4. »
  5. Lenses Nikon
  6. »
  7. Nikon TC-20E III
  8. » All Opinions


Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Nikon TC-20E III)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on March 25, 2013

Pros: Quality image

Cons: The specimen of which I have worsened compared to the af kenko I had before

Opinion: Strangely, the AF performance has deteriorated with the passage by kenko MC7 this. I'd like to compare it with other twins, since I find this strange thing and I'm afraid it's just my copy, not a birth defect. I've used both with 70-200, 200-400 with that ... I think I go to get my tc17. I'll keep this to match the 105 micro, since the image quality is very good ...

avatarsenior
sent on March 17, 2013

Pros: Great image quality coupled with Nikon AF-S 300mm f/2.8 G ED VR.rnL 'f remains excellent with conditions favorable light and still very good with light scarsa.rnSe subjects are not too far away is already in utilizzabilissimo full aperture.

Cons: Small thing, but I would have preferred not to hear the sound of the latch to the aperture when it is detached from the machine.

Opinion: I've always been super happy with the duplicator in questione.rnDa then when I switched from D300 to D3 my satisfaction is further aumentata.rnCon the D300 worked fine in good light conditions, with the D3 is almost always used with great risultati.rnVisto the weighs practically nothing and I never do without taking him out with me.

avatarsenior
sent on May 01, 2012

Pros: Very "transparent" and then high quality 'image. Much improved from the point of view of chromatic aberrations. Af more 'faster than the old model.

Cons: High price.

Opinion: A purchase very appropriate in my case. With the Af-s 300 f2.8 MkI the difference with the old model and 'unmistakable quality' image quality, very sharp, Af comparable to 1 .7 x. Excellent even with faraway subjects (with the old images were soft in that case) ... I do not know with less optical solving, but I'm really happy! ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 09, 2012

Pros: Coupled with significant new VR2

Cons: The pin of the ticchettia when dismantled

Opinion: I must say I am extremely impressed with the new TC-20EIII. The optical scheme renewed has been adapted in order to give the best with his new family VR2. For those who have a fixed optical VR1 improvements are still good while for those using optical VR2 will be excellent. Surprising results with the 70-200 2.8 VR2. It is rumored that it was ottimizzatto for the new zoom and this is proof. Nikon says it is not possible to make fire with 105mm f2.8 micro. It is not true. Despite the autofocus become extremely slow yet fully efficient and accurate.

avatarsenior
sent on September 28, 2011

Pros: The best multiplier of 2X Nikon

Cons: High price, limited performance increase compared to the previous version (at least from the viewpoint with which I have tried)

Opinion: I had the first TC-20E I used occasionally with zoom Nikon AF-S 80-200mm f / 2.8 IF ED. I switched to this version drawn by the optical scheme renewed. The improvement but there has been very limited, only the edges now appear much more incised, while in the center of the frame I did not notice significant differences. And 'maybe a hair sharper wide open, but it is difficult to confirm impressions. I've read that with other focal lengths (fixed) the performance is much better. For the moment I can make a 160-400mm f / 5,6 decent quality and with a very fast and accurate AF, better than the 80-400mm AF-D.



Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Nikon » Nikon TC-20E III » All Opinions


 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me