|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on August 08, 2019 Pros: lightness, display, ease of use, small size, great sensor, 39 autofocus points Cons: The proximity sensor keeps the touch on but not the monitor when you look from the crosshairs, so sometimes you touch the display with your nose and move a few parameters, ridiculous buffers, Opinion: Bought to take advantage of Nikon's cashback to get rid of a goal, with the intention of selling it, i was literally surprised. It works that is wonderful, very light, very small, I took it with me practically everywhere leaving the 7200 or the 750 often at home preferring lightness (especially when I go on the mountain trails). The autofocus is very fast, the 39 points are comfortable and there is also the possibility of touch to focus that is not cheap. The monitor is spectacular, I wonder why it does this kind of tilting only on this machine and does not propose it on the others as Canon has done for years. The dial is nice soft but precise, the possibility, the customization of the keys does not make you regret the second ring, using the machine in a or p is very comfortable. Unique precisely from my point of view, the real difference from the other its there is notice when doing photo hunting, the burst is also acceptable (if not in live view) but the capacity of the buffer is really limited, even using the lexar 1000 that I still do 5/6 photos and already you're still. But moreover, it is still an entry level, so for me it is approved with flying colors, I definitely will not change it, it is easier that I will sell the 7200 than this! I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to enter the world of reflex photography, but also to those who would like a mirrorless in their kit, go and see it because it is worth it! |
 | sent on June 26, 2019 Pros: Nn Cons: Nn Opinion: Hi everyone, I wanted to ask... Does this Nikon D5600 have a chance to be connected to a range meter? I ask why I was literally screwed by the purchase of the D3500 (purchased especially for astrophotography), which does not have the connector to connect any remote control. Amazing!!!!! Thanks to those who will be able to answer me, hello. |
  | sent on December 31, 2018 Pros: All, among the best of his band (APS/DX just beyond the entry level). Cons: Nothing, unless you claim things that are beyond that band of belonging. Points irrelevant to me but important to many: does not have the depth of field button, it seems to have a poor Snapbridge support, is sub-par for Video, has a live view not excelled, not by Autofocus possibilities for lenses that do not have internal . Opinion: After a year and a half of intensive use as a second body, it is a machine on which I find no flaws. To tell the truth, for its practicality, lightness, and surrender... it has become the first body of use. Weighs little more than a feather, including the lenses with which the most frequently used: 18-55 AFP-DX VR (had in kit and excellent), 35 1.8 dx, 50 1.4 G. The weight is reasonable even with the massive 28-300 VR, which incidentally makes it fine, more on her than on the D800 while losing the wide by 28 (on the other hand you earn 450 mm equivalent with some sharp shots even at 1/10!). The quality of the shots is excellent in the Raw as well as in the JPG: tone, contrast, micro-contrast, color. The JPG engine is so good that if you shoot Raw + jpg It is easy to not have virtually the first (unless there are high series burns or unless you are more than ISO 2000 about). It is of limited size and much greater discretion than a D800. Enter a small handbag. Even in a large pouch if with short things like the 35 1.8 or as the 50 1.4 G. Neck ache and wrist cramps become a memory. It's accurate, fast, flawless. Very rare autofocus errors and lost shots (when there are, is my mistake). Together with AF-P lenses it allows to shoot at 1/5 freehand at 82 mm equivalent (7-8 shots out of 10 are sharp). The high ISO seal is very good in jpg and absolutely excellent from Raw post-product (with valid software, be it clear). Using techniques of "expose to the right", bringing the exposure down in post, and using the best denoise, I have some shots perfectly usable even at Iso 12800 if the light is good (also tested in print up to A3). In low light and at night with little illumination, everything runs smoothly up to 3200 (which I use fluently) but sometimes the results are valid at 5000 or even at 6400 (in the latter case however you play fine textures if present, and the photos can be soft as a result of Denoi If heavy). The Sharpness, in particular col 18-55 AFP dx VR and Col 35 DX 1.8, is at the highest level, the resolve of the idem detail. The photos, also from JPG, are very good in black and white toning, even with heavy and dramatic postproductions. The flash is not the best, but it does its job. The battery has an excellent durability, and is quickly recharged (contrary to the D800). The pixel count is slightly larger than more advanced DX machines (such as D500 and D7500), and while the latter are (much) faster in the burst and have more advanced functions, the image quality seems to me equal in the "real world". In JPG performances are even higher than those of the D800 (weigh the years of firmware advancement), contrary to the Raw where obviously the headroom of 800 is greater (but the dynamic range of the 5600 is optimal and wide for every use, however). The display is excellent and the touch function does more than its duty. Honestly, I don't find "real" flaws. Has "only" 24 mpx? Unless you have to print street posters every day, they are more than one needs in life (you forget when only 10-12 years ago were "so many" 12 mpx). It's not tropicalized and it's plasticose? It's a 6-700 euro SLR, not 1500. Does not make burst from 14 fps? It's fast enough for its headband, it's 5. sacrificed controls? From touch menu activated by key "I" You can quickly access almost everything. The live view is slow but it does its job. I've never used it in videos where it's modest. If you want video figs, you have to switch to Sony or Panasonic. It doesn't have the depth of field Preview button, but I personally live without it. There is little snapbridge support, which I don't use. Like several Nikon, it doesn't allow Autofocus on lenses that don't have it internal. But I don't have any. |
user58495   | sent on December 20, 2018 Pros: Extraordinary 24 MPX sensor, touchscreen, Snapbridge, ergonomics, weight, excellent autofocus Cons: Does not have the depth of field control button Opinion: APSC Excellent: It does everything it needs to do and it does it very well: the sensor is extraordinary for dynamic range, excellent colors also in Jpeg, excellent definition and detail. I imagine that many have it with optics from kits or economic optics, hence the complaint that would be scarce in detail. All the opposite: with the right optics you don't even need the post production. Af rather fast and reliable, controllable even from the rear touch pad. Perfect and sensitive touch controls, rational menus, perhaps a more function button would have been appreciated. Missing, and it is Gravisssimo, the control button of the depth of field. For the rest, although not having so many direct commands as the older sisters of the series 7xxx, is a camera able to give beautiful images. Snapbridge is a bit tricky to pair at the beginning with Apple devices, but once done it does its job: convenient the function that immediately transfers the images to the phone in reduced format, ready to use on social media. Light, compact and Fruibilissima: For game I tried it with the Nikon 70/200 f2.8 and with the Sigma 35 1.4. Full frame lenses. Well, spells and surprises pleasant to no end. |
 | sent on May 16, 2018 Pros: Weight,24 Megapixel, excellent touch, adjustable display. Cons: No autofocus motor, low-hold to high (not too many) ISO, connectivity with smartphones through Snapbridge shoddy (not that much amounts, but since Nikon the VA waving it seemed appropriate to underline it) Opinion: I have this camera for a year. I came from the even more entry level D3000. Given that I am not a professional, I consider this machine a really good entry level, superlight that does not give the feeling of having a boulder in the neck, purse or hand. Excellent sharpness. As for the holding at high ISO, as already said by others is not much and the noise tends to be heard quite early, but despite this allowed me to take great photos at night (starry sky, Milky Way etc.) with single shot. I use live view a lot and it's quick, never encountered any kind of problem. The touch makes the machine management much faster and works great. The connectivity with the phone is good through Bluetooth, poor via WiFi. Gust not very satisfactory. Great videos. In my opinion it is fabulous for those who start, for those who already have a little more experience and to take on the road (see weight). |
 | sent on March 19, 2018 Pros: Weight. Excellent 3D tracking and ability to control the position of the focusing point with the touch. AFP lens with autofocus also in quick and silent live view. Cons: High estate iso (1600) questionable (with little light, not a low time!) And burst in raw limited despite a sdcard top. In live view there is a lot of (too much) time after each photo. Opinion: I replace (or intact?) The S5Pro with a light and inconspicuous car, to take pictures of the children. 3D tracking at the level of the d500 (not mine but sometimes I use it at work) even if with a few points. Perhaps the touch that (with the screen off) controls the point of focus is even better than jojstik. Too bad that then the gust dies on the most beautiful (the goal on the rival of the goalkeeper you lose them, so to speak). The viewfinder seems bright to me. With the wheel and the combination of a couple of buttons crushed at the same time you adjust well opening, timing, ISO: I do not miss so much the second wheel. With 35mm the photos are sharper than with the S5Pro, not too much color. With 18-200, the difference between d5600 and S5Pro is not much. With the AF-P I do not know why he does not go to the Fuji. ISO: Already at 800 better than the D5600 of the S5Pro. At 1600, however, the picture does not seem to me already a bit 'noisy in the dark parts. In live view the automatic fire seems to me fast, video ok. Photos in live view for me little usable, because it is blockeda too much after the photo. Connectivity with rapid cell phone. Allows the retouch of the raw already in the machine, a nice pastime. |
 | sent on February 17, 2018 Pros: The weight is its greatest value, 24 megapixel, ease of use, great display and touch screen, endless battery is never downloaded. Cons: Discreet hold at high ISO and the files do not have a great clarity. Opinion: I purchased this camera six months ago. I must say that to be an entry level goes really well the only two flaws I found that push you to make a new purchase are the high-ISO seal. Already at 1000 ISO there is the grain and you can see well you have to use all the skills and software to remove it or mitigate it to the detriment of the details. Another problem solvable in post is a lack of clarity of the file that resolves in lightroom quietly but there is. As for everything else, he does his duty brilliantly without problems. I do not recommend this camera to those who like to take pictures with strong contrasts of light and shadows or in very shady places with little light, while it is the Top for those traveling or hiking because it weighs very little like a mirrorless. For the rest a real wonder and you can take it all day with you without ever feeling the weight of the car. To use it to the fullest and enjoy beautiful bright optical board files so you go to limit the problem of high-ISO sealing. |
 | sent on February 14, 2018 Pros: Finally I decided (for the purchase of the Nikon D5600). Cons: I do not follow the reviews of the latest camera photos feverishly. Opinion: Today, with pleasure, I have discovered that I can use (in manual) the very bright old lenses of a Nikon FE2 (more than 40 years ago) of my wife, I think I have made a good purchase. They tell me that the comment must have a minimum length of 350 characters, it is usually the opposite ... (still 57 characters) almost force, almost there. |
| sent on May 04, 2017 Pros: Dynamic range, high ISO seal (for APS-C), small, lightweight and ergonomic machine body, comfortable keys, adjustable display. Cons: It does not have autofocus motor and end AF setting. Opinion: A really compact body, almost mirrorless, light and with exceptional ergonomics (even for those who have big hands). The Nikon D5600 goes unnoticed by prying eyes but inside it encloses one of the most powerful APS-C sensors (the heart of every digital SLR). Compared to the "almost" twin D5500 you have the opportunity to crank out excellent timelapse without the help of a PC and connect to the platform Snapbridge. The latter addition, along with a very responsive touch screen, gives him a very "smart" soul... (Perhaps more appreciated by the new generations who do not disdain the touch). Although light it seems sturdy and without loose in the rings/protections in rubber. It is advisable to predirect it with respect to its twin only if it is at a little higher price, as there are no major changes that justify an exorbitant increase in price. Unfortunately, like the whole 5XXX series, it does not have the autofocus motor inside the machine body, it mounts a pentamirror and it is not tropicalized. Obviously you can not expect to have everything, considering its headband, but for my needs I am satisfied; Right from the first moment there was a positive feeling and the only one to hold it in my hand gratifies. |
 | sent on March 31, 2017 Pros: Resolution, manageability, completeness of functions, rotating display Cons: Motor Lack autofocus Opinion: A brief premise. After inaugurate my digital photographic life with the mythical D70, I converted to full frame with the d700, passing in a whole other world (dynamic range, chromatic rendition, ISO manageability in low light, etc.). In recent years I have worked more and more with the 28-300, which, however, recently broke me. I therefore found myself in the need to replace it by addressing the relevant expenditure (800-900 euro). Having already a good kit of optics DX (12-24, 18-200, 35, etc.), comforted by reading reviews about the performance of current DX sensors, I decided to-instead of replacing the 28-200-retry the DX format, buying-not without hesitation-the D5600 with the two excellent and lightweight kit lenses (18-55 + 70-300). Well, at the moment, according to a series of tests comparing with the same optics and the same subjects, I must say that as image quality wins across the line the D5600 on the D700. That is to say: The current DX gets better results than the FX of ten years ago. Frankly, I didn't expect that. At this point, at least for me, does not really make sense to break my back with the heavy equipment FX, often left at home: I bought a nice backpack, where I put my wonderful 5600 with all my small, very light and Fantastic optics DX, and away to have fun! Only note, does not work the autofocus of the various 85, 50, 300 etc. who used the autofocus of the D700, but little bad, taken by the enthusiasm I remade them. P.S. Update after a year. In the long run, and after many tests in all light conditions and several hundred prints, I have to partially correct the above judgement on the basis of early initial tests. If you look at the pure and simple resolution, and the results under controlled lighting conditions, the current DX may be higher than the old full frame of the D700; But "when the game gets tough", ie in situations of strong contrast or critical lighting, the old full-format sensor brings home more satisfying results, opening better shadows and keeping the detail in the highlights, all with greater Chromatic fidelity. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
