|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on May 13, 2023 Pros: AF (all that is this compartment), Robustness and Ergonomics, White Balance, ISO Sealing, Image Quality, How the Menu is set Cons: I found no flaws. If we really want the hair in the egg, touch screen I would have preferred it also in the menu. Opinion: I bought this car a year and a half ago and for now I can only speak well of it because of the many satisfactions it gives me. Initially I took it to take sports photos of dogs, of which we know all the strengths, which I will not list, on this field. This camera in my opinion does not excel only in the sports / wildlife field, also used for other photographic genres pulls out beautiful files, with a high image quality, colors and a white balance more than excellent, an iso seal that up to 2000 is non-existent and usable safely up to 6400, over 6400 I never went because I have never needed it yet. As a threshold, however, you do everything just match the right quality optics. For now I have used it combining it with the Nikon 16-80 2.8-4 and the Sigma Sport 70-200 2.8 and it is exceptional with both lenses, later I already have in mind what other lenses to match for the photographic genres that interest me. This jewel of a machine I think I intend to keep it for many more years and use it in various fields, given the reliability that transmits to you just holding it, up to the general quality and files. Does it make sense to take it today? In my opinion yes because if you know the qualities and potential of this wonder, you do everything and you are fully satisfied, you also have access to a very large optical park. |
 | sent on April 23, 2023 Pros: AF coupling and sealing, buffer, shutter, materials used and assembly Cons: It has no cons if you know what you buy Opinion: Does it make sense to talk about the D500 in 2023, with production now ceased? I think so, since it is the best apsc SLR ever produced and having the security that it will never be surpassed, producing an ML costs a quarter and those of Nikon do not have the nose ring. Many D7500 owners optimistically claim that the two SLRs are almost the same but this is just wishful thinking, the D500 is unique. The many reviews prior to mine already exalt features such as AF, buffer, shutter, build quality, so I do not waste time repeating them. Some pious souls, however, have gone out of their way to praise the high ISO, and here we must take stock seriously. With its 21 mpxl and with that expeed that is found the D500 would have excelled even on high ISO but then would have gone into competition with the D5. At this point the ISO have nicely cut them at the level of sw adding a progressive dose of noise from about 2400 upwards. I recommend those who use the automatic ISO to calibrate the maximum to 3200 and use the 6400 (however fully exploitable) only for emergency. I also recommend the use of the battery grip - possibly the original MB-D17, unfortunately expensive - both because the jewel loves to consume power (and in the BG you can use the EN-EL 18), and because the best grip will be very useful for the predictable use with long burners. By the way, with the PF 300 and 500 it forms an incredible combination, super manageable, and returns beautiful rows, but even with the heavy 200-500 comes out a good match for sports and birdlife! For general shots I use instead the excellent coupled Art 18-35 and 50-100, stuff at these levels at Nikon I have not found. Unfortunately Nikon has never intended to develop excellent lenses for apsc, unfortunately their catalog is reduced to a host of plastics not worthy of so much SLR. What can I say, to close I dispassionately recommend the purchase on the used of this jewel, just use it a couple of hours to realize that in terms of apsc there is no better! |
  | sent on November 08, 2022 Pros: Fast fantastic autofocus Cons: Recommended to use it with bright optics so 'you can' also go up with the iso Opinion: I had this car 2 times the first sold for transition to z6II fantastic car but for birdlife not comparable, returned to my steps and I managed to find a new one. For the street passed to xt4 . In my opinion for birds etc. the SLR has no rivals yet and then goes well 'the d500 weighs 150 grams more' than z6II then the socket and' a whole other thing with long lenses |
| sent on August 23, 2022 Pros: Camera of the highest level. Quality and numbers from a true Nikon flagship. Very complete in all respects. Robust and reliable at all times. Cons: Nobody. We miss that he also makes coffee, but it would be too much Opinion: I have Nikon cameras since 1980: FE2, FA, FM2 new, F801, F801s, D70, D90, and now D500. This camera is absolutely professional level, very close to the D5, very reliable, robust, complete, from the 30 s times. At 1/8000 sec. Vast ISO, 1/250 sec. flash sync, infinite functions, perfect and dynamic autofocus with a wide choice of options. In short, a Top camera. Commands and menus that are quick and easy to select. I don't think you can have more. Even about 21 megapixels are abundantly satisfactory for every need. I recommend it to everyone. It is found in the used and at good prices, considering that it is an expensive camera and with good reason. |
 | sent on July 18, 2022 Pros: Ergonomics, AF, overall speed, image quality and ISO seal Cons: Touch screen not complete, live view good only for static photos. Opinion: I have owned it for about a year and a half, I preferred it to the various mirrorless because of its ergonomics and its top features in an APSC body. I am extremely satisfied with it, it is a pleasure to use and never disappoints expectations, whatever the type of photography. The presence of so many focus points on an APSC sensor allows you to take advantage of practically the entire frame and this is truly a boon for the composition. In addition to this, the AF is really lightning fast, the responsiveness of focus and the speed of the shutter button make it look like a sniper rifle. The aspect that constantly surprises me is the image quality, which I find to be fantastic. I also own a D850 and I can say that the files of the D500 are almost the same as those of the D850 cropped. I honestly do not understand those who criticize the seal at high ISO, since to be an APSC I find it exceptional. I shot in fairly poor light conditions even at 8000 ISO without any problem, grain present but file delivered to the customer without any PP intervention. The thing that I do not tolerate is a live view really unusable for moving subjects (even slight). The result is that you have to use it always and only with the optical viewfinder and this is a shame because sometimes it would be convenient to frame with the display. Overall, however, it is a car that gives me a lot of confidence and a lot of satisfaction and that I will certainly keep for many years. |
 | sent on February 23, 2022 Pros: Burst, smoke point, viewfinder, plunge speed Cons: incomplete touch screen, battery life, image quality, iso seal from 4000 if you use good cards and good optics otherwise above 2000 iso Opinion: This car has always given me pleasant excursions without ever having missed a shot, when the subject does not give up. I use it only for photographic hunting, in fact I appreciated the power of the autofocus, It immediately catches the subject even if it is located in the branches of the trees. I use it with a 200-500mm F5.6E, even with a 300mm F4D, in my opinion the machine is spectacular. It transmits colors to unique images. speaking of "negative" aspects if they can be defined as such, in my opinion the quality of the image compared to the advance of mirrorles is low on certain occasions. But it remains and will always remain a gem, this machine for wildlife does not fight even today. the iso seal I personally find it good enough to be an APS-C reaches up to 2000 iso without problems and if you use good cards and optics it goes even higher, then if known well the D500 gives beautiful photos always. It's simply a demanding machine all here. the points of mass affuoco are nothing short of perfect, really good to manage. Absolutely still recommended even if out of production but in the used you can find it!!! |
 | sent on March 22, 2021 Pros: Pro machine, ergonomic, autofocus, burst, pro viewfinder, control arrangement, a D5 mini Cons: It is a Nikon, the car focus in live view is obscene, touch screen not complete, rendered over 2000 iso, xqd cards, nital price Opinion: I have been owning this machine for a couple of years now, I am very satisfied with it, the use almost exclusively for photo hunting animals, not by capammo, you appreciate the power of autofocus, a missile and very precise, it manages to catch fire even when you are taking photographs of birds among the branches of trees. I almost always use it in combination with the 70-300 af-p, waiting to have some money for the 200-500 brother, but in my opinion the car is spectacular. A downside in my opinion is the yield when you go beyond 2000 iso, the files are still workable, but the noise starts to show, and if you are not experts in Photoshop, it begins to become a problem. Another negative note is the xqd cards, now rare and at exorbitant prices, price that is another weak point of the D500, too high, if you do not only do birdlife or sports, but you want a great car in everything, I would stay directly on the 7000 series. |
| sent on March 08, 2021 Pros: Nothing but a little d5 from which she has very little to envy Cons: Original battery that doesn't excel in durability, but patona solves the problem. Opinion: Having a personal need for a second body to support D5 and having a certain reluctance for cameras with many Megapixels (which proportionally reduce the size of the photoreceptors) I opt for this product which, after a year, obliges me to talk about only a great good. The construction and materials are decidedly satisfying (magnesium and carbon fiber), great solidity associated with a large tilting screen, the handle (an indispensable factor for me in the choice) is excellent, the body tropicalized. The processor is the famous Expeed 5, 153-point autofocus (including 99 cross) as impressive as the "big sister" d5, the continuous shooting of great speed and the buffer guarantees a series of 200 Raw in 20 seconds. It is a small jewel, in my opinion the best Apsc for years on the market. Having the good fortune to own even a d5, this "little" d500 has nothing to envy compared to the flagship Nikon, if not a lower limit in the use of the high iso. |
 | sent on March 08, 2021 Pros: Operational speed, AF, flagship construction quality but in the format and size of an APS-C Cons: Image quality not always up to scratch, held at high ISOs not from top of the range Opinion: I took the D500 after an intermediate passage with the d7500 and I have to say that despite the similarities the difference between the two is perceived. The D500 has the right papers to be called a true flagship. Operational speed and buffers are impressive and the AF if well set does not miss a beat. On the whole it is a machine that even today, for sporting use, can absolutely say its own. The only limits that I found in my "short" use (less than a year after the purchase I definitively switched to Fuji) are the hold to high ISO and the overall quality of image, factors with respect to which in comparison with FF systems now dipsoniable in the same price range maybe something is actually lost. |
 | sent on August 28, 2020 Pros: Speed, precision and sensitivity of the AF, burst, buffer, XQD-SD, construction, high iso yield, configurability Cons: Battery life Opinion: A real war machine for action photos (sport or nature), a miniature flagship. Constructively speaking is excellent and evidenced by any criticism: completely tropicalized, all in all light, ergonomically perfect. Extremely configurable, both in terms of keys and in terms of the performance of the AF. The latter is the same module mounted on the D5 and is simply perfect in everything: speed and precision in the hook, ability to follow the subject, sensitivity in situations of low light. At the burst and buffer level we are back at the top: the frames per second are 10 and, using the XQD cards, the buffer has basically no limits (only after 20 uninterrupted seconds the shooting cadence drops so as not to strain the mirror mechanism too much but just leave the shutter button for a moment and you can resume). In terms of image quality we are clearly not at the level of modern FF machines, but I have not found APS-C bodies with better performance: at high iso the yield remains very valid (excellent considering the reduced sensor) and exposing correctly you can use without major problems even at 12,800 iso. The look in which he excels, about the high iso, it is the chromatic seal: the noise is clearly present but the rendering of the colors is not affected and the final yield of the file is superior even to that of full frame bodies of a previous generation (I also have a D700 and up to 3,200 iso I prefer it as noise to the D500 but exceeded 3200 absolutely not because doing so means finding washed-out and dominant colors that make the file very lower what you get at the same sensitivity with the D500). Flawless machine? Almost. The only one I personally find is the battery life: it's really "energetic". With a battery normally travel around 6-700 shots, no more, a longer lifespan than reflex. It is not an insurmountable defect, in the end it resolves with one or two spare batteries (strictly original Nikon, the D500 disdains the compatible, I do not know there are fully compatible!), but it is right to report it. In this regard two notes: the first is that in situations where I use the gust the problem feels less and the shots pass abundantly the 1,000, the second is that with some lenses I noticed that the battery lasts much less than with others, from what I read it seems to depend on the management of the eventual stabilizer in the lens that in some cases remains active for much longer than due (in my case with the Sigma 24-105 the battery lasts hard definitely less than with the Nikon 18-200). |
 | sent on July 22, 2020 Pros: Autofocus, ergonomics, speed, balanced sensor Cons: iso estate Opinion: I nikon since I was in bands my mom has always and only had nikon, the never before reflex is a d200 bought used to then switch to d90-d300s and d610 that I have today and I'm very happy, a few months ago I decided to join the FF the d500 and I'm super happy but I absolutely have to debunk those who say hold well to the high iso is a great and performing sensor but personally for the quality I want in the photos I never go beyond 2000 iso, the noise is clearly visible already at 800 iso, unparalleled to a FF but surely you can reduce the noise in the post. That said, it's an exceptional reflex!!! |
| sent on May 04, 2020 Pros: AF, Gust, external and backlit controls, buffer, Body Robustness, menu. Cons: Support of updates from the parent company, bayo attack "playful", touch screen not compete, AF in Live View panic, Italian price, WB, consistent loss over 1600 iso, optimization sw, live view drinks like an aircraft carrier. Opinion: Honestly after owning it for more than a year I thought better given the name... Good machine in the aspect of technical features, intended for a very sporty lens and for photo hunting... Live view slow, outrageous that sucks battery like an aircraft carrier! It could do much more if only there had been a more adequate optimization between machine/lens and sensor sw. From the best of itself with lenses equal to or greater than the 300mm f2.8 nikon, at the bottom staying at home the game is not worth the candle very often even with third-party lenses. Its main strengths are AF, XQD, Buffer. |
user198779  | sent on February 07, 2020 Pros: Autofocus, operational speed, iso seal, pro body. Cons: It's addictive. Opinion: The use for 2 years after waiting for years the heir of the D300 have finally marketed the D500 and I can say that at least the long wait was not disappointing indeed this in proportion is higher than the D300 when you go out . In the meantime I took all the NIKon FF and a couple of ML apsc from other brands. It's a full-fledged mini D5, with the advantage of lightening the set at least for me. As soon as you pick it up you immediately feel that there is so much substance compared the D610/D750 look and are more fragile. The D500 is bigger than the aforementioned, it is the same size as the 8xx series is just a little lower and as ergonomics is the one that I find better even than the D850. The quickness to shoot the first few times leaves you dismayed you literally run away the photos without wanting to, in my opinion it is also faster than the D850 that even she does not joke at all. For the rest nothing to say Nikon did a really good job holding iso, very good white balance. Probably before Nikon replaces her with an ML, I'm going to take another one. Rating 10 |
user47513 | sent on December 16, 2019 Pros: All Cons: Maybe the white balance, for me coming from Canon. It makes you want to have two... one is not enough; ) Opinion: |
 | sent on December 07, 2019 Pros: Handling, Robustness, File Quality, Autofocus Speed, Iso Sensitivity, Compactness Cons: hard to find anything against Opinion: Pretty much a monster for what's been thought. Really fast and reliable. I went from a D7100 to a D500 and although only 3 years old, the differences are monstrously visible. Quick, flawless autofocus, when paired with quality lenses, churns out professional photos. Although a D850 and a D3S are taken, which, however old it is, remains a flagship, the D500 is one of the very first machines I use in various situations. With several bodies available, it remains the first or maximum second choice for what I have to do. Super with telephoto lenses or supertele, with the Crop factor. Sensitivity is high. Photos with the D7100 I used about 2500 Iso, with the D500 arriving just at 640. I took pictures of 8000 and 10000 Iso and for an aps-c it's a lot of stuff and the material obtained is quietly workable in post. It's hard to find fault in my opinion. Maybe the price at the time of release Nital (about 2000) but after almost 4 years since its release is about 1500-1600, not nital even to 1300 and used on 900-1000. Very robust even though the display seemed fragile. Also being an aps-c the body is slightly smaller and lighter. After taking the D5 I found very similar files and I can declare it therefore a D5 in "miniature", 10 fps, fast processor, with XQD the buffer holds a lot, the Autofocus very fast covers the whole frame, which helps a lot. In sports and stock photos it is among the best if not the best excluding the D5. What to say. Money well spent. Having d5 d850 and d3s, it often turns out the VERY choice as I said, in fact in proportion to the time had, the d500 is second only to the D3S as use |
 | sent on September 27, 2019 Pros: It is a machine body that allows a lot of creativity. Cons: In live view mode, multiple exposure is inhibited, so you have to remember that. Opinion: Implements a lot of new technology; Some electronic functions are not commonly used. The sensor is new and creates raw files of about 48 mb, which means a lot of dynamic range and depth of color. However, I do not see the so-called resilience to high ISOs, despite efforts to use the most cost-effective exposure. The burst: Using an SD memory 633x, 1000x, 2000x, or a 1st generation xqd you get "only" 35 clicks at a rate of 10 per sec before the buffer is full; With the latest generation xqd you get the promised 200 shots at the same pace before it crashes. It is preferable to have a few stacks in your pocket, because you need so much energy. The TTL is also perfect with third-party hi sync slits, with zoom af generally, varying the focus automatically varies the motorized focal of the flasher, very comfortable. The first approach is a little perplexed about the naturalness of the files, perhaps because of the picture control set, in neutral mode or fl if you do pp is perhaps the most faithful set. You have to match an uncompromising view. The price paid is a subjective valuation. |
| sent on August 21, 2019 Pros: burst, autofocus, selfishness, joystick Cons: weight, iso above 640, live view battery Opinion: it's been a long time since my upgrade from a D5100 to a fantastic D500 and the first thing you notice is the speed of focus, a misssile. not to mention the gust the 10fps make their broad shoulders the moment you sit in CH and if then one pairs it to the 3D track you just take the flight (I have to say the only flaw that I noticed that the moment there are multiple subjects could for a moment change focuson but is also normal). at first you find yourself a moment disoriented by the greater ergonomics and the most keys you have to a moment understand where everything is, but it's only a matter of time because once you understand you will think that it has been sewn on your hands, the joystick the iso key and the fn so keys put all your hand close and just stretch a finger or move one to make small changes. I also doing portraiture I realize that it is not a ff you do not have a dynamic range of an 850 but quiet nothing so particular we are talking about finesse. but still when you pair a lens Mr. the churned-out files are of excellent quality and very workable. the video department also makes him in sui duty sin only of the macance of a mechanical stabilizer but only electronic that slightly croppees the image. |
| sent on July 14, 2019 Pros: Fast machine, with an autofocus that in my opinion borders on perfection. Cons: held at high ISOs above 6400 Opinion: I have to be honest, I wanted to replace the D750, as it was devaluing in anticipation of exit new model and I wanted a worthy replacement to match the D850. At first I was hesitant and undecided, seeing some mixed reviews, but I cut off the bull's head and bought it. In addition to the landscape and study photos for which I use the D850, I often do services for roller skating sports and I have to say that this D500 is really a portport. The first test shots I made them at a water polo competition with a Tamron 100-400 and I was really impressed, the burst shot is tremendous, the autofocus nails the action and all the photos are not excluded. It won't have the dynamic range and resolution of the 850, but gentlemen if you need a fast camera, with an autofocus that doesn't miss one, for quick photos, sports, birdlife and more, you will also landscape and ceremonies, it will love at first sight. I exaggerate, no, this is the best reflex dslr aspc camera ever. |
user87191 | sent on June 22, 2019 Pros: ergonomics, AF, burst, buffer, hold high iso, 4k video, double slot (XQD-sd) Cons: Battery life Opinion: Perfect camera for naturalistic bird photography: it has a really fast and precise AF that, combined with a barrage of fear (I use it with XQD), allows you to capture every moment. I had a d7100, good car, but too slow for the photograph from the shed ! It holds up to 2500/3200 iso well, in good light conditions and with subjects not too far apart (I have not yet tested it in the dark for astronomical photography, nor for other types of photos). Even in suboptimal light conditions (clouds), it defends itself very well, for the possibility of dare a little more with iso than other mid-high-end apsc. All the controls are in the right place and with a bit of habit you can change many settings without taking the eye off the viewfinder. It is definitely a reflex that requires knowledge of the functions it has (see, for example, the AF), because it offers several possibilities ! The only downside is battery life. With the d7100 I forgot to load it, while the d500 is limited, in my case, to 400/500 shots, despite having the airplane mode activated. I have not tested the connection with the mobile phone, a bit because I prefer to preserve the battery to take photos, a bit because it is not something that attracts me (at least at the moment). The ability to make 4k videos is a great added value. I recommend it to those who take photography to birdlife : better, in that price range, there is no ! |
 | sent on May 22, 2019 Pros: Af, Gust, ergonomics, build quality, file quality and much more. Cons: As mentioned by other users do not have it. Opinion: Purchased for nature photography to replace the d7100: The difference is abysmal in every point of view. The precise AF and the burst are something extraordinary. Used with Sigma 150 600 c It hooks up the subjects instantly and allows you to shoot in absolute safety allowing you to bring home very sharp photos and detailed. For Nature Photography the council with my eyes closed. Rating: 10. |
 | sent on May 01, 2019 Pros: Professional body, AF exaggerated level, overhead monitor, high ISO seal. Cons: Nothing except the battery life with live view active. Opinion: I have the Nikon d500 for a few months now and today I feel I can review it. Having paired it with the Nikon d850 I can say I have two machine bodies almost equal in terms of structure. The camera body with DX sensor presents a monstrous quality, positioning itself at the top of the DX format in the Nikon home. Sports a very fast and precise AF even in low light conditions. I tested it at high ISO and I can say that you get exceptional results, especially if the exposure is correct. Being a mainly landscape photographer I think that the screen is a plus tilting, in fact it allows me to use it even in this genre, albeit for very few times. Just on these occasions I realized that the battery life in live view is quite scarce; On the other hand, also the d850, which mounts the same battery model, has the exact same problem. Do not neglect the crop factor for those who own FX optics. The d500 (like any DX body) allows me to have a 300mm to f2.8 thanks to the possession of the 70-200 F 2.8. I highly recommend to those who are passionate about nature and sports photography; I think it was born to shoot in these photographic genres. |
 | sent on February 18, 2019 Pros: All... No exclusions! Cons: Nothing... Opinion: Outstanding Reflex, under all points of view. I also own the 750 and the 850 and the 500 completes everything perfectly. I sold the D4s to replace it with the D500... Never choice was more apt, at least from my very personal point of view. The machine is fast, sturdy and light. The AF is accurate and very fast and the yield to ISO "human" is excellent, not even seems a dx... The advice certainly also for genres other than sports or photographic hunting. |
 | sent on January 01, 2019 Pros: Well finished body, good grip and size when assembled to its BG, good ergonomics and functionality, professional layout that creates addiction, difficult to forget when you hold on to other, even if the same brand. Configurable and illuminated keys, Plus not indifferent. Cons: Tilting rear screen, advantageous, but not very supportive with the monolithic rest of the Body, a bit small and narrow opening mechanism. Slight lag when the menu of the machine is activated, the hourglass appears for about 1/2 seconds, sometimes it is annoying to have to wait. Battery life a little low, when used in LV or in "Non-airplane" mode consumes a lot. Opinion: I have been using the machine for well a year and a half, coupled with my "long" (600mm F4/300mm f2.8) for birdlife, and to this day, I have not found any better, than so fast, outside of the admirals that have well other costs. of pro has the keys Layout, totally configurable, in total 4, to which you can make what is best believed, from Iso settings, to AF functions that are many and improved, sharing the same AF module of the elder sister D5. The autofocus module, in addition to other peculiarities of this reflex is something really innovative, very reactive already with F4 lenses, gives the best of itself with the most open, focusing in an extraordinarily fast. In hooking subjects is really fantastic, not late to acquire even if the brightness of the scene is small, given the AF module equipped with a-4ev reading, perceptible very easy to use. Another point in favor is the burst, at 10 fps for 200 shots continuously, I do not think I've ever used it, and when paired with a quality XQD card (Lexar or Sony), is able to give the maximum of its strength. is tireless in focusing and ensuring the take home the shot, was born for this. A little sore note, the sensor, holds well up to 1600 ISO in good light, after the noise begins to be present, although well manageable via noise software, I think, however, more a reflex devoted to the action with good light, and in these cases, can be better also to Some flagship FX. It needs equipment of solving lenses, as it has very dense sensor, the ideal is the use on pushed Tele F 2.8, where the multiplication factor 1.5 x comes to the aid, and acts as a TC. I use it as a TC for my tele, in fact, after checking I found that, the yield of lenses with APS-C, is better than those FF with applied TC. In Summary, the machine costs, but deserves, because you pay, for the feedback it gives. To date, on APS format, in the Reflex field, it has no equal. Difficult to repeat the output of a machine like this (reflex), in this format. To try, but especially from "have" if you are naturalists/sports photographers. |
 | sent on December 20, 2018 Pros: All Cons: Not having it Opinion: I find myself reviewing the last successful shot of Nikon home, before it went crazy with the mirrorless of dubious utility. So much is this machine is exactly everything you could want for sports and wildlife use. It doesn't have the AA filter, it has a 10 fps burst, it has an infinite buffer, an AF in some conditions faster than that of the D5 (!!!), a miraculous ISO seal (like a D750), double sensible slots (a xqd a UHS-II, not like Sony that puts UHS-II and UHS-I , so as to neuter the main slot, but it goes well), scary body completely in magnesium, all the keys at hand and beyond, touch screen, backlit keys (incredible breakthrough). I bought it to do sports having a kit Sony: In my opinion much more sensible to have a 200-500 or a 300 2.8 AF-S + d500 than to buy and mount the 100-400 GM on Sony. But then it has an AF hallucinating, we chase the bikes on the track, and anyway you have a scary super-Tele Optical park, starting from 300-600 AF-S, up to zoom 150-600. In essence It is a definitive machine for those who need a definitive APS-C, and also for those who use Sony and do not know which super-tele buy themselves (there are alas). Beware because it has a very demanding sensor, it is a 20mpx without AA, which means a pixel density of almost 50mpx. If you plan to buy it as a "handyman" and use slow patacche, there is a big risk that you may be disappointed. |
 | sent on December 16, 2018 Pros: An Infallible Monster! Cons: The Tilting Monitor - Battery Consumption Opinion: I've been using the Nikon D500 for a long time. Almost all the shots I've taken with this reflex are about birds and fauna, every outing is fun! A satisfaction! I come from Reflex Pro as D4s and before that D300 and D700. I have no doubt to consider this machine as a milestone for Nikon, from the Autofocus system to the white balance, to the ISO estate... well over 2000... The Reflex is super balanced, the ergonomics at the Top! Double Memory Slots! Backlit keys, Flexibly programmed Fn buttons, 4k Video and full hd 60p. Sensitivity focus at -4ev. 153 focus points, 10 frame-per-second burst, shutter speed 1/8000 sec, widely configurable for any need. We are faced with a reflex built and reasoned for rapid and precise use! Derived in all from the D5 in its native DX format along with a 500mm it offers with a ratio of 1.5 a lens equivalent of 750mm without any crop... and with a RAW file size of 5568 x 3712 pixels! The combination with a 500mm PF optics of the latest generation, significantly reduces weights and dimensions permanently even for long and strenuous excursions like those at high altitude, allowing a definitive use freehand! Definitely a Reflex to recommend for those who need an effective and long-lasting tool! Second battery a mandatory purchase, consumelike like a beast! But it is in every sense!!! Super recommended!!! |
 | sent on December 16, 2018 Pros: Aesthetically beautiful, robust body, amazing AF, buffer and burst, excellent overall yield, joystick Cons: Balancing not always optimal Opinion: Just taken in hand the first thing that stands out is the body beautiful aesthetically, solid as only Nikon can do, and the keys all put there in their place, just where they must be, with the gem of the backlit keys that are really comfortable. The autofocus is something wonderful, precise and almost infallible. Buffer and burst seem endless and the performance of the sensor are excellent although not comparable in full to an FX. Excellent ISO seal up to 1600, up to 3200 exposing well you still get good results, from 6400 up you take home the shot but without too many pretensions. To be a DX case but them really worth all the money spent. The only flaw is the light meter not always accurate, and maybe even the lack of a built-in flash, not essential, but sometimes would be convenient. |
 | sent on November 26, 2018 Pros: Speed, autofocus, ergonomics and weight Cons: Game on lens attack/camera body Opinion: I use it for about 5 months and I am very satisfied with this very precise and fast machine used on my part mainly for birdlife. You have the option to set the autofocus in three ways, via the front shutter button + AF-ON rear and jostick back as on the new Nikon D850, I set AF to groups + AFCs + af dynamic at 21 points. I took pictures even at high ISO, 3200/6400 and the resulting images are usable, as mentioned in the previous review of Galan I have the same little problem on the lens attack that has game... even I found after a couple of months, the game you hear it Much with long and heavy telephoto lenses nothing serious cmq. I use in combination with the Nikon 200-500, and I find this a very good combination. Finally I confirm that the gust is exceptional. |
 | sent on November 21, 2018 Pros: AF, XQD, machine body Cons: Tuch does not work in the menu, AF video as pitiful as all Nikon, attack lens tends to make play after a few months, iso estate, Snap bridge that looks like a tease Opinion: The machine is definitely right, I've been using it for a long time now and in my opinion it's a D5 in aps-c version. Great for Sports, Wildlife and Live Events... Of course, to fully appreciate the quality, it takes optics of a certain quality. I really appreciate that Nikon has put the XQD as on the D5 thus ensuring excellent speed with an almost derisory buffer. Surely the D500 is the best APS-C produced by Nikon and I think also on the market. |
  | sent on November 16, 2018 Pros: AF, burst, viewfinder, ISO seal, Ergonomics,, 5 x, buffer Cons: Fragility screen folding, little else Opinion: What about, great iron! The heir of the d300s "that still use" excellent burst AF superlative, complete menu of all you need, there are a bit of "tricks" to be able to exploit it in full especially in birdlife but once you learn you find yourself in your hands a deadly weapon! The sensor is good.. Not very good of course between the DX is not better, the buffer is infinite, as the pleasure of shooting with this toy! If you want a super burst and a lightning-fast AF in an ergonomic and lightweight body well the D500 is definitely the right machine! |
 | sent on November 01, 2018 Pros: Robustness, ergonomics, AF performance, burst, ISO seal, autonomy Cons: Touch screen function cannot be used in menus Opinion: Replacement of the D7100. What about, a whole other world. The D500 is an extraordinary reflex, the APSC at the state of the art. It has everything that a sports photographer or birdlife could want from their instrument, starting from an excellent autofocus that hooks anything, even at night. In AFC, once the subject is hooked, it practically never springs. The burst of 10fps is sensational and with an infinite buffer that allows you to shoot any scene. Surprising also the high ISO seal, not far from the FF sensors, a thing unthinkable until a few years ago for an APSC sensor. All this enclosed in a very solid camera body, with all the controls in the right place and excellent ergonomics, which is very important when working with heavy objectives. The many nostalgic of the D300 have found and will find in her a worthy heir. |
 | sent on October 24, 2018 Pros: Materials and ergonomics, control arrangement, operating speed, ISO seal Cons: Silent shutter mode, touch screen that can only be used for some functions Opinion: It's really hard to find flaws in this beautiful camera. The body is sturdy and well built with the controls all in the right place. Comfortable the reclinable touch screen that does not affect its reliability. The autofocus is incredibly responsive and surprises in light conditions to say the least criticism. Practically you are almost always sure to take home the shot, also complicit in the excellent ISO (obviously not like a FF sensor but really surprising). The crop factor 1, 5x, combined with a machine gun burst give a big hand in sports and naturalistic photography. The excellent autonomy of the battery allows to work without too much thought, even without the use of the battery grip. Maybe 24mpx would have been perfect but you can't complain (D500s?). I found the silent shutter mode quite similar to the standard one. |
user111807 | sent on October 14, 2018 Pros: Ergonomics speed construction ISO seal and dynamic Range. Cons: Maybe the lack of a small flash. Opinion: Back to the DX after d700 d800 d610 and d810 finally the long-awaited heir of the d300 (which I still have). What about the use for about 6 months and I'm thinking of taking another, together with the d810 form a perfect match although since I took the d500 the various FX cited that I still do not use almost more for my generic outputs now I only do with the d500 in Coupled to a d5500. More I do not know what could be desired for me was a surprise above any more rosy Expectation. Very fast the first outputs I took photos also not wanting a dynamic range a hold to the ISO level of the 610/750 series and a better sharpness in my Opinion. As I said I'm thinking of taking a second body to return definitively to the DX format for the type of photos I do, if I still wait is because I hope that we make a version with more mega Pixels. Rated 10. |
 | sent on October 06, 2018 Pros: Robust machine body, burst, image quality , excellent hold at high ISO, very valid for all types of photos!!!! Cons: Nothing....... Opinion: I came from a Nikon D90 and then I had a Nikon D7200.......... great cars, but the Nikon D500 is on another planet! I bought this machine as well as for the features it possesses, also for a large and robust body machine, I have big hands and I do not find myself photographing with small Reflexes. When you pick it up, you immediately understand who you're dealing with. It is great for any type of photo, from sports photos, to bird photos, and to ceremonial ones!!! (I do not agree with those who believe that it is reserved only for sports photos, I have made beautiful photos of weddings, and communions) up to 6400 ISO there is no noise!!!! (jpeg format) then you start to see a slight noise but acceptable!! It has a fabulous focus and a gorgeous image quality. The only small flaw is the lack of the built-in Flash.... (sometimes only useful for emergencies) I use it almost always with the Nikon 18- 300 foc. 3,5 / 5,6. Vote 10. |
 | sent on September 03, 2018 Pros: All shot burst focusing photo weight at high ISO Cons: The white balance some times with neon lights can make red. Opinion: I come from 7100 and it was a nice jump. I took almost a year to learn how to use all the commands. But with her you practically throw the flash and shots in every situation. Mostly I do portraits and just do not get off 1/30 to take home the photo even at 52000 ISO. The only downside is the white balance when shooting outdoor photos at night with the light of the lampposts the white turns red. What fixable the op. I've mounted the 18-140 and I never take it off. |
 | sent on June 03, 2018 Pros: Excellent dynamic range, focus, phenomenal burst speed. Cons: Nothing Opinion: I come from the 7200 which gave me great satisfactions to date, then I bought the 500 that I am testing these days, I can say although it is a little early that it is a professional na stains and that makes beautiful files, thrill speed, focus and dynamic range s Enza compromises, in short, a good purchase especially for those like me who likes to photograph avifauna. Recommended. Mauro |
 | sent on May 23, 2018 Pros: Speed, well-arranged controls, Iso, Design and optimum grip, battery life, professional machine Cons: Nothing Opinion: There is little to say, it is excellent in all situations especially in the photographs where you need the gust. Satisfied at every point. The focus is impressive, I think one of the best among the professional. The cost is high but it is worth it because it exploits all the points that serves a professional photographer and not. |
 | sent on May 22, 2018 Pros: Shutter speeds, materials, controls and semi-pro functions Cons: Price, quality of files over 1000 ISO Opinion: The D500 has fully confirmed my expectations. Perfect when it comes to shooting moving subjects, the subject is always in focus and very sharp. Obviously you can not compare the files of this machine with the files of FX or flagships, but I note that from 100 to 400 ISO files are impressed. From 400 to 800 obviously the noise is seen but the files are still very satisfactory, besides you hear an important noise. The advice to those who need a reliable machine, with a good burst and with a great ability to focus. |
 | sent on May 14, 2018 Pros: Total absence of noise up to 1000 ISO, solid body, a lightning bolt, excellent display Cons: The XQD.... expensive but I did not understand what it was for I did not see any improvement Opinion: If you need a quick reflex this makes for you is a lightning bolt, up to 1000 ISO noise does not exist, up to 3200 ISO files more than acceptable that for a DX is amazing (I remember my D5200 that in addition to 400 ISO was unwatchable). Too bad the Snapbridge that is a penalty, it will unplug continuously but when it works it is very useful. |
| sent on February 20, 2018 Pros: Sensor, dynamic range, ISO Cons: Nothing Opinion: I've been using it for almost a year and I can say that for me it's the top.rnI'm not a lover of post-production, indeed to say it all never even use, and with this machine out of the impressive jpeg, dynamic range to top.rnNon understand who says that when you shoot at 3200 ISO the image becomes unusable, I made shots at 6400 and the noise was very manageable, then oh well, it goes to personal taste, to me the pictures with a slight noise like, I give a sense of nostalgia and softness.rnSo frightened, I took sports photos and really freezes the movements without ever losing the subject.rnAll the keys in the right place, finally the iso button next to the shutter, with battery grip the balance of the machine is perfect.rnComfortable and ergonomic machine, for my manon is fine.rnA little 'complex the menu, but you have everything you need, vote 10 |
 | sent on February 14, 2018 Pros: Ergonomics, sensor, dynamic range, quality at definition level and also in noise management at high ISO with ambient light Cons: Frankly, I do not find anything negative Opinion: In my opinion it is a big machine in the DX format, without any doubt far superior to the Canon 7DII, which I have but that does not even come close to the quality that the D500 offers.rnChi knows me that I appreciate the detail in the shots naturalistic and the D500 satisfies me fully also from this point of view.rnSpeed ??speed, high definition, excellent dynamic range, excellent ergonomics and, last but not least, a good balance with battery grip even with long lenses put the D500 at top of the category.rnrnrnTanto to understand, this is a shot made at 4.000 ISO: rnrn https://www.flickr.com/photos/henry62/37354520022/in/album-72157686683351920/rnrnOther shots made with the D500: rnrn https: //www.flickr.com/photos/henry62/albums/72157686683351920 |
 | sent on February 14, 2018 Pros: construction, ergonomics, ISO control finally in the right place, burst, reactivity, AF, mobile display Cons: ISO seal. Opinion: After three exits, wildlife use, I must say that this machine is a gem from the point of view of performance in general. But I do not understand who would like to compare it to an FX for sensor performance. I believe that certain statements are the result of people perhaps paid to do it? I hope so because it means that they have never used an FX. The noise is already at 800 ISO even if still manageable, at 1600 begins to become a problem, at 3200 the image decays dramatically and the noise becomes really unmanageable, certainly does better than the d7200 but buy it only for that means just throwing the money, in any case the comparison with the files of a d3s or a d750 does not hold its own. |
 | sent on January 03, 2018 Pros: Construction quality and design, ergonomics, viewfinder, general responsiveness, AF point coverage, buffer, XQD slot, high-detail details and colors, automatic download on smartphone with Snap Bridge, jpeg on camera, tilt display and touch. Cons: Snap Bridge tends to disconnect, AF in video mode, ABCD presets can only be recalled from the menu Opinion: well, after more than 18 months of use in the field, after more than 100,000 shots it is time to review this little big flagship. We start from the construction quality: the polymers used, the tires and the surface finishes are excellent, resistant to abrasion, humidity and intensive use. The D500 is a sturdy machine, beautiful to see and hold, excellent feedback of keys and dials, with the gem of backlit controls, pity only that is not illuminated the ISO button and the lens port.rnThe finger grip is deep and the palm and thumb support is well shaped. Typical commands of the Nikon professional, excellent presence of the joystik, extensive customization of the Fn keys to recall the AF modes, but winks at those who use the shot in AF-ON. The strong point of the machine is the 153 point AF module, a module that is appreciated for the vastness of the coverage area and for its precision and speed.serious; Focus. The D500 looks like an inexhaustible machine gun. Excellent presence of the XQD slot that provides very high buffer but also a remarkable speed of downloading photos on pc.rnThe diplay is tilt, great on easel and or for creative shots. Very good live view mode with very high compensation values, useful at night and a touch AF all in all quickly and accurately. On the other hand, the AF in the video because it lacks fluency, better to use the AF in the manual. Video quality I would say excellent in HD, very much affected the 4k, however, is a central crop of 1.48x, returns useful if you ulate at the end of documentary on distant subjects, better if static because the rolling shutter is high.rnAs the image quality the D500 It has top performances in terms of holding high-quality details and colors, I have taken home and easily printed ISO photos unimaginable for a DX. The dynamic range at low ISO is also excellent. Clear that you compare to an FX the luminance noise values ??are moreelevati.rn |
 | sent on June 01, 2017 Pros: Body pro, tilting screen, aps-c sensor but full frame performance, snapbridgern Cons: the price Opinion: Excellent machine body, suitable for professionals and even amateurs. The sensor is great for being small, you can get very good files even at 5000 iso. The commands are positioned to be quick in the gearbox, always ready to shoot, and with a burst of fear. The lack of flash was not a problem in my case, with the benefit of a much wider viewer and with the technology of the D5. Practically you have to make a commitment to put out the fire. "Another point that has been spoken very little. AUTOMATIC OPTICAL END ADJUSTMENT. The machine mounting an optic memorizes the correction it does automatically by pressing two keys simultaneously. Enough with millimeter maps =) |
 | sent on May 02, 2017 Pros: Autofocus, handlebars and flashing with telephoto lenses, excellent burst. Cons: There is no flash, weight like D610. Opinion: Tested in good light with 300 / 4.0 PF and 16-300 Tamron, two very different optics. rnWith the 300 equilibrium and perfect shaking, the thumb on the iso command and the AF point selector seems to be "born learned" .rnOttima ergonomia.rnGabbiani flying in "infinite" sequences in jpg with SD633x, all the sharp, plastic volatile, better than with the D5300.rnCon the domestic cats and zoomed in to no micromassage I was almost used to treating half shots.rnI do not know if the handle is strong and the body / zoom balance or the 4megapizze less, but the scraps there are more.rnProved with old 28-105 AF-D in the street and set portrait .. excellent !! rn |
user122312 | sent on March 28, 2017 Pros: body and professional functions in a DX, XQD slot, incredible burst and flawless autofocus Cons: good but not exciting sensor Opinion: Having had previously D750, they are then passed to Dx with the D500 for its speed and step readiness, and must say that the choice from this point of view has been apt. The d500 always proves ready to tap the shutter release button ... a machine gun. The only thing that did not impress me very much was the sensor, I would have expected + performance especially from the noise point of view, but still remains a good level to be a DX |
user73603 | sent on February 28, 2017 Pros: Construction, speed, autofocus, noise management, adjustable screen, large viewfinder, possibility to cover the viewfinder, available to comandimette focus in the dark stabilizer 3-axis but only with G lenses, PERFECT Cons: Some caruccia..ma worth it Opinion: I expected a lot from this camera and I must say to be fully soddisfatto.Finalmente a Pro..avendo body even the D810 I struggle less with comandi.Bellisimi backlit buttons and two Fn buttons impostare.Video 4K and Full HD 60p. more able to focus at -4ev. and 153 focus points fuoco.rnNon could I ask for. Voto10 laude |
 | sent on February 27, 2017 Pros: . Cons: . Opinion: I come from a d300 and I must say I'm too soddisfatto..trovata and paid full sfortunatamente..ma the price is worth it all! 4 years nital and gift gadgets plus a battery and battery cover slitta..da when I picked it up in the store I noticed af velocissimo..gli iso holds really all right with them and picture control with various options such as contastro .nitidezza.chiarezza.saturazione.tinta etc. already have a file ready ..I really developed some shots with nikon capture where unlike photoshop keeps the machine settings and picture c. and basically I have not heard of touching niente..a of some shots where I forgot to change pict.ctrl..ho tried the 3d with birds in flight and fantastica..per the first time I liked capture movimento..raffica assurda..in live view c is a delay legggero in focus but it looks really good and it works as you deve..a part of the display which is unfortunately limited in movimenti..nella box c was just the normal sd while the other i have to spend 120 Euros in the coming giorni..di evening light up even the keyson the left side of the machine which I find very utile..é everything handy and each key instead giusto..il menu never opened praticamente..ottima direi..la battery holds really bene..la'm using a 50mm Nikon 1.8 and with a nikon 180 2.8 of which I innamorato..straconsigliata .. |
 | sent on February 26, 2017 Pros: Apart from the speed autofocus the flurry and ergonomics the thing that struck me the most is that focheggia virtually in the dark without hesitation ... digital noise goes pretty well and they really do not expect them to be more a right ... it was enough for me that he had less than D300 glorious and so was Cons: ... Price 500 euro less and it would be perfect (I took just because Euronics had a crazy promotion in 1749 ... guarantee of course nital) Opinion: Truly a magnificent reflex .... possess the D4S but this 5Mpixel having more and being a right in photo hunting me almost double magnification ... I feared for the life of the battery (the D4S is portentous to that effect and I would like to see ... has it that weighs three times!) really rather tough tantornl'unica thing I miss the flagship is the second shutter release button for vertical photos ... it cost so much to put it? mah ... |
 | sent on January 28, 2017 Pros: Construction, speed, autofocus, noise management, adjustable screen, large viewfinder, possibility to cover the viewfinder, control layout Cons: swivel the display in one direction, management of WI-FI, Ten-pin remote control, flash shoe cover not supplied on a body of over 2000 Euros Opinion: Fantastic reflex. I always thought of staying on APS-C format and the previous D7100 did not satisfy my needs in speed, holding the ISO, autofocus. In this case everything has been obviously improved, the body's level is professional and it feels right from the first handle. Excellent command management, with ISO button next to last in the upper position of 'exposure compensation, and not next to the live view. Noise estate is wonderful in my opinion and for my needs: file with a high quality up to 3200, good up to 6400, I held the photo to 10000-12800 without passing devote an exhausting process. The flurry to 10fps is supported by a buffer finally worthy, and the double slot is finally accompanied by a XQD beside the classical SD. Unfortunately, operating the remote latch is ten poles, and forced to 'purchase of expensive models such as MC-30 if you do not want to fall back on imitations (tried one, found poor construction and functionality). The returnthe swivel screen is handy in macro photography and other situations, although unfortunately with the chamber placed vertically, is rotatable along a single axis (horizontal). There is also the option of coverage viewfinder using a lever at his side, replacing the uncomfortable plastic cover eye. Unfortunately Nikon not 'covers, slide the flash provided. The WI-FI is very bad but I find the realization of SnapBridge especially for limited functionality remotely shooting mode. Other highlights include an auto focus, fast and accurate with an ease to hook the subjects in low light finally not limited to the central point. |
 | sent on November 05, 2016 Pros: Burst, buffers, Autofocus, screen Cons: Not 'economic, it has a few glitches especially in the menu management which we hope will be resolved soon a further firmware upgrade. Opinion: The best room for sports and wildlife, used in two photographic journeys over the past six months, Shetlands and Peru '. Solid performance, superior autofocus. In Scotland for nesting puffins, hooked the subject much better than the flagship full frame Nikon and Canon (D4, D4S, 1D) of the previous generation allowing me to bring home pictures that other perdevano.Accoppiata with 300 first, the old AF-S, not to escape the volatile, hooked to many meters away and never gave up. I sequences of 40 shots of birds in flight where no and 'out of focus, incredibile.Fortemente recommended to everyone, gets along very well even in mostly portraits in low light where it also engages fantasmi.Il new standard, Nikon has done it big this time. |
 | sent on October 26, 2016 Pros: frame rate, buffer capacity autofocus, high ISO, commands "standards" that do not require the study to those already used by pro or semipro models. Cons: My model requires you to perform fine tuning on some autofocus lens. In particular I have checked with the Nikkor 500 f / 4 ED II, which presented backfocus conspicuous. LCD tilting a bit 'cumbersome and appearance "delicate". Opinion: For me it is an excellent machine for the amateur evolved in field sports and wildlife. I do not think that it can be used by professionals instead of D5 (with which it shares several components) as I read in some article. rnL'impugnatura was too low compared to other models of equivalent quality and makes it less "safe" holding with one hand. RNA my opinion the elimination of on-camera flash is a sensible choice on a camera of this level, it would be useful, however, maintain some external flash control system, now only feasible sacrificing a flash on camera or buying triggers radio or the SU-800.rnIl overall rate is positive, especially influenced by the frame rate and the powerful autofocus, suitable for any situazione.rn |
 | sent on October 24, 2016 Pros: High ISO, outstanding image quality, pro body, comfort key, type snapebridge remarkable gadgets, screen tilting touch screen ultrarisoluto Cons: Price Opinion: It's from when I first saw it and picked it up and I said, it must be mine. I also have a FF D810 but I must say that the quality image of this DX is equal to a FF also the body a small D5. Really from when I took only use this and I have no lenses for DX only for FF, and I am overjoyed. Snap a photo and puff 2 ritocchini on camera and puff in a moment has already passed on the iPhone and are now on the web. The straconsiglio for any kind of photo. If compared to d810 sometimes the file is richer in detail in d500. I'm loving it even took the battery grip the sb-5000 flash with various gadgets and already I was there the tamrom 15-30 and uuufff much stuff. |
 | sent on September 25, 2016 Pros: Held high ISO AF Super -Tropicalizzata-quality construction to WiFi-tilting display and touch screen summit, what more do you want ... Cons: Perhaps the price per hour and weight but only in context asrofotografico ... Opinion: I am an astro now for several years and passionate about photography in general, what about this D500 a real monster in all fields, the high ISO seal is excellent, particularly as astrophotography competes evenly with much higher class machines, if you then cools the sensor is incredible. JPG routs smoothly all the competition. I do not understand how it is possible to state that high ISO is not really a valid contradiction. Needless to speak words of AF, ergonomics etc. Practically a D5 with DX.rnrnrn sensor |
 | sent on September 20, 2016 Pros: Small and lightweight but sturdy, burst, silent. Cons: High ISO sensitivity Opinion: I'm a professional, I had almost all the Pro and also some non-Pro, this small Pro has immediately enticed me, because it suits also have a machine that churns out leaner files where needed and enough, but unfortunately under the high iso profile I was disappointed, at least not reach what is declared and advertised, or for what is my work and quality standards is not up, even in the video, another area where work is useless to have a machine that records in 4K when raising a little sensitivity comes out horrible image unwatchable, all by trashing, mixed colors etc. etc. I regret not being able to take advantage as I would like, because the rest is a little gem. |
| sent on August 22, 2016 Pros: Crazy shooting speed, excellent manual and dual card Cons: One thing I can not stomach that after almost eight months from the exit is not yet available for iOS app. Snapbridge, so many owners of the iPhone and iPad can not take advantage of this useful application, we hope that Nikon remedies as soon as possible to this disgrace! Opinion: Except the snapbridge speech the rest is great, many great fires the menu with the menu customization, monitor high-definition touch screen, excellent opportunity to close the viewfinder when pictures remotely or self-timer. The price maybe a little 'pricey and Nikon could put a belt a little' more dignified, as I felt a bit 'stingy not put the shoe cover flash. |
 | sent on August 07, 2016 Pros: high tightness ISO-AF super-Tropicalized-quality construction and ergonomic optimal WiFi-tilting display and touch screen. Cons: I would be encouraged to say the price ... but in the end is worth it all. Opinion: recently purchased. For the series APSC come from the D7100 held a few months to go to another world where the D7200.rnOra I took the D500 I must say that you can not compare with the previous one because this should be assessed with a Full Frame.rnRaffica exciting, camera body balanced and a heavier bit of sorelle.rnInsomma ... for now I can say that I am more than soddisfatto.rn |
 | sent on July 12, 2016 Pros: Maf .. at high ISO sealing (up to 6400) speed and shutter noise, location of the buttons, lightweight, moveable display !! stracomodo .. Cons: the price !! Opinion: then tested with good light at high speeds the Nikon d500, pro: autofocus .. XXL ... superb, high shutter speeds comparable to the D4S, shutter noise .. it approached Canon, good yield up to max ISO 6400, almost with a noise reduction in Camera Raw you can not have a great file, against .. with little light in high iso (12800) quality of the file obtained is not the best, the buffer with classic cards does not take a lot of shots, with the XQD however not many issues .. do not talk together very good nikon d500 and 80 400 vr ",,, in my case I have to make a good MAF very detailed END .. what resolvable. ,,, with 70 200 600 f4 goes like a dream ,, here are my impressions .. vote 9:00 hello to everyone,., |
| sent on July 02, 2016 Pros: Speed ??'autofocus, high ISO, video, dynamic range, buttons at the right place, speed' shooting, basically a d5 in the right format. Cons: Nothing for now .Differenza between jpg snap and nef.ma I think is normal. Always shoot in nef. Opinion: I was looking for a d4 used, since I had a d3, fantastic car never had any problems, I heard good things of the new arrival in the house nikon d5oo, I thought, let's not 'a full-size but I also needed a DX format also having the d810. The price of a used d4 approached the price of the d500 and had thousands of shots. at first I was a bit 'hesitant, but on the field I changed my mind, this fantastic car. goes that 'a pleasure. as I said in the pros and 'd5 in a right format. |
| sent on June 22, 2016 Pros: high ISO, autofocus performance, dynamic range, speed, display Cons: For now no Opinion: I come from a D300 and I have to say that the jump is huge. image quality, large buffers, shutter speed, held at high ISO, and tilting touch display. The keys are all in the right place, easy to use, lightweight and robust. Snap used safely up to 6400 ISO, up to 12800 to correct in PP, but stunning image quality. The videos are well made, slight and phenomenal performance at the dark, it takes safely to 10000 ISO. Viewfinder exceptional as well as the live view function. Straconsigliata. |
 | sent on May 29, 2016 Pros: Autofocus, operating speed, buffer, high ISO seal robustness. Cons: Suspected non-compatibility with SD cards also UHS-II type Opinion: I decided to buy the D500 while having already a good right as D7100.rnrnLa D500 to the touch immediately it appears very "pro", although it is not produced in Japan but in Thailand, the impression of robustness and reliability catch our eye, on the floor physical then wins hands down against D7xxx.rnrnPersonalmente series I appreciated very much the ISO button position, just behind the shutter button, a convenient reach of the index finger, for people like me who does not make an excessive use of the Auto-Iso, you can quickly change the sensitivity without taking his eyes from the scene is a big advantage. rnMa especially the autofocus is really proves responsive, and the barrage of 10 ftg / s got me back to the times of exceptional D3s.rnMirino, absolutely light years away from the "old" dark viewfinders of dx.rnrnLa previous intensely and I am using published a use field tests in my blog.rnrnhttp: //brunomora.blogspot.it/rnrn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
