JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:My is not and does not want to be a review. The D3000 was my first camera and received it as a gift from my wife exactly 7 years ago (today is my birthday). Then I had another 12 (9 digital and 3 film) for the fetishism of having more and more powerful cameras in the illusion that depends on them on the quality of my photos. What a disappointment when I realized it was not exactly like that. It was as if someone had broken my favorite toy. Because that's what they are: toys. rnIf you have something to say and an elegant eye in the composition, with a D3000 you can do great photos. Great photos.rnGet even with a good goal, yes yes ... ahahahah
Pros:Pro: Great entry level for those who want to get started in the photography world, small and compact, extremely durable battery even after years of use, lightweight, robust, discrete but price-compliant performance.
Cons:Against: AF that sometimes makes the whims and after the 800 ISO the machine starts to not hold the noise well, lack of live view, lack of bracketing which however throws beginners, no AF engine, lack of some quick adjustments.
Opinion:The first serious camera I ever had before I was just a roller-coaster, fortunately I went to school with an Olympus OM 10 reflex to my father's roll, but as we all know, from a roll to the digital you open a world, at least for me being only a simple passionate. The only difference I have noticed is the solid, reliable and solid construction of the old school, which, compared to my little one, looks like a toy. As for the pros and cons I have already said it all.
Pros:Great entry level for those who want to get started in the world of photography
Cons:Being a very "entry" entry level can be very limited after a bit of use. AF that sometimes makes the whims and after the 800 ISO the car starts to not hold the noise well
Opinion:I'm telling you it's still my first camera and I have not upgrade to any higher level yet. As a first impression I can say that for those who have a very limited budget (I used it for 150 € with a Nikon 18-55 VR lens and a 55-200 VR, a good value for money deal) and maybe want to start To get into the world of photography, it's great. The ISO ranges from 100 to 1600 with the possibility of extending up to 3200, but after the 800 ISO noise is beginning to get very annoying in the photos. Overall, the AF is not bad, but 11 points sometimes make it hard to focus automatically, and to have certain effects you have to switch to manual focus. Nice to shoot both in automatic, semi-automatic (with various landscape modes, portrait, etc.) and the four manual modes. The only thing that left me dry mouth is the absence of a video mode, CAN NOT MAKE VIDEO. If you already go to the modelsLater as the D3100 and children, videos can be made. All in all I get a rating of 7 and, for what it is worth in terms of cost, already does good things. rnP.S. I'm hit by the battery, the former owner has never changed it and still has a long life. A small jewel of Nikon's home
Opinion:The ship perfect school. Not heavy and does not disturb, no problems of any kind ever. With what it costs you do not even fear null'usarla .. Obviously it is an entry-Level SLR but does not lack anything. So .. Why not exploit it? I've done everything .. From suffered ceremonies in the dark, sports photos, etc .. It works !! I was happy to have her, now replaced when I felt ready for high performance. However, what I do now with the D610 I used to with her .. More difficult, no doubt, more limits .. And yet it works and satisfaction !!
Pros:Easy to use. Gateway to Reflx world. Battery extremely durable even after years of use. Lightness. Robusta.
Cons:Autofocus which is struggling in some situations. ISO Scarsini, better to stay below 800, although with valid lenses improve. Lack of Live View.
Opinion:I own this camera since 2009. A 4-year distance I can express an opinion to 360 ° RNLA D3K easy to use even for those approaches for the first time in the world SLR is not so trivial, however once you're comfortable to you He manages to make the most of. I would give a rating higher than average wire, 7/8. It can give good satisfaction and give away more than good photo but putting impegno.rnIl 10 megapixel sensor is fine and it is definitely a good part of the machine. The shortcomings are in Iso that over 800 are losing a lot in quality. You can snap to 1600 in full sun for sports use although it is not absolutely the field of this reflex.rnIl autofocus system is slow and you have to learn to live with it. Photographic safari is not suitable for this product but here you can put the pieces with a little 'of abilità.rnCome many entry level SLR in the portrait it hard to focus, suffering frontfocus. Often you have to focus on the tip of the subject's nose. And only solution forprecise tory is af manuale.rnIn substance you can say that you have to adapt to the D3000, understand their limits and learn to exploit it to the fullest. optical rnCon medium-high level is an increase of quality in the pictures and you can postpone the move to good superiori.rnVa models to make landscapes. For macro feels the difficulty due to the lack of live view.rnNaturalmente is a machine that does not make sense to buy now unless the price is really low, and both the first reflex.rnIl camera body is robust, I have always looked after but without being manic and good resistance to moisture and polvere.rnPer conclusion it was and is a good companion that over the years you learn to accept his faults but wisely allows nice shots. However, the desire to move on to something better you feel after 4 anni.rnrn
Cons:background noise to Iso is not very high, at 800 ISO it already looks very, lack of many features that now with the latest series of D3xxx there.
Opinion:Good entry level at the time of the exit, now I do not feel to advise because with the latest releases of the series D3xxx many functions as the interval timer, which I would use as bread, bracketing, older processor, when the active D-lighting long it takes 5 seconds to process and makes you lose valuable time to take another photo, with a few pixels sensor, for charity is not essential but if there were more of them could use. However, it is a reflex that made me do school, which gave me a lot of satisfaction, with the optics of the series will not fail to make good photos, but as soon as you take in a non-optimal situation gets to see all its limitations. I wouldnt only if it was the first SLR and if you had at a bargain price ...
Cons:For what it costs compared to other models I do not see where they're against the eheh.rnUnica thing however that the lack of bracketing is tempting for beginners.
Opinion:In my utter "ignorance" photographic say I'm fully satisfied with this machine fotografica.rnConsente, with subsequent post-production, however, have outbursts of high qualità.rnSicuramente a higher model will end up having more advantages etc etc but initially I recommend it ! rnSe then the passion and enhances the capabilities of even then it will be time to move on to other models that would have been unnecessary for a total neophyte environment.
Pros:great way to start, good quality / price ratio, good handling, performance discrete
Cons:no AF motor, lack of some quick adjustments, high noise, look "cheap"
Opinion:Excellent as a first reflex, disappointed and tired once you have learned the basics of photography. Decent image quality, lack of definition, using improved optical quality than the "barrel" 18-55 vr. Good resolution of the display. Good autofocus. A lot of noise at high ISO! Lack of dedicated keys for the WB and ISO, there is a button customizable. On the other hand there are a lot of automatic scene modes absolutely useless. The camera body is lightweight, easy to handle, the economic aspect but pleasant to the touch (I had the opportunity to use the Canon 1000D and it seemed very much more "plasticky").
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
