|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on June 10, 2019 Pros: AF fast and precise, sharpness at full aperture even at the edges and all focal lengths, weight and contained dimensions, AF mechanism and INTERNAL Zoom, Tropicallizzato, excellent value for money, constant opening, filters 67mm. Cons: Honestly nothing Opinion: A beautiful lens. If you don't need an f2.8 (and need a lot less than you think about a zoom like this), this lens is the best choice in the range 70-200 for Nikon F. The fuzzy is very good (diaphragm 9 rounded lanelle). The VR very effective. The minimum focus distance of 1 meter allows for good macro use. The focal length remains the one indicated at the minimum focusing distance. Being an internal zoom does not enter dust with the use, it does not blow air on the sensor, it does not unbalance zooming. It's tropicallized. Very nice lens. |
  | sent on June 05, 2019 Pros: Sharpness, weight, stabilization. Cons: Overly expensive tripod ring Opinion: I made a nice cheap sacrifice to buy it and.. Wow. It's really impressive. The stabilization is great. Allows shots at 1/60. Good blur. Striking sharpness and colors. Acceptable weight. I preferred it to his older brother F 2.8. The only sore note is the ring with the tripod mount which is optional, and is overly expensive. |
 | sent on January 08, 2019 Pros: Weight, sharpness, quality, colors etc. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have now for 5/6 months, is the perfect lens for me, being all in all light in the mountains is a pleasure to carry it, has an optical quality for me at the top, I'm very satisfied with the purchase, I recommend it to all those who want something light and High quality. I use it on d600 I usually always shoot with tripod and MF, but when I happen to shoot freehand I know that the VR and the AF are really awesome |
 | sent on August 27, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, Autofocus, color, stabilizer, size, weight, Cons: Not received Opinion: I used the lens for a year mainly for fashion street, portraits and events indoors and no doubt the lens is a gem. The quality is very high and the AF silent and fast engages even in low light conditions. The VR stabilizer allows far-fetched shots at 200mm with 1/60s-1/100s, turning it off you will notice the boost it offers. With such short times you can compensate for the problem of the diaphragm closed by lowering the ISO (with D750 goes love and agree). The colors are full and I did not find any aberration that could not be fixed in LR or PP. Dimensions and weight more than contained make this lens a reliable and transportable companion in little space, Sorpatutto compared to a 2.8. The lens is worth all the €800 spent, I had a used specimen taken in store in Milan with 1 year warranty, held perfectly. If F4 is not a compromise for you, you have found the right lens. |
 | sent on February 17, 2018 Pros: sharpness, vr and weight Cons: collar that costs as much as a 50ino Opinion: after having overcome the scam of the original collar sold at a price from robbery, we appreciate the qualities of this lens. Obviously it is designed to work better outside closed diaphragms where it holds the comparison with the 2.8 but that shows an advantage not just in terms of weight and size. excellent vr. I used it with great satisfaction in sports, landscape and even astrophotography with excellent results. some portrait at f4 sometimes runs away as well;) is very recommended if you do not have to shoot indoors with very little light |
 | sent on December 24, 2017 Pros: Sharpness even with open diaphragms, autofocus, color rendering, fairly low weight, value for money. Cons: Missing the collar for the supplied tripod but with ONLY € 7 (!!!!) I got it in China and it works perfectly, NIKON should speculate a little less on its products that sometimes have exaggerated prices. Opinion: I was undecided between this lens and a F2.8 both Nikon and another brand, then given the weight I decided to "lighten" the kit and not the wallet. I must say that already from the first shots I was thrilled with my choice, apart from the diaphragm less I found no other differences between my and the Beast F2.8 that a friend made me try, same shots made with the surprise that at F4 this creates me a file with a clarity above the "PRO 2.8" to TA so at most if I need a diaphragm in more I raise the ISO and I remain in my pocket a thousand euro coupons that I invested in other optics. Combined with the multiplier Kenko is clear that loses 2 diaphragms and something sharp but a 400MM seems to me that costs a few euro more ..... and I'm not a professional who publishes in National Geographic so I'm fine so, very satisfied. The only negative consideration is that in my opinion with very closed diaphragms loses comparison with other zooms but how many times do you shoot at F22 / 32? I noticed this thing photographing the waterfalls and to get the blur not bawas the gray filter since the light was really big so I closed everything possible but as I said the image has remained less clear to me with more open diaphragms. For everything else in my opinion is a spectacular view. |
 | sent on October 22, 2017 Pros: Weight, sharpness, autofocus Cons: nobody Opinion: I did a great purchase and if you do not need the 2.8 diaphragm is the best choice. It does not weigh anything and duplicate it with TC20III almost completely retains its speed. I do not know its output yet with the multiplier but it's a fact that you have a 140-400 in the bag. It is used at acceptable prices. The hood is not much but I come from a 80-200 2.8 Nikon AF-D with two hinges: the 70-200 just bought seems to have all the more. |
 | sent on May 24, 2017 Pros: weight, clarity, color, VR Cons: at the moment no one Opinion: Taken used, Nital with 3 months of life, tested on D750 gives me great photos. I have compared it with the TAMRON 70/200 2.8 VC in my possession. My impressions: sharp opening, precise AF and fast enough (maybe a little faster than TAMRON), excellent VR (60% of the photos taken at 1 / 5th of a second they can be used, while with TAMRON at 1/5 second I can get a percentage not higher than 30%), faster but more loud than TAMRON. The hood does not allow effective shielding even when the sun is slightly out of the frame causing a loss of contrastornMy feel to recommend the purchase especially if found to be used at a fair price.rn |
 | sent on January 30, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, fast AF, image stabilization, tropicalization Cons: frankly none Opinion: Sharpness at the top also in f4, fast AF, excellent stability also call it "the thin one" for its relative lightness, I much prefer the big brother f / 2.8 for this reason. If you do not always shoot in indoor low light, then take this f / 4, which, among other things, as clarity is higher. And 'internal focus, and does not change its length nor focheggiando nor zooming, fantastic! RnNei tight portraits to f4 behaves very well and the bokeh is pleasant, also used to focal 135-200 mm also gives an appreciable degree of background blur, so do not feel the lack of major aperture.rnIn supplied lack the tripod bracket, you can take a "compatible" from the little bay, the one I took myself and metal is very similar to the original that, frankly, is over- prezzata.rnrnrn |
user103989  | sent on January 29, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, color rendering, VR, AF speed Cons: It is not weather sealed Opinion: It's my first telephoto lens and I am really happy with the purchase. L 'AF is quiet and quick to put the subject in focus with an amazing sharpness. The color rendering provided by nanocrystals I always liked so much, especially in this goal. The VR allows you to get up to 3 stops (I do not have a steady hand) .rnObiettivo recommended |
 | sent on September 21, 2016 Pros: All Cons: Lacks the bracket for the stand, it costs a disproportionate amount Opinion: What about voting 10 on my D7200 is stratospheric The photos are amazing both for clarity and for contrast and color. RNE in my bag for a few weeks but the first shots I made was pleasantly pleased .rnUn really good NIKON optical, On Dx body and even better because it uses the center of the frame, and the definition is migliore.rnrnhttp: //www.imaging -resource.com/lenses/nikon/70-200mm-f4g-ed-vr-af-s-nikkor/review/ |
 | sent on May 17, 2016 Pros: I would repeat only what I already and 'was written! Cons: Nobody Opinion: I'm not a professional, I do not do tests and do not look at the photos with the scanning microscope at CERN in Ginevra..da photography enthusiast can tell you that I like! Open a photo taken with this lens and find what I have seen in the viewfinder and 'almost a certainty! The colors and focus are good, weight is not an exaggeration, so even on a trek and 'portable. Personally I love it! And for that I sincerely thank all those who are professionals, do tests and look at the picture with 1Kx magnifications without the judgment of which is not the results that I would enjoy and 'able to get me! |
 | sent on February 25, 2016 Pros: Amazing sharpness, VR, lens quality, lightness Cons: A bit 'plasticky Opinion: After reading and viewed dozens of articles, tests, reviews and other at the end I decided to take this 70-200 f4. Found used a few months in a specialist shop in my town I could not say no (price too tempting) and I then proceeded to lower my current account. Currently I'm still testing but the first impressions are absolutely excellent. I was undecided until the last moment whether to take the f4 or f2.8 version but after trying them both I had no doubts. Too much more comfortable, lighter too, too much more usable on f4 model. Considering that as sharpness and final overall yield we are absolutely on par. VR fantastic and made lightning fire. Do not miss a shot and even in low light does not seem to suffer much. Excellent the focus. If you do not need to force an opening 2.8 this version is certainly preferable especially for portability. Really good in all and fully satisfied with the purchase. |
 | sent on November 23, 2015 Pros: sharpness, practicality of use, lightness, optical quality, VR Cons: modest and indeed ugly lampshade Opinion: This lens is Columbus' egg. Reducing brightness and adopting polymers in place of the metal alloy, the japs have pulled out a light, easily transportable optics with a yield very close to that of the 70-200 f 2.8 VR2 (and I can well say, having them both in the house). Almost the exact same sharpness, almost the same identical bokeh, and like the little brother asphalt severely the various old 80-200 (AFS included) as well as the 70-200 f 2.8 VR1 and the overrated 180 f 2.8. Our little one is also equipped with the latest version of the VR nikon which - try to believe - is absolutely prodigious. As robustness and consistency in performance the 70-200 f 2.8 VR 2 is certainly another thing but we are talking about a professional goal, while the f4, for when beautifully it can go, always remains a plastic. I think any evolved photoamateur should consider buying it, better at that price absolutely not found! Vote 10, absolutely undeserved. UPDATE OCTOBER 2019: After 4 years I am objectively over-happy with our plastic, the 70-200 FL rests at home and will probably go on the market, since I do not care about sports nor weddings and therefore the most brightness is for me Superfluous. The f 4 you can take it always with you, it's sharp to be scary, in short a real joker! |
 | sent on October 09, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, color rendering, VR efficient, blurred delicious Cons: Accuracy of the fire to the minimum distance Opinion: I got to try my new zoom in ideal lighting conditions, and I must say that the color rendering and the precision of the edges are professional optical, without the slightest chromatic aberration. In my tests gives his best already af: 5.6. Shooting freehand VR it seemed to work pretty well, much better than dell'80-400 same focal length. The D7100 is even better than the D750 where, if you do not want to vignetting, we must intervene by stopping and setting the vignette control on "high." A fully open the bokeh effect is natural and pleasant. Some concern about a possible use of macro lens: the minimum distance (about a meter) fire seems moved one centimeter behind the focus point, which does not happen already to a meter and a half away. This is why I did not give 10 to this perspective that remains really Eccel ... lens. |
 | sent on June 25, 2015 Pros: Minimum distance of focus, light, space, clarity, stability, speed AF, construction. Cons: I struggle to find. Opinion: I bought it used to be a week, it was looking a bit 'of time. Just I picked up I felt in tune. I use both the D610 and D750 with that I do not find differences, the balance is more than excellent, the sharpness is fantastic, the focus fast and accurate, the blurred and very impressive, shooting quietly even at 1/10 of a second and the picture is stopped. Little cluttered and the weight is more than acceptable. It focuses closer than f2.8. I keep it constantly now mounted on a body now on the camera body, I do not find the way to put it to rest. Fantastic. rnrnrnrnrnrnrnrn |
 | sent on June 02, 2015 Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, Weight & Size, Minimum Focusing Distance Cons: Building Opinion: A lens with the uppercase O, in my opinion gives the tracks to 2.8 VRII: the sharpness is the same, the color rendering is the same, the blur is the same (with the advantage that it does not cut the focal length of the minimum focusing distance focus and focheggia much closer). With the addition of a TC20EIII becomes a macro lens with a quality more than passable. Weighs little, it takes up little space, has a stabilizer fantastic. In my opinion the best in the house Zoom Nikon after 14-24. The only flaw is that it is built to the highest levels, where the 2.8 is better, but we're talking about small differences, is no longer a plasticky 24 1.4G or 1.4G 85 so let's say that it's okay for today's standards brand ... rnih conclusion, in my opinion, a must have. |
 | sent on February 03, 2015 Pros: Lightness - VR - minimum distance maf Cons: no one Opinion: Bought used from a forum user, combined with the D610 is a perfect match. The machine remains balanced, and the photos are spettacolari.Non feel the need for a collar as with the VR I tried a shot at 1/15 and the photo is perfectly ferma.rnOttimo the focus and is a blade, compared to big brother 2.8 I do not think has much to enviable, but ... |
  | sent on November 19, 2014 Pros: sharpness, low weight, blurred, speed af, minimum distance maf Cons: no one Opinion: If we want we can find defects: plasticky, missing the collar, the hood is bad etc ... rnMa sorry, each lens has its function. I personally took for landscapes. It has an optical performance at all focal incredible ... even better than the brother he f / 2.8! The blurred if only f / 4 is very pleasant and already at f / 4 is absent from defects ... what the f / 2.8 instead presents such as vignetting. It weighs nothing and then the collar does not interest me because in the backpack just breaks the boxes !!! mica small thing for those taking planes or take it in the mountains at 3500 meters. He stabilizer which is amazing and allows shots to 200 mm to 1/60 with sensors such as the D800! RnPoi talk about the distance of focus: 1mt poor compared to 1.5 in the 70-200 f / 2.8 which means that even in the portraits gets along just fine with excellent blurred as long as the photographer knows him and knows how to use it better (this obviously applies to all equipment) .rnIo believe that the strength of this lens is the practicality and versatility.It allows you to do everything at optimum levels ... certainly not a 135 F / 2.0, it is not a 300 f / 2.8 macro and not a 100, but if one wants a lens specialist takes it and uses it to situations for which it is designed. rnChi choose this lens I'm sure they will be impressed by the optical quality and its praticità.rn |
 | sent on October 04, 2014 Pros: Quality lightweight stabilizer Cons: No one Opinion: Excellent quality. Very light weight and well distributed, very good system VR.rnImpressionante the sharpness of this Nikon which in my opinion is comparable to a fisso.rnAccoppiata winning with Nikon D800.rnrnAssolutamente not need the collar as it handles perfectly and does not charge the 150g.rnPer weight of its lightness, its clarity in TA, its compactness prefer it to big brother Nikon Nikon 2.8.rnrnBrava! rnrn |
| sent on September 25, 2014 Pros: Lightweight, auto focus and brightness. Cons: No one. I do not understand why in many complain about the lack of the collar is so lightweight (only 140g more than the 24-120 that I own) that I do not see absolutely necessary. Opinion: E 'was love at first ... click! In my opinion it has nothing to envy to 2.8. Indeed, the lightness is its strong point which makes it much more practical older brother. There are those who complain that it is plastic, but why? If it was metal it would have been used to plant the nails in the wall? I think not. |
 | sent on September 06, 2014 Pros: For the pros I very much agree with the reviews so far published and therefore do not add more. Cons: The overall look a bit '"Francis of Assisi" compared to other Nikon optical performance. The price, not really popular, he would have deserved some more effort. Opinion: I have a few days ago, replaced my old 70/200 f / 2.8 VR1 with this new objective, and then my judgment about the appearance by "poor man" is definitely influenced by the older brother. But aside from the aesthetics, everything else is in the right place: weight, handling and dimensions are his skills more positive.rnIl my previous 70/200 because of the weight and size was almost always riposo.rnDa a point of view Optical, this new lens I was really very impressed. I find it works better for sharpness, resarncromatica and no vignetting. I took over a hundred photos in various subjects, and the results are really good: bright colors and saturated shots with well-rntrastati, excellent sharpness throughout the frame. All this for the benefit of post production as there is definitely "tweak" of meno.rnResto increasingly convinced that today's targets are available with improved optical characteristics with some "lightening" mechanic. But not being a professional and photographing as a hobby notI feel the need of optical battleships. Therefore, the exchange between the two objectives, on paper debatable, was unarnoperazione for me vantaggiosa.rnrn |
 | sent on September 03, 2014 Pros: Superb optical quality overall Cons: Ring Tripod not included Opinion: This is a zoom lens with wide focal length range which, however, has a weight and a footprint not excessive and such as to allow its use even during long trips or trips, always ensuring superb optical performance in all respects (including the resistance to the backlight and a pleasant blur), in particular in terms of sharpness. Also very efficient device to reduce vibration. Recommended to all nikonisti which have not at all costs need of opening f: 2.8. |
 | sent on August 04, 2014 Pros: Sharpness and weight Cons: Hood Opinion: And 'the least among professional goals in my possession, but to my great surprise, I consider it a "toy" wonderful to use: high-performance, lightweight, impeccably constructed, the VR works going against the laws of photography, photo razor sharp 1/20 the length of 200 mm, stupefacente.E 'always a joy to use, the only flaw that I recognize and' the hood, but these are details ... |
| sent on July 30, 2014 Pros: weight, clarity, price Cons: with the multiplier becomes dim Opinion: I studied and pondered for months whether to take the F4 or F2 .8 because I was looking for a lens for shooting sports outdoors (no concerts, theaters and halls) of high quality, bright and resistente.rnPensavo that the F4 was a toy in comparison all'F2 .8 but I changed my mind as soon as I started to see risultati.rnE 'a lens at a fair price offers high performance in terms of sharpness, and VR maf .. I have purchased used in 900 EUR nital with two years remaining warranty .. so I'd say you've made a real bargain. rnil optional collar that everybody talks about, in my humble opinion, it's useless on pro camera bodies since everything is well bilanciato.rnL 'sole objective limit is that if you multiply it with the TC 20E III optics becomes really dim and then limitata.rnConsiglio purchase for those looking for a zoom of the highest quality at the right price without having to shell out too much as if the F2 .8. rnrn |
 | sent on July 24, 2014 Pros: I agree with the previous reviews. Cons: Nothing Opinion: As for the collar, sold by Nital incredible price of € 149 on Amazon I found the twin, probably produced by the same company that produces the original, marketed by an English site of Wales, that within 10 days I l 'sent by post, was identical to the original, except for the words "by Nikon" instead of Nikon, it works perfectly and it cost me € 30 and some centesimo.rnfrancesco william |
 | sent on July 24, 2014 Pros: Weight, clarity, constant aperture diameter filters content, materials and texture Cons: Ring Tripod not included, and costs more than a little! Opinion: A lens which I can not miss in the kit. Stunning regarding the definition, the magical VR3 that forgives many small mistakes and shots relatively bassi.rnÈ a lens that operates from 70 to 200mm but weighs just 850gr. Really beautiful! Costs far less than 2.8 but big brother-level yield definition does not fear confronti.rnAF lightning on all occasions, I've used in sporting events with great satisfaction and without missing a beat. |
 | sent on May 28, 2014 Pros: Sharpness, compactness, speed Cons: None Opinion: Taken to sports photos during soccer matches of the children. Excellent results, fast AF, sharpness and incisiveness to the top, sin only by the neck otional. Much lighter than the 2.8 which has nothing to envy. Highly recommended to those who want a quality telephoto zoom. Also good results in blurred portraits and enjoyable. Previously I had a Tamron 70-300 stabilized ..... no comparison, another planet. |
 | sent on May 22, 2014 Pros: VR effective, fast AF, sharpness, weight, weather sealed. Cons: Collar option, nothing else. Opinion: Fantastic lens for its usability and performance, I can not leave it at home. In my opinion excellent alternative to big brother F2.8 much heavier and expensive. I was amazed by the speed of the 'AF and sharpness. Pleasant bokeh effect. rnAcquisto nailed it and recommend to my eyes closed, as long as you do not have to shoot very often in low-light situations and times rapidi.rnNikon with this lens did an excellent job. |
 | sent on March 13, 2014 Pros: Sharpness, effective stabilizer, strength, maneuverability, glide rings .... well BEAUTIFUL!! Cons: Price Opinion: Taken from a few days at a great price from the Ollo Store warranty two years and absolutely original packaging and undamaged. Lenses that just melt my heart to look at them they are so clear .... dials and levers of management absolutely handy and maximum fluidity of movement. After 10 minutes it is in your hand you seem to know him from a life as you leave embrace so so natural. Overall balance perfectly acceptable despite its length (which incidentally does not change during zooming). RnIl hood is very sturdy and long .... offers a great protection of the front lens in the movements. Focus lightning fast and super stabilizer. The focus ring does not rotate during autofocus, so you can support the lens in any way without interfering with the focus, but you can correct, however, in each moment ...... shame on a DX is a bit long as minimum focal .... on a full frame would be his! In short, a wonder. Thousand euroni but for now they seem decently spent .... well I will not say because it is not, A first object of utility in life, indeed, quite exaggerated for an amateur with the world turns economically so bad ...... HIGHLY RECOMMENDED! |
 | sent on March 01, 2014 Pros: AF fast, Exceptional sharpness, portability, though it seems, VR remarkable. Cons: Lack support stand, but at least for me it is a lens to bring and not to rest. Opinion: One of my favorite targets. I'm considering a switch to Canon for my kind of pictures that need many mm, but owning this keeps me very much, for fear of not finding an equivalent to the same prezzo.rnIo I use it on APS-C and 70mm is often too long for that I am a 105mm equivalent. On FF must be great and, again because of this lens I am considering seriously to pass. As it turned out they are at a major crossroads on the equipment, but continue to use it could be decisive on the choice. |
 | sent on January 28, 2014 Pros: Building supplies, AF, VR super etc .... Cons: none for now Opinion: I bought this lens at the beginning of December 2013 and now dopoa some evidence I can give my opinion. Excellent lens from the point of view that constructive optics, light, handy and a hoot to use it does not weigh as his brother or other f2.8. Blurry soft and pleasant the new VR system is super. I am fully satisfied with the purchase, even if I thought long because I was struggling with his older brother but finally after some tests between weight (which destroys you arm a lot faster than you think), the footprint, cost (high) and especially for the type of photos that I do so I hardly need f2.8. Obviously consigliatissimarnAgiungo the review which I combined with the D750 and made several shots in the dark theater with ISO up to 12800, pictures super !!! |
 | sent on December 20, 2013 Pros: Sharpness throughout the frame already at RT, VR lightning, sliding rings, light light, the autofocus locks that is a beauty, fantastic to use Cons: Not bad at petal lens hood, collar optional I can not think of anything else ... ah is not f/2.8! Opinion: I decided for this canvas despite being an f / 4 because I was afraid that the brother would have been almost always at home, in fact I do not regret it is very light and easy to carry it does not disappoint you, use it, it is a pleasure, sharp and nice bokeh, the 'only thing I do not like the hood is the bad, I would have preferred a petal, but crap! |
 | sent on October 31, 2013 Pros: VR impressive sharpness and efficient. Dimensions, weight and ergonomics absolutely appreciable. Cons: Nobody. Opinion: I got it recently, but I must say that is a lens completely failed from all points of view. Lightweight, razor-sharp, quick and stabilizer scary. You can use it for long periods without getting tired and lack the bracket does not feel at all. If you do not always fire and only in low light situations, but require a very short time, you can safely choose it as an alternative to 2.8. Consigliabilissimo. Taken NITAL to 1190. It's worth all widely. |
 | sent on May 27, 2013 Pros: Extraordinary sharpness, autofocus fast, lightweight and compact Cons: No one Opinion: Lightweight and compact with a very impressive sharpness even at room temperature with a focus really very nice, right feeling with my D7000. I waited a long time to come out this light and after several hesitations about purchasing this or 2.8 at the end I was very satisfied with my choice. Nikon has really got it right with the realization of this perspective. |
 | sent on May 08, 2013 Pros: Sharpness, fast AF, stabilizer, weight, handling, versatility Cons: no one Opinion: Excellent zoom generation, and it shows ... light and handy but extremely sharp, AF and stabilizer are designed for the most demanding amateurs or professionals. I was undecided until the last of this brand new f4 and f2.8 big brother, I must say that if you are shooting indoors is definitely better to save and take this little gem. I've used it for portraits (good blurred) and birds in flight at close range (but very fast), where he has not shown the slightest hesitation. D3 on the resulting file has an excellent quality, on D7000 behaves ottimamente.Consigliatissimo however for those who have discovered this focal range and photographer prevalentamente outdoors. |
 | sent on March 17, 2013 Pros: I put the pro in what I consider my order of importance: rnAutofocus very high performance, very pleasant blur, minimum distance of focus, stabilizer layer, light weight and versatility. Cons: With regard to the use it was unsuccessful for now but I think I would not have complained if the collar to the stand was "standard". RnL'unico against maybe the price high enough. Opinion: I chose this lens to cover a range of focal scoperto.rnDalle earliest evidence I have just been impressed by the results. It 's the first time I find myself so excited about a lens that goes around without even hearing the collo.rnNonostante its limited weight gives a picture quality unexpected from the point of view of definition of what sfocato.rnAltra amazing is the stabilizer. I possess the 300 F/2.8 with the stabilizer of the first generation that is almost ridiculous in comparison to that of the new 70/200.rnRiassumendo can say that they are happy the scelta.rn |
 | sent on January 17, 2013 Pros: Sharpness, CA very contained, stabilizer monstrous, AF speed, lightness. Cons: At the moment no, the collar can be useful only if you shoot with entry level SLR. Opinion: Nikon goes to fill that void that for many years has been felt, especially for people like me who comes from Canon.rnQuesto new 70-200mm has a sharpness monstrous levels brother f2.8. Already good at full aperture, the fuzzy is very pleasant. The color rendering is very similar to that of the Nikkor 16-35mm f4.rnHo had in the past the rival Canon 70-200mm f4 IS: I can certainly say that this new lens Nikon has a yield very similar to bianchino.rnConsigliatissimo, undoubtedly ! |
 | sent on December 11, 2012 Pros: Sharpness, fast autofocus, lightness and SUPERstabilizzatore Cons: The collar-1 RT could be standard Opinion: I was in the store and wondered why this lens is never available, he said gaurda arrived the courier should have sent me one, I would have left there I YOU NO! tonight I tried and discarded, I was impressed on the D700 to f6.3 iso 3200 light chamber 200 mm. with 1/10 VR a really spectacular I tried the 70-200 f2.8 VR but as it is better to say almost as eye resolution better than 2.8 but should have the tools to make a measurement, but astounded me. |
| sent on December 10, 2012 Pros: Sharpness, fast autofocus, light weight, stabilizer. Cons: Price slightly high - collar optional Opinion: The clarity is amazing. The color rendition is excellent, requires very little / no post-production. Aberrations almost non-existent. Suitable for portraits. Great for Street in low-light conditions, VR excellent (5 stops) and also due to the weight quite content. Recommended for those who can not afford the big brother. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
