JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I use this lens on Nikon D7000 and I use it mainly for portraits because I do not still run macro photography. Although used for other purposes other than macro, this optics adapts very well and can be considered a real all do, the only foresight is to lower the clarity to-30 when used in portraits in order to reduce a little ' the extreme Sharpness of the optics. I have promised myself to study the macro photography a little and then I will have the opportunity to test it in its specific field. Highly recommended in every point of view
Pros:Great sharpness, beautiful color rendering, blurry very pleasant. Plasticous but robust and well done, very practical in field manual use: lens that does not stretch and with a good focus ring
Cons:Nothing in particular
Opinion:I share the positive comments I read, and I add a point of view: this Nikon is fine with the Panasonic GH4 and the GH5 with which I mainly make videos in UltraHD. It then becomes a 120 mm thanks not only to the remarkable definition but also to the rendering of the colors, to a delightful blur and to a good separation of the planes is able to agree (without batters but agree yes) with the optics "APO" Which I am fortunate to use (Leica 100mm ApoTelyt-macro 2.8 and Zeiss 135 ApoSonnar f.2). It's not all of them: the brightest optics (such as the bulky and expensive Sigma 180 2.8 I've just tried) generally go fine, but often do not stand up to the "three-dimensional" yield of Leica and Zeiss. The Nikon 60G, on the other hand, defends itself: it is perhaps a bit underrated and with a very interesting price / quality ratio, especially if it is used
Pros:Excellent definition, construction of optical PRO
Cons:If we want to be picky the AF in certain situations he difficulties but for the quality of the lenses are willing to turn a blind eye ..... and shoot.
Opinion:I bought this lens used at a very affordable price and I have to say I was pleased from the first shot, lighter lens but built with materials that give me a sense of strength, also tried to portraits has given very good results quindo I gave up look for alternatives. The focus I find it very pleasant, engraving and contrast to TOP for what you can ask an objective of these levels. I had in the past a 105 micro but this 60ntino me and stronger emotions, I always keep in my bag because without it seems not to be in good company. I highly recommend it especially if you find it in used because it is worth all the money spent and never disappoints.
Pros:Excellent sharpness always, MAF minimum very short, blurry excellent, excellent resistance to flare and reflections, also very crisp with infinity focus, AF good and reliable, made of plastic but is made good, solid
Cons:Nothing
Opinion:I always had the micro in the kit, I love the sharpness, and this lives up to expectations and is excellent for both macro optical use that for general use, we do everything, including ritratti.E 'one of the few Nikon lenses still made in Japan, and you see, it is built very well. It 'very clear throughout the frame already wide open, and stopping down improves a bit and becomes crystal clear, has good anti-glare treatment, the AF is not instantaneous, it never is on micro, but it is very reliable, and MAF minimum is very short. Not extrudes focusing closely, it is internal focus, and I consider it an advantage. rnAd today, I did not find any weaknesses. Excellent price / performance.
Pros:Accuracy, color fidelity, blurred delicious, risolvenza and sharpness worthy of a good macro. Weight and size. Privacy No Minimum distance of MAF (less than 20cm). IF (value / down).
Cons:AF Motor not lightning. IF: the diaphragm often closes by 1 / 3-2 / 3stop automatically and autonomously, if set to TA.
Opinion:What about ... a lens as it should be: flexible (from the macro, to portraits, to landscapes, to reportage ...), light, well protected by aberrations and reflections of light, with a true color rendering, a blurred very well digradato and relaxing, a fantastic risolvenza throughout the frame, a quality / price ratio eccellente.rnUna lens azzeccata.rnL'AF is not extra-lightning, and sometimes hesitates a little bit (especially at room temperature and low light), but it's definitely accurate, then fault anything in particular. On APSC does not excite me as the full-size ... rnUna lens in her perfect whole.
Opinion:If some buontempone insists that they prefer the 60 micro AFD, it's because they have not tried this. Absolutely superior in everything: optical, mechanical, af, bokeh. It's a great look with excellent versatility, from a macro to a fashion or close-up shot and never disappoints, absolute security. For light outputs, along with the 20mm f 1.8G and 85mm f 1.8G cousins, a lightweight, low-bulky, inexpensive (about the nikon ...) optical optics and optically amazing optics. In its scope an indispensable lens, vote 10 with praise! NOTICE: The writer is not an influencer or a guru, nor does one who downloads other images from the network to impute themselves to unlikely improvisations. For almost forty years, a passionate nikonist of photography and photographic material has been, and my opinion is not a gospel, but only the result of empirical experience. The objects I write really buy them, I play a few months and if I do not like them, but always and in any case of matterat the moment in my possession. I do not make the copy paste of reviews taken here and there on the net, if I'm talking about an item it's just and because I had in the house the time it took (at least months) to try to figure it out. I often go against current, but this does not take my sleep, as far as possible I try to help young aspiring photographers who give a weight to their savings. But, I repeat, I do not bring the verb ...
Pros:Precision, weight, usability and versatility than the previous model
Cons:To use that I do, zero
Opinion:I bought this lens having sold the 60mm Micro previous series and the choice did not disappoint my expectations: not demanding very high performance at the micro level, I did not find significant differences compared to the old goal but only qualities: rn- immediacy in step Manual Focusing - Autofocus, taking into account that often use the lens in non-macro and autofocus suits me and with the old goal that transition was anything but silent immediatorn-, another aspect quite useful in certain situazionirn- The goal does not change size during use, perhaps a less interesting but avoids problems mode macro.rnrnMi happen very often to photograph landscapes stiching mode: thanks to the sharpness of the lens get shots with the possibility of crop truly remarkable and a final rendering that allows you to see carefully the mountain in the background as well as the stone first piano.rnrnUtilizzo said as the target even so generalist and over tattutto in this that the new model off than the old ... the sense of usability final is really sensitive to speed focusing, silenziosità.rnrnDavvero recommended.
Opinion:Use this lens to be about 2 years of D7000. I must say that I am fully satisfied, a real knife, sharpness impressive and very fast autofocus (for the few times you use in af). Resistant to flare! The optical construction is impressive and gives details truly unique! Perhaps slightly soft wide open but if it does perdonare.Consigliatissimo
Pros:Construction robustaNitidezzaSfuocatoResistenza in backlight
Cons:It lacks the aperture ring
Opinion:One of the best goals that possiedo.rnE 'built really well, made in Japan, and has a light output notevole.rnLo really use full-field together with the 105mm / 2.8 VR.rnRispetto the 55mm / 2.8, which I had First, it is more pleasant in general shooting, thanks to an excellent focus and contrast less duro.rnSecondo me is also suitable for portraiture, I use it often alternating with the 50mm / 1.4 G and 85mm / 1.8 G.rn
Cons:nothing to say, except for the usual lack of aperture ring, characteristic of the series G
Opinion:This is the worthy heir of the nikkor macro that have gradually gone before us. Of course it is a view designed for a specific use and is not the best for the portrait, but also lends itself well to the landscape, because of its indisputably high sharpness. Commendable as a correction of various aberrations, has a high contrast and excellent resistance to the backlight, although it is always advisable to use the long lens hood which is fitted. It has an excellent price-quality ratio.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
