JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user36759
sent on April 08, 2015
Pros:High optical quality and construction, today is cheap ... it is beautiful?
Cons:No defects
Opinion:Lens quality. Solid. Excellent for use on 24x36 because the viewfinder bigger and brighter than on aps-c, where, however, has the advantage of being a moderate tele macro. According me.rnPer the 24x36 recommend it without a doubt, as is normal with something extra capacity macro (1: 2) format .rnrnSul reduced performance is still excellent, but is too short to be a tele macro and perhaps too long to be versatile, accordingly prefer a 60 afd or af-s by dell'af.rnrnA whatever format it is an excellent product, built to last.
Opinion:honestly I do not put in against the fact that it is a short throw and that requires you to get close to the subject, it is obvious given the focus, if you do not want to approach the subject you take a 105 ---> 180mm.rnNon see a downside the fact that is manual regarding the macro, to make the macro AF practically not used, if you must do street instead can be certainly a point in its sfavore.rnstiamo talking about a lens that is 40 years played and which obviously not even know what the result of the AF.rnonestamente canon aps is stunning. money well spent. my old Canon 100 macro is now retired! rnciaornrn
Opinion:I put in against that only manual, but I think it is rather a PRO. This lens is one of Nikon's sharpest I've ever tried, just the 105 nikon 78 is just as sharp, and 200 in 1989. Affecting optics images as a ninja sword, however, does not forgive the error. The whole manual, so no type of AF, such as certain machines with my D90 even the metering, so much the better, you really learn to read and write light.
Pros:startling clarity, depth 'of field nano-magnification ring M2, compact and beautiful
Cons:completely manual, being a short distance from the subject 55
Opinion:kindly stolen from my mother's camera kit (NIKKORMAT 70s) I bought on ebay adapter ring just for fun and found to possess a lens incredible! that cuts sharp, with good contrast and colors of departure. Excellent and compact for street and portraits. perfect for macro if it were not for photographing the subject must approach extremely. Especially if you mount the tube extender M2 turns into a microscope and you need a sled to the focus.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
