JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I do not understand if my copy is scary ... Sharp also 200mm rnrnrn (http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?l=it&t=1633147) rnrnrn, a pretty good bokeh rnrnrn (http: // www .juzaphoto.com / galleria.php? l = en & t = 1475438) rnrnrn, not cluttered ..... the fact that it is a kit lens, do not presume that is not worth anything ... I have kept for my aps-c and continues to give me a lot of satisfaction, in spite of those who say it is a fund of bottiglia.Soggettivamente, then, give him a nice 9. !!
Pros:Focus better, the presence of the vr - albeit not great, the price (on eBay or used) took 80 €, focal length, weight,
Cons:Sharpness so and so ... to TA bad, it is very dark, and noisy vr af, af uncertain, minimum focusing distance, aberrations in TA, in general, all these problems are accentuated in the dark,
Opinion:Unclear (contours on my TA to appear "smeared"), it becomes acceptable to virtually f8. Impossible to use at RT for aberrations and sharpness. Dark, low light is difficult to manage the background noise, and VR is not much help. Bought at 80 €, is a useful all-rounder that basically has a nice yield, he left me the shots I am very satisfied, especially for the yield of the very pleasant blurry for the rest ... just remove the defects in PP. If you close a little after all it is quite clear. Good for iniziare.rn
Cons:quality, sharpness at maximum aperture, dim, slow autofocus
Opinion:Background: I am a beginner and beyond that I possess just another lens (Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f / 3.5-5.6 G VR), both paid the price of one from a friend who had used them for a few months. What struck me negatively of this model is mainly the sharpness at maximum aperture, really impractical; regarding the portraits you save, but sometimes the autofocus is slow / uncertain and the VR could be more effective. Over the 800/900 ISO Af has some problems. All in all, for a beginner like me is just fine to practice the focal more and not to be making a mortgage.
Pros:Great price, versatile, within its limits one blurred pleasant, good quality
Cons:sharpness at maximum aperture,
Opinion:For the price range in which it is located is a great lens to combat. It has a good build quality, although it is not very clear, especially at maximum aperture and has limitations with chromatic aberrations. Overall I would recommend if you do not want to exceed the expenses and take home something; recommended for those who have to take the handle as me.
Pros:competitive price, fun to use even if you are not professionals
Cons:dim
Opinion:Despite the negative opinions I recently bought this lens. I state that I am a neophyte who just is trying to navigate this complex world. I decided to buy this light because I wanted to try to work on my longer focal lengths without spending a fortune. I am very satisfied with my purchase. It 's fun to use to make the pictures and to play with depth of field, is a lightweight and easily transportable. It makes you feel immediately a "good photographer" even if you're a shoe like me. And 'bright enough to be used outdoors and in bright normali.srnLo highly recommend it to those who, like me, you are a beginner and want without spending a fortune, try to use different approaches. Obvious that the super experts and megaprofessionisti consider it crap but, you know, who knows more, see, since I do not know anything but I see very little of what I see I like you very much! Rn
Cons:Sharpness at maximum focal really scandalous, intolerable noise, aberrations, af very uncertain
Opinion:It 'is currently one of my goals, but unfortunately not very satisfactory. The sharpness at maximum focal length will literally bless, not to mention the noise and aberrations at the highest levels especially for photos in low light. He defends pretty well with portraits but we are not at lofty levels of course. Sometimes the colors look fake and it is constantly increasing with the darkness always in the dark ... plus the af vr becomes very uncertain and slow to stabilize. One lens dedicated exclusively to beginners and those who are content with little or nothing.
Cons:Sharpness, aperture, noise, colors, aberrations, construction, af, Dark, Vr slow
Opinion:Target really poor and disappointing. Color rendering ugly, poor sharpness and build quality really poor. Use as a second lens on the second body to always carry is not that great: af unusable by ISO 800. Poor plastic body that allows a considerable lightness but a very poor quality. Subdued compared to 18 55 nothing to do with with 70 200 2.8 vr. Vr lento.rnVoto 6
Pros:Good construction, light weight, I would say satisfactory sharpness especially in relation to the price, nice blurred portraits.
Cons:Vr not measurably effective ...... better to stay on longer time to 1/125 ......
Opinion:It 's the lens with which I performed one of my favorite shots, especially portraits, I was always surprised by its more' than good definition, if it were not for the bias resulting from its economy class ...... acquire the deserved judgment of great lens ..... obviously in 'use with light which enables management to F 4. Recently, driven by the desire of a definition, presumably better, I bought the 50mm f1.8, with which I am effettuanto the first portraits. The comparison (not really ecquo ...) I can only say that the 55-200 f4-5, 6 vr not 'mica to be laid in the cellar ..... quite the opposite! Apparently the photo d 'published example below are the major users of quest' perspective ....... judge for yourself! rn
Opinion:Good lens for what it costs, light and well built, the blur for portraits is very nice ... sometimes RNA, the autofocus is not very precise and then Valentino and I expected more from the VR system, which is not so effective. RNIN all ways, if you want a telephoto zoom at this price you do not think twice.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
