JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Ridiculous price, sharp, af fast, great colors, pleasant blurry on ff, usable ta, featherweight, tiny, good focal excursion
Cons:Plastic, plastic everywhere and fragile feeling & supercheap, terrible manual MAF, terribly tacky look of the most common silver version
Opinion:Great transnormal zoom that knows how to return sharp images and with beautiful colors despite its absolutely unreassuring appearance. It's entirely made of plastic, optics aside, and it seems to crumble under its own weight. Lifting a body as heavy as a D700 by taking it for this lens probably means breaking the attack... but it's also very light and small. The autofocus is noisy, suffers in low light but is also precise and very fast thanks to the short run of the MAF and the very light materials... but on the other hand it is terrible to use in manual having no friction and a very narrow dial. Even the zoom dive is lacking in any resistance/feedback. The filter fillet is also made of meager soft plastic and is quite difficult to center as the filter fillet always tends to plant crooked in the not hard enough plastic. In short, mechanically it is VERY poor except for autofocus, however (and I think much more important) the optical part is unexpectedly good. The images it returns have beautiful warm colors, a good contrast and even a pleasant blur to the most "large" openings, which although not a record are well usable as long as you accept a soft yield (for portraits on the fly from 35mm to 80mm at TA makes more than d It's all about being a zoom... a 20 euro zoom then!). Closing a couple of stops instead becomes well clear and has a good resistance to the flare to more or less all the openings. I personally use this lens on a D700 and find it great for travel/use "dangerous" (costs so little that it is expendable... maybe in favor of a black copy, much better aesthetically!) and I think it even superior to certain more ephaly ephaly optical, big and heavy... at least for the unexpected optical qualities. PS: To relieve the terrible appearance there is a beautiful green reflection on the front lens.
Pros:Robust but well-built. Exceptional glass with sd treatment.
Cons:Very heavy and not very fluid zoom ring.
Opinion:In possession of the old model I can say heavy but robust optics a myth for the era. Astonishing resolution also on digital bodies. Great brightness, though with minimum fire 3.5. It works very well in conjunction with the autofocus engines of modern machines, at least Nikon. excellent detail details.rnSecondly heavy although compact but the robustness and durability of the object have a price that is not devalued, of course, over time.
Pros:negligible cost, lightweight, small footprint, to the best of between f8 and f11, objective fullframe, almost no flare.
Cons:not to be used under 5.6 f, plastic construction, not nice so not suitable for fashion photography.
Opinion:I tried to buy this goal more 'out of curiosity than anything else', I must say it has a good colorimetry, if used to f 8 from the good satisfaction, focus fast and accurate, flare almost nonexistent, small footprint and lightweight, what ask for more 'for what it costs, and e'rnanche fullframe.rnDa absolutely try to realize as the manufacturers have us by the nose, proposing goals expensive, heavy and super sharp in theory, only to market policy, of course our expense illusion that as 'doing we would pictures much more' beautiful.
Pros:Optical very cheap, light, excellent color rendering.
Cons:Economic construction in plastica.Nitidezza just honest.
Opinion:In my humble opinion it is a goal, that even if he despised by many different qualities. Warm colors and pasty (best goals much more famous) .As for sharpness is a bit 'soft, but in some situations it is not bad (eg portraits.). With some PP gives beautiful soddisfazioni.Il costs the lowest in the market.
Pros:lightweight, cheaply, AF quite fast, bright, practical.
Cons:constructed entirely of plastic, ring rough and inaccurate, noisy.
Opinion:Optics honest, bought used, I was pleasantly surprised by the clarity and brightness. For me they are "beginner" is a great gym. More or less ill-treated by all widely ago in my opinion his duty. The plastic construction makes it sturdy and rugged little use of the zoom, but with a little patience you can adapt.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
