RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon AF 28-80mm f/3.3-5.6G : Specifications and Opinions


Nikon AF 28-80mm f/3.3-5.6G

The Nikon AF 28-80mm f/3.3-5.6G is a standard lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2000 to 2006 (discontinued). The focus is done by In-camera AF motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 120 €;
16 users have given it an average vote of 7.8 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Nikon F: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Nikon.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos





 Specifications
 Focal lenght   28-80 mm
 Angle of view   75.4 - 30.3°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/3.3-5.6
 Aperture blades   7
 Lenses/Groups   6 elements in 6 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.35 meters
 Reproduction ratio   0.28x

 Features
 Zoom type   Ring, external
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   In-camera AF motor
 Internal Focus   No

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   No
 Extenders   No
 Filters  
 Lens hood   Yes (not supplied)
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   195 g
 Dimensions   66 x 64 mm

 Buy

Nikon AF 28-80mm f/3.3-5.6G, buy on Ebay Ebay



Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 232000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





avatarjunior
sent on October 01, 2017

Pros: Very light, sharp, fast focusing,good color redering, cheap.

Cons: None

Opinion: I have had this lens for awhile and used it as my walkaround lens on a Nikon D600. It is sharp and fast focusing. Excellent lens. I have also used it on my Sony A7r as manual focus lens and that combo works like a charm. The lens is made of plastic so I take extra good care of it. It is simply to good lens to break even if it is cheap to replace. I got mine used for about Euro 50 in 2013. Included in the price was a film camera in good condition. I gave it a well deserved 9,0

Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on May 24, 2023

Pros: Non-existent weight and cost, excellent clarity and overall optical quality

Cons: Cheap

Opinion: I made an empirical comparison of this lens to focal lengths 35 and 50, aperture 5.6, iso 200, on nikon D700 (12.1 Mp) and D780 (24.1 Mp) with the following lenses: NIKKOR 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 D, 28-300 f/ 3.5-5.6 G ED VR, 28-200 f/3.5-5.6 ED G, 35-80 f/4-5.6 AF D, 28-70 f/3.5-4.5 D, 28-80 f/3.5-5.6 D, 35 f/2 AF-D, 50 f/1.8 AF-S G, 50 f/1.4 AF D, ZEISS ZE/ZF.2 Distagon 35mm f/2, ZENITH HELIOS 58 F/1.2, SIGMA 24-70 f/2.8 EX DG MACRO. I filmed a strongly contrasted scene. I considered sharpness (also) at the edges, opening of the shadows and tightness to the highlights, color rendering. In this personal ranking, with all the limits of the case, with both 35 mm sensors win the 35 f / 2 and 28/80 G here in comment, followed by the 28/80D and the 35/80 D (also featherweights from the negligible cost), in third place is the excellent but heavy sigma 24/70; The all-rounder 28/200 and 28/300 come last for mediocre results at the edges, but still good in the middle part of the frame. Beat the zeiss, which weighs three times and costs 10 times as much. The result at 50 mm is more complex. Considering the D780, the 35/80 achieves results almost indistinguishable with the benchmark, i.e. 50 f/1.4. Immediately behind are the 28/80 G and D and the 28-300. The solid and heavier 28-105 and 28-70 are less performing. The helios is a world apart: it is very sharp in the central area, it is manual, it requires an adapter that interrupts any automatism, and has a very particular blur, which you may like or not. With the D700 wins the 50 G f / 1.8, continues to do well in all parameters the 35-80, the sigma is slightly softer but holds the highlights well, the 28/70 D, the 28/80 D and G the 28/105 and in a very accentuated way the all-rounders burn the highlights. The 35-80 is an incredibly light lens (180 gr) with excellent performance even on Nikon D850 (45.7 Mp). The exceptional performance of the 28/80 also leaps to the eye, both D and the even more compact G, referred to in this topic, also a featherweight (less than 200 grams!), at 35 mm of optical yield substantially equivalent to the fixed. In response to these results, these very light, cheap lenses of excellent image quality returned, bring out not only the doubts about the policies of the producers, to which some comments that preceded me have effectively mentioned, but also the absurdity of dragging behind in street or heavy and expensive beasts travels. A nikon D780, plus the 28-80 in question, plus the very light 80-200 f/4.5-5.6 D, plus a bright fifty, you are on the kilo and six hundred grams in all, better than mirrorless. Of course, these products are certainly cheap and fragile, but they cost a few tens of euros! It may make sense to combine a zoom of these with one or two light and bright fixed ones for low-light situations or for blurred portraits. Obviously, then, those who do safaris, birdlife, sports, astronomy, architecture and design, weddings, advertising, catalogs of paintings, journalism, studio portraits will use something else, but it is 1% of cases, and perhaps less, and in any case it is a profession, where professional fatigue and the need to monetize do not coincide with the amateur dimension of simple fun and creative exploration. Lightness is freedom. Elliott Erwitt and Henri Cartier-Bresson used a small rangefinder leica with only the summicron 50 f/2: for them photography, more than an exercise in technical perfection, was to capture the revealing moment, the synthesis of a situation, the expressive simplicity. I think you are more ready to take a good picture if light and identify with the situation, than by fiddling with pounds and pounds of glass intent on assembling and reassembling them continuously. Excessive equipment is counterproductive, while a not excellent resolution at the edges or some small vignetting or chromatic aberration have never diminished a photo that tells something.

avatarjunior
sent on May 12, 2023

Pros: Price, sharp, featherweight.

Cons: So plástic, Maf manual difficult for rotation too short and light.

Opinion: Given the price I said: I take it or go or break it! It went very well beyond my expectations. Mounted on a D610 gave me back fantastic shots! It will be plastic but even if dated I never expected that something more like a toy than a lens would pull out such sharp photos. The speed of maf I find it very good even if slightly noisy but I do not care. The automatic maf works only on cameras with internal motor, manually I struggle to focus as the mechanism is little frictioned. I usually shoot at aperture priority, the best results I see them at f8 even at 80mm. My lens has silver color, for some it is an opprobrium but I like it even if it clashes with the black body of the d610. In summary, I consider it an apt article! A great buy!

avatarjunior
sent on July 23, 2019

Pros: Ridiculous price, sharp, af fast, great colors, pleasant blurry on ff, usable ta, featherweight, tiny, good focal excursion

Cons: Plastic, plastic everywhere and fragile feeling & supercheap, terrible manual MAF, terribly tacky look of the most common silver version

Opinion: Great transnormal zoom that knows how to return sharp images and with beautiful colors despite its absolutely unreassuring appearance. It's entirely made of plastic, optics aside, and it seems to crumble under its own weight. Lifting a body as heavy as a D700 by taking it for this lens probably means breaking the attack... but it's also very light and small. The autofocus is noisy, suffers in low light but is also precise and very fast thanks to the short run of the MAF and the very light materials... but on the other hand it is terrible to use in manual having no friction and a very narrow dial. Even the zoom dive is lacking in any resistance/feedback. The filter fillet is also made of meager soft plastic and is quite difficult to center as the filter fillet always tends to plant crooked in the not hard enough plastic. In short, mechanically it is VERY poor except for autofocus, however (and I think much more important) the optical part is unexpectedly good. The images it returns have beautiful warm colors, a good contrast and even a pleasant blur to the most "large" openings, which although not a record are well usable as long as you accept a soft yield (for portraits on the fly from 35mm to 80mm at TA makes more than d It's all about being a zoom... a 20 euro zoom then!). Closing a couple of stops instead becomes well clear and has a good resistance to the flare to more or less all the openings. I personally use this lens on a D700 and find it great for travel/use "dangerous" (costs so little that it is expendable... maybe in favor of a black copy, much better aesthetically!) and I think it even superior to certain more ephaly ephaly optical, big and heavy... at least for the unexpected optical qualities. PS: To relieve the terrible appearance there is a beautiful green reflection on the front lens.

avatarjunior
sent on October 04, 2017

Pros: Robust but well-built. Exceptional glass with sd treatment.

Cons: Very heavy and not very fluid zoom ring.

Opinion: In possession of the old model I can say heavy but robust optics a myth for the era. Astonishing resolution also on digital bodies. Great brightness, though with minimum fire 3.5. It works very well in conjunction with the autofocus engines of modern machines, at least Nikon. excellent detail details.rnSecondly heavy although compact but the robustness and durability of the object have a price that is not devalued, of course, over time.




Photos taken with Nikon AF 28-80mm f/3.3-5.6G

Foto
My Wolf
by André Roveyaz
58 comments, 3333 views
Foto
The Hidden Valley
by André Roveyaz
42 comments, 2438 views
Foto
Santa Claus is also on holiday
by Fotografone
36 comments, 2057 views
Foto
But isn't the exit here?
by Fotografone
21 comments, 1191 views
Foto
Interlude
by Gianluca Porciani
1 comments, 2246 views  
HI RES 8.1 MP

Foto
A thousand rooms
by Niccolo' Morando
4 comments, 201 views  
HI RES 18.7 MP

Foto
Dangerous types
by Fotografone
21 comments, 1367 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
On the set of "for A Fistful of dollars?"
by Fotografone
10 comments, 868 views
Foto
The Bench
by Giacomo Simonini
9 comments, 456 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Plane at sunset
by Sennar82
7 comments, 483 views  
HI RES 27.0 MP

Foto
Untitled Photo
by Eddie6630
4 comments, 603 views  
HI RES 12.1 MP

Foto
Mirror property
by Giacomo Simonini
2 comments, 338 views  
HI RES 11.2 MP

Foto
The party is over
by Fotografone
8 comments, 863 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Matteo Murdaca
0 comments, 495 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Fog 10
by Carlolivero
0 comments, 1073 views
Foto
Technicolor
by Niccolo' Morando
1 comments, 321 views
Foto
BRRRRRR but does not impress you ?
by Fotografone
6 comments, 660 views
Foto
Untitled
by Shahbazi
1 comments, 683 views  
HI RES 16.7 MP

Foto
Do you smell it?
by Fotografone
4 comments, 730 views
Foto
Memory picture
by Merendino Santo
8 comments, 1130 views  
HI RES 6.7 MP

Foto
He (p) if
by Eboy88bs2
0 comments, 826 views  
HI RES 19.1 MP

Foto
Asp
by Alex.m
10 comments, 1505 views  
HI RES 5.6 MP

Foto
Courtyard (Assisi)
by Rino Schembri
2 comments, 1425 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
The Atlantic Road (N)
by Fotografone
8 comments, 751 views
Foto
Sienese panorama 3a
by Fotografone
8 comments, 629 views
Foto
(Path )
by Giacomo Simonini
2 comments, 396 views  
HI RES 11.2 MP

Foto
How about this...... butterfly?
by Fotografone
0 comments, 681 views
Foto
Fog 4
by Carlolivero
1 comments, 978 views
Foto
The order of time
by Niccolo' Morando
2 comments, 73 views  
HI RES 4.9 MP

Foto
On the "road" to Montepulciano
by Fotografone
0 comments, 462 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Matteo Murdaca
0 comments, 591 views  
HI RES 24.0 MP

Foto
Géomètre
by Eboy88bs2
0 comments, 712 views  
HI RES 21.7 MP

Foto
The last Weaver
by Fotografone
3 comments, 724 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Between a house and another
by Fotografone
4 comments, 449 views
Foto
Here too we are in Piazza del Campo
by Fotografone
0 comments, 500 views
Foto
Look at the bubbles
by Fotografone
3 comments, 681 views
Foto
And now?
by Fotografone
8 comments, 895 views  
HI RES 16.9 MP


Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me