JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:It is an optic that can give good results on APS if you do not climb too much with mpix. This is my first 'digital' optic that at the time I paired with a D70, but it must be considered that it was born as a lens for use on film; comparing it to other 'standard' zooms of other brands, then it proved much superior to the contrast and the general sharpness of the image, and allowed me to capture beautiful images. As the number of machine bodies grows, to get to the 12 mpix of the D300, unfortunately began to show all its limits and from my comparative tests with the -bistracted- AFS VR 24-120 3.5/5.6 at full opening is much more kneaded at the edges, and then gradually improve closing the diaphragm, but without ever exceeding the 24-120 and I must say that this result surprised me not a little, but t'a. Suitable for machines no more than 10 mpix, it is useless to think of using it on 24 mpix APS machines, there are around newer optics (type 18-55) and much better. vote 7
Opinion:I do not like zooms but this lens has been with me for a long time, I mistreated it and now I would like to rearrange it. as a first zoom is great, useful the 35mm macro function for portraits very close to the subject. Of all the lenses I have is also the only one that gave me problems, and probably the cost will no longer be worth the repair. but if you find it in very good condition and you lack a zoom it can be a good idea. but given the low cost of fixed lenses of excellent quality, I recommend getting used to landlines. If you go out with the bag it is worth taking a couple if instead you go out only with the car will be much lighter and less invasive.
Pros:Good autofocus, brightness, focal excursion, small size, not excessive weight, close up.-
Cons:f. 2.8 only at 24mm.-
Opinion:I bought it used to use it with the F70. I use it almost permanently with the D750 and the yield is really excellent in all respects. The photos are well defined, the blur is pleasant and the colors are bright, do not envy anything to the most emblazoned 24-70mm. f.2,8.- Excellent also for street photography due to its reduced size and weight. The Macro function is more than acceptable, even if it gives me the idea of ??a close-up. I recommend the purchase, possibly used.
Opinion:It is an honest zoom that saw the price used vehicle is worth buying it on again instead still costs too much, returns clean images and engraving is good, is an amateur optical but good quality the bad thing is that is only 24mm a 2.8 to 50mm F3.3 is really buiornMa 240 cafes you can not expect everything even macro already ds 35mm rnEssendo is an optical repeat honest no frills a bit 'dated and heavy that advice is worth its money rnVoto 7RN
Pros:Good construction, excellent range of focal, macro function, fairly bright
Cons:Sprained Minimum focus. Others did not notice
Opinion:It's a good all-rounder. It features a more than adequate strength and its macro function is very convenient. The colors I really like with gradual and soft tonal passages typical of optical vintage but also has excellent sharpness diaframmando a bit '. I must say that I did not find large differences in the use with bodies FF or APSC. It is cheap on the used market and recommend it to all my friends amateur photographers who need a versatile lens to be used every day or read outputs. Rating 8
Opinion:is a lens that I possess for many years ... and has always given me good satisfaction to ... apertures is great for portraits ... almost looks like a fuzzy .... but stopping down to 5.6 -8 becomes crystal clear ..... right format has a very good color rendering is that of defining the format fx ... the yield on the edge is not the best ..... it is not perfect I'm sure a lens optics more expensive and have features tecnichernsuperiori made clean .... but the strong point of this is just not perfect ..... irreplaceable creative hands ..
Pros:good vision to 24 mm, distortion absent on film, af fairly fast, brightness
Cons:Build quality is not exciting outdoor
Opinion:I've used it for a long time on my F80 (of course we talk about the film). The auto focus does his job honestly and the lens was at his best at 24. brightness with a 2.8 is respectable, even if talking about the film is best to work quite high. the external build quality is not great, but I've seen worse. has a good setting and a good "manual". I've never tried it on digital, but film is really a lot of satisfaction
Pros:Small size, good performance on DX, good focal range (for me is the all-rounder, are the focal more use), macro function, Bright enough and good focus.
Cons:New Price high (just buy used), on FX lose quality at the edges, not exactly razor sharp macro as it requires a macro lens.
Opinion:And 'the zoom more use, it has a color rendering that I like a lot and a nice blurred. It 'a little' soft, the new version is much sharper but he also defends well. The macro function helps in many situations, although it is not really suitable as it does not have the sharpness and contrast that have macro lenses dedicate.rnDimensioni contained heavy and not make it an excellent lens to always carry dietro.rnA 24mm wide-angle lens has a fairly without distort too, at 85 a decent portrait lens at f / 4, which allows a pleasant out of focus.
Pros:Light, compact, versatile focal range of fx, macro function. complete! excellent on right.
Cons:mediocre on fx for vignetting, distortion at 24 and mixed edges. construction is not pro. cost of the new in my opinion not in line with the services provided, to take used.
Opinion:Objective born for film and borrowed the digital power factor correction typical of optical afd, I call creamy color, style afs 28-70 or 80-200 afd to speak. Has a range in my opinion very versatile FX, a little tight on the wide side in DX, makes it better on the latter course, while on fx shows all its limitations, such as distortion and vignetting evident in 24mm and poorly defined edges. Improves closing at f8/f11 and does not shine for a fuzzy all 'coverage despite being bright (f2.8-4, 2.8 to 24mm only). Autofocus velcoe although afd, construction pro but not compact and not too heavy, in my opinion used to be taken as a "tourist" even on fx (it also has the function macro 35mm and above). Of course, if you can get the 24-70 .. ;)
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
