JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Compactness, zoom range handyman, good sharpness, excellent VR price of used
Cons:Slight drop in sharpness at the edges to TA, attack hood little solid
Opinion:I bought it used about 5 years ago and it has never disappointed me. Both with my 'old' D200 that with the new D750 returns picture quality even if the maximum aperture not excellent not allow you to isolate the subject from the background with excessive decision. Despite having other seven original optical quality (all at least f2.8), I have always mounted thanks to its enormous versatility of focal (covers 70-80% of the situations). If you want to travel light, a budget handyman and have a view of good-quality is the lens for you. The stabilization allows you to take time to relax with 2-3 times below the safety times, offsetting the maximum aperture is not too open. I am very happy with it and even when I tried the new version f4 I gave up to change it because, in my opinion, the price difference is not equivalent to the difference in quality. Rather, if you find around 200-250 €, take it on the fly and, with the price difference resppound equivalent new F4, take a nice 50 F1.4! There are, in my opinion, many prejudices unedifying about this lens but if you are not professionals who need prints 70x100cm, is a great traveling companion with whom you will click with satisfaction the 80% of the photos. My score is 8.8.
Pros:Lightweight, good construction, vr effective, and good af advantageous price on the used market.
Cons:A little 'soft wide open at the edges.
Opinion:If used as it should be good results. I use it with satisfaction on D700 and colors that returns are breathtakingly beautiful. What more ...... If you find one at a good price and you can not buy more optical "emblazoned" accaparratevelo and he did not let you down. Do not listen to advice from "snob"! I have not done and I'm delighted!
Pros:Excellent handyman, focal excursion, satisfactory VR, excellent value for money.
Cons:It does not excel at the maximum openings, otherwise there is no glaring flaws.
Opinion:This is a perspective that enjoys undeserved bad fame, which can favour the purchase at low prices on the market of used... Shout also to the scandal, but the use often also on the Nikon D750, with satisfactory results, when I do not foresee photos "important", thus avoiding to shoot with a kit of optics 2.8 fixed, heavy and cumbersome... If I were to give you a vote, I think a 9 is not exaggerated.
Cons:Clarity so-so at all focal lengths, problems nell'autofocus, vignetting
Opinion:It 'a bit of a handyman with limited excursion, its sharpness is not convincing, I find a better 18-200 on the right, I often find myself fuzzy pictures and do not understand why, if the stabilizer is not working correctly or otherwise, even if also cartoon It corrects them into Photoshop. But the overall tone of the image is not bad, it is still a lens for me to be avoided unless you are printing photos 10x15 .....
Pros:Focal length, cost, vr, very good closing of a stop
Cons:Construction plasticky, does not excel at full aperture and maximum focal
Opinion:I have not ever used on the right but only on fx with d700 and d600, d800 on not even try to put it, I think it is much more mistreated than it deserves, compared with the new f4 loses but not so ecclatante to convince me to change ( because even when I want to use is the quality that the nikon nikon 24/70 28/70). His real limit is the softness at full aperture and maximum focal but I in 33 years that I take pictures, I've never seen uniform targets and perfect on the tour and at every opening. In his defense is that I I've had two, the former was more older and made a little 'less, the current was in a kit with d700 and outclasses plenty of what I had and I resold
Pros:Optics interesting from low-cost to be full-frame and covers a very wide range of focal lengths. If used during the day to f 8 by a good result. See photo "waiting" in the gallery Sri Lanka.
Cons:Poor image quality especially at maximum aperture and hike.
Opinion:On the market there is better but we need to spend more. Recommend to anyone who starts then move on to higher optical performance (eg 24-120 f 4 f 2.8 or 24-70 or the Tamron 24-70 VC) and to keep as a "mule". I used this very nl optics around the world with the D90 but with the new D800 shows its limits. It 'still a product that has always been extremely reliable.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
