JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lightness, precise AF and quite fast and noiseless, sharpness, chromatic rendition. Good construction.
Cons:Slight distortion at 18mm, easily corrected.
Opinion:I use it on Nikon D750, with more than satisfactory results at all focal lengths. The main advantage is without doubt the lightness, but also the overall yield is good. I often prefer it to the excellent Sigma 12-24, which I also own, for the possibility of mounting filters, especially the CPL, on certain occasions indispensable.
Pros:Lightweight, sliding ring, small hood, price / quality: good
Cons:Distortions very difficult to dominate, slightly crisp at the edges, obviously not bright, but a large zoom zoom can not be too bright. Poor construction materials.
Opinion:For leisure it is a great lens as it is light and probably the best of its brand in relation to the price. Seychelles did miracles but also a toy-toothed toy would be good for them ... The D800 works well even though the reflex highlights all the benefits but above all the defects. The use for home and interior jobs but honestly I stay a little long would be better 14-15 mm and then blurs and distorts scary and I always have to cut out losing another mm and then abundantly adjust the perspective. Overall, the discreet quality-price ratio but used at work level loses a lot of time then in the pp phase. rn
user120016
sent on April 16, 2017
Pros:Cheap, light, excellent color rendering, aperture ring
Cons:Build quality not excellent. limited top opening.
Opinion:Overall worth the money it costs. The construction is to be entry level. At the shortest focal distorts a bit 'more than they should and suffers from backlight. Defects end here because the color rendering is excellent, the ring is smooth and precise and the weight is negligible. Also good sharpness comparable to much more expensive 16-35. For its price one can not ask for more.
Opinion:plasticky construction, AF just enough, lack VR.Ottimo wide on FX, color who know Analog [follow updates] -------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
Opinion:To be worn in the kit because of its low weight or to start for beginners with a good lens .. A lens that you have to understand and appreciate without too many claims especially with camera with sensor apsc but certainly a good start even with the Full frame. .................................................. .................................................. .................................. .rn
Cons:Distortion 18 awkward, slightly bright, building a bit 'plasticky
Opinion:I use it mostly in my urbex outputs, then architecture and interiors on a D700, you can also use a free hand in the interior a bit 'dark holding pero' of high iso (3200/5000). It distorts a lot to improve in the longer focal 18mm up to 35. The sharpness is satisfactory, a little 'dark, but it is an acceptable compromise for a compact, lightweight lens. So it is worth spending those EUR 300 about who is in the used market.
Pros:Light crisp great price of the used 77 mm diameter filters
Cons:Motor Af nothing, nothing VR, suffers backlighting
Opinion:Practical and lightweight makes his dirty work without problems, minimum maximum yield spending, mounts 77mm filters are then calmly, and also low cost has a good color rendering and little distortion at the maximum focal, skews a bit to 18mm, not ago miracles but neither disappoints, I have not found much difference with the most recent version (that and more expensive also) so I opted for this version although it does not have the internal motor Af.
Pros:Used price, quality yield very good in the landscapes and Street, very compact and lightweight so excellent portability and present the aperture ring.
Cons:Absence of motor af internal construction is not very up to Nikon, the lens hood is not always supplied in used.
Opinion:I am using it with the Nikon D800 and gives me a lot of satisfaction even if it is like the big brother of f2.8 but you gain in lightness and compactness. The collars I find fluid and zommata is gentle and precise, the color quality is also good distortion is acceptable and affordable price of used, highly recommended.
Pros:Price used (is in excellent condition around 350 euro), yield 3.5 focus, clarity, weight
Cons:Building a bit 'plasticky, a bit' gloomy at 4.5 but still acceptable.
Opinion:I used it with some satisfaction on both APS C than on FX and I have always ensured that the most honorable results in various lighting conditions. The collars are fluid and the focus in MF precise. The focal allows use landscape more than satisfactory and the distortion is more than acceptable. Mechanically, I made choices a bit 'more qualitative but it is the only real flaw I can find him. For me positive experience.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
