JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user36759
sent on July 05, 2014
Pros:Versatile, wide range of focuses, lightweight and small in size, good at f8
Cons:Built bad, high price both new and used
Opinion:Taken used a month ago, I found it versatile. But the rubber ring for the zoom was a bit loose, maybe for use in the sun even though it seemed strange, and I got a bit bad. It also has a bit too much play, I think at 200mm , Which did not have the 28-200 G.rnAny generic amateur use may be fine; It solves different situations without changing the target. For professional use, well depends, but the optical quality is not excellent even though it is obviously justified by the extensive excursion. At the maximum focal point is rather soft. RnrnThese are the ideas I've been doing working on. Amateur is definitely a discreet purchase, if taken at a reasonable price. RnrnOnly better to zoom less.
Pros:Flexibility of use, good quality medium aperture
Cons:Lack zoom lock, slight vignetting
Opinion:It is a good compromise for a day when you do not want to carry around the entire arsenal, covering all areas. At the beginning had a 18-55 and a 55-200 which I used for the same purposes, not known much difference, if not in a greater brightness in favor of 18-200. The stabilized it well and also the sharpness is more than enough to average aperture (between f8 and f16). A 200mm is softer and also the stabilizer can not do miracles to these distances, but what is claimed by a scale so variable in one goal? rnNel Overall a good objective, practical and effective, I bought it used and the manual focus ring was slightly slow, but flows that are fiction and not betray when required in situations hasty. The only flaw is the lack of a zoom lock switch, because with the passage of time, the mechanisms, loosening, leaving stretch zooming when placed vertically when carrying over the shoulder, but mind you, not that it stretches forever, but can happen if solicited by one scossone. A simple zoom lock (present in the new version) would fix it with no problems.
Cons:stabilizer noisy, the focal ring is not very fluid.
Opinion:Since switching to digital (2007) was my first goal, I use it almost anywhere with exception of special situations where you need an angle of view (I use the 10-20sigma.) The best results are obtained at f8 and f14 to from the focal length of 20mm up to 170mm where known better picture clarity without excessive distorzioni. A wider apertures loses detail especially at the edges and suffers from vignettatura.Se managed well during the PP you can get results soddisfacenti.Per Finally, the lens is to travel excellence, belonging to the new 18-300, however I do not will destroy this goal.
Opinion:I find it a 'optic im very comfortable journey, in those moments that you do not know or can not predict that focus may be helpful to take a moment after something that we can no longer, or not worth the trouble shooting. Is very useful to vary widely, the focal length without changing the optics in very dusty-sand (Deserts, African tracks etc..). You can not say that it is an objective robust! I got out of hand as he slipped and fell on the damp ground and making a flight of no more than 60 cm. I found the lens open in TWO parts! The repair was going to cost me 50 euro in less than a new objective. Since I consider it very useful for the type of trip that I usually do, I bought another one. After about 2000 shots of the second objective autofocus stopped working. This time it occurred the warranty. To date, this copy I made a little less than 14,000 shots and sides of rubber rings which are the zoom and focus are loose (a bit like the rubber bands that eventually lose their elasticity). Perhaps this last is not a defect but is due intensive use.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
