JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Definitely a successful goal: 180 degrees on the diagonal, lightweight and compact, metal (great to take on trips). The optical yield is very good both in that 2.8 to more closures. night rnNelle 2.8 is crucial to make scenic, backlit full a little bit of flare and chromatic aberration are known (in the middle of wide angles, nothing earth-shattering) .rnL'autofocus afs has no engine, so it only works on some camera bodies , with internal motor to the body; still it manages to be too fast and accurate for sport.rnIndispensabile the rear filter UV.rn
Opinion:An inevitable goal in the kit of any serious evolutionary cameraman. It's absolutely amazing, you work with a very high optical quality with an infinite field angle! Built with noble materials, it also has 2 ED lenses inside. The yield is much better than that of 10.5 mm for DX, and absolutely not comparable to that of the various Russian fisheye. Many rear-mounted bayonet mount filters and one of them must always be mounted (preferably the UV one, called LC 37). The filters are supplied in a practical case of four, if you buy the used optics that are there! The 16 mm is compact and lightweight, and its output leaves open. The AF is fast, but this is normal for these types of lenses. The only note is the front cover, a real crap in plastic on the back of that one 14-24: ugly, uncomfortable and after a few months takes a game and there is no%3B to make it stay fixed to the optic. I have solved by cropping a velvety adhesive paper strip and attaching it to the inside of the cap, now perfectly closes. What else to say, those who love wide-ranging will not fail, even because the price is not prohibitive at all ... ATTENTION: The writer is not an influencer or a guru, nor is anyone who downloads other images from the net to embark on unlikely comparisons. For almost forty years, a passionate nikonist of photography and photographic material has been, and my opinion is not a gospel, but only the result of empirical experience. The objects I write really buy them, I play a few months and if I do not like them, but always and in any case of material at the moment in my possession. I do not make the copy paste of reviews taken here and there on the net, if I'm talking about an item it's just and because I had in the house the time it took (at least months) to try to figure it out. I often go against current, but this does not take my sleep as much as I caneven trying to help young aspiring photographers who give a weight to their savings. But, I repeat, I do not bring the verb ...
Opinion:An exceptional goal, costruto well and in metal. Loses something to 2.8 as quality but closing is scary, sharp and engraved. The strong point of the backlight controlled very well in fact it is the aim must for underwater photography environment in which very often is photographed against the light, average aperture closed and where the deformation of the typical fish-eye does not disturb indeed enhances photos by sketching out the subjects in the foreground. Unfortunately, a filter (rear) must always be mounted on pain of loss of focus. Aim for full-frame, with the aps you have a 24-deforming.
Cons:It 'dated, still costs a lot, lack ultrasonic AF, made the edges adiaframmi open.
Opinion:Dated lens that has aperture ring and allows the application to always excellent bodies pellicola.La construction is frighteningly professional, a real feast for the eyes. No plastic, but hard and raw heavy metal! Does not accept filters before, but at the back we have a slot for real? Strainers? optical glass bayonet are supplied with: L37C (uv), A2 (amber) for white balance, B2 (blue) as above, O56 (orange) for b & w. A filter, in general (and obviously) the first, must always be grafted or lose? Focus? the edges since it is part of the optical system. Eye so if you buy it used you have to check its presence. AF only with the bodies which so allow, and the ring maf that rotates during operation. Great for small apertures, suffers a little open systems. To note the useful references for setting the hyperfocal distance without much preamble. Not yet replaced on FF, I deserve an update of what type of DX Fisheye 10.5mm f/2.8 G ED as the stratospheric 14-24 does not cover the same angle (180 ° diagonal) and despite having a job obviously different weights and cluttered significantly compared to the "fish".
Cons:At the edge is not perfect at room temperature, improves a lot to f / 5.6, minimum focusing not great but average for the type of lens
Opinion:Solid construction, does not have the built-in motor so it works only in AF conle cameras with AF motor right. The ring discharged to fire is not disabled dursnte automatic operation, so care must be taken not to touch during operation. Good control in the backlight. The quality is very good, it becomes good to the edges at f / 5.6
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
