JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:JPEG on camera (film tenuous and lively), tend to completely demolish the detail and knead the photo. with those in bn clearer the details but the noise reduction is absurd. Slow sw in LV.
Opinion:That is, the system M either love or hate. I come from cameras "modern" as D600 / D800 / DF, but the M is unique in its absurdity. detail, the three-dimensional color and timbre of this system are unique. You have to buy it only if you know what you want otherwise they are a waste of money. RNLA 240 in question is an attempt to get closer to the technologies leica competitors while maintaining its stamp inconfondibile.rnRispetto version with CCD sensor, there are several improvements but also a disadvantage; we start from this: rnIl CCD offers unrivaled detail for a CMOS sensor. The leica m is less than the engraved M9 / ME to base sensitivity (ISO 160 CCD - ISO 200 CMOS) rnSul rest instead there storia.rnISO you can push in 3200 without any major dramas of loss if the photo is properly exposed .rnMirino Electronic - this is the real advantage of the machine with the best performance ISO. In fact, in addition to having the advantage of being able to shoot with long system and be sure of the point of MAF, the reduced draftallows if one wants to attack us anything like a normal mirrorless. With the rangefinder shoot with a 50mm f 0.95 or 1.4 is practically impossible, and the percentage of good shots is much reduced. by lengthening the focal things get worse esponenzialmente.rnConservando though the optical rangefinder and working with under 35 mm, the M becomes a machine to battle for the street. You're almost always in hyperfocal and speed focheggio with the rangefinder is istantanea.rnDa try at least volta.rnrnrn
Pros:The usual excellent quality materials Leica, modernity and tradition in a single device. Few frills and even fewer options for adjustment or operation. Sharpness, dynamic range and color rendering up to expectations though, at least for the dynamic range, not equal to the best SLR flagship. The arrival of a CMOS sensor has enabled the live-view. Combined with Leica optics and some of Zeiss and Voigtlander returns images of the highest quality and unmistakable imprint Leica. Great exposure that finally allows you to choose different reading systems (multi-zone and center-weighted and spot) and is also more consistent in the values ??of the previous ones. Bright viewfinder and contrasted as in the best M. The Frames viewfinder are more accurate and readable than those of the past. Battery from the considerable autonomy
Cons:Those typical of the Leica M system are but for many of us long-time users of a dress comfortable and convenient! The digital viewfinder is manufactured by Olympus quality very modest compared to the latest version but incompatible (VF4) when using liveview for obvious reasons the point of focus is only the center of the frame, which makes it very problematic focus on different points. The position of the SD below the bottom of the battery compartment is secure but very uncomfortable (for another I also Nikon DF with the same defect ..) especially if you mount one of the two optional handles. Focus peaking poor and poorly made. For those who use the Jpeg are not that great.
Opinion:Photographer with Leica M for almost 40 years and then the undeniably long curve of adaptation that the system requires to get the best you can give is established and achieved; many friends "hardline traditionalists" will not be in agreement, but I personally think the M 240 M Type the best ever, exceeds almost all the limitations of the system without losing the prerogatives best. Certain other steps forward are desirable and welcome in particular the use, vision and focus assist image with monitor and optional viewfinders. Certainly it is not a camera that shines for versatility of use and is totally alien to the main photographic interests of the average user of this forum but when it comes to reportage, street, photo-journalism and also a landscape less "fashionable" (ie without big-stopper, ND, focus stacking etc.etc.) and in the capable hands and aware is a real killer, do not miss a beat! Many consider it too expensive but no more expensive than the SLR flagship plus allows you to use natively best goalsAlways.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
