|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on October 15, 2021 Pros: Price, size, burst, silent shooting with electronic shutter, autofocus Cons: touch screen can be improved, viewfinder can be improved, screen not fully articulated, battery life Opinion: Taken recently at a very low price (certainly because now the T30 II version is coming out that from the features I have read does not change almost anything compared to the old model). Combined with an 18 mm F 2 of fuji it becomes a super compact to always carry with you (about 500 grams including lens). What can I say. Super compact size, I take it to flank it with other camera bodies that I have of Canon. If you need it to do street and always carry it with you is great, for more professional jobs I do not recommend it of course, because being very small you have difficulties in management. The features that make it perfect for street photography in my opinion are the following: Compact, lightweight, excellent autofocus even with facial and eye recognition, possibility to select the electronic shutter that is practically noise-free, so it is not heard when shooting on the street if you do not want to be noticed. The cons has my opinion is the touch of the screen, accustomed for example to that of the Canon RP which is really exceptional, this of the t30 is inferior in responsiveness. What can I say, right now it is at a great price, if you are looking for a light street SLR to always carry with you I recommend it. |
  | sent on May 30, 2021 Pros: Aesthetics, construction quality, rings and lots of adjustments, excellent for high use, burst Cons: The display is not posable. Opinion: Perfect to carry around but very usable. I was in doubt about ergonomics, coming from a Nikon reflex. Honestly, I feel great. The viewfinder is great. And great display to use even to shoot. The only drawback, of course, is the fact that you can move little (the display). Very happy to have passed to the fuji world. I look forward to trying it with other goals |
 | sent on April 16, 2021 Pros: Aesthetics, build and image quality, af, processor Cons: Q key, battery life, dual slot Opinion: It's the classic car to carry around all the time. Very light, obviously if accompanied by light focal points, and ready to use at any time. Aesthetically it is beautiful, the silver version in particular, and presents the analog rings in full Fujifilm philosophy. Great feeling to the touch. The only drawback is the arrangement of the Q button for the quick menu, which is placed in an uncomfortable area where it is very easy to press it inadvertently. Af side is lightning fast, thus having top-of-the-range performance, which is also possible thanks to the mounted processor. Indisputable image quality, good dynamic range and beautiful colors that fully reflect the color science of the Japanese company. One thing I didn't like is the battery life, too low, but this is a general ML problem as the other Fujifilms I owned or got to try also presented the same problem. The latter could also be the absence of the double slot, but Personally I do not see it as a big limit finding it right to differentiate the product from the X-T3. |
user91269  | sent on April 07, 2021 Pros: Good value for money. Cons: Not very long battery life. The flash's sled cover is missing. Opinion: I have had this machine for a few months now and I am fully happy about it, in relation to the price paid and the fact that we are talking about a reduced sensor and not a full-frame. I just want to write down a detail that I didn't like, but it's just a detail and not something important: the flash sled has no protection. I thought mine was lost, so it actually comes out of the house. The cover of the nikon D610 goes perfectly, without forcing. If you download the smartphone application allows you to shoot remotely without problems, it also allows you to manage times and diaphragms. In addition to the 15-45 kit I flanked a 35mm F2, which is equivalent to a 50mm (48). If you love fixed optics, and the 50in in particular, I think it's always to be held up, a beautiful light. I have the steel version and aesthetically if you love vintage it is very pretty. |
 | sent on March 06, 2021 Pros: Size, image quality, operating speed, rings, Fuji firmware updates, shooting experience Cons: Absence of tropicalization, non-exceptional body plastics, ergonomics not suitable for everyone, devaluation Opinion: After a year of heavy use I want to finally give an opinion on this excellent Fuji machine. PRO: we have the same sensor as the xt3 in a truly compact body and the performance is very similar to that of the flagship; the image quality is there and the shooting experience is typical Fuji, the analog rings on the body are fantastic; not having particularly large hands I had no ergonomic problems and I had no problems with the position of the Q button (demonized by many), which I find very comfortable instead. The firmware updates received by Fuji have also improved an already very performing machine in the race. CONS: not suitable for those who expect pronounced grips and "small" reflex ergonomics (the machine is really compact); the body plastics are not the best, on my silver version are already evident signs and paints that should not have been seen the use I made of them; tropicalization is lacking (given the launch price);the devaluation on these fuji product ranges is always very high, after not even a year the prices on the second-hand market have more than halved (good for those who want to buy it now, less for those who have to sell it). |
 | sent on November 14, 2020 Pros: small but complete and performance Cons: the stabilizer is missing, af not at the top Opinion: Taken with the 35 1.4 to be joined alls sony a7riii in all those situations where I want to bring a "box around the neck" while not giving up performance and quality. the sensor is great for both ISO and DR, but I didn't expect it differently as the last sony aps-c cry. the AF minus. Especially the implementation of face/eye tracking functions where two faces in the scene are enough to bomb everything. Although the data sheet speaks of 20 fps these can only be used in panning or subjects at a constant distance. buffer is reduced and writing slow. but at least it is allowed in the meantime to change and the parameters are clicked. the AF, at least with the outdated 35 1.4, is not suitable for dynamic scenes. As far as I'm concerned, it remains a chamber to use "reflex" with moving point, af and single shot. among the things I appreciate the most is the minimum time of 1/32000 and the automatism that allows you to switch electronically in case you need time over 1/4000 clickable and setable rings at will, fantastic jpegs, analog feeling. among the things that can be improved are certainly the af algorithm, the switch operation between the viewfinder and the display, the unusable fn button put there. Among the things I really miss is sensor stabilization. Also, since it is practically impossible to shoot under 1/120 freehand, I do not understand why filling half the time ring with times from 60 to 1" T and B. these last functions used obviously by easel could be made selectable from menu. I would have preferred a physical ring from 60 to 4000. |
 | sent on February 23, 2020 Pros: Light body, high iso hold, key arrangement, raf finally quality, Fuji XF system, outstanding jpeg, pad, touch, automatic mode selection key (never used, but could be great in some situations) Cons: unnecessary effects on the dial, better to equip yourself with additional handle, not top-not-to-top viewfinder (but better than that of the A7 III), dust-exposed sensor, single slot Opinion: I have been using this gem for several months after having x-T1, X-T2, Sony A7 III and Canon EOS R and with this little one I found what I was looking for: a light and compact body to use during my excursions but without giving up the quality of the files. The first set of fuji X machines however good, sinful in autofocus speeds and files that did not stand up to the competition much. With the 3 series of fuji these shortcomings have been eliminated and now the X-T3, PRO3 and T-30 finally have a responsive autofocus and excellent lychee files. The body is small as well as the viewfinder, but with some precautions you work without any problem. I find the battery life good, I usually never use more than 2 in the same day. The body is not tropicalized, but I also use it in the mountains and apart from a few grains of dust on the sensor (definitely less than the T2), I did not find anything dramatic. Just for comparison, the sensor of the A7 III got dirty much more easily. If you want to save something the T30 will give you the same quality as the big sister. If you have the chance, however, the T3 is built better, has the double slot and a larger buffer. Of the T30 I appreciated the insertion of the pad for focus, the excellent customization and operational speed and the touch finally useful. At the price at which it finds itself today I think there is nothing better. It's definitely a best-buy. |
 | sent on February 23, 2020 Pros: Suitable for both the beginner for automation, and the demanding photographer with multiple customizable settings. The weight. Vintage design. Cons: full-bodied manual to study. ISO with limits in extreme sensitivities. Opinion: My experience starts from a Sony A77 II that has many beautiful things to say and with which I still feel very good. First of all, the weight is definitely low and for me that I love going to the mountains is no small thing. I have owned it for three months: comfortable, portable, versatile. Since the settings and menus are different from Sony and the digital evolution is pressing, it is necessary to progressively disconnect from the easy automations that still allow you to use it immediately after inserting the battery. At first it looked like a toy, then, intervening on the multiple settings, the judgment went from toy to jewel. I remain doubtful about the ISO sensitivity: over a certain threshold (25600) the same manufacturer speaks of the presence of spots; below (100), we are talking about a reduced dynamic range. I do not have the experience to be able to compare this limit with other machine bodies, so I report the data but do not make more in-depth judgments that I leave to other more experienced than me. I have a small hand and I feel good, although the handle of a reflex is something else. Aesthetically I like it for the vintage appearance reminiscent of my first reflex: fujica ST 605N. If I went back, would I buy it back? Definitely yes. |
 | sent on January 08, 2020 Pros: Good construction, low weight, discreet chromatic rendering, interesting function of films Cons: PESSIMA battery life, excess programs and functions, q easy key to inadvertently press, some unclear functions. Opinion: Owner of Olympus for decades I decided to move to Fuji (convinced by my son owner of the X-T20) but I find it not very practical in use, although well built, I find the battery life very bad, that even with all the zero consumption possible, makes me struggle 200/220 shots, absolutely negative. I also find it excessive to insert unnecessary functions that complicate life, with menus not always intuitive. Photographer 99% in manual and I have to say it's not bad but you could do better. If you know how to take pictures, you don't need too much frills. Overall I can not say satisfied, indeed. |
 | sent on December 18, 2019 Pros: A machine with counter-maroni in the size of a mobile phone Cons: A pair of caulies Opinion: I had to give my first 10, honestly I find it great, the construction is solid, the machine is really nice to see, the files are great already in jpeg, I did not note any difficulty in processing them, maybe it does not have the dynamic range of the D850, but I would like to see , taken mainly to carry it often around, which with the reflexes passed me the desire. The only real flaw is that it made me want to change all the set, otherwise for the praise it would have been enough to put the q button somewhere else and have a second slot sd (but there would be no space, so it is normal there is only one) , the ergonomics improves a lot with the metal battery grip taken on Amazon at about twenty euros, as far as the battery I expected much worse. |
  | sent on May 15, 2019 Pros: AF really fast, file, general reactivity, burst with 20 FPS without crop, optical system, color profiles, joystick Cons: Ergonomics, needed Eyecup Tekiac's X-T3 and Meike grip taller and with grip. Fuji Classic batteries from low-life, mediocre buffer about 20 shots with the 90 MB/s Extreme Pro in writing Opinion: It's been a long time since I expected, after X-T20 and X-E2 finally a Fuji... Fast! The single and area are instantaneous, you can finally use only in AF-C like the Sony, it has revived even the 35 1.4 so that you can shoot to TA pure things moved, she hooks. Eye AF almost at the Sony level, the joystick is needed. I prefer the files compared to the previous sensor, more neutral to color, more natural, I have not noticed any improvement in the technology BSI. She and X-T3 are the first really mature products that Fuji has baked, use for the iridient X-Transformers Demosaic and then work the DNG on LR, excellent results with various Fuji color profiles to choose from on the file. Grip and Eyecup for me indispensable, in sports photography by satisfaction, arrives at 30 FPS in crop 1.25, a lot of brute force only serves at special moments, I'm using 10 fps without blackout in the viewfinder, often JPEG to have a nice long buffer (90 shots Almost), fortunately that by setting in the car the JPEG comes out already... Hello. I highly recommend buying after test, it's always an APS-C, who has a FF not looking for better quality with half less sensor... |
 | sent on April 21, 2019 Pros: Compact Size and lightness, excellent JPG/raw files, high ISO hold, AF speed and precision, manual controls, touchscreen and joystick Cons: Field of view and resolution viewfinder, unhappy positioning key ' Q ', charger style smartphone but slow and with short cable, lack of stabilization on the machine body, price at launch a bit high Opinion: Third personal experience with X series of Fuji (had X-E1 and X-T20), for me it is the ideal complement to the reflex system I use, but I do not think it can take the place, for purely ergonomic reasons. The X-T30 produces excellent files already in JPG, raw files are easily treatable through capture one express for Fujifilm (free). From comparison with the homologues files produced with Nikon d7500, they do not disfigure at all in terms of color rendition and dynamic range, and are a notch above in terms of ISO tightness, especially from the 1600 up. Use with XF 23mm F/2 WR... And it's a pleasure! It is only a Pity that neither the body nor the optics are stabilized, which would make a little better digest the €1,400 necessary for the purchase. P.S. the firmware of April 18 has a little ' cushion the problem of involuntary pressure of the button Q, which remains in the position unhappy. Overall Vote 8. |
| sent on April 02, 2019 Pros: -Retro Look-manual controls-quality of the available products and optics-compactness of the body machina especially coupled with lighter lenses-good reactivity to be mirrorless-convenient charging via USB Port C Cons: -Not really popular launch price: There are equally capable DSLRS that cost half-key Q too easy to inadvertently press-App so slow in initialization that I have passed the urge to use it-no external charger: it recharges however Via USB Port C-Low power (1A) of the supplied USB power supply-Reduced Eyepoint Opinion: First experience with a Fuji, choice for the presence of manual controls that the other homes are struggling to propose if not on high-end products, big and expensive. Along with the zoom 15-45 is so small that it looks like a toy, but the photos are of an impressive quality. The electronic viewfinder should be set in boost mode as recommended by all online, then the fun is assured. Solid body and "dense", unfortunately the ergonomics is penalized by small dimensions: difficult to grip firmly without inadvertently pressing a few buttons. Eyepoint 17.5 mm annoyingly short: Having relatively long lashes I often find myself preferring the LCD to the viewfinder. Immediate use also on the part of has never taken in hand a Fuji before, offers good customization options: Color adjustment, noise, focus, dynamic range... I am not a video expert but the results seem to me to be rich in details, both in FullHD and 4K. App of a terrible slowness to take control of the machine, I will not use it unless forced. Transfer photos to your phone, but for me it is more practical to extract the SD memory card and insert it into a player, exactly as it was 10 years ago or more. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
