|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on September 06, 2021 Pros: Perfect triptych with : 35 xf , 56 xf , 90 conclusive ... It remains the craving of the 16 mm but honestly I prefer a lightning af . The 90 is specific and lightning fast. Cons: New price Opinion: Alas I gave in like a child, accomplice of the monkey was my brilliant xt4 to which I asked: with what lens would you express all the speed of your AF ? Here he replied 90 mm f 2 ! Sorry for the rant of words vain a communication camera / soul, but honestly I wanted to create a competitive combo for dog photography in portraits, especially for those in motion using the afc and the zone system. |
  | sent on June 27, 2021 Pros: all Cons: I don't know Opinion: Probably one of the best lenses for this relatively important size, weight and dimensions considering that it is an equivalent 130 in full format; optics with a good yield already from f2, ac contained, af right and better than that of 56 1.2; the bokeh is as good as the color rendering I did not find relevant negative points, in short for me a must have on this system. |
  | sent on March 08, 2021 Pros: Tropicalization, sharpness, build quality Cons: Weight, noise of the maf "dancer" system with machine off, no stabilizer, light plug Opinion: Before buying it you must be aware that this is a "specialized" lens, designed for portraiture and limited to a few other uses (perhaps a little in landscape /photography of details, but not macro). Having said that, for these purposes the lens is in my opinion simply excellent for the construction quality, sharpness, openness and quality of the bokeh (perhaps not at the levels of 56 1.2, but still very very pleasant). The detail is there and it is absolutely satisfactory already at the maximum opening, closing a stop already maximizes. On the negative side, I would mention the absence of stabilisation, a cumbersome and not exactly precise light-off and the weight. Also watch out for the value for money, because for non-professional uses the new Viltrox 85mm offers services close enough but at a price halved, a factor to be evaluated during the purchase phase. If you have the option to buy a good used at the right price, fuji still remains preferable in my opinion, this 90mm is a lens that you will not regret having in your kit. |
user148470  | sent on September 11, 2020 Pros: Sharpness, blurry, construction Cons: unsteadied Opinion: Beautiful lens that I would have liked to try with the stabilization of the H1. using it at the time with XE2 and XT1 I lost several shots for micromosso, you need to shoot at least 1/200". Even in the full-length photos it gave a pleasant detachment of the floors. It also gives you the ability to make some good macro not extreme. |
user63757 | sent on March 21, 2020 Pros: Sharpness, Nano Crystal, Bokeh, WR, Very Close Focus. Cons: Optical internal noise, Bad light. Opinion: Pro - Fuji will have made considerable efforts to have this 90 f2.0 lens at the record level maximum opening vignetting, chromatic aberrations, distortions I would say a perfect optics also excellent the nearby focus. Cons - Despite very high levels of my personal opinion or some criticisms to be made. Focal I find it a long can but above all brightness would have built a Fuji 70 f1.2 lens result would have been much blurry less even micro moved. I also find too much metal the large ring focus all metal better rubber especially with cold metal becomes very cold. I also point out a strange optical internal noise that is moving. In the end the 90 2.0 returned in my backpack thanks to the purchase Fuji X-H1 with the IBIS I would say reborn. Perhaps the best Fuji optics at the perfect optical level is definitely over recommended. |
 | sent on November 29, 2019 Pros: Heart-pounding MTF, unreal correction, instant AF, tropicalized, minimum distance MAF excellent, buttery bokeh Cons: Create dependency Opinion: Despite having no flaws, it can not be said that it has no character, every photo with this lens... Speaks! At TA is engraved and micro-contrasted to the excess, closing the diaphragm only serves to increase the focus part of the frame. Despite this surplus definition the bokeh is always perfectly soft and buttery, never dreamlike as certain 1.2 FF lenses but clouds what lies around the subject even in full figure, maintaining a definition on the parts in almost unreal focus. It's the best optician I've ever had, on the H1 it's gruel and crap, you never want to disassemble it because it disrespects valuable optics and it's so fast that it's good for sport. |
 | sent on October 06, 2018 Pros: sharpness, Chromatic rendition, blurred, build quality, Good af. Cons: Weight Opinion: This is an excellent lens from all points of view, the only flaw could be the weight that is definitely higher than what you would expect from a Fuji mirrorless System. The focal though fixed is in my opinion ductile especially for those who walk and do not pretend to take pictures standing still and changing focal. To dispel the myth that it is a specific objective to be portrayed as being the equivalent of a 135mm and not an 85mm can be used very well even in the Mountains. |
 | sent on October 06, 2018 Pros: Build quality, Optical quality, bokeh, razor sharp already at f2, AF Speed. Cons: Dimensions not really compact, lens hood OBSCENE. Opinion: Taken used at a great price (650 euros as new) just mounted on X-T2 and tried for a dozen shots what I came to say is WOW! Incredible sharpness already at f2, a razor from edge to edge! It has no aberrations is very correct and the distortion is virtually absent. The AF amazed me for rapidity and precision, it is true, the machine off is noisy because of the 4 engines of focus that make "dance" the optical groups inside, but nothing worrying, machine turned on no longer warns anything and the speed of AF is really neither thunder And. The bokeh, which is very important in this perspective, conceived mainly for the portrait is really "buttery" very very pleasant and gradual, if the plays on par if not a better spin with the 56 F 1.2. The dimensions are not really paperless, but besides the optical quality adds weight, the lens hood is a scandal! Looks like a plastic gutter pipe cut! It does its job of course, but it brutifies this wonderful glass!. To have without reservation if you are fond of outdoor portrait because indoors, it is quite long! It is a specialized lens born for the portrait, so not very usable for other photographic genres (even if it is not so true) my vote is 9/10 because it is really a TOP lens. |
user91788 | sent on September 28, 2018 Pros: Sharpness even at TA. Colors. Microcontrast. Resistence to the backlight. Cons: It's not stabilized, weight, overly analytical rendition and "Nervous" bokeh. Opinion: I have purchased this lens mainly for making portraits. Initially I was impressed with the extreme sharpness even using it at full aperture (F/2), absolutely the sharpest lens I've ever used. It also has a very good backlight resistance. Very good also colors, and microcontrast. Corrected even at the edges, distortion absent. In short, a lens that I would define from the modern surrender. However, with the use emerged aspects that added to me have led to sell. First weight (500g) and size are excessive for my idea of system mirroless compact and lightweight. The AF (on XT2) is fast but often inaccurate in the sense that I have had many false positives. Compared to the old man 60 F2, 4 is slower but more reliable. The construction is of absolute level but the noise of the 4 linear motor-off machine is annoying. But we come to the optical yield, in my opinion its being super defined is its value but also its limit: overly analytical. Even the blurred, appreciated by many, did not convince me completely. Too hard, little mushy and unprogressive. Cat-eyed Lights. In short, in some cases, especially with backgrounds in backlight, the yield is nervous. The 56 and even the 60 give a bokeh in my opinion more enjoyable. Finally, the system of stabilizing OIS would have been comfortable. In short, a good lens whose yield, however, I do not seem optimized for the portrait while being or should be the classic lens for this type of employment. |
 | sent on August 29, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, blur, image quality, auto focus ETCETCETC Cons: I don't know. For me long focal, but I do mostly Street and landscaping. Opinion: Disinterestedly as it just sold, I think it is one of the best bright fixed of Fuji House. I highly recommend for portraiture. At full aperture he churn out images with an uprooso blur. Closing a bit is a blade. Maybe slightly bulky, but not annoying, but nice to me. To have at least once. Now I'll try the 56mm F 1.2 |
 | sent on September 14, 2016 Pros: Robust, construction, AF, quality Cons: Nobody! Opinion: What else can you ask from a 'very well built optical, razor sharp, fast by AF and the blurred beautiful? NOTHING! For me one of the best fuji optical although very specialized, born for the pure portrait but willingly use benches for more details ... I'm in love with his optical quality and its saturated and soft blurry! |
 | sent on April 03, 2016 Pros: constructive and optical quality, sharpness, autofocus, WR Cons: a little 'large, quite specifically for portraits Opinion: I share the opinion of Xchris82xx who preceded me in review: the 56mm is more versatile (and smaller). However, after several months of 56mm, I chose to change the latter in favor of 90mm. The minimum focusing distance of 56mm fire was a bit 'low for my taste, with a magnification ratio strongly in favor of 90mm. I also prefer this focus for portraits. Like optical quality, color, sharpness: perfect. Autofocus: perhaps the best of all the X lenses I have. I must admit that the XF 56mm aspect gave more magical and dreamy portraits (perhaps for the f1.2, perhaps because for the same magnification deforms a little 'more the features and gives more three-dimensionality to the portrait, of course subjective opinion). I must also admit that, compared to the canon 135mm f2 that I used to 6d, the stop unlike the blurry and full frame a little 'you see ... I have the impression that the 135f2 isolasse a bit' more subjects, specialmente when fotogragati full length wide open. As for sharpness and pure image quality, the 90mm lens is the best picture I've ever used. |
 | sent on January 19, 2016 Pros: Detail and bokeh Cons: Missing stabilization and is a perspective specific to portrait Opinion: Find the entire Review here: http://instantart.it/fujifilm-xf-90-f2-0/rnrnVeri and its defects have not been able to find them, mostly operational difficulties, mostly due to the focal length, here they are : rnrn-lens highly specific portrait, less versatile 56rnrn-Hard work in tight spaces unless you want to close the frame of particolari.rnrn-Lack OIS found in point-seguenternrn In low light the Iso increase a lot because shutter speed that must be greater than 1 / 125Secrnrn-size greater than 56 competitors, who search the compact will find in the latter the ideal companion. |
user26730 | sent on January 02, 2016 Pros: Construction. Image quality. Blurred. AF. Cons: Weight and size a little bit off standard for the ML system. Lack stabilizer. Opinion: Great lens! AF very reactive (even if not as the 16 mm and the new 35mm) and precise. Blurred beautiful and very interesting 3d. Although not my favorite focal (135mm on ff) I'm glad I took it because it is stratospheric. The only flaw, not his but of these focal, is that if you want to take a full-length must stay away and staying away when falling below the 1/200 of a second, shake-the danger is always lurking. Had been stabilized would be indispensable. It's tropical conditions, which does not disturb. As noted by others, the machine is off, the internal parts are not of a noise ....... something broken but instead everything is normal. Rating 10. Recommended !!!! |
 | sent on December 08, 2015 Pros: The image quality already at TA, excellent mechanical construction and improved in the hardness of the adjustment of the aperture, low weight for a ... 135mmf2, ring excellent MAF as in all Fujifilm models, weather resistant, price! Cons: Annoying interior noise due to the new MAF system, but ... only the machine off. sopportabilissimo Opinion: It is not much that click with this amazing goal, but within the first files I was amazed by its quality of imagine at full aperture. The color rendering is superb. Its construction ... wonderful. Comparing it to the Nikon DC 135 I had (also a gem), the Fuji wins hands and files that I see here on Juza ... even on the Canon !!! The speed of MAF has improved a lot but would not recommend anyway for sports photos (Fuji here a bit) must become more involved. Fuji good, a good step forward and important thing, is listening to the criticism of its users ... if you please! Last positive note, the minimum focusing distance 60cm ... (used in conjunction with the extension tube Fuji 11mm ... becomes virtually a Macro) !!! |
 | sent on November 29, 2015 Pros: Extreme resolution, tropicalization, brightness, close-ups to be considered almost a macro ... Cons: yet to be seen ... Opinion: I did this morning morning a first exit to the mountains after I bought this gem last week. After a few shots, I knew I had to hand a real gem of war. Since the thin air did not allow me to make panoramic shots then I folded under particular close the season offers at these times of the cold weather. Fabulous colors, and as I mentioned optical razor sharp contrast with a decision, but not intrusive at the expense of various shades. For those who love the Fuji system it is ULTRASTRACONSIGLIATO ... Note that I had with me the 60 macro that remained on the stock exchange since with his older brother did everything ... |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
