|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on May 24, 2020 Pros: Size, focal, Jpeg. Cons: Too many keys and also the small rear ring is useless and spoils the grip. Opinion: For me it was always the perfect machine, I had the x100, the x100s and now I've switched to x100t. For me it is the machine to put in the bag always and anyway, it is the camera with which I shoot the most and that perfectly complements the 5d that I have in the closet. The equivalent 35mm is my favourite focal point, if I have to have only one lens with me, more exploitable than 28mm. The considerable plus of the f2 aperture also allows for a blurry enough for 90% of the photos. The files, I could only write Classic Chrome and finish the review. Colors always consistent, natural but not trivial, white balance always right even in mixed and artificial light. Of the dozens of cameras I've had, it's the only one that really allows me to use jpeg only without regret. The defects are related to ergonomics. 1) has too many keys, they make confusion. 2) The small rear ring is completely useless and you end up moving it and pressing it continuously. |
  | sent on November 11, 2019 Pros: Portability, immediacy of use, ISO seal, file quality, retractable evf and hybrid, metal body Cons: Batteries, handle, fixed lcd Opinion: Assuming that it is the first Fuji that I use intensely, that was loaned to me by a dear friend and that I normally use reflex Canon: enthusiastic, I define so my experience with this machine, the body with metal on the outside and a good handle of bamboo in addition make it pleasant to the eye (but very!) and pleasant, comfortable to hold in your hand (perhaps without the addition of the impunity who knows), leaving a feeling of solidity! At the arrangement of the keys you get used easily, as to the dial of the times (never used before), the one for the settings changes may be small, but only at the beginning! The dimensions are therefore great, and make it easily "not notable", in the sense that held between the folds of the jacket you do not see much, giving the opportunity to shoot unseen (my 60D as soon as I'm in the street attracts the look so much that everyone just waits to see you take a picture). The Evf is really good, although not very big, but if initially I thought it would make me regret a bigger viewfinder I had to think again, the quality of the image was great despite having made an evening use and in the interior not very illuminated! The fact that you can move it by holding an optical-hybrid viewfinder with all the settings is really special, I did not use it much in that mode but I find it an added value! The Fuji menu, if initially seemed too complicated, turned out to be less complex than expected, managing to make the right changes (although bickering over the display mode between viewfinder and lcd). The focus has always been precise, pleasant almost, the points are right (compared to the size) but they did not miss a shot except with facial recognition, which occasionally got in the way on the wrong face (but you "train" it easily)! The surprise then at the opening of the files on Lightroom was there, the RAF did not make me regret the CR2 of my 60D, indeed! I got to make changes that I wouldn't attempt on other photos getting a result in, B&N especially, really good, indeed! Fantastic colors! Only satisfactions during the Post! At high ISO I expected problems, and at 6400 the grain is there and feels, but in a different way, it is almost cleaner and pleasant, and lowering the noise the result is really good! The files are heavier than the APS-C Canon, but given the results it's fine, despite losing two megapixels! Being an ML out of production a couple of defects there are obviously, the battery that lasts really little is one of these, I was given the nickname "energivora" and not wrongly, I realized in a short time that carrying with 2/3 batteries even just for an evening is a must! Too bad then for the fixed screen and without touch, but it's not a problem in the end. Really good! It left me with great feeling and an additional pleasure in shooting! For Street it's phenomenal! Indeed! Soon I will have to give it back to its owner, and I must say that I am very sorry, I found myself really good, so much so that in the last few days some thoughts about a fuji between the equipment or even a system change I did! If a fixed optics machine goes so well who knows the higher level with interchangeable optics! |
 | sent on June 24, 2019 Pros: compactness, both sensor and optical image quality, high ISO resistance, hybrid sight, central shutter Cons: Lcd not tilting, fixed optics with standard focal... which is not really a flaw ;-) Opinion: It is a magical machine, photos with excellent quality and unparalleled user experience. Today this is at a great price and is worth every penny! It has unreachable goodies for interchangeable optical machines, such as the central shutter, which allows you endless flash syncro times... If you like you can also watch my review on YouTube at url https://youtu.be/O-xrhPUhsLM |
 | sent on January 04, 2019 Pros: Well built, aesthetic cured, quite reactive, sensor quality, excellent hybrid viewfinder better from the optical side, good ISO hold, times up to 1/32000, very quiet central shutter. Cons: Small battery and therefore low autonomy, some uncertainty of the autofocus. Opinion: My model is black, inconspicuous, suitable to dissimulate and not get too noticed. I think it's great the hybrid viewfinder undoubtedly better in OVF mode, with parallax correction, allowing you to see just outside the framed scene, an advantage if you want to seize the moment for a subject that is entering the scene. To save battery It is better to use the "viewfinder only" mode that can be activated with the eye sensor, the autofocus is generally reactive and precise but in some low light or poor contrast situation it shows some uncertainty. It ' a small but substantial camera and well built, with commands well arranged and easy to use: excellent aperture ring with shots at 1/3 stop. From the sensor and image quality side you can customize and produce good JPG's in the car but clearly from the Raf you get significantly higher results using the RAW CONVERTER EX 3.0 powered by Silkypix. Another advantage of the X100T is the central shutter with mechanical times up to 1/4,000 and electronic up to 1/32,000 allow you to shoot at F2 in full sun or in theater or in discrete places in total noiselessness, by disabling the artificial beeps of Camera you have to stay close to the camera to hear the real shutter sound. I suggest to mount on the lens the filter holder ring and the original metal hood to protect the front lens and to reduce flare and parasitic reflexes. Overall it is a small, qualitative and above all essential you do not have to change optics but give yourself to do only at 35 mm equivalent. |
 | sent on June 10, 2017 Pros: Dimensions, philosophy of use, construction, aesthetics, personalization, image quality, "character" Cons: Scandalous battery life, "with character" optic, non-tropicalized Opinion: I was curious about the minimalist philosophy of the X100 series for a while and a month ago, with a good offer on the used, I decided to jump by selling my mini Fuji kit to take an X100T. So far I have had very positive impressions. The idea of ??doing everything (or at least everything I care about) with a single focus has always fascinated me and fortunately I find the 35mm equivalent very natural compared to my way of seeing. Surely it is a machine that must be understood and tired (I'm still working), also because of the many customizable options, not always intuitive or well-explained in the embarrassing manual; On the other hand it is much more versatile than you might think - I'm using it for street, set portraits, and urban scenery, and I would say that it does it honestly in every situation. I found the hybrid viewfinder excellent, which I use almost exclusively in OVF mode with confirmation box (very comfortable), and I was amazed at her discretion - in black version is almost invisible on the street andThanks to the central shutter you can really kick almost in the face of people without being noticed. But the best thing is that I'm slowly getting rid of the pixel-peeping mania: let's say if the overall image quality is unquestionable, the 23/2 optics, however good, is not in my opinion fixed XF that I had before. However, this is a sacrifice to be taken into account: you lose 10% of QI, but you gain a lot in terms of bulk, serenity and fun ... because at the end the point is that this X100T is especially fun: it invites you to carry it Always below and use it in any situation, and after a while even the most obvious optical defects (flare, softness at TA) are also pleasant to use creatively. The only real faults I think are the battery life, which is also low for the ML standards, and the absence of tropicalization, that on such a car would in my opinion beessential. |
 | sent on October 19, 2016 Pros: Portability, operating noiselessness, build quality, optical quality, file quality, aesthetics, optical/electronic viewfinder, remote control application and photo transfer on your smartphone. Cons: Unlockable ignition lever, ridiculous user manual, sufficient video quality. Opinion: Camera for many but not for everyone. Who buys the X100T or what he wants or easily will be disappointed. It is not a photo camera "on the Fly" is more a machine that lends itself for reasoned photos. I bought it for use in outputs without photographic destinations programmed, in those cases I use a reflex. It is a big mistake to compare it with APS-C or FF SLR because conceptually it is a completely different machine. The presence of a fixed optics for many can be a limit while for others a resource. I recommend buying a second battery if you plan to exceed the 150/200 photos in a single session. The ignition lever moves easily to the on position. The user manual consists of only 58 paginette. To understand how many pages are dedicated to the explanation of the commands of the menu must be removed: The summary, explanation on how to charge the battery, how to insert an SD, how to apply the strap, appendix and 6 pages on safety. The videos have a sufficient quality, but it is to be considered that it is not a machine conceived for this function. In my opinion a great camera! |
 | sent on August 31, 2016 Pros: absolute portability, invites you to take freely without thoughts of optics to change and stimulating the creativity to do so! For lovers of b & w, to be set with b & w + red filter (perhaps "pumping" even more shadows) and literally becomes a drug .... Cons: I am not -for now - comfortable with the Hybrid Viewfinder ... it will be a matter of habit but in fact I am using only the EVF Opinion: Purchased by just two days after being rid of the heavy kit Pentax, consisting of three objectives, additional battery grip etc ... What say the first impression is that this baby returns an already perfect color rendering without the need for special post production adjustments ( while the pentax k5 returned a dominant green light to be corrected on time). Else: Invite to shoot in jpeg ... indeed the paradox is that in post production can not always match the performance of the "classic chrome", from my point of view perfect x most occasions. Account to update you when I will rule 'better medium .... |
 | sent on June 28, 2016 Pros: discreet, light, strong, immediate feeling Cons: AF sometimes uncertain Opinion: I wanted to buy this compact more to "monkey" than anything else because I already had two fuji bodies and a whole range of optics but this little car I was stunned! RnImpressionante, incredible as you can you open your mind to a totally different approach to photography from what you're used to, you feel free from the thought of the focal length, the lens and finally .... MOVE! RNE when you move discover! rnIl feeling was immediate, the fact is the AF sensor ottimo.rnL'unico that still does not fit in my complete reliability parameters ... but the margin for error is really just around errori.rnInsomma a car that makes you forget everything else ... because in the end with you will not miss anything! |
 | sent on April 16, 2016 Pros: Compact ?? Yes, for the size. For the rest, it is a jewel that has few rivals. Cons: Expensive, but worth its price. I find it too easy to accidentally move the exposure compensation control, that made me do some bad shooting set. Fortunately, the exposure latitude is good, and posts are almost always able to save those mistakes. Now I'm MUCH more careful. Opinion: Perfect to accompany a reflex (to undertake the most challenging tasks). The 35 mm format equivalent allows you to do ALMOST everything. Of course, some problems with the bird life there ... But on a trip "backpacker" in Japan has been my salvation. exceptional definition, viewfinder and fabulous screen. Perfect automatically, personalizzabilissima manually. ergonomic and functional controls. Also good resistance to high ISO. The two additional lenses (the wide and tele) integrate very well, and also give a perfect quality. Just do not broaden or tighten a lot (to get to the equivalent of 50 mm is not really a tele ... but it's great for portraits). Many extol the jpg Room. I shot only raw. Lightroom gives me the impression of being a bit 'heavier than with CR2. I solved by converting to DNG on import. |
 | sent on February 25, 2016 Pros: Size, weight, picture-taking, sharpness, quality of the sensor, optic, electronic viewfinder, design. Cons: Perhaps the fixed lens ... but maybe ... I think it's a Pro. The battery is improved but still last little bit, even with the electronic viewfinder ... to insert a protective filter on the optics must mount a screw adapter It prevents mounting the original case. Opinion: A car without compromise, throws out the sensational shots effortlessly; is not very light, we say it is not really a pocket device, but it is infinitely more lightweight and portable of an SLR. Line really stylish vintage (particularly the Silver version) although aesthetically delicate (very suffers scratches). slightly cumbersome menu but IMHO more linear analogues sony (at least for my experiences). The price does not exactly popular is repaid by the overall quality of the device. |
 | sent on February 18, 2016 Pros: SIZE !!! Is in his jacket pocket, you have the quality of a DSLR in your pocket, always! very good sensor even at high ISO (for APSC), excellent lens, decent sharpness at TA, but if you close a little better. Leaf shutter, ND filter. Cons: You have to buy an awkward adapter to put the filter. Menu a bit cumbersome. The flash in commander mode does not activate me the speedlite canon. Opinion: Lately they speak a lot in "how many photos I take home". Often when I went out, I was still undecided whether to take the SLR (and a couple of goals) as a matter of weight and size. Leave it at home and things happen that you should take pictures, bring the whole backpack and not photographers nothing. THIS IS IN POCKET !!! The yield at high ISO is very good, decent photos even in 3200, to 6400 save what can be saved. RAW shooting and files as they come out from the camera are not particularly sharp, but good and improvable PP. Good auto white balance, fast MAF but with some problems in low light or backlight. I wanted to write a review in a few weeks, to deepen it more, but it is such enthusiasm for this baby that I wanted consigliarvela soon! |
| sent on January 26, 2016 Pros: Lens super sharp, stunning images even when compared to those that come out from almost a reflex, lightness, aesthetics, simulations films EXCELLENT, made flawless skin colors. Cons: We are against ?? ' Opinion: I bought this little Fuji for about a month now and I've used it a lot already. I familiarized with the new shooting modes (the difference in use compared to a reflex beginning is felt) and are now almost as fast as when using the SLR. Lens has a wonderful both for what concerns the focal, both as regards the sharpness of the images that pulls out. It 'a wonderful machine both as regards aesthetics (you will just want to take it out and let us Quelch shooting) and for what you can do. I did a photo shoot with models in the studio and after a review of the shots, I realized that 90% of the pictures that I took out as "best" were of this small camera instead of my camera !! It 'a pleasure scattarci, pulls out pictures that really do not expect. The black and white ... then I tell you to do is sublime. In practice, this camera has become my machine black and white ... although putting simulation for portraits ago deskin colors that are perfect. I did not have more to do corrections in post for skin tone - what now routine with the camera (whereas generally use professional lenses such as Sigma series ART) .rnInsomma what about ... the camera if you want the world's greatest alongside your SLR. I say assist you ... because it is clear that this little wonder has its fields of action. Not good for all ... but honestly I find it suitable for the vast majority of occasions! Hello! |
 | sent on December 22, 2015 Pros: weight and dimensions; aesthetics and ergonomics ... pleasant to the touch and vintage style really exciting. Cons: activation of the menu on the LCD when shooting from optical viewfinder, a little cumbersome advanced commands. Opinion: I start from the end; It is a camera that I like a lot and I think we will stay with lungo.rnrnPiù specifically say it is a camera that, in the manner of use, allows you to take a leap into the past with the quality of presente.rnE 'camera whose peculiarity is certainly the optical wide (35mm equivalent of FF) fixed and not interchangeable; some call his handicap, I consider myself his point forza.rnQuesta choice of Fuji gave this camera a taste of particular challenge; in essence is how to take a cell phone with which very often we were able to capture great moments but with a poor quality ... there is this camera in a pocket, weighs little and is ready ... it leaves in the handle pockets without risk of breakage and if necessary turns on in an instant and is a true point and shoot ... rnAF fast and fairly accurate even if the area of ??the MAF is very wide to prevent the choice of point precided in subjects piccoli.rnDiciamo not a camera for all; is a camera for those who can give up a few shots ... not all the photos you can do but the challenge it tastes impareggiabile.rnrnQuando took my first Canon 1Dx did not feel the same emotions ... this take it in hand, turns and reversals, you look at it, the taste you, I'll scrutinize the ... disassemble with occhi.rnrnLa file quality is very good; Tonight I made 4 photos to my daughter's dance recital .... to 3200 ISO at full opening gave me back the file spectacular printed 20x30 leave stucco also 1Dx or D4S ... is a real thrill shoot with the X100TrnrnPer who this camera: for who is carried away by the emotions of touch, for those who can see the scent of fotografia.rn |
 | sent on February 24, 2015 Pros: Dimensions and weight sensor, look. Cons: Lens, ring back, no ISO dial, ring focus, aids for the manual focus, high ISO. Opinion: It's not the car that I expected reading reviews online. Positive that he is small, lightweight, and you can carry it wherever you want without obligation. The files are very good, really excellent regarding colors and recoveries in the shadows. The thing I most appreciate in the machine, however, is the range finder, it's fun and it's another way to shoot. See off the frame framed by more chance in certain types of photography, although it is not easy all'inizio.rnNell'uso practical I found the lens very soft at f2 (by my standards), already at f2.8 is fine. .and I want to clarify that I am not a picky so much on those things there. For goodness sake, it is very small and light, but it is not an excuse because 1) must cover only one size aps-c, 2) is f2, f1.4 not. Go see the size of Leica 35mm f2 and 35mm f1.4 voigtlander parliamo.rnGli then we are good high ISO up to 1600, then the files are mushy. In the reviews are all enthusiastic high iso, inIndeed, it is difficult to see grain, but honestly I prefer to see a file recorded and noisy, very, rather than have a photo without a trace of grit and all crushed and mixed. No no no. Noise reduction in -2.rnVisto which is a machine and fixed lens rangefinder, it would be nice to use it in manuale..vista and considered the cabal pulling on the various fotografoni sponsored by Fuji on the implementation of creativity as a result of the limitation of freedom. .Ecco, the "broken line" is not really the top, having used the old crescents Nikon and Leica rangefinders. It 'hard to use especially on more complex images. The peak focusing can not be used with the rangefinder and immaginina bottom right in the viewfinder that zooms in the central part of the frame is very small to evaluate the focus on speed and above all I find it difficult to compose well with distraente..già telemetro..rnOltretutto, the focus ring to focus the lens, almost infinite, is little braking. Even Volendo work in hyperfocal walking sooner or later touches you and you disgraced the focus. It 'a moment. rnUltima thing, the ring back, which in manual mode is used to change the shutter speed (even if you have already set on the bezel just above) is mollissima and unrestrained, with jerky little perceptible. The consequence is that once you set the exposure and backed the car to the belly, just a couple of steps because the wheel from turning independently and you change the exposure. And if that were not enough, the wheel is positioned right where my thumb rests during shooting. I solved it by covering it with scotch.rnLa machine is great fun and files, all things considered. But it would be nice that someone super fotografoni pecking the ding from Fuji had written at least one of the things I listed prima..rnrnAh, if you think it might be an alternative to the Leica, not è.rn |
 | sent on February 10, 2015 Pros: Image quality, processing jpg ooc, hybrid viewfinder, solid body, seven customizable keys, compact lens and bright, exceptional aesthetics, shutter from 1 / 32,000, syncro flash 1/4000, whisper quiet, expandable with the converter. Cons: Battery life, improved autofocus, addictive. Opinion: Who buys a series of Fujifilm X100 has very little to discover. He knows everything. Or almost. It 'a machine suitable for those who know what they want from their photographic experience and this X100T is, nowadays, probably the very essence of the concept of photography that is closest to each of us. The 35mm focal length is a historical, together with the 50mm focal length is easier to relate to our eye. And who says otherwise is lying to himself. Then put a 35mm in a compact and rugged, foul nice bright comandalo through a Galilean optical viewfinder which becomes an electronic rangefinder (according to Fujifilm) or directly to an electronic viewfinder and you have the X100. Missing the heart though. We must get it right because the car has to be special, and that's the X-Trans. A breath of fresh air in the face of decades in which large companies have made us believe that only the pattern Bayer could be "digital photography". The X-Trans is special, is unconventional, is perfect for a camera like the X100T. Has its colors, its nuances, its yield that can not be compared to Bayer with the usual test dpreview style. Be tested, do not add more. |
 | sent on January 30, 2015 Pros: comfort, image, functionality, body well done and aesthetically very beautiful, display and viewfinder, ergonomics despite the size very good Cons: battery, menu a bit 'cumbersome (there is to be a habit, especially for people like me it is not used), maf that with the strong contrasts in a while does not do his duty. Opinion: Like many who SLR kit, tired of the weight are passed to the mirrorless or compact too, after a first test with fuji x20 but I was not satisfied, I went, still holding the Nikon D610 with 24-70, in this beautiful Japanese girl. The machine is perfect in virtually all, convenient from all points of view. Excellent viewfinder in all configurations, my stepping stone to the review of Giorgiomilone who described impeccably the x100t. The only drawback, (but I think it's a matter of habit) besides the usual battery that lasts little, is the menu which is a bit 'too cumbersome, for the rest of the board many more of x100s, seem identical but in this c 'is really much più.rnrnDopo a year of use I can only confirm what was said except for the high iso that actually blend in (and they are really bad) exceeded 3200, but otherwise I sold D610 and I am really well. |
 | sent on December 31, 2014 Pros: Machine reportage practically perfect. Image quality at the top for aps-c, 3200iso usable, boken pleasant, lots of customization, robust body and finished made in japan, refined aesthetics, viewfinder, despite the size excellent ergonomics. Cons: Video Options sparse, a bit noisy autofocus, I would have preferred an ISO dial instead of EV compensation Opinion: I took it to be attached to the SLR kit to make reportage and portraiture, is a machine at the beginning not easy to manage, as it has a different approach from the SLR. However after a few tens of shots beginning to understand the potential and the fun is guaranteed. The fixed lens 35mm universal demands rigor of composition but returns an image quality without compromessi.rnL'utilizzo and management of RAF with new versions of ACR8.7, LR5.7 and RawTherapee 4.2 is now excellent and allows exploit all the potenzialità.rnRispetto X100S improvements, sensor part, are obvious and finally AF is very responsive even in low light conditions. rnInoltre Whereas fuji regularly releases firmware with substantial novelties, we can expect some new features or performance increase already in the next version. |
  | sent on December 30, 2014 Pros: I take a bit of time to be able to praise and weaving defects, partly because I was not prepared for a quality like that. I understand that the X100 "S" there are around a blunder, and everyone is excited, but to say that the "T" is almost the same thing is a colossal boiata. What you would do for groped to keep the swollen hand prices of the "S" ... Cons: Is distracting me from my work too, it was from the times of the pinhole that I did not play with pleasure with a camera without professional purposes. Opinion: I was looking for a super lightweight compact, with all manual adjustments to make even use to my child, and given the public's enthusiasm for the x100 series I decided to give my attention for the first time to a compact. After a survey among friends and colleagues the overwhelming response was "the sensor is great, take the S savings and apart from the viewfinder are identical" or, "have released the new version too early, did not even tilt the LCD." I tried them both lunge and I took the "T", which so to point to today 12/30/14 differs from the "S" for 200 euros and for these (about # 22) features: # 1 It has the occurrence of a viewfinder with digital rangefinder that is added all'OVF, and a more responsive EVF in the refreshing. # 2 The graphics of the functions in the viewfinder is much more discreet and less distracting. # 3 The indications for the parallax compensation are now in real time, Consist of a simple rectangle and not a traffic-type lines the rails of a railway junction that clog up the entire frame. # 4 EV Corrections to - 3 + instead of a - + 2. # 5 Lcd 3pollici more than 1M instead of 2.8 on 460k. # 6 Wifi that instantly allows you to transfer photos from your smartphone and control the machine through various free applications, includes AF management, and various exposure settings. # 7 Battery Room loadable via USB, so needs no charger (even if they have still provided in the package). # 8 if necessary activated electronic shutter reaching the 32millesimo and step is invisible ALMOST (with remote control becomes a private investigator object) # 9 Record video with totally manual and AutoISO settings up to 1080 60P including 50P and 24P. # 10 The buttons are customizable 7. # 11 Steps 1/3 stop in manual exposure settings instead of 1/2. # 12 The ISO arrive at 51k instead of 26k. # 13 Ability to set between the various films alsothe classic chrome. # 14 The button AF-L AE-L can be used as AF-ON with settings manually, it is closer to the ergonomic multifunction wheel. # 15 In AF-S has a face tetect that works impeccably even recognizing faces in the frame, giving priority to the most central. # 16 Cover OVF rises to 92%. # 17 possesses an accurate interval timer. # 18 The custom settings menu Q is customizable with a "base" + 7preset. # 19 The battery life is said to be nearly doubled (unlikely), however much improved. # 20 The peaking focus can be set in many colors in contrast with the background. # 21 Metering spot AF area selected. # 22 The live view in the viewfinder has a dynamic playback range 4 times the x100s. There will surely be something that now I can not think but in essence compared to x100s changes the world, it would be more appropriate to call x200. I confess that after the first testsI consider inappropriate a jewel like that in the hands of a child, in fact, has shifted instantly in my fanny pack, naked and pure is a wonderful toy for the discerning photographer. My kid will pluck sooner or later a virtuous x100 first-hand model ;-) |
 | sent on December 20, 2014 Pros: Solid body and alloy and tropical, light, files exceptional noise almost absent until 3200, barely perceptible in 6400, full of features such as electronic rangefinder, focus assist with split image and magnification detector lights and shadows, and new controls rapid maf, optical viewfinder and electronic galeiliano, choice dynamic range and film simulation faithfully, in short other things that make this machine a technological jewel high-performance cameras Cons: small for those with large hands, cumbersome menu, fixed lens, Opinion: Hello everyone, after an excruciating dilemma I decided to take this new mirrorles compact, but unfortunately I own this machine from a single day, and I can only give the first impressions in the skin that are grossly reported in pro and against. In the next few days if I can go into the review of this little gem, trying to explain at least the optimal configuration for a yield to best |
 | sent on December 02, 2014 Pros: Easy shooting, LCD, electronic viewfinder / optical, image quality, macro function, lens 23mm f2, yield low / high iso, design. Cons: Battery life Opinion: I bought very little from this new fujifilm coming from two cameras nikon semi-pro. I needed a camera body small, light and not cumbersome to do reportage and photographing everything that I could never shoot with an SLR. Believe me, this little Fuji is a dream. A real gem. The image quality is comparable, if not superior, to my D7100. The management at high iso is stratospheric, superior even to the surrender of the latest full frame SLR. I mean, what good is having a reflex when you can have it all at your fingertips in just 400 grams? The operations in the work. Those who work with the reflex can not and should not do without. Those who want a camera that can awaken love for the "real" street photography, very old time, and those who want to take pictures without weights and dimensions can not not choose this wonder. I argue that amateurs should buy a mirrorless fuji rather than an SLR. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
