|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on December 11, 2021 Pros: Weight, dimensions, diaphragms ring, colors, lens Cons: battery life, grip Opinion: I had for a couple of years this wonderful machine that I used for pleasure shots. Nothing to say except that it is really great and worth all the money you buy. Superlative image quality to be a compact, also thanks to the lens. as mentioned above, the grip is the only note that made me turn up my nose a bit; for the rest only congratulations. Purchase more than recommended. |
  | sent on December 02, 2021 Pros: Size, intuitiveness, compact exposure triangle, beautiful grain, high ISO well managed Cons: non-lockable manual fire ring Opinion: for a couple of years I have been using the X100F with great satisfaction I do not understand who criticizes it for not having the stabilizer or the tilting screen or for having a fixed lens .. they seem to me totally useless criticisms .. next time inform yourself better about what you buy rather many functions available, no one is obliged to use them all of course, well-arranged keys and quick access joystick very useful to quickly change the focus point (for those who use it, I always use manual fire) I do not really find defects in this machine except for the focus ring: really very sensitive and fluid, convenient to quickly change the focus the sin is that it is not lockable in a certain position which leads to having to be very careful not to touch it when you are around for those like me who use the zone focus is obviously something that must be kept a regular eye on but in reality there have been very few times that I had to correct the focus the camera, once set, becomes a simple "point and shoot" to be used with a really nice hand, surely the X100V offers something more in terms of mobility (tilting screen) and composition, but that's another matter |
 | sent on November 26, 2021 Pros: Colors, Colors, Colors, Portability, Lens, Dynamic Range, Battery in Economy mode Cons: High Performance Battery, Aperture Ring, Stabilizer Opinion: I'have owned this amazing camera for about 2 months. Maybe soon for a review, but I must say it was a stroke of lightning. Initially taken as a "battle" body to take on a trip, in the end I always find it in my hand: home, street, shopping, dinner with friends, photos of the son, his wife .... All the time! Already from the first images, you are enticed to shoot again and again. Thanks to the return of beautiful colors, the practicality of use, and if well set, often it is not necessary to process the raw but rather the jpg are already perfectly usable, as if you already knew what I want to get from a specific scene. In case you feel the need to raise the shadows, or have to lower the lights, the RAW have information to sell (I owned a Sony a7iii and I must say that the comparison holds it very well despite the marked differences between the 2 sensors). The only flaw, if we want to define it this way, is the ring of the diaphragms ... a little too small and uncomfortable not to allow a change of opening without stumbling somewhere ... perhaps a matter of habit. Excellent point in favor also goes to the battery: it has consumed 40% of battery with 120 shots (jpg + raw) of which 30 long exposures of 25-30 sec each (+ Noise Reduction) ... a great result! Ergonomics are not worth talking about. Those who buy it or think of buying it, do it precisely because of its size, which makes it extremely practical, but also uncomfortable. Forgot!!!! ..... the integrated ND filter. A resounding cool for those who already use it! |
 | sent on October 14, 2021 Pros: Small, build quality, overall image quality Cons: ergonomics, battery Opinion: I state that I use it only for street shots, without controlled lights or anything else and above all without fiddling in the menu: naked and raw. Excellent car, I always carry it with me when possible, given the bulk. I was impressed by the image quality, churns out (from good fuji) excellent jpegs. Maybe I find it a bit uncomfortable sometimes in pressing the various keys, especially the ignition one that almost seems to have no grip for my taste. Initially I happened to press with my thumb the menu button and the directional cursors, a matter of habit and it will not happen again. The battery on these machines you know, they do not last long, but just buy some spare and the problem is solved. Ultimately it is an excellent compact to always carry with you, pleasant to use, more suitable for street and reportage. |
 | sent on July 13, 2021 Pros: Portability, image quality, manual apertures, rangefinder Cons: Non-swivel screen (I don't need it) Opinion: Rating 10. Outstanding camera. Already the rangefinder is worth its value, of course, it is not like shooting with a pentaprism but it helps a lot in the composition. Excellent yield of files even if it is not the last sensor of Fuji is still excellent. You fall in love with this camera easily, once "understood" you always remain around your neck ... |
 | sent on April 10, 2021 Pros: Beautiful, cult object, level optics Cons: Useless, expensive, obsolete Opinion: I took it too because it reminded me of my old nikon fm2 and the leica m4 I had when I was young. Going for a walk on Sundays is great, cartier bresson and 70s intellectual does a lot. then... if you need to do a professional portrait or use flashes in the studio, you need to shoot your beautiful full frame reflex. Well, you may tell me, but it's a street car. Okay, but even there, when compared to my little rx100 it weighs twice as much, it's not pocket-sized, it doesn't have a zoom and it's very slow; if you use it for editorial work, moreover, sony's results look much better. It is an obsolete machine, good for nostalgic old photographers like me, who will place it on the shelf together with the old leica and the nikon. |
 | sent on July 09, 2020 Pros: Line, portability, build quality, image quality. Cons: Non-tilting screen Opinion: A great compact camera both in the constructive aspect (Made in Japan) and in the aspect of photographic quality. A little soft at f2.0 but already at f2.8 it becomes very detailed. Convenient the internal filter nd. The X-Trans sensor and the various film modes make all the difference to the competition. Since I own it I always carry it with me because it is not bulky and light. In conclusion, excellent quality with minimal footprint. |
 | sent on January 15, 2020 Pros: I don't express myself Cons: I don't express myself. Opinion: I do not understand all these criticisms; it is a model that has been on the market for three years, not for a month, it is a compact fixed target, no one is obliged to buy it. I have owned an X100F that has been coming out of the market for six years and I use it with satisfaction for street photography, certainly not for photo hunting or sports photo. |
 | sent on January 14, 2020 Pros: Aesthetics, sensor quality, lens brightness. Cons: Ergonomics, raw files that can only be managed with C1, depreciation used, too many unnecessary functions. Opinion: Beautiful to see, how ridiculous to use. Good camera only for street, a genre that by the way bores me to death, the fixed 35 mm focus is perfect to never go well, always too short or too long. The brightness of the lens is there and the blurry and bokeh effect are really nice, but the softness is excessive under f4. If I had to make a list of things I hate I would not finish anymore, I make a short list : colors, ergonomics (full of keys, sticks and wheels, so much so that every time inadvertently touch something), raw owner, really ridiculous options (movie simulation, in-room crop, grain effect, etc.), dynamic range, used null value, quick but unreliable autofocus, etc. Conclusion, Fujifilm from me will never take a penny again. |
 | sent on December 15, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, handling, controls in the right place, iso seal and 23 f/2 Cons: Screen not tilting - AF sometimes hesitant - no double slot - no tropicalized Opinion: I think anyone who buys this car needs to know what they want. It is not a machine for newbies in the sense that the focal 23 (equivalent 35 on ff) fixed to f/2 is a great resource only for those who have decided what and how to photograph, otherwise it turns out to be a condemnation . I have it for a few days, I strongly wanted it and sought it and at the first available opportunity I did not miss it. I mainly do street and find it ideal; commands in the right place, practically reachable with the right hand only. Of course it is not a pocket camera, let's say it is a compact "generous" as size, instead of carrying a backpack now I use a small purse, but holding it in your hand you have the perception of having something solid and not a toy. Estate iso excellent I would say, the same sensor of xt2 does not disappoint, I snapped at 6400 iso and I did not find anything that in pp could not be corrected at the level of noise and then for those who love the b/n like me, already the jpeg is practically ready. Having an xt20 I was already in love with the Acros red and immediately went to sectarian here too. In my gallery you find a shot of a friend on her wedding day. It's a stolen shot in the sense that I didn't want to hinder the work of the official photographers and so I moved very discreetly, she is not posing, but being used to seizing the moments with the street, I did not miss the opportunity to seize a particular expression of her. I mean that the machine is always responsive, ready, I also found the autofocus responsive, at the level of the xt20 that I have indeed, maybe it seemed a little more precise. The macro function, on the other hand, is trying, or rather this is the impression that I have, but I repeat, I have only for a few days and I have not yet squeezed it properly. The only flaw in my opinion is the screen not tilting as instead I have in the xt20, too bad, because I consider this possibility a must, but patience, that's fine. However machine promoted with flying colors, now in the second-hand market I think there are more affordable prices than the new. Any doubts or otherwise do not hesitate to ask. I hope in the next few days to insert more shots in the gallery Update after a more constant use: remaining everything I have previously said and adding that Often I shot in really poor light conditions, I have to add two things. The first one mentioned is the high iso yield which, in my opinion, is excellent at least up to 6400Iso. Practically just a little in pp to work the digital noise produced. The second is the AF, which in suboptimal light conditions sometimes tries not to immediately hook the subject. Let's say that out of 10 shots a couple I then found them at the pc a little blurry. It's about being more careful even maf on single point. However, it is still a real pleasure to use this jewel I add that if it had double slots and was tropicalized, it would be perfect |
 | sent on November 19, 2019 Pros: design, lightness, compactness, file sharpness, Raw conversion to room Cons: ISO noise, EVF scope to be improved, several rather unnecessary functions, price Opinion: A nice object, nothing to say. Attractive design and very compact body that entices you to carry it with you at all time. I also own an X-T3, but it's a different story, I'm sorry to point out. It is clear, we are talking about a compact but born from a rather ambitious project. The X100f is very comfortable but its features in my opinion are little more than discreet. That's it. You have to settle for a lot. I had read rave reviews and opinions which I unfortunately have not yet got to confirm. Ok improvements compared to the X100T or X100S, including the AF, the joystick, the megapixels, etc. but to me personally still does not convince you at all. The hybrid viewfinder (especially the optical one with an electronic viewing window) is rather useless and the electronic one reaches the sufficiency. Little defined returns too artificial a vision and (especially in B/N) is also characterized by an annoying purple dominant. The lens is good but even here without exaggeration, as I have often been able to read from opinion-gave- even open-mouthed. Definitely comfortable the f2 in situations with little light but in a fixed 35mm, glued to a compact mid/high band I did not expect all that barrel distortion, I have to admit. And then the noise already at 400 iso, slow AF, slow storage RAW-JPEG, poor battery life. I agree with those who have gone before me to consider many keys and many functions more fun than useful. In short, the X100f is not only flaws, indeed, the qualities are there and touch each other, but compared to the price of the new, really exaggerated, you would expect much much more. |
user2943  | sent on November 29, 2018 Pros: Aesthetics, weight, compactness, battery life Cons: File rendition worse than X-T2, Low ergonomics Opinion: For years I used with much satisfaction a x100s after trying a first version x100 (which I sold right after for the well known AF issues). I bought this X100F sure to find the same feeling as the previous one but did not take the lightning strike. Briefly, the rendition of the file is too much digital, the strange thing is that it has (say) the same sensor as the X-T2 but as a yield there is an abyss in my view. The X-T2 can be set to have a yield less "shot" like film for instance. This X100F is super resolute, but an artificial resolution, digital precisely. Even when I was working with the RAF, I couldn't find the Quadra. Then I noticed that they have replated the menus of functions in my opinion unnecessary that make lose the Spartan spirit of the X100 project. I often lost myself in the menus to set basic/trivial functions. I would like them to do a new base x100, without all these "spatial" functions. I made her... |
 | sent on September 15, 2018 Pros: Quality sensor, processor and professional-grade optics in a compact machine body and superb construction and ergonomics. Cons: Little things to which you probably just get used to Opinion: A superb compact machine with high-level performance. It is studied in my opinion to be pleasant and fun to use more than "useful"... but for an amateur centers in full The purpose of photography: the fun! The focal fixed on the first displaces and may seem limiting, but then you quickly realize that the equivalent 35mm covers perfectly what is the field of binocular vision human... in the end you give up only photos from Supertele... for everything else goes Great and faithfully makes the field of attention of our view. The possibility to choose between optical, electronic or hybrid viewfinder does not offer any substantial advantage, but I really like to wander from one to the other and enjoy the merits and differences of the different ways of framing the shot... as I said before, more fun That Teutonic and cold rationality I do not know if it is a defect of calibration of mine, but in certain situations the electronic viewfinder is a bit dark (for example room with artificial lighting and main source of light behind us), but thanks to the infinite possibilities of Customization I have set a shortcut to switch between automatic adjustment to manual with 2 Click Macro (below 30cm) are done with aperture closed to F4 or more, pain an extreme softness of the photo (but this optical anomaly allows you to take pictures Surroyals very funny) surprising the little Flash to lighten the shadows in the portraits with sun at the peak or behind the subject take this machine was a challenge with myself, in fact I gave up for her to a kit Olympus... but buying fever and Taking me behind a (albeit moderate) backpack for the fear of not having the right lens have made me homesick when I was shooting around my neck and nothing else... Soprassiedo on the details of image quality... There are professionals who use it for work, so for an amateur is superabundant... Last detail on the construction: it shows the inscription made in Japan, and this gives me hope for the durability and robustness of the appliance. To the touch all the controls and the rings seem tdo |
 | sent on July 16, 2018 Pros: Exterior appearance, rings with old style times and diaphragms, noiselessness Cons: Size, versatility Opinion: A car that buys more with the heart than with the head. Hanging from the neck is "very chic", recalls the image a little ' romantic and a bit ' vintage Leica and the great season of the photojournalist of old. In fact we see at the neck of all the photographers more "cool" and celebrities who like to play the photographer but with class. Not like the plebeians who grind photos on the phone. A car to splurge, but a good tool in the right hands. If you look at the substance however it is totally unnecessary. Who already has a kit and wants to go around lighter has better alternatives but less cool. Like the Panasonic LX 100, smaller and more versatile or the new Canon g1x Mk3, sensor of the same size but with 24 -72 Zoom, built-in flash, viewfinder and tiny size. Even the Ricoh GR-1 In my opinion is more functional, with its additional optical wide-angle lens. And even smaller with the same sensor. I kept it a few months and then resolved. Although he is an admirer of the brand and supports Fujifilm's commercial policy, which is more about photography than electronic gadgets. Beauty and charm Surely, but this Fuji is very smoke without roast, at least for me. |
 | sent on June 24, 2018 Pros: Indiscreet Compact (black) very light battery life improved Cons: Digitized to the extreme... Opinion: I kept this car for a few months, I came from a x100S that I thought I had to change for the duration of the battery. I was wrong! This new X100F is a product of the new that also advances in the Fuji house. Too bad because having a S5 I thought that Fuji was always a step forward with the personality of development sensors... I was wrong. Are all the same the increasingly "pumped" Cmos of useless pixels on a sensor that fails to go beyond an Aps-C (when will you do dear Fuji a 35mm worthy of the mark?) Now I have a LeicaM9 other story... other price is true but I think the real race was to do simplicity, in the few functions those indispensable to make an image worthy of being so called. |
 | sent on June 24, 2018 Pros: I've never had so much fun, portability and ease of use, image quality. Cons: No overhead LCD, battery life. Opinion: It forces you to think first, you must necessarily design the shot and this forces you to think, in the end it is much more fun. I come and still use Olympus that with its extraordinary functions is in part irreplaceable, but this is definitely easier and fun, not forgetting that has a quality dìimmagine really remarkable already in JPG. Perhaps the thing that is missing is good software for RAW files, however if you are willing to get involved with the use of a fixed lens you will not regret the purchase. Rated 10 |
user134991 | sent on June 14, 2018 Pros: Practicality and portability that results in the desire to sleep behind and not give up because too heavy and cumbersome, in my case Canon 5d Mk IV- Cons: None significant, improve the power button and joystick, but are trifles. When the viewfinder and electronic only do not see the ink shots made and not reactivating the display. Opinion: Taken recently and so I still have little confidence with the menu always coming from Canon and I do sometimes fatigue but it is only a matter of habit. The raw are great open with camera raw and also the JPEGs that I use nn but I tried. The quality and higher than mine though old 5d MkII and lower than the Canon 5d Mk IV, I tried to print with good results. It is certainly not the definitive machine with which to do everything, but it is really nice to take it around and shoot. I read comparisons that NN can be made with other brands or models or the criticism that has a fixed, but I bought it for this reason, I have this 35 and this I do enough if the photo does not come out is not the fault of the car but mine. Let's say that a nice whim for those who, like me, can not afford a Leica Q (for now) which is not to be compared of course for characteristics ne for price. Ultimately very satisfied and the Council, without expecting miracles from about 1000 euros and anyway we are the ones that we click and if the photo is good with the x100f comes out excellently. |
| sent on May 14, 2018 Pros: Portability, image quality, appearance Cons: Price, fixed optics (for those accustomed to using the zoom) Opinion: Premise: I was looking for something to support my camera, something portable for those excursions and/or situations where the clutter was a problem. But I did not want to give up the quality of the photos by buying any compact. The Fuji x100f was such a nice surprise. Although at the beginning I was ' afraid ' of the fixed optics I immediately discovered another way to photograph. You think more, you walk, you get closer to the subjects. The optics is ideal for building a narrative photograph. The photographs made so far have a good quality, focus not very fast but that rarely misses. I absolutely do not regret the purchase (although always expensive). I will not replace the reflex with this Fuji x100f obviously, but the complementarity is excellent. |
| sent on February 15, 2018 Pros: The facade Cons: price, size, modest image quality Opinion: A disappointment! RnPremated that optical viewfinder and digital zoom are only ballast even for the most unwary amateurs, I still bought it in the illusion that the high price, the fixed goal, the lack of 4k were rewarded by a professional image quality that instead it remains at the level of a much cheaper compact camera. It is not equipped (as are other compact high-end) of a RAW conversion program and the one downloaded from the site recommended in the manual is unusable.rnPreferisco use my previous camera because more compact, not burdened by uselessness, has a convenient 3.1x zoom, I work well in RAW and above all is competitive in image quality while having a purchase price half of the disappointing fuji. |
 | sent on December 09, 2017 Pros: Portability, image quality, construction, has everything that the previous little sisters lacked :-) Cons: The price can (and is) seem high, but on balance you will be happy to have bought it. Opinion: A few years ago I sold the younger sister (X100S), and since then I have always felt the lack of this type of machine. So portable, so versatile, that having to choose "what car do I bring today?" on balance the choice always fell on her. Just released the X100F, after buying the Pro2 and having abandoned the Canon world, I finally filled the gap left. I would not like to go into technical specifications or counting the pixels of the image, as it is full of any kind of comparison with other machines. Furthermore, other members who write in this section have already said almost everything. This camera represents more a philosophy and an approach to photography. Initially I defined it almost propaedeutic. Ideal for almost every photographic genre, fun to use, responsive, excellent image quality. Soft to f2, but here they come into play their tastes (I do not mind, indeed ....). Trust that if you have a second body, you will seriously start thinking about selling it as uselessized ... |
 | sent on November 18, 2017 Pros: The joystick, the iso can now be used by its personal ring and the new sensor, as well as some other features such as the customizable double wheel on the front and behind the dx, and an additional and customizable pushbutton on the evf-ovf conversion lever. More durable and equal to older sisters, so you can switch between them. Digital zoom function at 50 and 70 mm fixed in jpg mode Cons: Indeed, someone has preceded me in the observation of slow storage, despite having inserted a 95mbs sd, just does not compare with the upper sisters. The iso-timing lever seems delicatine, as the same joistic, surely over time will create problems. Lack of lens hood on the lens, if photographed against light has much flare. Menu shabby compared to other machines I'm used to. Soft lens from f / 2 to f / 2.8 included, only improves from f / 3.5 onwards Opinion: Previously I had both x100t and xt-10, 2 great machines, and unfortunately deprived me of monetizing on optics L. Compared to x100t, some improvements have it, but it would not have been possible to change it if I still had the T, since the quality is indistinguishable, in fact the objective in my opinion, being the same, did very well on the 16mpx, but even here cmq does not disagree. The battery now lasts twice the T, and its files are improved. Also nice is the 50-70 electronic zoom, a shame that can only be used in jpg recording mode, so it's worth cropping the file, as it now has 24mpx. Lightweight, pocket-sized and of great quality, I took it for the outdoors with the family and a bit of street when I want to do it. For the rest I would not dream of replacing it with reflexes for a wedding or an important event, although some famous photographers are also doing it |
| sent on September 06, 2017 Pros: Small, compact, high quality focal length with the right length Cons: little grip, slow in saving the data Opinion: I got to take advantage of the photo marathon milano to try fujifilm equipment, including this camera. For three hours with me I've been around for some fun !!! surely it is a valid machine, it does the usual good fuji files and the optics are great. However, it took us a lifetime to save the files (RAW + JPG, single shot mode) in comparison to my XT1 and sometimes it became snappy. Another thing that unfortunately I'm sorry is that, feeling it without a shoulder strap or wrist strap because I borrowed for the fateful 3 hours, I noticed that for a long time tired my fingers and it is not the utmost comfort the transportability .. I would have improved a thread design to improve the grip. |
 | sent on July 10, 2017 Pros: Completes the "right". General quality and good jpegs to use right away. Great for traveling. Cons: Creates dependence. Fixed display. The price (perhaps) Opinion: I say I own it for a short time and so I did not get to use it very much, I left for a trip to Canada and put it in my suitcase with my xt-1 ... the latter one week away unused !! The machine is quite light and small, so there you go around, silent and almost invisible. Great for "street" but also for other genres. The optic is quite bright, maybe a little smaller than the fixed (23 / f2) .nn I personally find the ring of "compensation" a bit too soft, it has often happened to rotate it inadvertently. RnA complex beautiful car, it has its charm and above all it is a pleasure to use it with all those rings! It really is not cheap but I think it can give you satisfaction for a long time. rn |
 | sent on June 05, 2017 Pros: Compact, viewfinder, overall quality, ready Jpeg (great for traveling) Cons: nobody Opinion: From T to F I just went through a sensor issue, but the car was improved (again) in all respects. The best car to travel, this is my opinion ... If we compare it to the Leica Q, it does not overdo it, especially in the quality of the lens, but is definitely less bulky than street room and costs 3 times less. I also recommend to those who travel a lot, perhaps with family, or who would like to start approaching the world of photography and not know what brand to turn. In this case, the only limit on this machine (but not so good if you think about quality) is the price, but at least you do not throw the money by buying a small-large entry-level reflex with a banal / anti-creative / pale-bright 18-fifty-five. |
 | sent on May 26, 2017 Pros: All. It's making me forget about the Nikon d810, the car I love. Cons: I can not find obvious defects except in the price, maybe a bit high, but the quality is paid. The fact that having a fixed does not disturb me, is a focal that I really like and in any case I have the choice Because for other uses the reflex.rn Opinion: I possess it for a few days but I already find it fantastic in every situation. Small, silent, invisible. A pleasure for those who love street photography and reportage. Wonderful file files that we might not even retouch, it is discreet but at the same time elegant. RnI still can not find fault with it, maybe the command dial which, coming from the reflex world, is not yet used. Someone says the autofocus is not very fast, but I find it very good too. There is also the possibility of taking a cell remotely, a fantastic trick for those who do not want to get caught. |
 | sent on March 03, 2017 Pros: Joystick, light, excellent jpeg, digital converter and af fast enough Cons: Price, the ring behind me is not very smooth because the ribbing is not very pronounced and get caught sometimes in the press and then use it as function key. Lack diplay articulated Opinion: What to say except that I have it from just a week, but has already taken the right feeling. I like a lot and I took it as a portable machine to be attached to the good kit olympus I have. For now I can not but be glad that purchase. The joystick I love it and I hope will be implemented sooner or later in Olympus, because as a system with interchangeable lenses I prefer it. For the true quality and appearance of your files to vouch after using it a bit ', cmq x now I jpeg like and once I get a sw that read me raw, I'll see what I can come up with. The x100 series has always attracted me, but every time that I felt no feeling snapped. This did not try it before and I bought on impulse after taking it in hand in the store and seeing that finally had an af fast. But given the price they could put an articulated display, even as simple as that of xt1, although probably not be leica style. |
| sent on March 03, 2017 Pros: Lightly. Compact. Portable . Fast . Digital teleconverter. Batteries of the "Fujifilm sedans". Silent. FANS optics. Cons: Fragile (but less than other compact). Price. The parallax of OVF. Grip for those with big hands ... Opinion: Taken the day it was released. rnCon fujifilm 2 years. I come from XT1, Xe2s, XE1, XT10 rnOra I have the Xt2 and I thought maybe ... What support for "DAILY" or naturally for a trip? Well .. from ad already seemed interessante..una proven time I can say that a LADY CAMERA. rnPESO: very light but feels in your hand. Compact size and only as leggerezza.il central sensor allows the mechanical shutter to be silent almost as an ES. ... And the thing is not to be underestimated. rnIl fact that the battery is the same as 2 home sedans fuji (xt2 and xpro2) is of course a PRO for those who want to combine as a second machine. The rear joystick for selecting the point or focus area has become irreplaceable for me because practical and fast. rnAF valid in all morality, do not expect the speed of T2 cmq but is quick and precise. POINT & SHOOT practical and effective because it is fully customizable, if it comes from reflex you can set the dial to T and use the wheel to set the tempi and ISO on COMMAND to use the other wheel ber balance the ISO pre set prior. It has the new morality C on the balance of exposure that acts a bit like the Program mode for Canikon world. GNI 23mm 2.0 lens (35mm equivalent) lens is an amazing ... more "comfortable" of 27 (pancake used as a target fixed minimalr on fuji machines) and more "normal" of 18 (x70). The function of the digital converter allows the use of a crop in the car for interpolation without losing DIMENSION d 50mm image and 70mm..riguardo of the final image quality usandl digital teleconverter not know yet say anything ... rnOra come to troubles ...: GNI OVF as in pro 2 by the parallax problem ovvio..ma although minimal can be annoying if it's set up scenes of landscapes or portraits ... why there the resounding EVF.rnIl grip is like that the 100T, in my opinion a bit too small and not very accentuated for presa.rnIl menu is fast and intuitive, and the size and performance of thethe car make it a 5stars pura..una professional machine to always keep with you. rnPostilla extra color: GNI color appearance once try both asked me 2 queationi important .. seems painted gray and not the classic SILVER dellecprecedenti versions ... so lost a little bit of compactness because soooooo bright as paint. The other aspect is the color / contrast of the numbers above the rings, the silver / gray to bright light it is hard to read the measurement while White on Black is read without problems. IMHO all this! :) |
 | sent on February 23, 2017 Pros: Easy to handle, fast autofocus, crop possibilities in the car, like having a zoom or if you prefer more goals. Cons: Perhaps fixed lens ....... perhaps. Opinion: I come from fuji, from xpro2 and a series of bodies and optical fuji, reflects little but not too much in fact has a nice weight is a false lean ........ the pro2 as controls and ergonomics, the file we know it for the rest af fast, it holds well in hand, the great crop, and combined with the teleconverter with a possibility of many targets in a small package, then the opportunity to be able to use the battery of pro2 and xt2 it seemed like a smart thing , a very good buy for me. |
 | sent on February 23, 2017 Pros: taken from a few hours unproven Cons: x now I can not say anything Opinion: He never had Fujifilm Nikon d700 used to find blown away but the fun and just what made a 20 pictures in the house and outside the house a granddaughter of 30 photos I have to say that for sure I'm having to tell later on we will see something more relevant alluded i find it very useful to the small joystick x the management of the focus points with your thumb you can quickly switch the various focus points of the sensor is used 91se l.area large and more than 300 if you use the fine positioning but here there a lot of things to handle hi |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
