|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 31, 2022 Pros: Quality and CHARACTER of the images, physical keys in the right place, menu without too many functions (you photograph stop), style, robustness, beauty. Cons: are we talking about photos? then very few. It is not a camera for sports photos or where you should not think too much (maybe this is a PRO and not a con) Opinion: SHE REMAINS THE QUEEN. I've had all the mirrorless X series, all the versions and models... I have the GFX system, I think that by now I have been able to experience something, but what she transmits I have not yet found. There is feeling, there is style, there is the desire to photograph and enough with her. It makes you want to shoot, to feel that shutter that closes, it makes you want to compose to find new points of view. I am encouraged to shoot even with manual optics ... call them pippe but also the feeling counts in photography. It has its own character, precise, incomparable and unobtainable; coupled with dated lenses such as the 35m 1.4 or modern manual optics, the particularities of the lenses are combined to give life to images rich in "identity". I hope Fuji always remembers where it started. |
  | sent on December 22, 2021 Pros: Image quality, colors, aesthetics (sublime), Galilean viewfinder, high iso yield Cons: Only discrete operating speed but still usable most of the time (see below), EVF, no confirmation of focusing in M mode, autofocus not really performing (see always below) Opinion: It has limitations and it would be strange to do the opposite. Before taking it, however, I thought that those limits could be more stringent. This makes us think a lot about what we believe we need to photograph and what we actually need. In typical circumstances: Street, family or friends parties, holidays, it is perfectly usable. It has a long learning curve, but if you come from fuji bodies after half an hour you feel at home and what you will have to learn most is to take advantage of the autofocus, which is not a lightning bolt of war. It is a contrast autofocus, so in contrasting situations, it will be necessary to search for contrast, block the focus with the afl button, recompose. (on all other occasions using the af-s is very feasible). It takes longer to say it than to do it. In M mode the fire is even more precise, but not illuminating the square of green to have the confirmation of the fire leads you to make a further step. Press the front ring to have a magnification of the area in focus (then automatic switch to the evf), shoot. Even here it may seem cumbersome, but if you know what you take it for it is not an insurmountable limit. Basically, I haven't found many limits to single-point autofocus so far, especially in good light. I recommend for quick subjects (children in my case) the M mode and focus lock, learning to use it in this way is feasible. Out of 10 photos, 3 were not in focus, considering that it was the first time I used it in that way. Well I'm satisfied. There is only one thing to remember: if a photo is not in focus, the fault is not the car but your :) I have not done specific tests and I am interested in doing them, but the yield at high iso seems better than my main camera (xt3), I guess it is for the 16 mpx. Up to 6400 iso (beyond I did not push) the yield is perfectly usable, as for the xt3 of the rest, but in my view with an even better pasta. Finally, parallax: it is advisable to use evf for nearby subjects, at least for me who am better understanding the use of the Galilean viewfinder. P.S. If you work in manual focus it may be useful to use a simulation black and white film, since the focus peak can be set only in white color and is not always clearly visible. For those who have glasses like me, it lacks the adjustment of the diopters, which I do not use even on the xt3 that has it because I always prefer to use the glasses and the viewfinder of the xpro1 does not create problems with the glasses, or at the limit like any other viewfinder |
 | sent on December 18, 2021 Pros: Image Quality, Aesthetically Fantastic. Cons: Autofocus, slow operation. Opinion: I always wanted it and for a couple of months I took it to support my X-T3. It is a fantastic camera, which can still say a lot if you know its limits and offers a shooting experience with an analog flavor. The image quality is incredible and the colors, although not as faithful as the x-t3, are very eye-catching. It is excellent if used with manual optics or in contexts where you can lose that extra second. The AF is decent in good light although I prefer to use it with MF optics. The years are felt with regard to the slowness of writing on the card in case you want to review the photo in the 2-3 seconds following the shot. Absolutely not suitable for dynamic photos, but this is already known. These are all flaws that the X-Pro1 makes itself forgive when you open photos at home. Highly recommended for street, where the only flaw is the lack of electronic shutter. |
 | sent on November 13, 2020 Pros: She's beautiful as hell. Cons: autofocus Opinion: I had the X-Pro1 a few years ago. I bought it used, but practically new, in February 2014. It took me 27 f/2.8. eeehhh... It's Bella taking her breath away. Its shape, materials, texture, handling... Maybe it's the camera, among those I owned (after the Leica M6 ttl) that I liked the most aesthetically. And he defended himself quite well even in terms of photographic rendering. I resold it because its af, absolutely unliably, made me too nervous. Sooner or later I'm going to buy it back. Maybe I'il use it little, but it's nice to have it. |
 | sent on November 12, 2020 Pros: Crosshairs, superlative JPEG, vintage, top aesthetics and much more. Cons: slowness in saving the shots, a little great. Opinion: What about I've had it for 8 months and I was in love with this vintage style camera. It was supposed to be my second that flanked the XE2 but lately I can't help it especially with vintage optics. Perfect even with the 23mm. RAW files are great, superlative JPEG so much that I use it when I want to shoot in BW without banging in raw room. I am one of those who is convinced that it is not necessary to invest in the machine body unless you use it in the sports field or on a professional level, but that in case you have to invest in optics even if I personally prefer vintage optics for their yield that comes very close to my way of "presenting" photography. As a negative point but you already knew is its slowness in saving photos, so forget a flurry of modern machines. I would avoid using it in night time because of the af that is certainly not at the forefront, but if it is not too dark you can take the shot home without any problems. |
 | sent on September 28, 2020 Pros: Vintage aesthetics, dials like analog machines, great battery, film simulation Cons: Aged badly, lag in liveview menus, slow shooting rescue, dynamic range not excellent Opinion: Bought in mid-2020 to return to an analog-like feel (according to many fuji owners) I took it used by a forum member. I make this comparison on the assumption that I use 5dii, but at the time of the release of this room (2012) I had already used rooms such as a7, nx300 and the like. Speaking of concrete things, the camera gave me yes that vintage look, analog, the film simulation is very comfortable, allows you to have ready-made files. E.g. I went out for motorcycle or mountain rides, I would go home, take the card and upload photos directly to IG, without the need to develop raw. The customization of these films is quite extensive, you can change contrast, sharpness, sat. and tint x every simulation, thus going to "work" already in the room to develop a look that we like without shooting raw. Personally I really appreciate the Velvia profile, with excellent contrasts and saturated colors, if we can have opposite colors in the photo. ERGONOMIA side coming from a 5d you feel quite the lightness of the room, it is still heavy compared to modern mirrorless, but in the end it is only half a kg, even for walks or trekking does not feel too much on the neck. The GHIERE are great, you can use everything in full car or changing the values of the dial of the times (the overexposure I find quite useless in this case, more comfortable when using everything in full car, to compensate for the choices of the room). The BATTERY using the room for a couple of orettes a day and then putting it back in my backpack has lasted a week (head in summer, I imagine that in winter the battery suffers a little definitely). For those who want to do VIDEO the room works completely automatically, but offers a recording up to half an hour, available we only histogram and peaking, excellent but excellent the blurring that we get on this room, with a 50 1.4 you get beautiful results. FINAL CONCLUSIONS: Overall it is a machine to try if you want to go back to shooting in analog and you have the opportunity to buy a good fuji lens, I used it by adapting some m42 optics (using the k&f adapter) and I still felt good. The hybrid system of the crosshairs in truth I did not use it often because under the direct sun it becomes very difficult to see inside the viewfinder, ergo I immediately switched to the electronic one. In xpro3 it's a show, but in this first model you can see that this kind of technology was still in its infancy. To buy if you can find it on the 350/400 including optics, otherwise at 300/250 and we adapt some vintage lens. |
 | sent on August 30, 2020 Pros: It's a nice complete car. Cons: It is not considered "avant-garde" and where, avant-garde, it is the true paradigm of our existence. Opinion: I personally consider it a current machine. And where - the current one - stands for what you intend to use it for. Of course it is not a machine created for "the pursuit of bodies" but it is especially in the context of reflected images, where it can take a few minutes to take a shot. On the other hand, the ease offered, like mobile phones, to take pictures on image concluding that the best will still be chosen, does not offer the certainty of having "got it right" anyway the right one. The photo, in my humble opinion, is first and foremost a mental composition. |
 | sent on June 02, 2020 Pros: Oscar aesthetics, jpg files ready from the first shot, great grip, crosshairs, Fuji colors Cons: Battery, very slow, wifi absence, fixed display Opinion: Does a Fujifilm X pro 1 make sense again in 2020? Absolutely yes, especially at the price at which it is located. Paid 250 euros with less than 4,000 shots, I think it is still a very good alternative for those who want excellent jpg and the legendary Fuji colors. If you add to this the vintage charm a beautiful aesthetic line, the choice is almost obligatory. Yes, it is true, it is not very fast but the photograph that I like to make with the Xpro1 is of concept, composition, relaxing and meditating. Recommended |
 | sent on October 04, 2019 Pros: Aesthetic beauty, practicality, files Cons: I don't know but better to read in opinion Opinion: I wanted to specifically buy this machine in 2019. Obsolete? Undoubtedly if you look at modern machines with 20000 mp and hyper-performing autofocus. But I took it on purpose. I tried almost all the Fuji and then sold them because if you already have a full frame full set it makes no sense to recreate a new kit that, needless to hide, can not compete. Why did I choose to keep this? I am a convinced Canon user, the rendering of the canon ff sensor combined with the L-series optics can certainly not be in the least compared, useless to turn around. But there's a but. The Canon is the "safe harbor" when you need to do certain types of work, when you need a performance, a three-dimensionality and depth of level field and you have to take home the result. But photography is also emotion and feeling, and this machine takes you back in time and, for certain uses, takes you back to real pleasure. Your handbag (and not the heavy backpack), a little book note and the desire to have a fascinating medium, not flashy and invasive in your treks, trips or city visits... An absolutely exciting feeling Light, practical, aesthetically beautiful. A file that is sometimes imperfect but that brings you back a bit to the analogue and entices you to print, a fundamental aspect of photography. And speaking of analogue its "slowness" leads you to reason, to frame well and study the lights. It's no coincidence that she travels with my Nikon fm2. I use it with the 35 f 1.4 and the 16 f 1.4 and I don't need anything else. |
 | sent on January 05, 2018 Pros: Aesthetic beauty, viewfinder, generated files and body quality Cons: To date, whoever buys it is because he knows what he's up against, on the contrary, he risks throwing money Opinion: is fantastic ..... bought 2 times, resold one, I will never make this mistake again, I'll keep it to life.rnThe machine itself is beautiful to the eye, and robust to the touch ... the dials are at the right point, the layout of the keys a little less, but you make it a habit.rnEra (and is, now together with the pro2) famous for its hybrid viewfinder, which is great at the beginning to play with it a bit ', and have a little fun even with the lens inside that enlarges the focus but .... it lasts a little ..... has many many negative sides .... you end up early to use the evf, which is not magnificent, but you can understand given the age; remains however more than usable.rnI files: they are beautiful, at high iso you notice a little 'noise, but much less than you read around, and when present, if not very high iso, you have a nice grain, especially in black and white, where he produces excellent files even at higher sensitivities.rnThe speed of macchina is anything but high, but acceptable: it is not made for sports photos, but for street, landscapes ... nothing ultra fast, in short .... the autofocus is quite accurate, lent, but it goes a little in the ball in situations of low contrast or dark.rnNel complex, it is a machine in my opinion magnificent, from all points of view ... but you must know what you buy it for. |
 | sent on September 10, 2017 Pros: EVF + Galilean viewfinder, construction, sensor quality, vintage style. Cons: Not suitable for sport photography, slow AF. Opinion: Excellent old-style camera, effortless RAW files work well with Lightroom. Purchased used at the end of 2016 after reading several positive reviews on the web and specialized magazines at a great price (400). It's a pleasure to shoot with this jewel, having the ring for body time and that of the diaphragms on the lens has become, for me, indispensable: I went back to shooting as if I had a film camera, reasoning as much as possible before every shot. Autofocus is not suitable for sports photography, intended as subject tracking and burst shooting, but with static subjects it does not have problems even in low light conditions. On ISO sensitivity I consider it usable up to 2500, after losing, in my opinion, too much detail and the noise becomes invasive. It's better to always have a spare battery so you do not get dry during long outputs. RnThe X-Pro1 is the best with fixed fixtures for file rendering and portability; suitable for travel,hiking in the mountains and street. Recommended! |
 | sent on June 19, 2017 Pros: Double viewfinder, optical pull, sensor, design Cons: Slow, slow, slow Opinion: Beautiful car with which I entered the Fuji world. I used it with all three system objectives (18, 35, 60), the quality is very good for an apsc, good high iso and a sensor yield that I like very much (subjective opinion). The vintage looks more and makes you want to use it, what you have to keep in mind is its overall slowness: both operational and AF (even after various updates). You have to know her well to make full use of it and not to be disappointed, it's the classic reasoned photo camera. I advise you if you are clear about what you are looking for, even because you start to find little in the used. |
 | sent on January 17, 2017 Pros: weight; retro design; Price flea; ability to use virtually any lens in circulation, current or vintage Cons: menu a bit 'messy; battery scandalous Opinion: I found this camera really at a bargain price of less than 4000 shots. taken to complement the outfit reflex and to take advantage, adapters, my good collection of vintage optic. this is a great traveling companion as small and light, although less than most competitors. It has two viewfinders, the electronic one and a simple Galilean viewfinder. the shutter is silent and does not create interesting details vibrazioni.rnmolto the various filters that simulate Juji films applicable to the image. batteries, as with many mirrors, have poor durability. I barely 300 scatti.rne then, personally, I find that in design from the 60s and 70s rangefinder film is terribly fascinating. is currently tranquillamene around 400-500 euro.rnconsigliata! rnrn |
 | sent on September 12, 2016 Pros: light weight, price in used, look, white balance, compatibility with many optical vintage through adapter, optical viewfinder, grain, detail at low ISO, shutter sound Cons: Operating slow, slow AF, technology, high ISO Opinion: I would not recommend it so lightly, has several cons that may be away from fuji world unless you are a little prepared. rnUn bit like advising in 2016 the Canon EOS 5DmkI: I wouldnt whole life, has a great price / quality ratio, but you have to have very clear what you want from a camera. The MAF is sooo slow, the operating speed unnerving, in saving photos it takes about 5-6secondi, the electronic viewfinder is archaic, to get nice pictures have to really commit. rnIl files like a hair more than the XPRO2, but sin in high ISO and in large prints certainly does not shine. But from his works well with vintage optic or with the first Fujinon outputs for X-series, the 35 / 1.4 is incredibly slow but at the same magical time of X-Trans1 rnSe feel ready for a jump in the "past" is a photographically speaking bell exercise to do, predict the action, speed of cognitive processing, reaction, things that the machine does not provide and which you can not count come instead the latest releases help thanks to their mega ultra fast processors. rnIl optical viewfinder I used it for a few months as an assistant from the viewfinder to the mirrorless world, but then once given the enormous utility dell'EVF I abandoned. Nice to you but of little use. rnCosa that of PRO2 they have greatly implemented. rnPer 2-300 € is an excellent investment even to keep single lens (35mm or 18mm) the street or reports in general is his death. rnL'ho used a lot and I keep still, it is to understand. I think not everyone could understand, everything is in the approach you have with her, used to take pictures, not to solve your weaknesses |
 | sent on May 24, 2016 Pros: Complete, versatile, easy, functionally perfect. exterior noise. The absolute quality. Cons: If you do not do sports photography, virtually none. Opinion: I was torn between this and the "big step" towards FF. But reading the opinions of many professional and not, I realized that this camera had something more to offer. This is a world class, at the current price, then, is simply donated. It 'a professional gadgets "in effect, and the quality of its dedicated optics is simply amazing. But it is even more. RnUsata optic vintage, brings the full power and the photograph in manual or aperture priority and manual focus back to be a pleasure. and when you regard incredibly sharp and detailed photos and you know that that picture you made "you" and not your computer, well, then enjoy like crazy. then when you start to use its optical, then you pervades an astonishment forgot to see that details so once could be seen only in the medium and large format. in the face of "just" 16 PM!. Then, the colors, the different possibilities of relying on Simulatthe vintage films, but also modern, variations on them, stored in seven different profiles can be recalled from the "quick menu", a vast ISO range, an optical viewfinder, but also electronic, the change of focus spots changed without removing the ' eye from the viewfinder above. In short, a pleasure. Everything you need is at your fingertips and without taking your eye away from mirino.rnIo I found it perfect. And the size / weight are those of my old Canon A1 ... some time fà.rnQuesto system enables photographers who are able to go directly to the big picture, which, obviously, has now become even cheaper. In a nutshell: photographing with this gem is simply entusiasmante.rnL'FF can expect. |
 | sent on December 10, 2015 Pros: lightweight, reliable, high performance, a jewel. Cons: Perhaps battery life (approximately 300 shots), but I did have the stock for the exits more manly. Opinion: Bought so recently, I find it superb. Reflex from the world, I made after careful analysis wanting to lighten the "BAG" and, immediately, I was fine. In any test gives results desired, the HIGH ISO are well managed and jpeg are utilizzabilissimi. Soon posterolateral some pictures of Juza. |
user8728  | sent on July 28, 2015 Pros: quality construction and finishes, optical viewfinder, excellent jpg files without processing, simplicity and use controls, light weight and portability than the SLR Cons: for my needs no ... maybe conserving battery power, but with less than ten euro if it takes another Opinion: It had long been targeted to assist the SLR (which does not replace but complements), but early in my opinion overpriced. I read reviews before you buy it-various opinions, then after trying x100t (for me limited with only 23 mm without lens interchangeable) and x-2 (electronic viewfinder did not convince me) I had it in my hand for ten minutes and it was love at first sight for the body strong and well built metal, the great - for me - the optical viewfinder and the pleasure of using the various dials and controls. Criticism autofocus do not understand, if we take into account the philosophy and the use to which this machine is born, especially suited to wide angle range up to 35 mm (more than I think is best to use the EVF that is not at all bad) for landscapes, travel and street-portrait, without wanting to take raffica.Anzi in my opinion, to the last firmware, I do not find any particular problems of auto focus, which is also preciso.Per other needs there is always the reflex.L'esposimetro funciona perfectly, the automatic white balance is ok in daylight, in artificial needs fixing, like all machines. Purchased new 549 euro in physical store with 2 + 2 year warranty ... Value imbattibile.Sul sensor and the files produced can only add more praise for yield, color, sharpness, dynamic range and absence of rumore.JPG fantastic ready to use, saves time elaboration. |
user26730 | sent on May 11, 2015 Pros: innovative machine (and when 'output), Leica style, sensor. Cons: more 'than one but you can live with Opinion: I purchased the X-Pro1 used on ebay for 500 $ but in perfect condition (like all things that are ordered from sellers japponesi !!). I took it out of necessity but because they are not a lover of the Fuji X and this' It was the first of that family to me and therefore has a value of concetto.rnParlando machine so I can say that technical and 'use it and it's very pleasant "Leica style". Although in size and 'the most large of the entire line and Fuji X' however slight and maneggevole.rnLe properties of the sensor X Trans need not list them as they are stranote at all. In contrast I noticed that taking the OVF (optical viewfinder) in short distances (0.5 to 1.5 meters), the focus is not 'very accurate. For such situations much better to use the EVF (electronic viewfinder) because it is 'precise and accurate and benfatto.rnLa machine in general (in ALL its functions) and' quite slow. And 'slow nell'accendersi, writing files, show in the picture when you push play and above and' slow nell'autofocus despite updating the filmwear.rnUn other thing I do not like much (and that inFuji and other I 'much better) and' white balance automatically shooting in jpeg. In light situations forced indoors it is not luminous and 'mallet use the K (color temperature) and personalize the white balance otherwise the machine returns file very hot (red everywhere!) But instead is outdoors under sunny or shadow of clouds or white balance automatically works quite bene.rnPer street photography, portraits outdoors, photojournalism, reportage and travel photo-X pro1 and 'a good car that works well with each lens Family XF. Indoors and in low light situations (type street night) I make use of the use of manual Voigtlander lenses to avoid get nervous with autofocus searching, look for and then ....... not find the point of focus .rnIn conclusion I can say that the machine a lot of satisfaction in the applications mentioned above whereas if you want to shoot in low light situations and then 'much better to focus on other machines in the house as the Fuji X-E2 or better yet the X-T1 .rnMax |
 | sent on March 12, 2013 Pros: The only use Leica and Voigtlander lenses in manual rnSpettacolare made colors and resistance to high ISOrnPortabilità with small lenses MrnCon half a "pant" s'impugna well! Cons: It is not Full Frame Opinion: Bought to flank the analog Leica m4 waiting for a fuji FF in order to take full advantage of the optics of the house mentioned above in digital happy with this purchase! RnOvviamente do not care performance "SPORT" I own a 1D or a DS with its L or Zeiss optics (I have too) but they are "Universes" differentirnMa ......... UNIVERSES RNLA ricomprereirnAttendo only FFrnOvviamente colors Fuji does not betray the tradition of the brand in the films for analog |
 | sent on October 07, 2012 Pros: This machine has a sensor revolutionary, I bought 6 May 2012, just out, with three fixed lens lenses available, in addition to the flash and the handle which makes it more comfortable to use. We begin with the machine body, metal, very massive, with the 35mm lens mounted reaches a weight of about 390 grams, still holding it with the shoulder strap is not so heavy. I remember long ago that my friend and great photographer, David Procaccini, blackened with pieces of adhesive tape brand of its compact so you do not see her neck a very expensive LEICA ... well it seems that Fujifilm has thought of that fact in front has not written any remaining very "low profile" only from the top you can see the mark of the manufacturer and model, I really appreciated this thing :) The camera does not flash on board, the truth is of little use since the ISO which is capable of reaching out to "noise", I still bought the Fujifilm Shoe Mount Flash EF-X20 I use if I have todo some shooting particular where I need it, the EF-X20 is really well done has a ring for the settings, a lever to change the scattering of light, a power button and one to test the flash, go with two AAA batteries with an autonomy of about 60 flashes, but is slow to recharge the flash takes several seconds. I enjoyed the first three fixed focal length lenses available, because it forces me to move and move to get the shot (which I did not with zoom lenses standing still and turning the zoom) so I am experimenting with different camera angles that did not I explored with my camera. Emulation of the famous film Fuji Velvia and Black & White, amazing results! Cons: Something she is not congenial, under difficult light and moving subjects when you need to shoot a sequence of frames, hoping then to get one good ... the machine after a dozen shots or so (in the highest quality RAW +) pauses for a few seconds ... which may be important ... and is therefore unusable: (when it happened I had a huge sense of frustration ... it was solved by installing the FirmWare 2.0 that improves the speed of focus and write files on the card, but we must take a very SD The fast :) perfect for a photography dynamic and sporty, it must have its time, landscapes, macro shots and poses, but exclude for shooting fast action where a true reflex makes the difference. But a nice SLR with the same sensor? By Fuji Mama Hurry up! Hehehehe Opinion: Excellent for photojournalists and street, great for portraits and astrophotography is a show, if you try it you will carry always behind, are commercially available adapter rings of all kinds, waiting out the other goals you can explore other optics :) In card you wrote "AF Micro-adjustment No" is the magnifier by pressing the COMMAND DIAL, the wheel at the top right of the screen lcd rear. The weight is wrong with the 35mm mounted weighs only 390 grams. |
  | sent on September 06, 2012 Pros: Quality of output files to high ISO quality of the optics so far presented compactness, lightness, construction quality hybrid viewfinder AF precise Cons: Need to install FW 2.0 for fast AF (accurate it is not already) Poor feeling with the system manual focheggiatura Low battery autonomy Lack - for now - a software for converting RAW wholly convincing in the excellent Jpeg (or direct conversion on camera) Opinion: I bought it shortly after the presentation on the market. It is obviously a device for shooting photo hunt, but in use "like" rangefinder revealed herself an excellent replacement for the M9 that I had in the past. The classic rangefinder system adds the possibility of a precise AF (which also becomes fast enough ccon installing firmware 2.0) and focus when focus at short distances, thanks to the switchable viewfinder evf. In particular, the unique sensor random matrix is ??a substantial improvement over the traditional bayer matrix and the benefits are immediately obvious by looking at the incredible Jpeg room on Current developments of the system (super-wide, zoom) leave much hope. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
