|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on November 10, 2022 Pros: The best Fuji aps-c ever produced if you are looking for a "Pro" tool Cons: That they haven't updated it enough Opinion: It's a brutal machine. It has a body that cannot be described, you have to hold it in your hand: it exudes solidity in every aspect, from the rings, to the buttons to the tires. It has an infinite amount of buttons, an exceptional viewfinder, a stabilized sensor, not even an empty corner of the car. One of the last machines that Fuji produced saying "we want to do the top!". Too bad an AF department not exceptional, but that is amply sufficient for 99% of uses. Very convenient BG that contains 2 batteries, to which to add the one present in the body, which compensates for a not exceptional duration of a single battery. Too bad only for Fuji who has castrated the possibilities by not updating the film simulations section to probably push the sales of his other bodies. I recommend it with my eyes closed again instead of xt3 and xt4, without the slightest doubt. Among other things, right now it is at the price of the xt3, crazy stuff ... |
 | sent on October 16, 2022 Pros: Construction, handle Cons: In power saving mode slow viewfinder, some shortcuts. Opinion: I like to write reviews on the spot, almost immediately after the first contact with the camera. The X-h1 comes so close to the ideal camera. Built in a really excellent way, you feel a different quality when you hold it. Each dial and button has precise controls and no play; It is a well-designed mirrorless. On line, 4 years from the date of trade you will find reviews... Here I can tell you what he transmitted to me: excellent grip, firm and safe, but for those like me who have the smallest than average hand, will feel the difficulty of holding it well. The little finger here has a grip on the handle but being nice wide, some buttons I reached with difficulty. The display on the back is comfortable in certain situations but it is not fundamental. Convenient joistick but this also seems to me a duplicate of the classic 4-way controls just below ... It is certainly faster to manage especially in diagonal directions. The shutter button has been much criticized but once you understand its game is really enjoyable. The display as I like, only tiltable but in addition also opens on the side, function used very little. Large and defined viewfinder but for those who wear glasses it is perhaps too large and the frames you risk not seeing them at first glance. Often the refresh in battery saving mode becomes slow but with the Boost inserted it is smooth and pleasant. Valid stabilization, of course the photos are made even without but having it available is a big help. The Q key where you can set various profiles for my fault I did not find it so intuitive (easier to set profiles with the Om-d1 in my opinion). I found the files very beautiful, workable while maintaining their high quality. Maybe I liked the file more than the X-t1. Had it been slightly smaller, I would have put it on a golden pedestal but its "extra" size does not make me prefer it. |
  | sent on July 23, 2022 Pros: Stabilization, feeling of reliability given by silence and grip, viewfinder Cons: Battery Opinion: Even now another thing compared to the other Fuji that I tried (I miss the xt4), I use it especially for street and it seems to me the extension of the hands thanks to the intuitive grip and the viewfinder, or the screen, which make any shot easy. Coupled with lenses with a good focus speed it is extremely effective, but also only with the "old" 35 1.4 from great satisfaction. As for the other Fuji (I often use the XPro2) you can easily go to 3200 iso with more than acceptable results in the middle of the night, the grain is not the same as the films but it is always pleasant. Clearly the batteries are not its strong point but if you do not have to do a wedding service you can save the battery grip. Very recommended even now. |
 | sent on April 27, 2022 Pros: Grip, high ISO, quiet, burst, stabilization, AF Cons: Battery life Opinion: A truly exceptional machine. I use it, mainly, with the 50-140 f/28 (+ 1.4x multiplier) to photograph football matches. Really foolproof and simple to use. Needless to praise the aesthetic beauty of Fuji. The only obvious flaw is the life of the batteries. The purchase of the battery grip is necessary. Mirrorless still valid in 2022! PS: those who complain about weight have never shot with an SLR. |
 | sent on March 19, 2022 Pros: file quality, excellent grip like a REFLEX, resistance to high iso in relation to an APSC (perhaps the best) softness of the shot and mainly stabilization of the sensor Cons: bad battery life (I have 5) Opinion: Found second-hand by giving in trade-in my XT2. it represents its natural evolution having the same excellent photographic quality; excellent stabilizer that allows me to make the most of the potential of my Viltrox 85. I do not find defects in relation to the use I make of it. I have no comments to make on the video part. I don't use it. Rating 10 |
  | sent on December 31, 2021 Pros: Construction and feeling of robustness, file quality, customizations, ergonomics, effectiveness of stabilization Cons: Battery life, some hesitation in AFC, battery grip connection Opinion: Taken at the time of the price drop and super cashback in September 2019 since then it has always been my main camera used both for leisure and for especially sporting events (Millemiglia and the like). Honestly I must say that I have never had the slightest difficulty or found myself in a situation where the H1 did not prove to be up to par for prstazioni and quality. Used with red badges or fixed, it produces detailed and chromatically rich files and as GD. The AFC struggles a bit in some situations, especially in terms of correct coupling, but using AF-On with manual focus and correct setting the situations in which you run into difficulty are drastically reduced. The very effective stabilization affects the life of the batteries (the same battery on Xpro3 or even on XT30 easily lasts me almost twice as long as the shots) and here the battery grip comes very useful. Unfortunately I have to find on this always difficulty to restore the correct connection to the camera after removing it. The battery grip is also useful as a dual charger! |
 | sent on December 13, 2021 Pros: Almost everything Cons: Q button position and shutter button Opinion: I have this machine for 2 years, I use it mainly with the 16/55 zoom, the ergonomics are excellent and well balanced. The files are ok and hardly need postproduction. The only flaw for me is the position of the Q button, it is activated continuously, decidedly unhappy position, the other defect is the shutter button, too soft, I often happen to unintentionally take a series of photos of the same subject and then have to eliminate them once poured on the PC. |
 | sent on December 09, 2021 Pros: Solid as a tank, very quiet. excellent image quality. Right controls in the right place. Good grip. Very quiet. Cons: Weight. Battery life. Opinion: I'have owned an X-H1 for a couple of years. I consider it an underestimated camera, because, to evaluate it carefully, it is a true professional in all respects. The body is robust, the focus valid, it is tropicalized. It has an imperceptible mechanical shutter, which allows you to shoot even during a chamber music concert without giving any discomfort. Only two negative notes: the battery life (less than 300 shots) and the weight of the machine, which is a bit high for the mirrorless category. |
 | sent on September 18, 2021 Pros: Ergonomics, weight, ISO seal, stabilization and price. Cons: Battery, autofocus not always perfect and noise even at low ISO in shadow recovery. Tends to under expose. Opinion: I must say that it is a great machine, for the price of the used it is really a bargain. Surely ergonomics is its strong point it grips very well and is not heavy. I must say that in the high lights and in a general sense the high ISO up to 6400 the machine is really good there is always a bit of noise but never annoying. Unfortunately, however, this cannot be said in the shadows that as soon as you try to recover in post production the noise is evident. Excellent stabilizer. The battery lasts very little but for what I do it is not a big problem. Not perfect focus area, sometimes the focus points move for no reason. In case put the focus points back where you want manually. The machine tends to underexpose. Overall according to my needs a great machine throughout. The price for the used is really interesting. Satisfied. With the 16-55 fuji is the perfect match. |
 | sent on April 21, 2021 Pros: Robust, ergonomic, IBIS, very performing, silent and ready shooting Cons: Battery life, complex menus Opinion: I use Sony and Canon mirrorless and although the cost of these is much higher I find the XH1 a worthy competitor of better performing paper machines and FF. It does not disfigure in performance or photographic rendering. Unfortunately the batteries last a little but with a few € they take stock. very ergonomic, very responsive and quite light. What can I say? Very satisfied |
 | sent on September 18, 2020 Pros: Solid, grip, IBIS and EVF Cons: Battery life and perhaps the af in continuous improveable firmware side Opinion: I have owned this camera for a year and a half now and despite the new releases I have seen it well since changing it. It's very fast, you do everything and it gives us a sense of robustness and assurance while using it. Like all fuji is intuitive, great files (if worked with C1 pro) and the colors are respectable. Stabilization works really well and with tripods I finally filed for divorce. Useful top display. In 2020 I think it's still a great machine for both work and not. Maybe for a photographer who likes to stay light I do not recommend H1 but at the price at which it is also found in the used is definitely a must-have. |
user148470  | sent on September 11, 2020 Pros: Robust, ergonomics, stabilization Cons: Technologically outdated, top display Opinion: Taken at day one (smart isn't it?), it was time that I waited for a body to balance the f2.8 and the 100400 zooms, I was immediately satisfied, the grip is also excellent with my hands (large), sturdy, the stabilization allows to shoot with the xf1655 even at 1/2" or even with long times. I didn't use the easel anymore. practical tilt screen. Evf from cinema. The Af is a bit poor compared to the competing releases of the same year but allows you to take home photos almost always in focus. The top display I never fully appreciated, I would have preferred to keep the dial of the exhibition. |
 | sent on November 06, 2019 Pros: Good AF, burst, sensor, stabilization, ergonomics, top display, truly resolute EVF Cons: Required BG for events given the non-flagship battery life, continuous background noise, FP not up to par Opinion: Bought by Fotoema at a paltry price after having had both X-T2 and X-T30, precise that I use the AFC but not tracking, use or single point or 3x3 grid and compose the action with the joystick, I saw a slight improvement compared to the T2 even if it does not reach The performance of T3, however with fast optics the difference is almost nothing, the big advantage of the T3 is with the old ones. I used it at the end of the week, portrait, an event, landscape, I start by saying that it was a forced choice, first of all I wanted a BG for the T2, new costs 200 euros, with 300 euros instead I gave back the T2 and bought the H1 with BG and 3 batteries! Second thing I use unstabilized and bulky optics, 16-55 and 90. Well, the H1 with these lenses is simply sublime, well balanced, goodbye micromove, AF very fast and very reliable, image quality really at high levels, compared to the others using it you feel the aura from flagship, really ergonomic and pulsating grip with a mortized shutter are really appreciable finesses, they have also improved the arrangement of the keys and their shape. It's made to work, I'm a photoamateur but using it makes you understand what a tool is to get the result. The stabilizer is good but not exceptional, allows 3 stops to the maximum, forget the shots of 1 second freehand, already with the 16-55 if you are not careful may not be enough 1/15, obvious micromove penalty and with this dense sensor and without AA filter... You can see everything just zoom me a little! The flaws relate to Fuji autonomy, in the sense, it's average Fuji, ok, people there around the world, but given the bigger grip, you could even double the batteries. The machine then has 2 processors, from on makes noise, both with the stabilizer off and on, strange, very strange! Fp Fuji remained at the X-PRO1, unreliable, after appreciating that of the S1 Panasonic, Fuji is really behind. Fuji, if you read us, make a final firmware update to this noble beast, put the functions you added on the PRO3 as HDR and multiple exposure to 9 shots, maybe giving the last pump edout to the AF algorithms! I after long wandering I will stop a little with her, I also made the warranty extension! |
 | sent on September 28, 2019 Pros: double slot, stabilizer, current price, viewfinder Cons: nothing if referring to the machine segment Opinion: I took the xh1 as a second body to support the xt3, the first thing I did was to detach it from the grip and compare it with the xt3, for weight and ergonomics in my opinion imperceptible differences due more to the arrangement of the keys of the h1 than to the size. Put to the test immediately after a short setting paired with the 16-55 f2.8 and without grip, (probably I will use it only as a charger or in the very rare cases when I will find myself needing autonomy without having to waste time changing the battery), the machine responded excellently to my expectations, the file is great, I tried both raw compressed and not, it is I must say that I did not see on video between the two rows differences that justify a file that weighs twice as much, quick maybe a pelino less than the xt3 in afc, equal in afs, facial recognition and maf on the eye fast and reliable, with the battery fully charged I took 360 shots and the display marked two notches , I did not push myself until the complete exhaustion and shutdown of the machine so I believe that on the 350/360 shots are in line with the mirrorless of this range, (with my Sony RII) at about 300 shots I had to change battery because I had focus problems), precise that I disabled the revision to the photo monitor but with the boost and stabilizer activated. The judgment on this machine is absolutely positive, at the current price do not buy it and taking a used xt2 at almost the same figures is absolutely to be avoided. A little reflection on the commercial side of this machine is to be done, at its exit it cost too much, then the price fell when the market had turned to something else.. on 1300/1500 it was a car at an honest price but no one bought it and consequently the second-hand market is also stuck, I would not be surprised if after the move of the 300 euros discount and after that, as is happening, many and many will appreciate the goodness of the machine, you can also wake up the second-hand market .... and I wouldn't be surprised if in a year you will find used H1s for sale at the same price paid today for the new. 03/02/2021 I take up my opinion on this machine, after a year and a half of use coupled with the xt3 and xpro2, I can only say that in heavy use I have never disappointed in any of its characteristics, comparing it with xt3 and xpro2 I can say that the IQ is absolutely identical (xpro2) the lean operating speed (of the xt3) is almost imperceptible in use (I do weddings and events), to the point that I sold the xt3 before the devaluation thanks to the discounts and various cash backs of Fuji, and I kept xh1 and xpro. in conclusion I can only confirm the positive opinion on the camera that maybe I will change only for a uniformity of machine bodies moving on to the xpro series, or maybe I will keep it, I have not yet decided, my advice for anyone who is still undecided having found some for sale is to take it quietly even today in 2021, as long as you do not make the usual mental pippe on the weight on the dimensions etc. because today it seems that the hundred grams more or less on a body machine have become decisive on the choice of a camera built to last and for traditional use, for those with weak shoulders there are other types of cameras or excellent smartphones |
 | sent on September 25, 2019 Pros: Very good machine that has everything Cons: Firmware stopped at version 2.01. New firmware is missing that makes af fast, face and eye tracking and recognition like the latest X-A7 Opinion: what about great machine with valid handle. Expected battery grip compared to the competition as nikon. possibility of two memory solts, external commands. You can see it's designed by photographers for photographers. Bright EVF sight and fully tiltable viewer in multiple directions. Mark focus stacking and focus trap. As I said would need a firmware update according to the latest trends and news. It's a shame that Fuji leaves his flagship abandoned, to devote himself only to increasing new models in the catalog |
 | sent on September 25, 2019 Pros: Grip, stabilized sensor, EVF Clarity, touch screen, double SD slot Cons: Weight, Battery Duration, Value Hold Over Time Opinion: After 2 years of testing I stopped with purchases because I think I found the ultimate machine body (for me at least). It falls perfectly in my hand despite the weight not quite feather, so much so that sometimes I take it without shoulder strap to go out to photograph. The stabilized sensor is frighteningly effective, the duo Xh1 and 16-55 2.8 is the ultimate solution, sometimes I find myself photographing with unthinkable times. Good ISO seal, in my opinion you can use up to 6400 exposing correctly, worth a little too much noise in the shadows. EVF among the best I've ever tried, touch screen (I don't use it but it's still a great option). Bad battery life compared to the competition and holding the value virtually non-existent but this is a good reason to get one soon! If the future XH2 will have USB-C, touch screen at XT3 levels I'll evaluate a gearbox otherwise I'll be fine so! |
 | sent on June 18, 2019 Pros: Well built, solid, tropicalized, stabilized, comfortable and intuitive controls, excellent yield with favorable light, double SD slot Cons: Batteries the duration is almost embarrassing (in a negative sense) AF in difficult light and in lack of contrast Opinion: I think it's a great machine for unprofessional use, but if you have to use it to work don't make the mistake that I made to abandon a Canon FF kit to move to Fuji. With Canon I could do a whole wedding with a battery and I was still advancing, with the XH-1 to finish a wedding it takes from 3 to 5 batteries, with the same ISO with an FF the yield is worse (but this depends on the size of the sensor and I knew it) but the thing ve dramatically dramatic is that it often fails to focus also and especially in group photos (yes, you read well, in the group photos where they are all still and posing) in these situations I always take 5 or 6 photos to be sure to take home at least one where everyone they have open eyes and smiling faces, often and willingly 1 or 2 of these photos are not in focus and the focus is always central at one point and the subjects do not move one step. Another embarrassing thing is the flash, the top of the range of course, which costs like the level peers of Canon and Nikon but that after a few shots (10 or 15) begins to sound to signal the overheating and you have to wait for it to cool down. If you plan to take it to do weddings and ceremonies forget it. |
 | sent on June 17, 2019 Pros: Truly professional body built for intense use, fast and accurate autofocus. Stabilization that allows you sometimes impossible shots with other models,stunning sight. Double SD slot. Button that allows you to lock the two ISO and Times. Cons: I consume batteries but it is normal given the stabilization of the sensor, the weight but it is referred to as a highly professional product. Too bad it's not Full Freme Opinion: My first impact with this jewel was immediately positive, the speed of focus is very good as the stabilization of the sensor that allows you in certain situations impossible shots. In certain situations the display tends to underexpose but corrects quickly. With serious goals, we say, the machine is divinely gripable and holds even the 100-400 without the slightest imbalance. Let's be clear it's a professional machine to tame but if you use it intensely you understand it and give you beautiful shots. The viewfinder is truly spectacular even in extreme conditions. I used to say almost all Fuji bodies and this is made for me, the ipugno as it should and the controls are within my reach, the stabilization I put it and remove it to my liking so that in certain situations I can bring home the result. The battery gives you after about 350-400 clicks, but all those who more or less of this kind of machines are so, a couple of batteries in your pocket and so the problem does not exist. I recommend it to professionals who know how to tame it and do not understand why it is not valued like the other Fuji. I took two of them with a wide-angle and one with a canvas so that I don't have to change my optics in situations where dust can get in. Now it is used at decidedly affordable prices. |
 | sent on May 22, 2019 Pros: PRO machine, qualitative balance, 1000 carefully manicured details Cons: Autonomy, viewfinder that reacts to LED lights with banding (not pictured) Opinion: Taken because I happened to change the XT2 spending little, without being convinced, I found myself an ABSOLUTE SUPPORTER. The wide and soft shutter button without that annoying Fuji collapse (to want to do the vintage button all the crooked and moved photos:-)) The mechanical shutter cushioned perfectly and noiselessly, the solid consistency of the body, the best and More rational grip, the excellent stabilizer (!), the viewfinder that favors a perfect framing, the focus perfected in precision: all these elements add each one a zero comma of final quality, but enough to get one Shot different and a percentage of perfect images always higher, so that in the end you find yourself with another machine!!! A huge leap: a PRO room! Yes, the others are more chic (but the H1 is not ugly or very coarse)... But if you have to shoot, this DGT will amaze you! Finally a constancy of results and a great reliability, with a couple of batteries always in the pocket. I read about disappointments at high ISO.... For me 6400 usabilissimi and pleasing, 3200 excellent as long as you use the right SW. |
 | sent on March 03, 2019 Pros: construction, magnesium alloy body, grip, stabilization Cons: Non-immediate menu functions (like many Fuji), battery life, battery life (...) Opinion: The X-H1, in my opinion, divided the audience. There are those who snubbed it immediately considering it an X-T2 stabilized and designed especially for video makers waiting for the X-T3 to come out as it happened then, and who, like myself, bought it to have a second Fuji body (or first?) less?) less like the X-T20 and more solid, comfortable and with its physical presence. The other reason that drove me to purchase was obviously the body with stabilized sensor, but even here, those who ignored it argue that the stabilizer serves mainly for those who make videos and that all in all is almost useless. Of course I do not agree and having the opportunity to shoot at previously unthinkable times and use manual optics without a stabilizer was very satisfying. Let's face it, the X-H1 wasn't very lucky right away. By the way, I say this with sincerity: the X-H1 is not aesthetically up to the other X-series cameras that owe their fortune even to the vintage taste reminiscent of the analogues of the years before. The X-H1 looks like a kind of hybrid, between recovering a retro design and something very modern and technological. Let's say on the middle road between the X-series and the medium-format GFX to which it seems to make the verse. Perhaps this was another reason for his almost unnoticed passage, indeed probably crushed in the middle, between the two series. In fact, many have asked themselves: what is the use of the X-H1? How does it position itself and what does it add? In my opinion, however, from a technical point of view the qualities are many and touch each other with their hands. Ok, it has the same sensor as the X-T2, but stabilized on 5 axes (!), very improved and decidedly wide, comfortable top display, joystick, touchscreen, af more reliable, ergonomics and grip, excellent tropicalization, very workable and rich files detail, customizable function keys, mute shooting possibilities, professional video compartment, double slot. The sore notes: menu (but this, in my opinion is a problem common to Fuji in general) not easy to manage and rather tiring (especially if you want to find on the fly a function to change, every time you have to start over if you leave the menu for the Check. A real stress!), "Q" button in a truly unhappy position (it activates almost every time you hold the camera), quite noticeable noise at high iso and battery life, really ridiculous! Okay, with battery grip it solves, but someone like me who doesn't want to carry a machine with a prosthesis every time that makes it almost bulkier than a reflex, that's a real problem. But is it possible that there is no way to study a better-performing battery? In conclusion I am still testing the machine, but I must say that apart from the aforementioned defects I am very satisfied with the purchase, because it was what I needed. A robust body, well assembled and with the ability to mount important optics of both weight and quality. Definitely recommended also for the price that dropped considerably compared to when it came out. |
 | sent on November 03, 2018 Pros: Stabilization, controls, ergonomics, build quality equal to the perceived one, adjustable screen. Cons: Image quality at ISO above 500, sometimes the electronic viewfinder goes jerky, menu is a little too complex, autofocus not always reliable, on the market of the used is rubbish. Opinion: I have always owned a second Fuji body machine and I decided to take this machine in May as first body along with the 16/55 2.8 coming from a Nikon d600 and I have to say that at low ISO and good brightness there is no story the H1 is much higher. Things change when you exceed the ISO 500, the grain is very visible and growing with sensitivity and decreasing the noise in the PP phase. The image is mixed with fear losing in sharpness, I was immediately disappointed and after 2 months I tried to put it back on the market but I I am seen to decrease the price almost 50%, I understand that already when you leave the store the machine loses its value but this has practically become what in the car market would say "a lung". I was very disappointed by Fuji that with this machine has shown not know how to do marketing at the expense of those who like me gave confidence to the brand from a life, unfortunately I trusted blindly and I have not tried it thoroughly before buying it, my fault... |
| sent on September 19, 2018 Pros: Stabilizer, ergonomics, viewfinder, IQ low ISO (with Capture One), support Lens Park, operating speed, AFS, shutter 1/32000 Cons: IQ at high ISO and low brightness, battery, AFC Opinion: Machine bought to replace the already in use XT2, with previous provenance from Canon FF. Use Fuji in weddings and personal projects. No noticeable difference in IQ compared to XT2, but I appreciated everything that was improved: viewfinder, LCD, stabilizer, ergonomics. To bring out the best of IQ is my opinion obligatorily leave Lightroom and rely on Capture One for those who like me do not give up the catalogs. Fuji gives access to a well-calibrated, complete, high-quality and very small-sized optical park (apart from a few exceptions). That's the real "secret" of Fuji. I left the rotten for AF in crisis during low-brightness events and for the ISO under the same conditions. For its system of measurement of light the machine in fact raises fast the ISO and the results are not in my opinion fully satisfactory. Inadequate battery, in very long events if you eat 4. |
 | sent on June 02, 2018 Pros: A complete machine, light, ergonomic, of absolute quality Cons: I noticed a flicker in the EVF when put under stress focus, according to some batteries but for now I would not know Opinion: After a month that I own I do not deny that I had some trauma in the transition from Canon to Fuji, some controls were for me immediate and I had to have patience in setting and customizing it. For me coming from 1DX is like having a feather in my hand, I am much less tired after a service, but there is a MA, the autofocus is not comparable even if under stress I must say that has not missed a shot, in short a complete machine and at this time I do not regret my Choice, indeed. The kit lens is very good (18-55), I also took a fixed 35 1.4 (comparable to the old 50) and I must admit that the qualities are really excellent. Depends on what kind of photography you look for or realized to craft the real difference on a personal level I see it in my spare time, I never dreamed of going out to take a walk with the 1DX and 24/70 both for a matter of weight and a matter of value , the X-H1 instead with a nice peak design strap I take it everywhere. Excellent Despite the flickering the EVF that I personally use with histogram exposure, difficult to miss a shot so and you will see immediately the photo that you have taken. Well advised. P.S. I read a lot about the battery life, personally I preferred not to take the grip but put in my pocket a couple of batteries and use the viewfinder holding the display only for values, result I took in an afternoon service about 580 photos and I still had battery in the first the other I didn't even use them. |
 | sent on May 02, 2018 Pros: Massive, improvements in general, stabilizer Cons: Price, Size, Battery, SVALUTATION Opinion: I've been using this machine body for a while now... I'll tell you what I think... It's definitely more massive than the X-T2, the larger body helps to give more feeling of robustness and improves grip but on the other hand, it loses a bit the sense of mL, that is, portability. The weight is more or less unchanged but the body grows closer to the bodies of the reflexes... It remains a great street car thanks to the fuji lenses, some really small... For example, I always carry it behind the use almost exclusively with fixed f2 lenses that are very fast, quiet and give a good yield. With these goals, you still notice the difference with the reflex... and with a little experience you can very well go unnoticed. It is designed for the professional, the one who wants a top photo and who, using it for work, the "mistreat" more than an amateur... It looks like an indestructible tank. Improvements in general there are and the stabilizer is really something spectacular. LCD at first I did not like it very much (I preferred the dial in the style of xt2) but I have to say that it has its own why and in the end comes very useful. More pros... you can shoot at 1/3 of a second in fluency, which is crazy (great for creative photography and video). The price is high to be an APS-C ... Okay it's a Top Gamma... but it's also almost 2000 coffees... and they're not a few... I switched to X-H1 from X-T2 because of a good offer... one of those "that you can not refuse" but for those who already own the X-T2 I do not think it is I would suggest to make the switch... The battery doesn't have a very long life but I don't have a problem because I have three... And i'm just... and then with the fuji system I greatly reduced the number of shots compared to those I did with the reflex and the thing I like the most is that often I shoot and the photograph is beautiful and ready... Touchscreen comfortable... even though I don't use it very much... Top sights... Despite everything I've written, I'd buy it back... I would never buy Fuji again... With what I paid for it (without bgrips and batteries) today I would buy 3 with bg and 6 batteries... On Fuji's part a real disrespect towards buyers... and say that his time I preferred it to Sony at7III ... |
 | sent on March 30, 2018 Pros: Excellent ergonomics, stabilized sensor, excellent viewfinder Lightning AF, excellent construction. Cons: Battery life, but manageable. Opinion: Testing the product under various conditions I noticed a marked improvement in the AF-c coupling, especially during the photo hunting sections with 100-400 Fuji, also multiplied, compared to my "old" x-t2. rnThe detail, the colors and the three-dimensionality that give the sensor combined with the excellent Fuji optics are extraordinary, as with x-t2, and ... for a "DX" .... for those like me who used Nikon d7200, d750 d500 and d810 is always surprising.rnIn addition the mechanical shutter has been improved sharply, very quiet, the viewfinder is really at the top of the category, and the stabilization of the sensor is really effective.rnIn conclusion I find the Fuji system a real alternative to tradition Reflex, a set of optics and cameras with high quality / price compared to the competition. |
 | sent on March 28, 2018 Pros: Weight Balancing, Customization, Stabilized Sensor Cons: Nobody Opinion: I come from Nikon D750 so in giving my judgment I rely a lot on this. On the quality of the images, held to the high ISO nothing to say. The stabilized sensor is extraordinary and allows very low-time shots. Overall a great camera. Tropicalization is also excellent in environments such as Iceland in winter. Satisfied with the purchase I can only recommend it |
 | sent on March 10, 2018 Pros: Photo quality, stabilizer, ergonomics, balance with bulky lenses, robustness, finishes, jog, lightning AF, silent shutter, second screen for information Cons: Big body (if you like me from x-t1), battery life Opinion: I state that I've been using it for a few days, but it really impressed me. I come from the x-t1 and so it is obvious that for me it is a "quantum" jump, but besides this the x-h1 is really an excellent mirrorless. The pros are those listed and celebrated, in my opinion rightly, in many articles and hand on that I read before buying it. From a constructive and design point of view, nothing to complain about: comfortable to hold, excellent finishes and assembly. It gives a feeling of really reassuring robustness. Spectacular image quality, really lightning AF and thanks to the jog it's really easy to select the precise point, the stabilizer helps a lot, both in the video and in the photos. Very quiet shutter, very useful if you do street. Hypersensitive shutter button, you have to take your hand, but as soon as you do it, it's a pleasure and you shoot snaps ... and the battery goes down. As usual the battery does not have a very long life (it would not be bad if Fuji worked on this front, the technologies are there), I took the Power Boost forare at 1000 shots for travel. The problem of the body "so" big (for me ex X-T1), is rapidly disappearing and you do not notice if you use it with the most cumbersome lenses: trying it with 100-400 is perfectly balanced. rn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
