|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on December 09, 2019 Pros: Fantastic sensor, light and robust at the same time, beautiful, high iso. Cons: Aim of course not up to the height of the xt3 Opinion: Having had and having the different Fuji Xe1, Xt3( Xpro1-Xpro2-Xe2-Xt1), nothing, what concerns the image quality this little gem churns out the best in the absolute sense. I explain better: I took at the beginning the Xpro 1 , fantastic, only left me puzzled at the iso of 3200,beautiful the grain, but there was, then I matched to the pro1 the XE1 , here I found a cleaner and more full-bodied file, beautiful really in all situations, even at 6400 (which I do not use m (ai) the colors and resolution of the image never gave way by a comma. Over time the series of new XTrans came into the world with more mpx , but here they gave up the beauty of the file, too often I find it artifact, and especially in the XT3 I find the introduction of too much noise, already from 800..... my favorite machine has always been the XPro series(if it had been ff , it would have been definitive, unfortunately marketing among snack friends), I would have hoped for an XPro1s .... personal impressions, for an aps-c I find too much the 24 mpx |
  | sent on November 02, 2019 Pros: A lot of stuff in little space. 16 mpx quality. Cons: The good 18 55 limits it quite a bit in a low light. Opinion: Light and essential camera, produces more than good files. I use it mainly with the 35 1.4 and 14 2.8 and with the fixed, compared to the zoom, the photos have a well-marked and very pleasant character and is more than satisfactory the speed and accuracy of the focus. Irreplaceable for street. The new, much better performing models have more technology on board but to my taste a less pleasant file. |
 | sent on May 05, 2018 Pros: Low weight and size, good quality of files, good chromatic rendering and high ISO, simple to use and good general technical characteristics, good focus peaking. Cons: Slow autofocus, ergonomics, low readiness between shots, mounting the grip to improve ergonomics you need to remove it to access the battery compartment and SD card. Opinion: I am happy with the purchase done. I bought it used in black version, I must say that the aesthetic is very appealing, even if this dowry clashes with the ergonomics. It does not appeal well as the most evolved and contemporary forms. Overall I would say that it is equipped with a simple menu, intuitive, with the possibility to manage the various technical aspects of control and setting. The coupled with the kit lens, the 18-55 f 2.8-4 is very good. I share with those who consider this zoom the best kit lens ever produced. I own two other mirrorless and have come to this system to contain weights and dimensions keeping high the quality level of the files. The first purchase was the Oly Pen E-P5, with which I have not found a good feeling, appreciating the sturdiness and aesthetic beauty. The second I bought was the Pana Lumix G5 with the Lumix G 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6. Excellent feeling right from the start with the appreciated viewfinder (although the quality is poor) and monitor articulated, excellent performance, lighter and ergonomic than the Oly, but certainly more ugly and anonymous from the aesthetic point of view. Very appreciated the features that you can silence completely. You can take pictures in complete silence, which with the Oly and the X-E1 is not possible. I landed at E-X1, after reading and rereading reviews and photo blogs. With this I have purchased in overall quality and practicality. For my needs I see that exploit G5 daily, always on the stock exchange, on site and for the various occasions. When I go out to photograph, I bring the X-E1 with a park of "old optics". The Oly? For the moment in the window to be admired. In the future I would like to buy a pair of Oly M4/3 fixed optics to see if it improves the performance from a qualitative point of view, even if I suffer the lack of a viewfinder. I believe that the X-E1 is an excellent compromise between weight and size, flaw in ergonomics and the application of the grip improves its portability, but increases the weight and slightly clutter. I find a flaw the lack of a flap below, in correspondence of the battery/SD, which obliges the removal of the grip for the change of the battery and the replacement of the card. Recommended, so now is at a good price in the market of the used. |
 | sent on February 07, 2017 Pros: Good files, Iso estate, pleasant sound, aesthetically apt, returns (in part) a feeling of old film camera. Good solution to use old lenses. Cons: Plastic very delicate metallic; the electronic viewfinder does not fall in love; focus peaking helpful, but room for improvement Opinion: Bcome once "even on a digital. Small memo also on peaking focus, useful to facilitate manual focus, slows down the operation of position and stays maybe a little 'cheesy. RnMa it is more than acceptable compromise. |
 | sent on June 16, 2016 Pros: Quality of the photos already in Jpeg, vintage look, high ISO seal Cons: small viewfinder, AF to uncertain times Opinion: Bought it used and combined with the small but excellent Xf 35mm f2 out of curiosity after reading countless reviews on the Fuji sensor quality I was struck by this beautiful machine. I always used zoom lenses, I decided to match this a fixed machine to make school and I find this really great match from all points of view. Is equivalent to a 50mm so standard optical, bright, well-defined, compact. The camera produces jpeg excellent and usable with very few interventions in the computer. rnTiene very good high ISO and the yield in general is really nice. The ferrules on lens and the body put you all on hand parameters. Fun and useful the film simulations. RNA times the autofocus is slow and with little contrast struggling to do its job but it is a "limit" you already know before you buy, as well as the poor battery life (fault common to all mirrorless). rnPer my experience I can only advise to anyone as long as you do not expect to use it for pictures for which no; It was conceived |
  | sent on May 29, 2016 Pros: beautiful to look at, intuitive to use, lightweight and compact, crop to 100x100 in my reference point x all the others, including full frame, the original noise, threaded socket snap flessiile Cons: little color fidelity, EVF too slow and small, annoying tendency to burn the highlights Opinion: After long he delayed the digital switchover (I used contax air and contaxg2) and 'was my first digital, bought in December 2012. I had already' element x 10 x photo editing I used the scanned slide timing, so I was a bit 'already 'digitized, in the nex 3 + I played with my partner. I was torn between nex 7 and fuji xpro (too expensive), costing less XE1 I bought it right away (in + had the flash). I used it first with the old Zeiss lenses already 'in my possession, I then bought the 18/55 2.8 / 4. He immediately demonstrated his (many) strengths and its flaws, has given me great satisfaction, run 'proven very reliable and honest (if not focusing it clicks). An old-style machine that produces files of exemplary cleanliness, quiet shutter chance 25 'high and low lights adjustment, constant firmware update by fuji. In short, be able to create a real addiction, I used it along with a couple of canon (100d and 760d), but if I wanted to take a picture I used THE BEAUTIFULI. I commuted x sony A7II not without regret, in the future I will buy 'a fuji, if they were to make a FF I would be sooo happy. Really fantastic, I will not bore well, a pier greeting. |
 | sent on March 31, 2016 Pros: Very beautiful retro 'style, spectacular sensor, quality' image stupendous. Cons: A little 'slow Opinion: I bought the XE1 used about a month ago because I was tired of walking around with heavy bags, convinced that the lightness was worth some loss 'quality'. I am immediately changed his mind, despite its small size, the quality 'of the image is outstanding, already' in jpg will make good shots. The estate at high ISO is full-frame, absolutely best of my Canon APS-C, kit lenses is of the highest quality 'and the car despite being an older model enhances the maximum. Of course the speed 'is not comparable to that of an SLR, but for landscape photos, portraits and street I do not create any problem. Result, I sold 5 Canon optics for taking only the naturalistic photo gear in which I think the SLR is unmatched, and I bought 5 optical Fuji's size makes it a companion to take with itself, with 27 mm is a little more ' larger than a compact, but with a performance of the highest level.A tip, if you do not plan to buy a Fuji, never try it, otherwise you will immediately inscimmiati and you can no longer 'do without it. |
 | sent on December 31, 2015 Pros: Beautiful, well-built, lightweight, intuitive menu, sensor spectacular Cons: Sometimes a little 'slow Opinion: Bought used (body only) a few days ago to accommodate a monkey sudden and I'm loving it. The pros I have listed above, and that is enough - for now we only mount on old manual lenses, thanks to the focus peaking are a joy to use. The yield of the sensor is simply spectacular, brings out the best even from humble Soviet lenses. With a Takumar 35mm 3.5 is the perfect size to carry around for street and urban landscapes. In general it is fantastic to use in manual and broke away for a moment from my side since I have it. At the first opportunity I'll get more in used even 18-55 XF to carry with you. The video did not try it, you might as well not be there for me and I'd be fine comunque.rnVenendo a DSLR Sony had some doubts only on ergonomics and the absence of stabilization. As for the first I am better than expected, but after a few hours of use your fingers a little 'you indolenziscono; the second honestly I do not miss, because if there is littlelight you can safely push the ISO on almost anything without losing quality. The battery lasts me for about 350 shots using too much the rear display so I'm not complaining, it is not certain autonomy from SLR but me aspettavo.rnUnica sin if ever it is that certain functions (especially the display of images) are a bit 'slow, but it is a trivial matter. Now is used around at ridiculous prices (I paid 140 pounds less than 4000 shots and all accessories) and definitely worth every penny and more! |
 | sent on November 05, 2015 Pros: Quality sensor and image, construction, handling, aesthetics Cons: Autofocus, general slowness of the system, battery life Opinion: Now two years that I use this machine and I am fully satisfied, the sensor I believe is unbeatable by any other sensor APS-C, has a quality crazy and allows the recovery of shadows / lights really incomparable; Park Fuji Optical is absolute level; the only flaws are very slow autofocus and a general slowness of the menus (display photos, etc ...). |
user50158  | sent on March 18, 2015 Pros: Quality files, quality at high ISO, body beauty, lightness, shutter dial comfortable, rich menu of features, speed shooting. Cons: Display little resolute for the type of files that churns, excessive lag of display when using high ISO, focus peaking color white only, not controlled by the computer via USB, burst default to 3 or 6 fps Opinion: I bought this machine for use only with manual focus lenses, it is a pleasure to use it, even if the manual focus has its speed limits and the absence of stabilizer, makes the use of time in 1/60 a bit difficult hand libera.rnComunque are satisfied with the performance of files and many features it offers its menu, as well as the old-school feeling that offre.rnLa rendering files, although with no optical fuji, unregulated and not autofocus, is excellent, sincerely I'll buy a lens fuji to extend the capabilities and fields of use of the machine. |
 | sent on February 25, 2015 Pros: Yield Colors, High Yield ISO, construction, light, possibility of adapting old optics, precision AF Cons: AF SLOW, response between a picture and the other slow shutter speed dial that do not like, the price a bit 'high Opinion: Jack used, came from a Nikon D3100 (which I did not like the performance at high ISO, and the fact that I had to recalibrate AF twice). I am fully satisfied and would not go back at all with regard to the ISO yield and the yield of the colors here are CLEARLY superior .... to make good photos serves only manico.rnUnico big downside ... its slowness. ... in AF response, response viewfinder, reactivity between a picture and another. With the X-T1 I've tried have improved, but we are nowhere near the level of reflex. There I mount the old optical ... the Helios..e gives me so much satisfaction. Yield much if you do not do sports photos |
 | sent on December 27, 2014 Pros: Machine has an aesthetically acccattivante design vintage style, compact and well costruita.rnIl good sensor and allows to take pictures at ISO 3200 with grit that accettabile.rn Cons: Shortly ergonomic, battery short duration (range 100-150 shots, activating only info in the viewfinder) .rnLa bezel compensation often inadvertently moves, as well as the key 'Q'.rnNon for photos sportive.rnPrezzi too high for mirrorless. Opinion: For me that I come from Nikon D70 and D700, I found and still find difficulty in both hold the car, but also to look inside the viewfinder for its response times and in times of light forte.rnComunque, and 'an interesting machine and take home interesting shots with strong contrasts of light in the scene inquadrata.rnPer regarding the electronic viewfinder, with respect to a good SLR has still a long way to be concorrenziale.rnI prices are a bit' excessive and I think buying an X-e2 is not worth the price difference elevata.rnAd today (December 2014) can be purchased new at attractive prices, as I did in io.rnL'obiettivo kit and 'well made and solves pretty well all the problems of distorsione.rnLa maf goes just fine for pictures not particularly movimentate.rnrn |
 | sent on November 24, 2014 Pros: Sensor, AF precise, robust construction, excellent resistance to high ISO, vintage line irresistible charm Cons: AF slow, unresponsive, viewfinder display and low performance when compared to the older sisters. Opinion: Purchased used with an 'optical manual focus, the modest sum of 300 euro, l' I use exclusively with the 27mm f / 2.8. Compact, handy, built impeccably, this great little car following me in all my travels and I returned the pleasure of taking pictures wherever I am, as with the small 27mm, you carry in your pocket or purse. It is not a camera dedicated to the action, but I assure you that for those who composed in a brooding his shots is the right partner:-) |
 | sent on September 22, 2014 Pros: Small, good price for what it offers at least on paper. ability to mount all the objectives for SLR or rangefinder manual control adapters seen the short draw. Cons: I do not know if it's a defect but it is a digital ... unreactive between shots and the other, perhaps a reflex behaves better. Opinion: I come from the ancient technique to sn film is not a professional, but I cpitato a job and no one lent me a digital SLR will do serious mirrorless, and the compact in my posseso (a fiuggi hs 20) perhaps did not guarantee the right quality of the images. Since the badget allotted was little I could not have a job to support film with my old glories with a Nixon f90 zoom 24 * 120, a voiteland with a 25mm scoparex, and a mammamia 7 with 80mm lens .... I relied voices, and I bought this fiuggi ex1 with the zoom lens in the package. for now used with puppies human and I have to say it is not so reactive as a film camera (even with manual winding), but I do not think I will have many problems to adapt seen that the results are not bad at all. I aggeggiato on file rov neffa a nixon 7000 and seemed a little different, having regard to space and cost me feel like I made the right choice to buy this item. |
 | sent on September 12, 2014 Pros: Excellent on many punti.Piccola and portable at every opportunity. great pics and very detailed with optical base.Rumore very content. Cons: Autofocus, slow to show scatti.Parco accessories ridotto.Menu to improve. Opinion: Compattona with excellent optics, very versatile in the walks in the city very positive thing if we consider all files rispetto.Stufo of the REFLEX heavy and very ingombranti.Questa machine built impeccably charm old.Consigliabile with a light kit to take with you everywhere. Great quality 'files from almost FF.Non is a machine to be used for photo sportive.Bella and go unnoticed in terms difficili.Comincio to appreciate the system FUJI although I come from NIKON.Penso be missing useful accessories like extension tubes and -moltiplicatori optical macro.rnrnrnrnrn |
| sent on September 09, 2014 Pros: Quality file, jpeg is that RAW. Ergonomic controls. optical viewfinder, appearance, size, noise very basssa. Cons: Handle ergonomics, autofocus situation in unfavorable light, battery autonomy. Opinion: 26agrave; price, for those who want to bring the world enough fuji 600 euro for the sexy 1855 ... valuable XE1 and you suffer a little lack of a reliable autofocus ... but only in terms of speed, accuracy is at the top .rnla real monkey FF is FujiFever.rnbuona light to all |
 | sent on August 22, 2014 Pros: High quality, beautiful to the eye and to the touch, convenient controls, ability to mount virtually any lens vintage thanks to the short draw, good resistance to high ISO, high quality sensor Cons: I read that the autofocus is slow, but I use it only in manual focus. For me the real minus is the highlight of the focus peaking is only in black and often not easily visible. Also I find the menu a bit 'slow. Opinion: Purchased to complement the SLR (and X100) and use it mainly with optical vintage, is slowly supplanting the Canon 50D for most common uses. Small, light, beautiful, with controls at the right place, with optics used vintage manual focus is changing the way I shoot and what I really like. The use of lenses with both affordable (for example an old Pentax 50mm f: 1.7) that lenses with more series (35 summaron 2.8) and the quality is always absolutely satisfactory. It will never replace completely the reflex, but easily covers 80% of my needs. Highly recommended |
 | sent on August 21, 2014 Pros: Handling, sealing iso, detail spectacular images Cons: Slightly slow autofocus as in some situations than xe2. Opinion: More than positive, especially for the cost of the used abbordabili.A in my opinion combined with the 27mm and 35 mm and 'eccezionale.rnL I used it for about a year for glamor shots and street, I would say that nn I missed my old Canon SLR 60d.rnInoltre I could use it in combination with old lenses using adapters on the market today (Leica in the first place) and also in this case have nothing to eccepire.rnOggi past X100S, having found my ideal measure leveraging additional optical Fuji , but I would recommend anyone to take a ride with the XE1 |
 | sent on July 04, 2014 Pros: Incredible image quality, pleasantness of the files held ISO incredible, dynamic range adjustment Cons: maybe a hair slower to show previews species in the gusts but it's a detail that I do not care that much Opinion: I bought this car about two months ago, to be attached to 7d, for use with objectives vintage, I fell in love with, the electronic viewfinder helps a lot focus, the shooting in black and white means "previsualize" photography already in black and white, the controls are convenient, cost nothing for the potential it has, consigliatissima |
 | sent on June 14, 2014 Pros: 10 image quality, impressive quality at high ISO Cons: Video / Audio: 5/4 (can be remedied with an external microphone, but it deserves?) Opinion: A camera designed to convey emotions. nice for the view, nice to the touch and beautiful results that ottieni.rnpesa little and so I can never say, "ah, if I reach!" rnPensavo of having to use the flash and instead often amazed me because going on ISO holds a surprise for photos hand held battery libera.rnLa little, but with 2 other Patona not spend so much to solve the "problem". rnFantastico the Q key: faster to use that spiegarlo.rnBuon fun for those who will his! |
 | sent on April 21, 2014 Pros: Compactness, weight, ease of use, quality sensor, Cons: slowness of the thumbnail view Opinion: Initially I was skeptical about these Mirrorless, but after a couple of uses I fell in love gradually abandoning my Nikon d7000 kit lens and various ... unmatched level of detail captured by the sensor, excellent jpg, raw ready for conversion without too much processing , dynamic range and superb sealing at high iso before that I was dreaming, impossible to turn back |
 | sent on January 10, 2014 Pros: Quality 'jpg, weight / size / portability, construction, held at high ISO awesome, vintage aesthetic. Cons: Charging the battery ridiculous. Opinion: I took questaa machine, used by poco.L 'I got to have something more than a simple compact you always have with me when I go skiing or in the mtb.Quando' I tried, I could not believe what I was seeing : virtually no noise at 6400 iso ... excellent sharpness, great contrast, colors incredibly belli.Oggi to work the 'I showed it to a colleague of mine, who runs with Canon 1D4: l' I set it to 6400, then also to 12800 : you should have seen his face! not sell my 5D2 just because I have an important optical park (I would say very important), but if I had goals "normal" I do not know how it would end ... |
 | sent on January 07, 2014 Pros: it is beautiful. The first thing that struck me was the yield at very high iso, usable up to 6400. It 's easy to use, has the ability to uin quick access to the main settings. Allows you to shoot with old manual lenses thanks to a focus on aid. Good also the digital viewfinder which immediately gives the glance of how the photo will be. Excellent quality. The optical boundle (18-55 F/2.8-4) is all over, nothing to do with the plasticotti of nikon and canon. Also useful swiveling flash. Cons: Jpeg sometimes too much contrast. Poor performance on movies (but who buys it to make movies?) Blurs soon as you try azoomare and the audio is not nothing to it. Opinion: I had both a canon 550d nikon d7000 and that in the end I switched to x-e1. I must say that I am satisfied. Compared to rreflex I had this allows me more freedom in the shots indoors or in those nightclubs that is no small thing for me. Furthermore, the quality is superior. I think it's a great machine for those who do not have the chance to own a DSLR with good obiettivi.rnLa battery does not last very much but we do a whole day tranquillamente.rn |
 | sent on May 12, 2013 Pros: quality 'image jpg / raw, weight, construction, aesthetics, lens kit, very quiet, customizable buttons, electronic viewfinder Cons: Lens Cap uncomfortable, improved menu, af, slow, battery life ridiculous Opinion: A machine that churns out incredibly vintage files incredibly exceptional! Motivo.I I bought it for this menu are different from the SLR but with a little patience is easy to learn, can not be excluded by software and the dynamic range in focus from the viewfinder oled there is a slight delay trascurabile.L 'AF is not fast but for this I have the camera in fact, this x-e1 I joined the SLR and what is required is eccezionale.Non I never used the flash because the 3200ISO are tranquillamente.Possiedo used only the 18-55 kit that excites me very much and very well built even if the cap is difficult inserimento.La battery does not last very much if you use the display and stabilizer you still behaves very bene.Aspetto new targets sore point of this system (I hope in a short time they can get to market new). Top marks recommended purchase! ;-) |
 | sent on May 11, 2013 Pros: Size, weight, quality files, construction and design. Cons: The small size in relation to my hands (large) makes it un-ergonomic. The automatic white balance tends to make pictures taken in full sun a little cold. Opinion: I bought this machine for many reasons, starting with the extraordinary quality of its sensor, portability, the ability to use lenses I already had, and also for its classic style and decidedly vintage. I was not at all disappointed by this, but .... For all the pictures taken in those circumstances where the camera must remain "fair" and 'phenomenal. In practice, no one note and another, and between the 'whisper quiet. L 'AF is not up to a SLR system but it is more than enough for general use. The lenses are excellent tradition Fuji as finding the 18-55 kit zoom much higher than any other of equal excursion normally supplied with the machines also reflex. The 35 F 1.4 and who also possess' excellent with a very pleasant blur. The electronic viewfinder and 'very good, bright, and with a "ghosting" acceptable. I do not really like the white balance in the car, since it makes it a little cool pictures taken with full sun, but is fine in all other cases. The dim |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
