JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Bought bundled with the xt-20 for a palyable price. I had planned to support a fixed focal point immediately, but when I saw the first results I decided to wait. For more than a year it was my only goal. At F8 it is very sharp on all the focal points. The stabilizer works well and the AF is sufficiently accurate and fast. In short, a kit lens that made me forget the previous experiences not really exciting with this class of goals.
Pros:Exceptional price quality, great yield, fast and quiet autofocus, stabilized.
Cons:Plastic bayonet, but given the price it's in.
Opinion:It fooled me. I took him on holiday on the tour of the lakes of Northern Italy and he gave me great satisfaction. The autofocus (X-T1) is fast and very quiet, the quality is great at diaphragms a little more closed, at full opening suffers a bit at the edges. As much as it costs it's a drama not to have it.
Cons:Plastic compared to XFs, but it is already known at the time of purchase
Opinion:I was wary of this optics until the moment I tested it: the files you get are excellent even at full opening. Ideal for travel and for all occasions when you want to stay light. I did home tests with easel comparing it with 14 2.8, 23 1.4 and 56 1.2 The results were surprising as well as unexpected: for the same diaphragm I did not notice particular differences, not even looking for the details to monitor Recommended. Given the results I decided to buy also the 50-230
Pros:Very light, stabilized, excellent yield at all focal lengths, unbeatable value for money.
Cons:For the use that I do, as an optical ' from kit ' and given the price, I would say none.
Opinion:Taken used at €120, it has an amazing value for money! I preferred it to the most fancy XF 18-55, which however lacks those 16mm which for me make a difference. Ok, it's plastic, missing the aperture ring and if it gets wet it explodes... But for me it is not a problem, given the use that I do (' casual ' exits where I want to be light), and above all, given the excellent performance. For me it was a bargain, highly recommended. Rated 9.
Cons:Unmanageable lens hood, a bit harsh on the zoom ring
Opinion:Outstanding quality price if purchased in camera kit. Not very bright but excellent handyman superior to the basic canon and Nikon lenses. I'm using it on a Fuji Xe2. Surely his older brother 18-55 is brighter but the 16mm are always comfortable!!! I personally recommend it even if it is considered ' Plasticoso '
user47725
sent on July 22, 2016
Pros:Value for '/ great price if purchased (100 € used see NOC), stabilized, clarity, lightness
Cons:seemingly robust construction but unfortunately to me is a complete bayonet sector is broken
Opinion:The plastic construction of the bayonet is not up to the optical range, but not the quality of economic optics nikon and canon is so deficient, just compare the thickness at the point of rupture is about one millimeter and a half of very brittle thermosetting plastic . In September, I will send the optics in assistenza.rnPreciso that the optical and machine have never fallen, at least since I acquistato.rnHo decided to stick with Loctite optics on a XM1 well solve the problem of the cost of repair and dust. castom version!
Pros:Value for '/ great price, stabilized, clarity, lightness
Cons:plasticky construction
Opinion:Has a quality '/ exceptional value in comparison to the canon and Nikon kit lenses are ciofeche. Stabilized and with very good sharpness at all focal lengths, contained the distortion. Construction is plasticky and cheap, but really the price at which it is located you can not 'expect more'. Missing the dial aperture, but you can 'adjust with the wheel, however, very convenient. Highly recommended.
Pros:quality / price ratio, sharpness and lightness
Cons:No one saw the cost of the lens
Opinion:I bought this lens kit with Fuji XT10, I was already aware that the construction of this lens was all plastic, but just mounted on the camera I had to reverse, the graft is without force and they do not have the game between ' bayonet and lens, the zoom ring is also very smooth and pleasant to the touch while the ring MAF is a bit 'small and for those with large hands may be uncomfortable. rnUnico drawback to this objective, and that does not work with LMO (lens modulation optimizer) that is located inside the camera software as the optics of the XF series, the rest has a very good sharpness almost uniform throughout the frame except to 16mm where one notices a small decline on the frame but nothing irricuperabile than basic lens supplied as original equipment on SLR cameras and not only, can safely confront optical medium / high qualità.rnGrosso advantage is that having a good quality, is the '; Ideal lens for travel and the long marches in the mountains where the lightness of kit for me is very important without having to give up to bring home a lot of clicks buoni.rnIl its range of use where returns some good shots is between f / 5.6 f / 8, as well starts to go in diffraction, of course, it has some limitations in very dark scenes but it is not only due to optics "dark" but for me that predominantly daytime shooting is not a problema.rnNegli indoors does very well and it returns colors and sharpness of good qualità.rnConsigliato for the really low price for its handiness and lightness without compromising on the quality of the shots, now you can find it on the web again to € 169.
Pros:quality / price ratio, does its job pretty well
Cons:total lack selector diaphragm
Opinion:What many do not say this in sull'acquistare kit and the reason why many prefer the 18-55, is that with the fuji xt 10 makes it more artificial and less immediate l 'use of the machine in A, S, M because without the switch diaphragm forces to 'use the menu of the room, very slowing of the' immediacy of fotografare..meglio choose 18-55 spending a little 'more ..
Cons:low light with paintings (but you knew that already)
Opinion:When I purchased (online in Germany) the X-A1 have been long fought to take it only if the body or the whole kit (ie with this goal). In the end I decided to spend 70 Euros more to have too zoom. The reasoning was this: the X-a1 was purchased for use with the 27mm f.2.8 and 90% will remain attached to the pancake. But it is also true that for 70 € I brought home a 16mm F.3.5 that can always be handy (other focal are not to be thrown away anyway if you use them during sunny days when the brightness is not in short supply). So I can say that this lens is definitely recommended for those who buy a complete kit (car + zoom) paying the latter a few tens of euro as in my case. The overall quality of the lens (though the price might suggest otherwise) seem good. Obviously it is a view that I never bought separated from the body for 300 euro :)
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
