JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Image quality, sharpness, solid construction, unique in its kind, creativity
Cons:Weight, size, front lens is very exposed, manual focus, high cost
Opinion:Objective extraordinary, excellent image quality and great creativity, even if limited mainly to use landscape / architectural reasons for sopraelencati.rnTramite change the plug (see forum Juza) can be mounted filter plate (eg Lee, cokin) . rnIl decentralization is free of vignetting up to 9 mm, then begins to glimpse, but practically inesistente.rnIl bascullaggio use it mainly for focusing planes with good risultati.rnInsostituibile for architecture in general, especially in the interior , great for landscaping urban and non-use mainly on a tripod, but also usable in freehand; RNA f / 8 to the best of such sharpness across the frame (FF). rnPer me, irreplaceable lens that gives great emotions , although it requires great effort to exploit its caratteristiche.rn rnrn
Pros:Quality 'of general image, resistance to flare and distortion correction. Center and edge sharpness. Construction
Cons:Optical challenging, expensive, a bit 'bulky, obviously lacks autofocus (manual focus confirmation). Front lens is very exposed and sensitive
Opinion:The TS-E 17 and 'certainly superior optical performance, along with the equally excellent TS-E 24 II. If you need a lens to take pictures in the city 'and architecture, or the views where you do not want distortion, this' your lens. It 's great for making buildings with straight lines in the city', provided that you keep the focal plane of the camera perpendicular to the ground and make tiltare the goal. The results are obviously best (by far) than those obtainable by straightening the lines PP, where, apart from the crop necessary, one must account makes a pronounced distortion and fall of sharpness in the parts straightened. For the shift, which is hard to give such effects miniature, and 'perhaps less obvious than that achievable with the 24, because of the greater depth' of field. However the limited focus allows for creative effects that really and if one 'capable (not me for now) can differentiate your photo to make it go let' say from the pack. For landscape the only real limit of this lens and 'the inability' to mount any type of filter. Even those in Lee or Cokin type plate are not allowed since the front element very convex and pronounced. So, you should expect to do multiple exposures and accattarvi the excellent filters Nik Color Efx that in the end the results are equally excellent, as long as' the exposures taken have been made wisely and that recover high and / or low lights. I also made available to the lens Juza to make a test more 'official, but unfortunately I do not live in Italy. Optical highly recommended, price furious separately.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
