JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Given that you can not expect who knows what came out in a kit lens, it must be said that from 2011 until October of 2015 was the only lens I've used. For those who have never used a DSLR or approaches for the first time in the world of photography, a lens is more than useful! The 18-55 is a lens that does scuola.rnE 'so light as to seem empty, therefore, perfect for trips and hiking excursions, in low light conditions the auto focus makes a huge effort to connect with the subject (and it is said that he does it ) and the noise can be annoying if we are in a museum, in a church or in a particularly silent places ... rnNon is a lens to aquistare separately, it would be foolish to spend money on accaparrarselo if it is not sold in kit, but this does not mean that is poor. RNTI does taste the potential of SLR and if used in optimal conditions Offering beautiful shots.
Cons:slow autofocus, non-stabilized, not bright, sharpness
Opinion:Without infamy and without praise. Perfect to learn and to understand what are the favorite genres of photography. Suitable for all kinds except sports photography: slow autofocus and very dark. Is it okay to gain experience and not be afraid to do damage; Recommended only for those who buy for the first time and finds him in an SLR kit, that is what I did with my 700D.
Opinion:Price here is the only pro of objective data in 'gift' with the reflex acquistata.Lo would change immediately with the Tamron 17 50 much clearer to the point that not even compare it. I used it with the first SLR that I purchased and was asking myself stè reflex cos'anno of so different from a Canon S90? I knew when I sold the lens and passed to goals best. It is a lens that takes 'to free' with the reflex of the kit I can not say that they are a waste of money but do not ever buy it separately.
Cons:It 'an objective basis and the numerous limitations are noted but, for what it costs, no
Opinion:Goal came in the kit with my now worn 1100D. The limits to list are numerous: the bad material, the maf ... but may be limits to a lens that comes with a coffee from 350 euro? I think what he does is acceptable. No doubt the board to use for newbies like me and get some 'hands with the SLR.
Opinion:I had written the usual comment, plasticky, dark, AF inaccurate. Then I decided to change it, because a judgment, in my opinion, must be related to the actual cost of the object and this is supplied in kit form, for the same price of the camera body only, so it's almost free. In addition it is an objective that has a lens audience from beginner like me, it is a lens that serves to learn. With its focal range can cover all that is needed, allowing pictures ranging from the landscape, the road, the portrait, so I do not find defects that are not the classic ones of a basic objective. Great to learn and to take the first steps. Surely, if you are passionate about photography, he soon wants to experiment with other
Opinion:Discreet to begin, I use it for three months, I state that I am a beginner, and I bought just three months, the Canon 1200d, but actually I wanted to buy good optics for the fun and sbizzarrire.Avrei going to buy Canon EF 70-300mm f / 4-5.6 IS USM, I advice you to professionals or those who understand more than me, whereas my use and not professional but of course I would look out in a somewhat '+ professional in this fantastic world
Cons:not stabilized, plastic bayonet, dim, leaves little to the imagination
Opinion:Contrary to what they say all the 'objective in question (series III) is excellent as far as sharpness, ease of use and lightness, the problem is that it leaves little to the imagination of the photographer, being a little' dark , another problem (not for me) is the absence of stabilization, which in some cases back utile.rnC 'is, however, saying that the price of this' lens is really very low, we will not find anything so good at that price, then recommend it to those who do not have any objective, at least to start ...
Opinion:After a month of using an SLR (with a minimum of PP) one wonders why not sell the camera body ONLY: within thirty days of photos in fact, we realize that unnecessary spending is to buy the body kit with this lens ; is really poor. Save the money and get a Tamron 17-50 2.8 or smooth a canon 50mm 1.8.
Cons:Difficulty in autofocus with low contrast or low light.
Opinion:Economical and lightweight. Dim. Difficulties in automatic maf with low contrast or low light. Just solid, if it takes a bit 'of rain is likely to freeze as it has happened to me. But the photos are not bad unless you sweat for high-level professional jobs. For tourism, to learn is just fine. The price makes it affordable objective of reserve or emergency.
Opinion:Optics that is in the kit and this says it all. There can expect excellent photos, but to learn, experiment and see to their needs is buona.rnLa optical quality from the best around f.8 and light conditions easier. Bad backlight and night where you can focus only manually, as the AF is hard and does not hook almost never.
Opinion:What can I say, is the classic 18-55 kit, nothing more and nothing less. He manages to find its use to those who approach the world of photography but once you forget easily addentratosi of this lens. It is not suitable even to those who love the business of film makers perspective being not very bright. A tip would be to use it along with a 55-250 IS just beginning to practice for practice.
Opinion:I have this lens for a couple of months and can not be compared to other objectives bought separatamente.Bisogna be considered that is soo economic and for this reason you can not expect more from essa.E 'good for those like me who want to start du shots for all kinds (flora, landscapes, etc.) but just want to change it after a short time because it is not specifica.Quoto Roberto1977: As soon as you have other more specific objectives, you forget the 18-55mm.Infatti I can not wait ' time to buy a wide angle and a zoom L-series
Pros:Lightweight, included in the purchase price of the camera
Cons:Little specific
Opinion:This lens is usually coupled with the purchase of an entry-level SLR (in my case a Canon Eos 1100d). In my very little experience, and 'a view which is fine for almost all situations, but that has nothing specific. And 'the ideal introduction to SLR photography without spending money on targets that are not included in the purchase of the camera. I think if then if you buy other lenses more '"dedicated" this' a lens that will be' used less and less by the photographer.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
