|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on May 02, 2021 Pros: Lightness, sharpness, silence, footprint, 15cm minimum focus distance. Cons: Original lampshed simply useless Opinion: I had years ago before I switched exclusively to FF, which is why I sold it, now that I've bought back an aps-c (7d mark II) to refine to my two ffs, although I already owned the canon ef 35 f2 is, the 40 f2.8 stm and the sigma 50 f1.4 art, I was looking for a focal a little wider than the 35 that on aps-c becomes a 56 and above all as light as the 40mm on ff , to always carry with you without sacrificing so much space. I have the opportunity to take it used at an excellent price and remembering the good quality, when I first had it, I bought it back with my eyes closed and I must say that I am extremely satisfied with it for the reasons I have set out among the pros. Then at the price paid nothing to complain about, among other things in impeccable conditions. Highly recommended, I think I'll keep it as long as I have an aps-c body. As with the 40 stm we recommend a good protector filter rather than the useless original light screen. |
 | sent on April 23, 2021 Pros: Price, weight, footprint, fast and silent MAF Cons: Lack of lampshed (to buy apart), lack of stabilization (sometimes it can be useful), Opinion: I used it with good satisfaction on the Canon EOS 100D as a fixed lens instead of the bulky and contingeous 18-55 of the kit. He does not sin in anything but neither does he excel at something, even if I have satisfied myself: it is a lens that does "honestly" his job and for the price that it costs it is advisable to keep him in the kit. I gave it away to buy the Canon EF 24 mm. f. 2.8 (not stabilized) which is a heavier and bulky pelino, but has a lampshed and above all I can use it as a wide angle also on the FF Canon EOS 6D, which is impossible with 24 mm. EF-S STM. |
| sent on April 23, 2021 Pros: Size,optical quality Cons: nobody Opinion: I bought this lens because after years of heavy and bulky SLRs I wanted to mount on an eos100d a lens that created an excessively compact set. I did not expect miracles from a compact lens with few lenses but not even a disaster since it is a fixed lens. I have to say that I was very much fought between the 24th and the 40th then I opted for the 24th which I have to admit is a 'smart' focal length. On a dx sensor that is with a factor of 1.6x it is an actual 38mm (perfect focal for Street use) while on the full frame it is 24 'true'. That said, it behaves like a good wide angle and the vignette almost immediately stops at f4. It goes like a missile in terms of AF also having the step engine that gives silence and just precision. Very low aberrations and the 'filter' dimension make it disappear under the nose of the machines. Full vote and a recommendation..... Used you pay half and have fun......... Perfect optics to take to the sea or in situations of extreme agility. A final comment: if you have two bodies, one right and one FF with 24 and 40 you have a high-end pairing and you do pretty much everything because the multiplication ratio of the focals allows you to go from 24 to a 64. |
 | sent on February 19, 2021 Pros: Size, weight, aperture, focal Cons: vignette a little bit Opinion: Beautiful lens that is also found in the used with super low prices (mine I paid him 100 euros). The most beautiful thing about this lens is the compactness, I mount it on 80d and it almost feels like I have mounted on it only the cap, not from in the eye and I always put it in my photo backpack, it is an equivalent 38mm, so you can do a little bit of everything. I'll probably move on to FF (1dx) soon and then change it to his older brother (the 40mm pancake). Only flaw: vignette and not very little, but just close at f4.0 to solve the problem. I recommend it, little expense and optics not bad! |
 | sent on May 26, 2020 Pros: Compactness&weight, sharpness, price Cons: Well it depends, for what it costs and represents I would say no one, maybe bokeh not very pleasant Opinion: Taken used to a ridiculous figure (but on average it is still around 90/100 euri), it satisfied my need to be able to ride in practice everywhere with a light and above all not flashy lens. My 1300D with this pancake almost looks like a compact, so much so that I almost miss being able to support the reflex while maintaining the lens, which could represent a more serious lack if mounted on larger machine bodies, such as a 7D. It's very sharp already at f2.8, at f4 it's a blade. What to say, the focal length is quite standard (38mm equivalent FF), I do everything, or almost (I tend to avoid portraits, which I find a bit distorted - I prefer different focal lengths - and with a bokeh effect a bit too nervous). Great for street and landscapes, in the evening/night I would prefer to use a faster lens. Clearly not to be used in MF: just thinking about turning that mini-dial makes me jump my nerves, but after all the strength of the lens is just that (the compactness, including the dial). Ultimately, grade 9: If you're looking for a compact lens to carry around, mounted or in your pocket, it's the best purchase you can make. |
 | sent on April 16, 2020 Pros: Compactness, sharpness even at TA, AF speed, great value for money Cons: If you like this corner of the field, no one Opinion: Purchased to have an optics considered normal on APS-C. It actually returns a field angle very similar to that of the eye. Excellent sharpness in the center also at TA, useful "macro" function due to the minimum distance of MAF. Great contrast and MAF very fast and quiet also thanks to the STM engine. Despite this, I have decided to get rid of it because, for the use I do, it is neither meat nor fish. Too long for a landscape, too short for portraits and macros. It's suitable for the street, but it's not the kind of photography I do. One last extremely subjective thing is the "evirate" syndrome, such a compact lens is certainly positive if you do street and is paired with equally compact machine bodies. In my case however I can not have a nice grip on my 40D (not really light and compact) precisely because the pancake is very small. For the rest great value for money. |
  | sent on December 21, 2019 Pros: Tiny! It's in your pocket. It looks like a button but churns out respectable photos. Cons: Nothing. Opinion: It weighs a nonsense, clutterabouts zero. You put him on the car and then you swear because you think you came out with only the body. After a series of fairly targeted tests, I can say that it has an image quality that does not make you scream with joy, but the shot is there and you do not throw it. Maf spells like any other STM. Used costs a dinner in two. Combined with its machines, normally more minute than the FFs, it seems to have a compact. He doesn't miss anything. Over-recommended purchase for generalist use (considering the crop factor that returns a field angle very close to a 35mm on FF.) The minimum focus distance is paltry and allows you to take selfies with the reflex (I swear That I Do, When I'm in company), to the face of mobile phones. What more do you want? |
| sent on November 26, 2019 Pros: Compactness, value for money Cons: In relation to the price virtually none Opinion: Great lens if you think that, taking advantage of some offers, you buy new at a price around 120-130 Euros with canon Pass Italia warranty; it's a very sharp lens all over the frame already at full open. Chromatic aberrations are practically absent and even the distortion is not very pronounced; the STM autofocus is reliable, quiet and fast even if, to be very fussy, sporadically errs to properly hook the subject. The blur is good and an additional point in favor of this lens can be the reduced distance of maf. Definitely to buy if you are looking for a bright fixture on APSC without spending too much. |
 | sent on November 17, 2019 Pros: Price, lightness, compactness, very sharp, MAF fast and quiet. Cons: I can't find any... perhaps the lampshade to be taken apart, but many Canon targets have this "defect". Opinion: I associate myself with the comments of other users adding that I am using it with extreme satisfaction on mirrorless APS-C Fujfilm by adaptor and without any loss of functionality and quality, indeed; on these cameras, the field angle is equal to that of a 36 mm. but the quality of this optics remains unchanged. Wrongly, in the past, I had twisted my nose in front of this lens ideally associating his small physical thickness with an equally small optical thickness... and I was wrong!!! I'm glad to have it and especially to use it. |
 | sent on August 09, 2019 Pros: Light, compact, crisp and bright lens. Quick and precise focus. extraordinary for streets, landscapes and portraits. good for discos and birthdays. Cons: For what it costs, I don't think it's any better! Super versatile lens. Paraluce not included, it must be bought separately Opinion: I have been using it for a few months now, I have to say that the quality is there, the sharpness is great, the blurred at 2.8 is good. Small but extraordinary, saving space and ride with a lighter car. This makes all the difference when shooting, especially during disco nights or during a street outing. I recommend it to anyone who wants to spend little but wants a lens all do. |
 | sent on June 25, 2019 Pros: It's a great lens, it's cheap. Cons: If you know what you buy, nothing. Opinion: I read a lot of notes that I can't understand and share: it's not full-time manual, it's just for aps-c, it's not stabilized.... We know this before, they are not cons but intrinsic ragrates. There's the EF 24 f2.8 USM IS, there's the Sigma 24 f1.4 Art, there's the EF 24 f1.4 L..... If you buy this, it's because you're looking for an f2.8 pancake from APS-C and 150 euros new, to use with a yummy AF (not an ultrasonic, but very good). For me, he has no flaws because I do not find him any weaknesses. It doesn't even have particular strengths, it's not a blade like some red stains, it's not as magical as the f1.2, but if you buy it you look for something else. I repeat, you are not able to find a weak point, it has a high and homogeneous yield and quality in any use. Maybe optics not exciting, it doesn't rip you "wow", but it's solid, consistent, it doesn't betray you, it doesn't pull strange rabbits out of the cylinder: what it has to, it does. What you expect, it's up to you. In its limits of use, the shot takes him to the house and photos throw a few. What the hell do you want more, for 150 euros? For me, a must like the 50 f1.8 and the 85 f1.8, two other glasses of different level one from the other, but both of an uncommon convenience. |
 | sent on June 24, 2019 Pros: Sharp, cheap and light Cons: Nobody Opinion: I purchased this lens for my Canon 500D, both to have a fixed lens (in addition to the 50mm f/1.8), and to have one with a wider angle. It is very suitable for outings and especially for holidays, because it allows you to carry a very sharp, bright and light lens. I believe that at such a price we cannot expect anything better. |
 | sent on May 24, 2019 Pros: Lightness, size, sharpness, brightness, price Cons: Nobody Opinion: I bought it to have something more Wide than the 50mm and I never regretted having purchased it. I use it especially in those conditions in which I do not want to give in the eye with heavy and expensive equipment, when I want to travel light, or to the birthday/Parties indoors where I need a bright lens and quite versatile. Excellent in everything from construction to auto focus, and even in the minimum distance of focus. Recommended |
 | sent on April 30, 2019 Pros: Very small, bright, light, very good yield. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I took it used, but immaculate, to 2 pennies and it became one of my favorite lenses: on APS-C is the perfect optics to carry around to make the pocket reflex and allows you to tackle a range of situations unthinkable, from street to Parties, to Portraits to landscapes. And it teaches you to zoom by going back and forth until you find the perfect framing. I'm delighted. |
 | sent on April 18, 2019 Pros: Size, sharpness, price Cons: Nobody. Opinion: My first fixed goal; Despite my qualms, it almost perfectly replaces the classic all-rounder zoom... obviously as long as you have the opportunity to get away/approach the subject and you are willing to walk. Giving up extreme diaphragm openings and stabilization, with 150 euros you bring home a sharp lens already at f/2.8, compact and light. The non-original metallic lampshade (with filter thread) is found online at ridiculous prices. Cartoon at TA, but I like it (and it resolves in PP). Paired with the EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, if you don't need wide angles and extreme canvases, you have 99% of the photographs with 250 euros of spending. Very recommended. |
 | sent on March 14, 2019 Pros: Size, sharpness, cost. Cons: Only for Aps-C, absence of Lens hood, AF stm ring. Opinion: I use now for some time this lens, I bought it new (the price is really accessible to all) and use on my 100d, especially for videos but occasionally also for photos in the outputs hyper read with only 100d and 24stm. For the cost it has is really a well built lens, little cluttered and the image quality is noticeable even at full aperture. The original lens hood is useless, I bought a Nikon metal one that screw in place of the filters and it certainly works better than the canon. Too bad it is a lens only for APS-C Unlike the 40mm pancake which is also for FF. Rating: 8 |
 | sent on March 14, 2019 Pros: Sharpness, compact and pocketable, advantageous price, bokeh. Cons: Almost no one, maybe ring nut MAF a little uncertain. Opinion: I bought it about 10 months ago to enlarge a little ' my kit and experience a lens so compact (you can tuck in your pocket even with a plug mounted!). I am quite satisfied: it lends itself well to all situations and returns a good yield. Nothing to envy to the competition for the price to which it is sold. The only flaw that often gives me trouble (I do not know if it is the fault of my model in particular) is the focus ring: In addition to having no end of stroke often turns me "empty" not activating the internal motors, as if slipping. I have to do a few times switch between AF and MF and it all comes back normal. Anyway in AF is pretty reliable. Would recommend. |
| sent on January 20, 2019 Pros: Light, robust, good sharpness, fast AF, excellent value for money Cons: Ring nut MAF But for a pancake is not the end of the world Opinion: A sincere and honest goal, usable even at full aperture and in many areas also thanks to the reduced minimum distance of MAF. Crisp, fast and fun to use. The only flaw, if we want to find it, is the usual MAF ring of STM that has no limit switch nor no indication on the focusing distance; Apart from some street pust who wants to shoot in manual fire I don't see any problem. Good construction, it also fell a couple of times because it rolls well:), metal bayonet. A nice 9 full |
 | sent on August 09, 2018 Pros: Bright, compact, solid, good AF, economical Cons: No Prof Opinion: I do not add much to the already excellent reviews that has the lens between these pages. Comfortable lens, light weight, with good sharpness not to TA, quite fast and bright. Segnalo where to find an excellent lens hood not original but in metal that pairs perfectly: https://www.amazon.it/dp/B0149HD6IM/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_S0bBBb72725B4 |
 | sent on July 16, 2018 Pros: Size, build quality, sharpness, value for money Cons: Focus Ring Opinion: Purchased used last year, has become immediately the lens I use most often: it is very light, good quality (has a "durable" appearance), not cluttered. The focal length is great for landscapes and photos on the road but lends itself also to some foreground. A f/2.8 is not exactly sharp but you get good shots, while at F/4 is perfect. The only downside is the focus ring: it is silent but the rotation does not have a beginning and an end, it runs endlessly and therefore can be uncomfortable. |
| sent on July 08, 2018 Pros: Lens that does not weigh and not cluttered in the bag, suitable for almost every need, with good sharpness and aperture. More useful. of the 40 mm analogue from which it comes out. Winning. Cons: Some small uncertainty in the focus in low light certainly more ' slower L series Opinion: I often use it as a fixed lens on 100d. So it's a little thicker than a compact one. Very practical but not absolutely performed as 24L. Less detail on the edges, less depth of field at an equal aperture. Unsurpassed advantage. You can put your car in your coat or jacket and walk everywhere unnoticed. |
 | sent on July 08, 2018 Pros: Value for money, sharpness, weight/size. Cons: Original lens hood exaggeratedly expensive. Opinion: Lens already sharp at TA, with peak on F4-F 4.5 in the middle and middle frame area and F 7.1 on the edges, up to F16 Utilizabilissimo, by F18 the sharpness suddenly degrades. Vignetting pronounced ad f2.8 and barrel effect from normal wide angle. AF quite silent and quick (only a slight sibillio is audible). It seems that for the hood there is not a version built by third parties and then who wanted it, would be forced to buy the original. |
 | sent on March 16, 2018 Pros: Dimensions, value for money, sharpness, quick and precise maf Cons: Light vignetting Opinion: Mounted on the 100D turns an SLR almost into a compact, in general at this price I find that the "pancake" is a remarkable lens.rnNititious sharpness, fast and precise focus, at this price difficult to ask for better, a perfect lens for both the landscape that for the street.rnFaccio really struggling to find some flaws but struggling I can detect a slight vignetting and even a slight distortion, adjustable in post in a second.rnOn the complex I would say that deserves a 9/10, gave me great joy ! |
| sent on February 17, 2018 Pros: 1. Blurred af / 2.8 rn2. Compatibility rn3. Mass a fuocorn4. Resistenzarn5. Versatility Cons: None (apart from slight vignetting, which I will discuss in the review) Opinion: I have this little gem for over a year. He has accompanied me in the most varied adventures, and he has never disappointed me: I photographed the Carnival of Ivrea, made several trips, made photos (amateur level) at a wedding and the last experience was a trip to Poland to the fields of Auschwitz concentration. rnrnHow to say, in this last experience I only brought my 60D and 24mm as a personal challenge and I was not disappointed, indeed. The versatility of this lens is staggering. The reduced focal length makes it suitable for Street but also in the portrait it defends itself very well. The focus is very fast and silent, and the blur at 2.8 makes it perfect for street photography: isolates the subject, but makes you guess the background at the right point. rnrnAl carnival of Ivrea has taken orange sketches and did not suffer anything, let alone the snow or rain, although not tropicalized.rnrnThe only cons is not a cons, but it is subjective: the slight touch of vignetting, which however af / 4 disappears, gives; a unique atmosphere to the photos and the post production is reduced to a minimum. rnrnRecommended at 100%. rnrnIf you are interested in seeing the shots I made with this lens, visit my Instagram profile @giacomoverzino |
 | sent on January 31, 2018 Pros: Lightness, sharpness and low cost Cons: Autofocus some uncertainty with little light, uncomfortable in MF Opinion: Combined with a canon 100d transforms it into a pocket bridge, purchased at € 80 and used in street and portrait set, lightweight and very manageable vignetting. The focus ring is, for obvious reasons small, therefore inconvenient in MF. Exceptional on the road and for occasional shots at parties, birthdays, etc. given the small size. Recommended purchase. |
 | sent on January 30, 2018 Pros: Lightweight, economical, bright. Cons: Only aps-c. Opinion: This lens is really special already clear to f2.8.rnSince it is a very small wide angle is perfect to use it on the road, in fact I decided to take it before leaving for Amsterdam and coupled to my 1200d we forget to have the camera on the neck and then on the road you enjoy taking pictures without stress with a focal length that is quite versatile in almost all situations. |
 | sent on December 23, 2017 Pros: size and weight, price, IQ, focal length, aperture Cons: like all STMs difficult to use in MF, just aps-c Opinion: A fantastic lens, versatile, practically invisible (it does not weigh anything, it does not protrude from the body), plus it has an excellent opening, a fantastic focal, a fast AF. In short, the ideal lens for 90% of my photos, and that now remains virtually always glued to the body, except to leave room occasionally to the legendary 50ino. 24 + 50 is the winning combination also for traveling light and having 2 focal lengths (always on aps-c) that cover practically 100% of my needs. |
 | sent on November 06, 2017 Pros: Super compact, crisp, lightweight Cons: Plasticous material, nighttime low fatigue, tiny frontal lens (I think it reduces lightness?) Light vignetting Opinion: I bought it for making a product photo for ecommerce thanks to its f2.8 it is bright and remains sharp. Maybe it has a slight vignetting and distorts slightly. Anyway, I've taken him on a journey as a sole objective and he did not betray me. If you ask me if I would buy it back then I would certainly say yes, but it is enough to keep in mind that you do not have to have huge demands from a 150 euro target. |
 | sent on September 23, 2017 Pros: Weight, angle of field, cost, size, brightness, construction, image quality Cons: stabilizer, it's not Full Time MF. Opinion: It was bought to return a 35mm on an EOS 200D and I must say it does its dirty figure. Although compact and of little weight, I found it well built and solid. It gives you a very good picture quality of 2.8, which you will not be surprised if you do not ever get rid of it. RnFlicking with a FF and a 35mm, I would say it was a good solution for those "little weight" outputs! |
 | sent on March 21, 2017 Pros: Lightness of field, angle quality Cons: the focus ring without limit switches and references, bad to use in manual Opinion: phenomenal optics: the attacks on the camera body, you forget to have it and not coming off the most. I use it often as a fixed-rounder on vacation and returns perfect photos without being in the least in the way. The use of 70D and coupled it becomes extremely simple to handle and fit in a backpack. Together with longer perspective (usually trip with this and fifty), allows you to deal with any situation lightly estrema.rnE 'clear already at 2.8, insert a slight vignetting pleasant and returns a "perspective in the scene" that I love. Consider now the purchase because then the other targets will use them pochissimo.rn |
 | sent on January 16, 2017 Pros: Lightness, clarity, cost, size Cons: Vignetting at F2.8 Opinion: I was looking for a lightweight solution for my 70D, I bought this 24mm because of the small size, I can now afford to have a car that weighs less than 1kg globally neck. The lens is very sharp, the focus works well (STM between things) and the prospect that returns thanks to the 35mm equivalent is really interesting. Your back thanks, take home the big shots with a very minimal expense. For 160 € is a best buy. |
| sent on January 08, 2017 Pros: Compact, bright, well-built Cons: a cartoon Ninin to f2.8 Opinion: I recently I use it, but I would say that is a really outstanding goal. rnMolto comfortable, and I use it as a grand angle, although many do not define tale.rnPotete find many online reviews and videos that highlight its advantages. rnI materials used are really good, it is very compact (I use for travel by bike), light and weighs very little. I am very informed before you buy it, and I'm very happy with the purchase. RNLA maximum sharpness you will get it at f4, cartoon a little 'to f2,8-3.5 but can be remedied in Post Production. rnAffiancato to an ND filter, you will get some really beautiful shots. rnHo some photos on my profile. Seeing is believing |
 | sent on December 29, 2016 Pros: Portability with the machine, shutter speeds without being stabilized, construction. Cons: More than against are features, and nothing unrecoverable. Opinion: F30 without problems, after several tests with self-timer to 2s and preventive mirror Raised I arrived at 1/6 blur-free, even if difficult to repeat as records :)), nice bokeh (with a break between f4 and f5.6 where we see a hair more the shape of the diaphragm but nothing really annoying), minimum half-focus distance that allows some close pictures without too many worries of mind, clarity in all very good and usable open enough even for large prints as long as you remain pretty low ISO. Mention of the focal extremely versatile for a aps-c, with an angle of view equivalent to a 38mm around is perfect as normal, straddling the very classic 35mm and 50, many non-interchangeable lens rangefinder film had a near focal to 40mm. In conclusion, together to 50mm, from optics have regarding a aps-c. |
 | sent on November 05, 2016 Pros: Light, very light and small Cons: For now, no Opinion: I bought it about a month ago to give me a gift, and to enter the world of the fixed objectives. I mounted on a eos 600d and will not be taken again. This lens so far has met my needs, very bright having an aperture of 2.8, returns very beautiful colors and sharp images. Another important thing to be reckoned with is the lightness, for the journey is a blade due to its very low weight. The STM system is excellent, fast and quiet. For the price ... it is to buy absolutely. |
 | sent on October 19, 2016 Pros: Light, bright, pocket Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have given him no opportunity for a trip to NY, I wanted to have my light 100D to move without too much clutter, it was a pleasant sorpresa.rnA this figure did not expect pictures so sharp at every opportunity and with so beautiful colors! RnSoddisfattissima buying, so do street is really good |
 | sent on September 27, 2016 Pros: compact, lightweight, mm great for use of street Cons: the sale price no Opinion: purchased from 6 months, I consider a perfect reflector for use by road and go unnoticed that on holiday in tourist places and not very ideal, it mounted on the 100D becomes a real compact, good sharpness, for the sale price, and for the quality and 'a perspective that you have in your backpack if you like to travel leggerirn |
 | sent on September 16, 2016 Pros: Small, light, cheap, build quality, clear. Cons: no cons. Opinion: Bought for my last trip, along with the 10-18mm zoom. I think it is a great goal and I'm using it a lot. Rendered images are sharp and always in focus. Great colors, great contrast, minimal distortion. I also strongly recommend it for the reason that the price is definitely one of the parameters, necessarily, guide me in the choices. I work mostly with fixed lenses 24-50-100 (APSC) doing almost exclusively pictures on the go, so I tried building a kit "light." And this little guy is really lightweight. Fully satisfied with your purchase! |
 | sent on September 07, 2016 Pros: Compactness, Macro, Price, Portability, Lightness Cons: I found it slightly crisp, not mountable FF Opinion: I was looking for a ML for travel and portability. rnHo thought of buying the Canon EF-S 24mm STM and leave him permanently mounted on my Canon 700D.rnIl result is a compattona not particularly portable, but for my needs go bene.rnL'ottica is light, mounted on the reflex disappears, the price, bought used, it is reasonable and you do not have svenare.rnSinceramente I do not find it particularly clear; raw materials be processed and quality, but maybe I'm used differently, especially since this is my Canon optics alone is not L of my trousseau. Excellent macro function. RNA compared with his brother Canon 40mm STM, and had sold because too "long" for my needs on APS-C, I find that the latter is much sharper and limpido.rnInfine I find the major failing of not being able to mount FF, sin . always speak of photographs, videos do not take them into account and I can not make a judgment. |
 | sent on July 30, 2016 Pros: Brightness, sharpness, value for money Cons: I found none Opinion: Surprise, gave a new life to my 60D that the transition to the FF was hanging on a nail. The combination between the body of the average 60D with this small lens leave you in the hands of made a compact. Performance overall result, however, very good especially if you want to travel light but do not give to photograph almost everything and in all conditions at home bringing RAW that will not disappoint you. I did some tests with the housewives 20mm F2.8 which costs three times but that does not hold them for sharpness it for distortion in particular to 2.8. If you want to make the machi is not the lens for you but if you want to play it safe with no thoughts prendetelo.rn |
 | sent on May 06, 2016 Pros: image quality, weight, quiet Cons: Missing the hood and be picky the ring of maf is almost nonexistent Opinion: I bought it to have in the bag all fixed objectives. And most of all to have a excellent picture quality. It 's really a big surprise. Bright and sharp even at full aperture. When I bring it around to be light it seems to have a compact. The focus is fast and accurate. Nothing to blame except the lens hood that must be bought separately and costs madness. |
 | sent on April 19, 2016 Pros: Weight, thickness, construction, sharpness, noise af. Cons: No FF, the focus ring may be too thin, it is not supplied with lens hood (taken apart costs € 24 the canon original) Opinion: Bought for about five days, have not been able to remove it from the machine, it is a wonder, practical, light, crystal clear, cartoon slightly to 2.8 much better at 4.0, I use it almost always over 4 and puts fire anything, even for discreet as for macro photography, focuses at about 20cm from the subject, in extreme cases to 2.8 can also be used, although in my opinion it is more enjoyable than 4.0. Is 150 € in physical store so you should take them crazy the hood, the original canon costs € 24 and is frankly too much on a lens that costs less than 200 €, fortunately are not original at very least, makes the my 700D a semi-compact is very convenient to carry around, lets you take pictures almost without being seen, tried in video mode, it's quiet though not lightning in focus, although I think it is a defect of the machine and not of 'goal, not usable on FF. 24mm This intrigued me and maybe I'll try anchand 40mm stm. |
 | sent on April 12, 2016 Pros: Sharpness 2.8, weight, construction, commissioning proximity, AF, price. Cons: Lens hood is not provided, not compatible with FF, distortion and vignetting noticeable at close range. Opinion: I just returned from Romics and type the fourth exhibition in which use this lens for my photos and I could not resist review it. The sharpness you do not expect to very contained weight this lens solves a lot of problems for the photos from above from below, in portraiture leaves desired, of course, but for the entire figures or large spaces deserves! very clear already at 2.8 so bright, very well built, the problem is the lens hood is not provided and in any case impractical. I now only use fixed lenses and these also for the street is really convenient. A cheap one brings home a lens that will remain forever in the kit, or at least until you switch to FF |
 | sent on April 02, 2016 Pros: Size, weight, clarity, construction. Cons: It is not supplied with lens hood. Opinion: It 'a really amazing lens for quality' of the images it achieves. Although it is a fixed focus does not regret the zoom, but demonstrates that with little you can achieve remarkable results. As I used the Canon Lens Hood ES-62 which fits very well. He ordered with amazon and 'arrived early and with the usual excellent service. For me, this lens should be present in every kit given its flexibility 'of employment and its very minimal size. |
 | sent on February 29, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, silent AF, contrast and color rendering Cons: Vignetting on TA but nothing you can not remove, and in some circumstances does not hurt Opinion: I had into permanent loan. Then the day of the refund prematurely arrived, so I ordered it, I could not live without. I recommend it not only to experts or to the lovers of the fixed lenses, but especially to the novice photo enthusiasts who want to try a fixed lens. This lens will amaze you. |
 | sent on January 11, 2016 Pros: Clarity, lightness, strength, cost. Cons: Apart from the fact of being an EF-S, I can not find. Opinion: Goal that use recently, but just enough to draw the first conclusions. Sharpest already in TA with a barely perceptible vignetting, so much so that not correct her ever so rarely seen. 70D mounted on its yield is spectacular. Returns very sharp even at 3200 ISO, where usually with 18-135 detail begins to degrade. Perfect for street, landscapes and portraits settled, it is a perspective that fits in your pocket and you should not miss in a good suite of aps-c. I am excited about this little gem that I can only recommend to everyone. |
 | sent on January 02, 2016 Pros: sharpness, color balance, contrast, quality 'constructive Cons: slight vignetting at f2.8, reduced chromatic aberration visible at the edges at full aperture Opinion: They are in possession of this lens by six months. Very clear, no flare, beautiful colors, small chromatic aberration at the edges and only at full aperture. Only for APS-c and ideal for photo generalist and street. Since part of my kit does not use nearly as smooth as the tammy 17-50 but I have always considered, optically, a valid objective, and that gave me so much satisfaction. Color, three dimensional 'image and contrast, maybe because it consists of a few lenses and well treated, they are comparable to my f 70-200 f4 L (objective quality' optical amazing). Vignetting not notice above f2.8, very low distortion and visible only in architectural images or lines with vertical sides. Not fast but precise the MAF. Compact, solid and cured with metal bayonet. Value for price / performance excellent. A lens that I love and that I recommend very much. |
| sent on December 24, 2015 Pros: sharpness, non-existent footprint, weight inesistenze price Cons: at this price and with these construction features none Opinion: I have this lens for a few months. Used in Kit with 50ino STM, 100 f2. Small footprint, low cost, such surrender. The use of most landscapes, often the use of night with long exposure. Canon 7D camera body. What to say? At this price there is no alternative with the same requirements. The autofocus does not seem particularly noisy. Used sporadicamnte (about 3 times) ... for video autofocus does not seem I create noise. It fits in your pocket. It also has excellent construction, transmits feeling of strength. When I got to say I did it just to have a wide angle lens, I took it as a joke, almost sottovalutandola, will have a lens as a coin of 20 cents! ... Recommended! |
 | sent on December 18, 2015 Pros: Extraordinary sharpness at wide apertures, value / price excellent, light, vignetting, brightness acceptable Cons: AF noisy, no distance scale, no hood, narrower dynamic range, unfortunately only for APS-C but we know already from the time of purchase, so there would be a failure, effect "emasculation" of your camera considering that it is a Pancake , vignetting, MAF sometimes not very precise, the minimum distance of the MAF does not match that of 16 cm, but is intone to 21/22 cm. Opinion: Bought recently I must say that is one of the best buys. Stunning clarity under the f / 6, in particular conditions of light is practically a razor. Mounted on a camera Canon 1100D, it is giving me great satisfaction especially in the quality / price ratio. Highly recommended. It 'a hoot to focuse apertures. In some circumstances I must admit that tends to restore images with the light conditions do not correspond to the real both for luminous intensity, both for saturation, whereby, due to a reduced dynamic range, you notice high and low lights devoid of detail. Do not know if it depends, in this case, from my camera, but other targets mounted on the same machine body do not suffer from this effect. The hue towards cyan is slightly visible in some situations, but entirely negligible. Vignetting may be an advantage to those who like or a defect in some less. Obviously all fixable PP, as well as the curvature of the lens that can be seen when shooting the horizon. In some scenesAF not "pinch" properly, but nothing serious. The distortion, however, very light, is visible only on subjects close enough sprattutto when shooting vertically. The minimum distance of the MAF is a bit 'longer than indicated, but it is a negligible. It 'a shame that can not be mounted on FF. For "exhibitionists" is a lens to be discarded because they make a kind of reflex compattona, iperchè seems that no lens is mounted on the camera, then "manfully" weakened. In conclusion I think it is a good buy. |
 | sent on November 20, 2015 Pros: Lightness, quality construction, optical quality, price Cons: Vignetting (if you do not like). Opinion: Purchased new from physical store, use this lens on canon 70d for street-reportage. And 'perfect for the exits where you want to stay light, and the image quality is high. Maf fast and very solid feel. Slight vignetting that for me is not a problem, I like it. At this price I really do not know what else you can get! |
 | sent on November 05, 2015 Pros: Small size, light, crisp fast af Cons: The slightly noisy af Opinion: The I took a few days but I was immediately impressed by the sharpness and colors. L f is fast and maf manual is accurate and fast. I had before this goal a sigma 30 1.4 24 I thought that with the reduced imgombri but lost in quality, however has been a nice surprise to find otherwise. A beautiful optical really recommend it to everyone. |
 | sent on October 25, 2015 Pros: Pocket, economic, sharpness, minimum focus distance Cons: Difficult to change the lens with gloves, hood as an option to be purchased separately Opinion: I took it as the only alternative to the Sigma 24 1.8 I need for macros acclimatized, I chose not to peck at the Canon Sigma defective. And 'unbeatable in APS-C unfortunately FF Canon EF-40 STM can not compete with Canon EF-S 24 STM seen the minimum distances setup fuoco.rnSul price, very convenient to buy it from the physical store because the product purchased online spending Shipping costs as a new store in the physical. It is not easy to change the lens with winter gloves due to their small size, so you risk to turn the focus. |
 | sent on September 27, 2015 Pros: Compact, clear already at f2.8, af precise, beautiful colors and contrast, light, high-quality materials in relation to price. Excellent bokeh in close-up, creamy and very nice in my opinion. Distance focusing of just 16 cm. Cons: Nothing compared to the price, a little cartoon 'and I noticed a slight distortion with close subjects (I think mainly due to focal itself, but solvable in the middle click and vignetting which sometimes I like) rn Opinion: I love it. Just I do not expect to find a similar goal. I bought it in the second half of August and since then c'avrò fact half of the picture; day, night, close-up flowers and insects (excellent minimum distance of focus of 0.16m), I bought it also to take advantage of this very small distance and I must say it turned out to be very useful in certain situations. I paired with the 50mm f1.8 .stm and 100mm f2.0 usm, with "little" spending have completed the triptych of fixed I wanted. I think you can define a fixed-rounder on aps-c, unfortunately does not have a great opening, but you can not have everything and already with f / 2.8 has a good detail. I would absolutely recommend to anyone who wants to try a fixed lens (maybe just to be attached to the 50mm f1.8). |
 | sent on July 21, 2015 Pros: Compact, Good Materials, Image Quality. Cons: It can not be mounted on Full Frame Opinion: It 'a good lens, very convenient to carry around for the small size, very clear already at 2.8, the picture quality is remarkable. I bought it to match it to 'EF-40 STM outputs for comfortable reading and I am very satisfied. And 'STM then applied to the latest Canon camera bodies home allows the continuous focus on moving subjects in making the video. The only flaw is that unlike the Canon EF-40 STM 24mm this is an EF-S and therefore can not be mounted on a Full Frame. |
 | sent on June 26, 2015 Pros: Small and light, focusing distance, instant AF, bright, crisp ... and inexpensive. Cons: Manual focus is possible only when the camera is on Opinion: It's my first focused focal target. Accustomed so far to zoom and "kit kit", I was impressed by MF speed and sharpness. It's solid, it has metal attachment, it is very sharp even at the maximum opening. Just closing the diaphragm over f / 16 you notice a few drops, but only magnifying at 1: 1. It's extremely light and small so ultra-portable, it's in any compartment or pocket of your backpack. The focus is very fast and silent (total two or three millimeters), the STM engine works well, the only downside (if you can call it) is that the focus ring works only when the camera is on (not c 'is mechanical contact between this and the lenses). The minimum distance from the focal plane is particularly short so you can also get very close shots. At full aperture a blur is fairly pleasing, while closing af / 8 and beyond the depth of field is particularly estesa.rnIs advice without reservation. |
 | sent on May 31, 2015 Pros: Light, crisp, af lightning resistant to flare, good solid construction, small and great for the street. Cons: The minimum focus distance is false, af slightly noisy. Opinion: I bought it on occasion to reduce size and weight of the 70D. It behaves very well in almost all situaizoni.rnSpecifico the problem of maf: trying to photograph very close objects (flowers, insects, etc.), the lens can not control the focus on the subject even if they are at a cut from the same (ca 20 cm) and you have to take a little 'further away (it takes about 25 cm) but means that the decrease dell'ingrandimento.rnPer the rest all ok is great. |
 | sent on April 30, 2015 Pros: Small, light, discreet, crystal clear already to 2.8, excellent compromise between a wide angle and a normal. Cons: None Opinion: I bought just out this objective, and already love him crazy, incredible quality already at large apertures, form together with my 70D compattona a nice quality, I combined the excellent 2.8 40, another small gem, and are a perfect match. Everywhere in the purse amateur photographer but also, why not, given that the professional looks good with its rivals costosi.rnLo recommend without hesitation. |
 | sent on March 16, 2015 Pros: lightness in general, compact, nice vignetting Cons: so far no Opinion: I bought a little over a week this beautiful lens. very funny and I dare say "challenging" because you can play with shots and forces you to approach or to get away from the subject (as, indeed, all fixed lenses) .rnmolto bright and beautiful colori.rnil engine made Fire is very quick and silenzioso.rnlente recommended for those who want to approach the world of fixed lenses |
 | sent on February 27, 2015 Pros: Lightweight, small, crisp, economical, distance focusing reduced Cons: For now no Opinion: I bought it recently, but I've already made several shots and I can not be excited! APSC is almost on a 40mm focal and how, after testing using plasticones stuck at 24mm I am not at all sorry !! rnRestituisce of very beautiful colors and the engine stm allows a focus really fast and silent, for now has not never missed a colpo.rnOttima also sharpness, even at TA, closing then becomes fabulous: even the bokeh is pleasant and also resists very well to flare.rnNon I can recommend it 100%! |
 | sent on February 11, 2015 Pros: Lightweight, well built, fast and silent AF, very sharp even at f2.8, resistance to flare Cons: It looks like a toy, and people will think you're poor photographers Opinion: Bought as optical street and handyman to be coupled to the 70D, the result was amazing! RnLe small size, the focal length of the right to APSC, make that my 70D is a pleasure to use it in every situation, without compromising image quality as Indeed, this 24 stm is very sharp, creative and resistant to flare in an exceptional way. rnSi carries around very well and soon you will regret not taking it prima.rnPrezzo affordable, must-have! |
 | sent on January 19, 2015 Pros: light, crisp, no aberrations Cons: It produced only from 2014. Opinion: Having already had a great experience with the 40 stm I decided to take even the 24. The optical qualities are amazing, especially compared to the price: Very crisp, harmful really minimal, the absence of chromatic aberrations, blurred quite pleasant. Adding good speed focus (best of 40 especially in low light), weight and dimensions almost nil he is a lens to which the holders of aps Canon can not give up. With two pancakes'm 'leaving more and more the 15-85 at home, especially for family outings. Perhaps it could have been a bit 'brighter, but in that case the price would be much higher and you would run into the 35 f2.0 is. |
 | sent on January 18, 2015 Pros: Light, crisp, fast, and price Cons: no one Opinion: I bought this little gem about 170 € ... It 'a nice gift. I paired the canon 7d for an equivalent of approximately 40 ff. The combination is a winner ... very well done ... the photos are very sharp, fast focusing ... is really a pleasure to use. Since I bought it I have not taken off. rnConsiglio everyone to buy and priced abbordabilissimo than many other goals you will have a little gem. The result is more or less like the older brother 40mm stm. rn |
| sent on January 04, 2015 Pros: Price, lightness, sharpness, brightness, focus fast and quiet Cons: no one Opinion: I recently bought this lens and are very soddisfatto.E 'an EF-S but it seems well built and when you pick it up it looks like a technological gem and not a toy, because it is solid, lightweight, compact with a focus fast, quiet (suitable for street photography) and the attack is metal. It was long ago I was looking for a 35mm fixed (my first love) without breaking the bank and 24mm in my canon 70D (APS-C) is equivalent to a 38mm and it was just what I wanted. Being bright is also suitable for photos in low light thanks to its diaphragm 2,8.Puo do macro (obviously not with a 1: 1 ratio) and the sharpness is very good. A few months ago I was going to buy his brother having already 40mm but the 50mm 1.8 does not seem the case (wanting a 35mm effective), therefore not suitable ale ere my needs. Lacks the stabilizer but with this focal not a problem. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
