JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:For this price range it is difficult to make negative judgments.
Opinion:In my opinion this lens has all my respect, price range really low and despite this remains a great lens, for those who start I think is a mandatory step, you can learn a lot of things with this lens and it is right that has certain flaws , this allows people who are starting to take pictures of "fend" and maybe start putting their hand on graphics programs just to go and correct those that are the flaws of this lens. If we want to go and see the physical flaws, well, then it's full, but if we compare it to the price, in my opinion it doesn't have any. Conclusion: Excellent school lens, you can bring home really distinct shots.
Opinion:This objective, considered in all its aspects, is a masterpiece. Canon gets us to the fourth attempt in terms of 18-55 mm. You see, it is not a feat to achieve a massively constructed, luminous and excellent optical performance, standing above 1000 euros to the public. To make products like this 18-55 instead, the CONTROCOGL. Oni are needed. Comments on possible distortion, chromatic aberrations and vignetting leave the time they find, when they can be eliminated already in the car and/or on the computer with a simple click. On printed photographs, I did not notice any difference at the same aperture, between the performance this David compared to my goliath 17-55 2.8 IS. Magic Target.
Opinion:Arrived last year with the 800d I realized that to do photographic experiments I needed something more lending.. So I took courage and I made the purchase of the Sigma 17-70mm with which for now I am very well. I recommend this 18-55 for those who take an APS-C Canon entry level and want to take a few shots to get passionate about photography!
Pros:Only the lightness and the fact that in a kit with the body-chamber is to cost trifle
Cons:dim
Opinion:3 NEW objectives purchased in kit with as many cameras, only one of which remained operational. Although very little I used because I prefer the 15-85, either expressed AF problems and the other mold problems despite the silica gel bag. They are there, in the drawer because it is not worth them cleaned or repaired. If you do not want to spend too much recommend the Tamron or Sigma hand in focus but with max fixed f open. 2.8.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
