RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on October 23, 2017

Pros: size, yield, stabilized, cost any filters.

Cons: There is the scale in meters of the focusing distance,

Opinion: Very happy with this lens. I love it for the weight and size really reduced, for the sharpness at all focal lengths and apertures and for the materials with which it is built. In my opinion for money worth buying it. I use it in the mountains and all those trips where I have little space in your suitcase. The fact of having to unlock is cumbersome if you have to make only one quick but personally I have never had any major problems.

avatarsupporter
sent on October 12, 2017

Pros: Size, rendering, cost, covered focal lengths.

Cons: If I consider the use I do, no one.

Opinion: Taken to have a wide-angle lens for my M6. It does not greatly increase the size of the machine that remains (relatively) pocketed unlike the M6 ??EF 16-35 L F4 binomial. The yield is good and the focal 11 in combination with the articulated screen allows you to make different pictures without performing acrobatics. The optic allows you to get close enough to the subjects, not for macro, but always to get different images. Great companion of Canon M.

avatarsupporter
sent on August 21, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, stability, solidity, compactness

Cons: Lack of manual / automatic selection and lack of focus ring

Opinion: It seems to me a lens that gives excellent results of sharpness, small size and weight to take it at any occasion. The possibility of blocking the lens in closed position, judged by many, a defect in my opinion is a good thing, in fact normally I keep it open and I can shoot without any special problems and only in case or "risk" situations or when I put it in block, thus getting smaller size and I feel more resistance to occasional shocks.

avatarjunior
sent on June 13, 2015

Pros: Sharpness, stabilization, robustness, compactness.

Cons: It must always be unlocked, so it is annoying

Opinion: A compact lens, clear, stable and above all light for EOS M.Ottima color definition, vignetting and distortion contenute.Che say more than that he must always be unlocked for use ?! We get used to that but also to bring home beautiful photos, remaining light and using a wide-angle lens stabilized and so small. A vote of at least 9!

avatarjunior
sent on June 02, 2014

Pros: sharp images, good stabilization.

Cons: cumbersome and impractical to unlock it and use it.

Opinion: It really looks like the 10-22. Good quality of the shots, very sharp, excellent performance at all focal lengths. Ideal for EOS M or for travel. In hand looks solid because of the metal construction. Generally use the 22/f2 because of less space but you have to have to have a zoom lens or a longer focal open aperture and a more 'closed, I highly recommend it instead of 18-55. chromatic aberrations contained and still easily erasable with DPP. Deserves a 9 in relation to the M series and its use with this system.

avatarjunior
sent on October 14, 2013

Pros: Sharp across the frame, excellent contrast, silent autofocus and effective stabilization. Resistance to flare. Metal body well done.

Cons: Need to unlock it from the closed position to the ring fotografare.rnManca of distances.

Opinion: Lens design very modern, effective at all focal lengths, even at full aperture. I find that the images obtained are better than standard EF lenses as the Sigma 10-20 or the Canon 10-22.rnL 'irritating aspect according to me, is the necessity of having to unlock the front through the actuation of a button and while rotating the zoom ring, quite slippery due to the metal construction, utilizzare.rnStabilizzazione before it can be very effective, even for video.rnLa focus at infinity is almost impossible at night, since it lacks an acknowledgment of distances, making photos of cielo.rnOttimo difficult for photography of landscapes and architecture. The deformations are fully acceptable to a wide angle so spinto.rnVignettatura and chromatic aberration are corrected very efficiently and automatically by the machine.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me