|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on July 08, 2021 Pros: Price and alleged characteristics Cons: Noise, slowness AF Opinion: I bought it in December 2020 and resold it a little while ago, I tried it in every way and with all the settings, but nothing does not do what it promises. I start that maybe I'm the one who demands too much, I take sports photographs, birdlife and macros, with the first two too often lose focus, I thought I had problems with settings or because of my inability, but then when you look at the photos and the focus point is right where you wanted some doubt you get , note that I use a 100-400 L IS 2nd series. The macros are flat, 100 F2.8 L IS macro, require a good post to pull out textures and details. Another sore note is the ISOs, with poor light already at 400 ISO you can see everything in the underexported areas ..... I may have been wrong to choose the machine body, but on paper he had convinced me, nothing is not for me! |
 | sent on April 30, 2021 Pros: Battery life, resolution, fps, tropicalized. Cons: nothing Opinion: To be passed by a 5D (which I still use and that's great), I had to get a little familiar in some settings (the manual is a bible). I recently started taking shots, but I already feel good, light. Paired with the new 100-400 L II it is very responsive and fast. Noise after 1600 ISo you start to see. High resolution of 32Mp allows you to make good crops as well. To conclude, in my opinion, a machina that can give a lot of satisfaction, even if I do not use 4k. |
 | sent on April 29, 2021 Pros: Battery life,resolution to sell,compact, ergonomic and lightweight, Cons: to be an a-psc nothing. Opinion: as mentioned to be an a-psc va that it is a bomb , pixels to sell , detailed and for me superior to its flagship 7d markII, I kept it for a short time , bought new and sold after 50 days. Sold to switch to full-frame that despite considering the 90d a war machine, the photograph remains full. the autofocus is quite precise despite the 45 focus points, which in f8 become 27 or less. cmq excellent machine, I repeat higher than 7d II. |
 | sent on April 22, 2021 Pros: Build quality, fabulous images without the need for PP, solid and robust, fairly tropicalized body, intuitive, compact Cons: nobody Opinion: A fabulous Reflex from every point of view, really well built, solid with good tropicalization, light and compact, I have been owning it for about 1 year and I have to say that I find it simply perfect, you think what to do and she does it without hesitation, even in extreme conditions she performs well, the DIGIC 8 does its job and even in poor light with high ISO the noise is never present , the quality of the images is then so high that there is almost never a need for post production, the colors are very faithful and beautiful as per canon tradition, I believe that for those looking for an APS-V Canon (1.6X) this is the best of the best, no compromise and all substance. |
  | sent on April 17, 2021 Pros: Image quality, autonomy, excellent construction,adjustable display,af,ergonomics and much more Cons: For the category of membership absolutely nothing. Opinion: She is a prosumer and has all the cards in order to be a great product. I've had it for eight months, and I had 80D before. Excellent up to 1600 iso, very well up to 3200 as long as you expose well. Right megapixel quantity in my opinion that allows good cutouts, performance autofocus, tropicalize and built very well. It needs great optics to express its potential. If you know what you buy, that is, the fact that it is APS-C and reflex while the trend is now called mirrorless and possibly full frame, you are not disappointed. |
 | sent on March 19, 2021 Pros: BATTERY, 4k video, touch screen, adjustable display Cons: It's not FF Opinion: After 1 year and a half I can say it's a fabulous car. I usually mount the 17-55 f2.8 and the photos are sharp and with nice saturated colors. The comfort of the touch and adjustable display is a plus. 4k videos are top. It has a battery that looks like two iron lungs. The only sore point from my point of view is the fact that I am not FF and for portraits you do not get the highest quality. |
 | sent on March 05, 2021 Pros: High resolution, operating speed, lightning autofocus, file quality, ergonomics, fully adjustable monitor, fabulous touch screen, reliability and robustness, 1/16000 sec. electronic shutter, battery life, 4K 30fps Cons: If you study the instructions well and are aware of what you are using there are no cons, but they could insert the second slot for the SD card Opinion: I went from 7D MkII (who never convinced me) to 80D which was a fabulous companion on so many safaris. Now 90D is the perfect synthesis between the mirrorless and reflex worlds. I do this review after a year that I have it and after evaluating its capabilities and potential well. Many have not yet noticed that on this latest reflex APS-C Canon has used all the latest mirrorless technologies by equipping it in LV also with an electronic shutter of 1/16,000 sec. The high resolution of 32Mp allows you to also make good crops to adjust the frame. The image quality is very high and robustness and tropicalization is a guarantee that I found (at these levels) only in Canon bodies. The autofocus is very fast and precise, the inexhaustible battery (as opposed to the 7D Mk II) and the deadly pairing with the 100-400 L II (also multiplied with the 1.4x III) is pure enjoyment. Not least I love the great display with fully articulated total touch screen. My advice is not to mortify it with lenses that are not up to scratch, especially in relation to the sensor that is not FF and high resolution. |
 | sent on February 05, 2021 Pros: High resolution, jpeg color quality, touch adjustable monitor, AF, video, compactness and lightness, ergonomics, ability to add battery grip Cons: It would be perfect if it had a dual memory card slot Opinion: It was my first Canon reflex, and I was very positively impressed. Excellent colors of JPEG already as they come out of the camera, excellent autofocus in videos, well organized menus, sensor with high number of pixels that also guarantees ample possibility of crop. I compared it to Nikon's D7500, and this Canon wins on various fronts (JPEG colors, sensor resolution, autofocus in videos, LCD monitor orientability, joystick, ability to add a battery grip, etc.). With its kit EF-S 18-135 it is an excellent pairing for light travel, with the possibility to also add a comfortable and light Canon EF-S 10-18 to be covered on trips even on the wide-angle side. Obviously then, also thanks to its high burst and excellent autofocus, it lends itself well with appropriate objectives to applications such as sports, nature photos, etc. Camera definitely recommended! |
  | sent on July 12, 2020 Pros: Resolution and sharpness, burst, touch orientable display,comfortable joystick,AF, 5 macro point focus solutions, single, and 3 zone, ergonomics, price quality, infinite battery. Cons: high iso ,double slot Opinion: I come from an 80d even if I wanted to switch to a FF or reflex or mirrorless but in doing so I would have lost the CROP 1.6 effect. Since the crop I need for the photographic genre that I do I decided for the 90d for ergonomics af for sport Fauna etc. I've tried mirrorless them even if they give you advantages but with ergonomics I didn't find myself there if you then mount a canvas are unbalanced. Compared to the 80d the differences I noticed are the joystick very comfortable to move the point the handle more hollowed out more comfortable with my hand resolution from 24 to 32 more detail and you can cut more the photo in the PP phase without losing sharpness more burst to 10 per second af faster . Videos I have never made even if this has 4K is something I do not care about. Reflex that I have for 5 months and I am satisfied although unfortunately the isos on apsc even if they are improved on this version (but little stuff) do not work miracles. If you shoot in good light no problem if you cross iso 3200 we are not there because of the noise. The battery is as endless as the 80d you can stay out a whole day taking a myriad of raw photos and arrive in the evening with still 50% is endless!!!!!! never had trouble staying dry. the 90d with 32 px needs very firm and valid lenses as L series and I having some fixed lenses and the 100 400 L 2 I find a winning pairing . Price quality I find it good with what it gives you. The double SD would have been a plus although I honestly didn't miss it. Machine that I definitely recommend. |
 | sent on July 04, 2020 Pros: Focus, burst, beautiful to hold, quality of the .jpg, orientable display and precise touch, C-RAW files almost identical to normal RAW for post-production possibilities, battery life, build quality, price. Cons: Missing double slot, 32Mpx Opinion: I come from a 1300D, used for almost 2 years. I was very undecided whether to take a reflex or a mirrorless, but in the end I preferred the feeling, ergonomics and durability that only a reflex can offer. The passage was obviously surprising, the 90D is higher in range than the 1300D and the thing is noted: - The focus works well, even in low light conditions manages to hook the subject well in an instant; - The handle conveys safety and solidity, I never had the impression that the room could slip out of my hand; - The battery seems almost inexhaustible, with a single charge I took home about 90GB of material, of which almost 30GB were video: the battery still had a notch. That said, it must also be said that from a room of this level I expected a slightly better ISO seal: Natural light I have nothing to say, I shot at 8,000 ISO (55mm, f/4 and 1/100) and the level of detail is amazing... Unfortunately in case of artificial light the result is not very satisfactory... I know that the yield is not the same between natural and artificial light, but already at 2,500 ISO the room starts to lose strokes and this I did not expect. In this sense it can be said that its very high resolution is also a weak point in case of low light, however, remaining low ISO the image quality is really spectacular and, thinking about it, there are few cases where I happen to exceed 3,200 ISO, so for me that's fine. With a double slot it would have been perfect. |
 | sent on March 29, 2020 Pros: Focus, ergonomics, quality/price and many other features. Cons: For now none, although it is necessary to study the full-bodied instruction booklet in order to make the best use of it. Opinion: I took it after careful confrontation with the 6D II, and it came to me at the end of January. I used it for now with the 100-400 US IS II also just taken and I had a great impression and photographic results beyond expectations. The live views quickly focus and automatically follow what I have selected even with the 100-400-2x II, point the moon to the rise and follows it from one side of the framed area to the other, it is exceptional. The 90D and 100-400mm pairing is perfect! |
| sent on March 29, 2020 Pros: Focus, ergonomics, quality/price and many other features. Cons: For now none, although it is necessary to study the full-bodied instruction booklet in order to make the best use of it. Opinion: I took it after careful confrontation with the 6D II, and it came to me at the end of January. I used it for now with the 100-400 US IS II also just taken and I had a great impression and photographic results beyond expectations. The live views quickly focus and automatically follow what I have selected even with the 100-400-2x II, point the moon to the rise and follows it from one side of the framed area to the other, it is exceptional. The 90D and 100-400mm pairing is perfect! |
 | sent on March 29, 2020 Pros: Autofocus,resolution, not loss micro detail at high iso ,electronics Cons: You have to pay close attention to the focus and micro choppy Opinion: It took me a while to do my review for the Canon 90 D in these period of corona virus I could study it and try it out well , already lucky owner of the 1DX Mark II just came out this model I took it , the reason have a light body to pair with the Canon 100/400 for a wandering naturalistic photograph, the things I like are the resolution the Focus car, the tilting monitor and what not told a state-of-the-art electronics that allows you to do Focus staking in the room ,automatic panning ,peaking Mf , automatic timelaps , super silent electronic shutter, now I can say I'm very happy with my new Canon. |
 | sent on January 16, 2020 Pros: lightning, burst, reliability- battery life Cons: nothing in particular -- maybe high iso estate -- Opinion: I used it in the mountains with snow situations and I have to say that the colors seem well balanced - I got to use it at the end of December on a trip to Iran - the subjects were different in type and lights sometimes at a minimum but I have to say that I never had problems - the f Iles are all too big (32 MP) - but this allows you to crop when the situation does not allow you to make the optimal cut - what to say, I had, and I still have the 70d of which I am very happy, this I think is a natural evolution but maybe also something more - I will have the right to use it in other situations hoping that it will always give me satisfaction... of course mirrorless, especially for young people will be the future. maybe some new features will be mixed between reflex and mirrorless - I'm using it with 18-135 usm, with 70-200 f4 is, with sigma 17-70 and I'll use it with the 100-400 II |
 | sent on January 03, 2020 Pros: Ergonomics, Burst speed, lightness, file detail, battery life, orientable display, great touchscreen, joystick. Cons: AF system as customizable as on the 7D2 and 5D4. Opinion: the machine as a whole I like very much, only in the specialist in avifauna where it should be its strong point, I see a weakness, the points of focus can be selected with the mini point, the center point, the nine points and all the points, for me a big m Ancanza is the missing enlarged point, because with the nine points you cover an area too wide of the sensor, different on the 5D4 where with the nine points the covered area is lower, in this way with the shots on the fly you risk to focus on an area of the background or a p art of the scene that has nothing to do with the subject. With the central point we know that it is practically impossible to hit a subject on the fly with long canvases. |
 | sent on December 25, 2019 Pros: Gust, battery life, sharpness and cutting and if you know how to use... High ISO. Cons: No one at the moment. For the price range and the type of machine. Opinion: Taken a few days as a replacement by the 80d and with which before selling it, I got to make direct comparisons. What to say, great burst, great battery life, much more complete menu, 4k video and really sharp and detailed photos. Compared to its predecessor, I found this machine with the digic 8 very fast to display the photos on the display, ergonomics that (at least for my hands) fits like a glove. And then the really soft and sensitive shutter button that is that it does not oppose too much resistance to the shot. Great to avoid the micro move with low tempo. With the lenses In my possession mounted on this body, the photos are much better. In conclusion an excellent evolution of the 80d with so much photographic quality and extra goodies... I am very happy and fully satisfied with the new purchase made. |
 | sent on November 11, 2019 Pros: Burst speed, battery life, sharpness, joystick Cons: high ISOs Opinion: Tested especially with Canon 70-200 II 2.8 IS and for sports photos, having also the 80D I can say that the difference between burst and sharpness you can see. even in landscape photos with Nd1000 filters it turns out to be much sharper. Despite using a non-original bat, I arrived in the evening with almost 1200 shots (some video and live view evidence) with still drums. Very quick and precise focus. The only flaw (as I imagined) is that at high ISO shoves there have been no improvements; obviously they are personal impressions, but over 3200 you can't go. Despite this I am very satisfied with the purchase, although the 80d I will keep it as a second body. |
 | sent on October 08, 2019 Pros: Excellent evolution of the 80D compared to which is better performing on everything. Finally the joystik... 220,000 pixels compared to 7,560 for 80 D Cons: With a double slot it would be perfect... Opinion: Video test filming a singing show in a mall : with SD formatted exfat now makes a single file for the maximum 30 minutes allowed that at 50 fps weighs about 12.5 Gb. After two hours and a quarter of continuous video shooting, the battery still has 50% charge.... like the 6D M2 however with power grip with two batteries .... exceedingly great. The canon online manual credits her x 1890 shots .... Effective and fast eye detection. It keeps the face hooked even if two singers filmed side by side then separate away from each other... Faster facial recognition than the 6D M2. After watching the videos of the show taken with both the 90D and the 6D M2 always at 50 fps on full HD TV, you can not appreciate the difference ... On 90D optical 18-135 with engine, on 6D M2 24-105 L f4 II series. Hello everyone at the next photo test. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
