JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Sharpness, flare control, color rendition, build quality
Cons:Maybe just the selling price
Opinion:What about... Simply the ultimate in the focal one for the Canon world, lens really of excellent quality and widely exploitable also duplicated, really remarkable build quality and performance from "Top of the range" What would you want more? It's true it's not a completely new lens but an update of the II series... Yes, but..... That update, now in addition to all the other features that make it an excellent lens, even the control of the flare that was the weak point of the II series has been decidedly improved. Being able to do it is to be bought with eyes closed.
Opinion:I Come from the same lens Mark II, who had "exhausted" for too much work.... I changed it just to look for a better approach to backlighting and grazing lights... For me necessary for my work in the field of Coreutics. The difference you see a lot. The Controluci control has markedly improved (even if the miracles do not exist), but it manages to bear the detail much better, in the theater where precisely the differences disposition are enormous. They Say the stabilizer is better, but I, working at least a 500th, never use it... I did some experiments, and with my hand not steadfast I made sharp images at 1/45 second to 200mm, and I do not seem to little, but I work I do not use it so I do not know anything more.
Opinion:I owned the 2.8 II, it was practically unmanageable when used for landscape under grazing light, the ghosting made the frame illegible and the flare was very marked. Finally, with this update, the problem is solved and, at first impression, the images are much more faithful and sharper than the previous model. As an update, the aesthetics remained unchanged
Opinion:I state that being a beginner in the photographic field I can not call myself expert to be able to evaluate a lens (so please take with the pliers my statements and in case of explaining where I am erro in my review hot), however I got to try it thanks To my friend as well as colleague Pierghitti. Having supplied a 70-200 f4 L of 99 ' the differences are abygenal. The first thing that strikes you is the feeling of robustness mixed with the image quality that you can get with the PP and mounting it on my humble 800d I managed to take a picture to the incredibly beautiful full moon! The actual weighs a lot more than the old 70-200 but the 2.8 and the double stabilization affect in this regard. I hope to have the chance to "play" again and bring back more impressions on this intriguing Japanese gem!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
